-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 711
[css-counter-styles-3] fallback for cjk-earthly-branch and cjk-heavenly-stem #8975
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
The CSS Working Group just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<TabAtkins> seems reasonable to me too<emilio> fantasai: seems reasonable, we should make the change and republish <emilio> miriam: objections, anyone need more context? <fantasai> emilio: would like someone familiar with cjk to look at it, but otherwise seems fine <fantasai> +1 TabAtkins <fantasai> TabAtkins: These fall back to cjk-decimal due to matching fullwidth <emilio> TabAtkins: all fall back to cjk-decimal because of full-width, same applies to these <emilio> RESOLVED: Change fallback for cjk-earthly-branch and cjk-heavenly-stem to cjk-decimal instead of decimal <fantasai> RESOLVED: Republish CR |
…d fallback to cjk-decimal https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258447 rdar://111208503 Reviewed by Tim Nguyen. cjk-earthly-branch and cjk-heavenly-stem should fallback to cjk-decimal according to CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#8975 * LayoutTests/fast/lists/w3-css3-list-styles-fallback-style-expected.txt: * LayoutTests/fast/lists/w3-css3-list-styles-fallback-style.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-earthly-branch/css3-counter-styles-202-expected.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-earthly-branch/css3-counter-styles-202-ref.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-earthly-branch/css3-counter-styles-202.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-heavenly-stem/css3-counter-styles-205-expected.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-heavenly-stem/css3-counter-styles-205-ref.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-heavenly-stem/css3-counter-styles-205.html: * Source/WebCore/css/counterStyles.css: (@counter-style cjk-earthly-branch): (@counter-style cjk-heavenly-stem): Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/265474@main
We discussed this issue in the Chinese Layout Task Force Teleconference. The consensus of the task force was that |
@xfq we could create another issue for adding new styles, like: |
…d fallback to cjk-decimal https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258447 rdar://111208503 Reviewed by Tim Nguyen. cjk-earthly-branch and cjk-heavenly-stem should fallback to cjk-decimal according to CSSWG resolution: w3c/csswg-drafts#8975 * LayoutTests/fast/lists/w3-css3-list-styles-fallback-style-expected.txt: * LayoutTests/fast/lists/w3-css3-list-styles-fallback-style.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-earthly-branch/css3-counter-styles-202-expected.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-earthly-branch/css3-counter-styles-202-ref.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-earthly-branch/css3-counter-styles-202.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-heavenly-stem/css3-counter-styles-205-expected.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-heavenly-stem/css3-counter-styles-205-ref.html: * LayoutTests/imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/css/css-counter-styles/cjk-heavenly-stem/css3-counter-styles-205.html: * Source/WebCore/css/counterStyles.css: (@counter-style cjk-earthly-branch): (@counter-style cjk-heavenly-stem): Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/265474@main
…/cjk-heavenly-stem w3c#8975
These changes were added to the Ready-made Counter Styles doc editor's draft. |
As it is being discussed in #8596, it seems the right system for these styles is
fixed
. With that, thefallback
for them becomes more relevant, given they defined just a fewsymbols
(10 and 12). The styles don't explicitly define afallback
, so it isdecimal
.I have no knowledge on CJK languages, but I'm wondering if
decimal
is the bestfallback
for them. For example, other CJK related styles havecjk-decimal
asfallback
. So I'd like to discuss if this (or another style) would be a better fallback option here.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: