Skip to content

Use valid UUID in blob: URL example #151

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ctavan
Copy link
Contributor

@ctavan ctavan commented Apr 6, 2020

The algorithm for creating a blob URL references RFC4122 to generate a UUID. However the example contains an invalid UUID (according to RFC4122): 9115d58c-bcda-ff47-86e5-083e9a215304

This given string is not a valid UUID because it does not contain a meaningful version field (the first character after the second dash).

It could be worthwhile to consider specifying the specific UUID algorithm to be used (Version 4 UUIDs) however that might be an actual change in the spec, not just an editorial change like the one I propose here.


Preview | Diff

The algorithm for creating a blob URL references RFC4122 to generate a UUID. However the example contains an _invalid_ UUID (according to RFC4122): 9115d58c-bcda-ff47-86e5-083e9a215304

This given string is not a valid UUID because it does not contain a meaningful version field (the first character after the second dash).
Copy link
Collaborator

@mkruisselbrink mkruisselbrink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for catching this!

@mkruisselbrink
Copy link
Collaborator

@marcoscaceres any idea what this "Travis CI - Branch" is this PR seems to be blocked on? I'd expect "Travis CI - Pull Request" to be required, not the branch version, since afaik the branch version doesn't work for pull requests made from forks. Is this some misconfiguration?

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

Oh, this might be stuck because of the trivisci.com vs travisci.org change... I'll just merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants