Skip to content

docs: update note in README.md #445

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2022

Conversation

ersachin3112
Copy link
Contributor

@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 commented Jun 17, 2022

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

Note

This is new Note syntax

Warning

This is new Warning syntax

update note in README.md

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #445 (e40c7ac) into master (ef05908) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #445   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.17%   92.17%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         588      588           
  Branches      188      188           
=======================================
  Hits          542      542           
  Misses         37       37           
  Partials        9        9           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ef05908...e40c7ac. Read the comment docs.

@snitin315 snitin315 merged commit b8f3bed into webpack-contrib:master Jun 17, 2022
@ersachin3112 ersachin3112 deleted the docs-update-note branch September 2, 2022 08:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants