Skip to content

Add comment to explain why we change the layout for Projection #61193

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2019
Merged

Add comment to explain why we change the layout for Projection #61193

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Add comment to explain why we change the layout for Projection
  • Loading branch information
@spastorino
spastorino committed May 25, 2019
commit e6aa4b8033417732e2906bd9fdb8eec976f92c3d
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions src/librustc_mir/interpret/operand.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -475,6 +475,8 @@ impl<'a, 'mir, 'tcx, M: Machine<'a, 'mir, 'tcx>> InterpretCx<'a, 'mir, 'tcx, M>
PlaceBase::Local(mir::RETURN_PLACE) => return err!(ReadFromReturnPointer),
PlaceBase::Local(local) => {
// FIXME use place_projection.is_empty() when is available
// Do not use the layout passed in as argument if the base we are looking at
// here is not the entire place.
let layout = if let Place::Base(_) = mir_place {
layout
} else {
Expand Down