Skip to content

Conversation

FoseFx
Copy link
Contributor

@FoseFx FoseFx commented Jan 1, 2023

fixes #9887

I refer to my comment to explain this PR.


changelog: Sugg: [empty_structs_with_brackets]: The suggestion is no longer machine applicable, to avoid errors when accessing struct fields
#10141

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 1, 2023

r? @Jarcho

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jan 1, 2023
@Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

Jarcho commented Jan 3, 2023

Thank you. @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 3, 2023

📌 Commit 7a1a9c8 has been approved by Jarcho

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 3, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 7a1a9c8 with merge 8b1ac45...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 3, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Jarcho
Pushing 8b1ac45 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 8b1ac45 into rust-lang:master Jan 3, 2023
@FoseFx FoseFx deleted the fosefx/9887 branch January 3, 2023 10:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FP empty_structs_with_brackets
4 participants