Film sample relationships fix typos & use carrier specific relationships

[lucasotodegraeve]

• "is represented by" must not not contain any newlines
• add missing "copy" to relationships
• use carrier specific relationship

[mielvds]

Should we avoid spaces here?

[lucasotodegraeve]

Fine by me. But we should have a consistent vocabulary.

IRI	With spaces	Without spaces
rel:isr	is represented by	isRepresentedBy
rel:rep	represents	represents
rel:inc	includes	includes
rel:isi	is included in	isIncludedIn
haObj:hasMasterCopy	has master copy	hasMasterCopy
haObj:isMasterCopyOf	is master copy of	isMasterCopyOf

Some of these look kind of funky, but it's alright for me to skip the spaces. What do you think?

The standard vocabulary can be found at https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservation/relationshipSubType.html

[mielvds]

The standard vocabulary can be found at https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservation/relationshipSubType.html

Yeah, that's the only reason why I would include spaces, but it's a good one. Let's keep the spaces; it's what's in the reference examples as well: https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/sample-records/PREMIS%203%20example%201.xml

[lucasotodegraeve]

I kept the spaces and added the haObj relationship sub types to the documentation.