Skip to content

Improve SyntaxWriter.visitAny(_:) docs #2738

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MahdiBM
Copy link
Contributor

@MahdiBM MahdiBM commented Jul 18, 2024

SyntaxWriter.visitAny(_:) does not clearly mention that it always and completely skips running on the children nodes if you return a non-nil result.

@MahdiBM MahdiBM marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2024 08:07
@MahdiBM MahdiBM requested review from ahoppen and bnbarham as code owners July 18, 2024 08:07
Copy link
Member

@ahoppen ahoppen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you. Good improvement. 🙏🏽

@ahoppen
Copy link
Member

ahoppen commented Jul 18, 2024

@swift-ci Please test

@ahoppen
Copy link
Member

ahoppen commented Jul 18, 2024

@swift-ci Please test

@ahoppen ahoppen enabled auto-merge July 18, 2024 20:10
@ahoppen
Copy link
Member

ahoppen commented Jul 18, 2024

@swift-ci Please test Windows

auto-merge was automatically disabled July 19, 2024 09:18

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@MahdiBM MahdiBM requested a review from ahoppen July 19, 2024 18:07
@ahoppen
Copy link
Member

ahoppen commented Jul 19, 2024

@swift-ci Please test

@ahoppen ahoppen enabled auto-merge (squash) July 19, 2024 18:31
@ahoppen
Copy link
Member

ahoppen commented Jul 19, 2024

@swift-ci Please test Windows

@ahoppen ahoppen merged commit d491eec into swiftlang:main Jul 19, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants