I really want to corrupt your girl. She reminds me of someone I know! Thanks for not just assuming that I was trashing you.
I help good games sell copies on Steam. I do my best to end the careers of bad game developers. I'm a little crazy, so my reviews tend to be more like an essay on the subject, the Dev, my life. But they get attention.
If you want to see what I'm talking about, I have a review for 'Between Two Worlds' for a positive one.
'Love Potion' is a game that I pretty much killed within 48 hours of launch.
And while I didn't kill 'Thirty Days.' I severely hurt its sales numbers in that critical 2 week launch window. These days, when he addresses the community, it usually reads like he's contemplating abandoning it entirely. (He should have made PORN instead of cock block! lmao)
-------
I had a lot to say about what you got wrong in my first comment. I'll be looking forward to telling you how much fun I had with your next update. I really do wish you luck.
The porn genre is a mess. A bunch of lazy developers pushing out trash to people that shouldn't be allowed to handle their own money! It makes it so hard for a decent developer to get noticed. 4 years ago, when I first started reviewing porn games as a hobby, I was the ONLY person bitching about story and sensible content, believable people. I see more and more people picking up that torch.
I'll leave you with a couple more thoughts.
Dr. Pinkcake is a scamming thief, and 'Being a Dik' is total garbage. Regardless of how much money it makes. There is no story. The MC is a fucking bitch. And the girls are hot, but it's pointless bullshit because all he fucking cares about is cashing those Patreon checks.
R.J. Rhodes is a MUCH smaller developer. Her game 'Come Home' is much smaller than Dr. Crackhead's. It's well written, with likeable characters. The plot (alternate universes) is ridiculous, but everything else around it is grounded and simply makes sense. Suspension of disbelief is easy. It's an absolute gem of a game.
Both of them use(d) Patreon to get their game made. One of them panders to every thought of the subscribers, but makes them pay dearly for it. The other never wavered from their vision, never gave creative control over to the people simply because they had an extra $5 that month!
And one final kick to that dead horse:
William Shakespeare did NOT poll his patreons on whether or not Romeo and Juliet should live happily ever after. Had he, it might have made a decent porn story for the 1500's, but there would be one less movie with naked 14 year old tits in it for us to watch today!!!
(A story written by committee will ALWAYS suck!)
P.S. If you ever make an incest game, Step 1 to making a coherent story is allowing the player to redefine the relationships from Patreon's standard landlady, roommate. (As if the CEO of Patreon doesn't watch, buy, and jerk off to daddy/daughter porn!)