On 17/12/13 14:21, Joe Watkins wrote:
Excluding Windows, most users will have it solved by their distros
package maintainers, that's pretty clear. We will have to include the
file for Windows, and I see no harm in not doing the same for the source
distribution either, I do see how not including it can be a problem,
don't see how excluding it solves anything. Including it doesn't make it
harder to override, it doesn't change that package maintainers will
likely be responsible, but it does allow more possibilities of
successful execution wherever the source or binary distribution came from.
Windows has its own system CA store, doesn't it? Is there some reason why we can't just use that? Wrong format?
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/