Skip to content

Issue 49 #58

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
May 27, 2016
Merged

Issue 49 #58

merged 20 commits into from
May 27, 2016

Conversation

rmloveland
Copy link
Contributor

@Heray because I was sitting on an issue branch for so long I had to rebase my changes on master and it led to a strange PR with a lot of stuff.

You can see the actual doc changes at:

a2e2a4f

I've tested this locally and everything is good. Mind if we merge this in?

Normally I'd just do it but wanted to get your doc review comments on this one.

Rich Loveland and others added 20 commits May 10, 2016 18:00
Explains what to do with the bids sent to the ad server by
`pbjs.enableSendAllBids()`.

This is almost the same content as in `step-by-step.md`.  The difference
is mostly in the introduction, with a few changes to keywords here and
there.

The edits to `step-by-step.md` are to keep the files "diff-able" since
the content is so close to a match.  When we encounter a third dupe of
this content, it'll be time to do the work of breaking this out into
re-usable fragments.

Addresses #49
Also:

- Update examples template with a link

- Update API reference so `pbjs.setPriceGranularity()` links to the
  example

Addresses #50
Based on in-person conversation with @Heray
@Heray
Copy link
Contributor

Heray commented May 27, 2016

  1. "have a contractual agreement with your header bidding partner" => some header bidding partners require publishers to send all bids returned by that partner to the ad server. These partners don't allow client side logic to determine who will serve.
  2. Adding casale params doc #3 => We should make it clear that send all bids vs. send top bid have very different ad ops setup.

@Heray Heray merged commit 3286685 into master May 27, 2016
@bretg bretg deleted the issue-49 branch October 1, 2018 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants