Vin D

Estados Unidos da América

Opiniões

Opinião sobre Safeway


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Safeway is overpriced.

During my recent shopping experience, I observed a significant price increase at Safeway. While I typically purchase Minute Maid Lemonade from Walmart, it was currently unavailable. Consequently, I visited Safeway, where the price exceeded $3.00, whereas Walmart offers it for $1.89. The employees at Safeway appeared visibly dissatisfied.

11 de novembro de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre Wendy's


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Wendy’s poor treatment of its employees.

I recently came across a disturbing video on Facebook that depicted a manager exhibiting extreme rudeness and disrespect towards an employee who had dedicated over 37 years of service to the company. The video further revealed that the employee’s hourly wage was a mere $13.00. As a result of this experience, I have resolved to refrain from patronizing Wendy’s restaurants in the future.

22 de setembro de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre ...


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Workout vest scam.

I wish I could give them a zero, they’re falsely advertising a workout vest, only sending a vest without the weights and pouch to store your belongings. Customer service is nonexistent and they have terrible business practices.

1 de setembro de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre Burger King


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Burger King treats their employees horribly

I discontinued patronizing Burger King a considerable time ago due to their appalling treatment of their employees. For instance, an employee who had dedicated two decades to the company received a meager gift, akin to one given to a child.

15 de agosto de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre LinkedIn


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Upon careful evaluation

Upon careful evaluation, I have concluded that LinkedIn’s effectiveness in facilitating employment opportunities is limited. Despite being unemployed for a year, LinkedIn has failed to provide valuable insights during my job search. The platform consistently displays job postings that receive over 100 applications simultaneously. Furthermore, LinkedIn’s premium version misleads users by suggesting that they are highly qualified candidates for positions, only to fail to generate any responses from companies after submitting applications. Consequently, I have transitioned to Indeed, which offers a more comprehensive range of job opportunities.

14 de agosto de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre SavvyMoney


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Incorrect Credit Score.

Their credit reporting is inaccurate; they have displayed an incorrect rating on my credit report through my credit union. My credit union advised me to contact them via email, but they failed to respond to my inquiry.

12 de julho de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre T-Mobile


Classificada 5 em 5 estrelas

Positive Feedback.

Recently, I upgraded to a new iPhone 16 Pro and a new plan, and I wanted to express my satisfaction with the exceptional service I received. I am thoroughly impressed with both the phone and the plan.

29 de junho de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre Bay Alarm


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Bay Alarm and DEI programs.

I recently learned that Bay Alarm has decided to step back from DEI programs, and this has truly disappointed me. As a loyal customer, I believe in supporting brands that align with values of diversity and inclusion. Therefore, I will be reconsidering my shopping choices moving forward. I also feel compelled to share this on my professional Facebook page, where I have over 12,000 followers, as I believe it’s important for others to be informed. I hope to see Bay Alarm reconsider its stance on such vital programs in the future.

4 de março de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre HUGO BOSS


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Hugo Boss's affiliation with Nazi Germany.

I was thinking of having my tuxedo tailored at Hugo Boss. The meticulous crafting and elegant designs are often benchmark standards within the realm of high fashion, making it a popular choice for formal wear. However, my recent curiosity led me to discover a rather troubling aspect of the brand’s history, particularly its association with Nazi Germany during World War II. This revelation was shocking; I had no prior knowledge of this connection and it has left me feeling quite appalled. Hugo Boss, the man behind the brand, was previously a member of the Nazi Party, and his company was known to have manufactured uniforms for the German military, as well as for the notorious SS. The uniforms were impeccably designed, projecting an image of authority and strength, which in turn contributed to the enforceable ideology that the regime propagated. This historical link is not just a mere footnote; it underscores a pivotal moral conflict between the brand’s present-day identity, which focuses on luxury and premium fashion, and its past entanglement with oppression and war.
Thinking about this has led me to consider the implications of supporting a brand with such a controversial history. While on one hand, many people dismiss the past as bygone, it maintains a powerful grip on the present, shaping how we perceive different brands and what they stand for today. This intersecting blend of history and commerce creates a deep and complicated narrative that influences consumer behavior. Fashion isn't merely about the clothing we wear; it reflects ideals, sentiments, and sometimes, uncomfortable truths. As I reflect on these newfound insights, I am torn. On one end, I acknowledge the modern iterations of Hugo Boss as global fashion entities that provide jobs and foster creativity in the fashion industry. The designs are elegant, suitable for various formal occasions, and often, they represent a sense of style and sophistication. However, when I consider the origins of the brand and the atrocities associated with it, it compels a deeper evaluation of ethical consumerism. Choosing to patronize a brand with a stained legacy poses questions: am I inadvertently endorsing their past actions, or can the current endeavors of the brand be seen as a separation from their dark history?. Moreover, this dilemma highlights a broader issue in the fashion industry and beyond; how many companies willingly forget or gloss over their histories for the sake of marketability? It becomes essential for consumers to be informed, to seek knowledge about the entities we support and the implications of our purchasing decisions. A single purchase may seem trivial, but collectively, consumer behavior shapes the marketplace, making ethical transparency a critical conversation for all industries, particularly those with complex legacies. So, the question looms: should I tailor my tuxedo at Hugo Boss, knowing the historical context? It's a choice that extends beyond just aesthetics; it’s a negotiation between appreciating design and acknowledging the painful past. Perhaps, instead, I could seek out other designers who do not have such burdensome histories, finding those whose business practices and legacies align more harmoniously with my values today.
In conclusion, the decision isn't simply about fashion anymore; it's become a reflection on ethics and social responsibility. As I weigh my options, I am reminded that each choice we make as consumers carries weight, weaving into the narrative of cultural and historical consciousness. Whether I decide to have my tuxedo tailored at Hugo Boss or to seek alternatives, I will do so with a deeper understanding of the implications behind those choices, ensuring that my personal style doesn't come at the expense of my ideals.

2 de fevereiro de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre EarnBetter


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

This product does not meet expectations and is not functional.

I had been using this product for over the last couple of months, and I found that it creates a resume that doesn't help your job search. Initially, I was hopeful about this tool, believing it could streamline the daunting task of crafting a professional resume easily and effectively. After all, in today's competitive job market, having a well-crafted resume is crucial for standing out among a sea of applicants. However, as the weeks passed and I continued to utilize the software, my optimism quickly started to fade.
At first, the interface seemed user-friendly, and I appreciated the plethora of templates available. They varied from modern and creative designs to more traditional layouts, which I thought would cater to different industries and personal styles. I invested significant time customizing my resume, diligently inputting my experiences, skills, and educational background. The tool even suggested various phrases to enhance my qualifications and contributions at previous jobs, which initially felt reassuring.
However, as I began sharing my resume with potential employers, I quickly realized that the positive feedback I had hoped for was not forthcoming. The feedback I received leaned towards disappointment, with recruiters pointing out that the format appeared generic and lacked the tailored qualities that many employers now seek. To my dismay, the automated nature of the product seemed to result in a one-size-fits-all approach that severely limited my ability to stand out as a candidate.
Moreover, I learned that effective resumes often require a degree of personalization that this tool simply could not provide. Each job opportunity typically demands a unique touch; highlighting specific experiences that directly correspond to the job description is essential in grabbing a recruiter’s attention. Unfortunately, the proprietary product did not offer adequate guidance in this area. Instead, it encouraged me to stick to a standard set of bullet points and accomplishments, leaving little room for the specific nuances of my career journey.
In addition to the issues regarding personalization, I encountered several formatting glitches that arose once I exported my resume. After investing so much energy in the creation process, it was disheartening to see my hard work marred by discrepancies that rendered the document unprofessional. From misaligned text to missing important information, these errors conveyed a lack of attention to detail that would likely be off-putting to hiring managers.
Furthermore, I began to question the value of the automated keywords suggested by the application. While the inclusion of industry-specific terms is critical for getting past Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) used by many companies, I started to wonder if these keywords were truly an accurate reflection of my skills. Using buzzwords simply for the sake of compatibility with ATS felt disingenuous, and I realized that I needed to ensure everything on my resume was authentic and representative of my true capabilities.
As my frustration grew, I sought advice from friends and mentors, many of whom had successfully navigated the job market without the aid of such products. They encouraged me to take a step back and reconsider my strategy. Their insights highlighted the significance of understanding what employers are truly looking for: authenticity, passion, and a genuine connection to the role at hand. This required hours of research into specific companies and roles, along with an effort to articulate my unique value proposition, rather than relying solely on a tool designed to simplify my efforts.
In conclusion, after several months of using this resume builder, I reached a pivotal point in my job search journey. I realized that while the product may have offered convenience in theory, it ultimately lacked the depth and flexibility needed to make my resume truly effective. I decided to take matters into my own hands by researching best practices in resume writing, leveraging the insights of experienced professionals, and, most importantly, focusing on crafting a document that honestly reflects who I am as a candidate. This experience taught me an invaluable lesson: while technology can assist in many ways, there is no substitute for the human touch, particularly when it comes to something as important as presenting oneself to prospective employers. So, I bid farewell to the product and began creating a personalized resume that truly encapsulated my career and aspirations.

31 de janeiro de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre Ford Motor Company


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Ford removing DEI programs.

I recently learned that Ford has decided to step back from DEI programs, and this has truly disappointed me. As a loyal customer, I believe in supporting brands that align with values of diversity and inclusion. Therefore, I will be reconsidering my shopping choices moving forward. I also feel compelled to share this on my professional Facebook page, where I have over 12,000 followers, as I believe it’s important for others to be informed. I hope to see Ford reconsider its stance on such vital programs in the future.

26 de janeiro de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre Target


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

Target moving away from DEI programs.

I recently learned that Target has decided to step back from DEI programs, and this has truly disappointed me. As a loyal customer, I believe in supporting brands that align with values of diversity and inclusion. Therefore, I will be reconsidering my shopping choices moving forward. I also feel compelled to share this on my professional Facebook page, where I have over 12,000 followers, as I believe it’s important for others to be informed. I hope to see Target reconsider its stance on such vital programs in the future.

26 de janeiro de 2025
Opinião espontânea

Opinião sobre LinkedIn


Classificada 1 em 5 estrelas

The premium service contains significant flaws.

I wish I could assign them a zero. Over the past year, I have been devotedly utilizing their premium service with the hopeful expectation that it would significantly enhance my job search experience. However, instead of easing my journey, this service has remarkably proven to be entirely ineffective, making the task of finding suitable job opportunities even more challenging than it already is.
Initially, I was drawn to their promises of personalized support and expertly curated job listings that would align seamlessly with my skills and experience. They assured me that, as a subscriber to their premium offering, I would be matched with opportunities for which I would be considered a top candidate. This enticing proposition filled me with optimism, leading me to believe that my dream job was just around the corner.
Yet, as the weeks and months dragged on, the reality became starkly different. The job alerts I received were disappointing. Rather than seeing a plethora of relevant positions land in my inbox, I was inundated with listings that hardly resonated with my qualifications or career goals. Roles that required vastly different skill sets, companies located in regions I was not considering, and even positions at entry-level when I was seeking something more advanced—these were the type of notifications I received regularly. It was a frustrating experience that left me questioning the reliability of the service.
Moreover, the customer support I expected to be a cornerstone of this premium experience has also been sorely lacking. On multiple occasions, I reached out for assistance, hoping to gain clarity on the discrepancies between what had been promised versus what I was actually receiving. Each time, I was met with generic responses that felt dismissive and unhelpful, failing to address my specific concerns.
The disconnect between their advertised service and my actual experience has not only been disappointing but has added stress during a period already filled with uncertainty and anxiety. Rather than providing me with encouragement and the tools necessary for a successful job search, this service has felt like an additional burden, one that weighs heavily on my already fragile motivation.
In moments of frustration, I often reflect on the financial investment I made in this premium service. It was not inconsequential, and seeing no return on it feels like a betrayal of my trust in the brand. Every dollar spent without value adds to the sense of disappointment and disillusionment with the entire process. It is difficult to reconcile the claims of "expertly curated" opportunities with the reality that has unfolded.
As a job seeker, I understand that the current job market is competitive and that not every application will lead to an interview or a position. However, feeling misled by a service that promised to enhance my prospects adds another layer of complexity to an already arduous journey. Seeking a new job can be a strenuous and emotionally draining process, and to be led astray by something that was supposed to aid me has been nothing short of disheartening.
If I had the power to assign a rating, I would unequivocally opt for zero, as I feel that this experience has not warranted even a single star of approval. My wish is that the organization behind this premium service could witness the gap between their promises and my lived experience. It is my hope that they consider reinforcing their offerings, truly investing in ways to help their subscribers effectively navigate their job searches.
I encourage potential users to weigh their options heavily before committing resources to such a service. It is crucial to conduct thorough research and consider testimonials from others who have utilized the service to gain a clearer picture of its efficacy. If I had known then what I know now, I might have pursued alternative, perhaps more meaningful avenues to support my professional growth and job search endeavors.
In conclusion, the anticipation and excitement that surrounded my initial subscription have all but evaporated. I stand firm in my belief that I deserve not only better support but also opportunities that are genuinely aligned with my aspirations. As I mark this chapter in my job search journey, I carry with me the resolve to find a better way forward, one that does not involve services that fail to deliver on their promise.

18 de janeiro de 2025
Opinião espontânea