Clarify Gondors stance #677
Merged
+2
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I don't think we should compare Gondor and Heroku simply based on user base. While it's true Heroku is the largest PaaS and Gondor is run by a small company, I think we should be a bit more explicit about how Gondor tries to differentiate themselves. Per conservations with @paltman, Gondor seems to much more of a partnership with companies aiming to launch Django/Pinax applications than a simple hosting company.
Including @jtauber @brosner, in no way do I wish to speak for Gondor or Eldarion :)