does anybody even have a 9-5 anymore. at some point they started making you work 8 hours not including your lunch break so it's all 9-5:30s and 9-6s and we should have killed them for it
sometimes I read a shipping pitch and the only thing I can think is "wow, we forgot about the concept of friends here"
You guys call anything Catholic just because it's christian and vibesy. "oh he's southern and makes me feel bad about myself" girl that's a baptist
widobrave breaking up and then both immediately trying to kill themselves.
no one does it like them ❤️
I've talked about this in a lot of individual case by case posts and I may have made a general one, I really can't recall, but like. I feel there's a growing and frankly terrifying tendency (in its implications) that the only way a character can be good is if they do not have the capacity to even consent to evil, which both a narrative dead end and objectively the opposite of what goodness means to me, ie, to me, a good person is someone who chooses to do things that benefit others even when an easier and more self-serving option is available. And so this is really at the heart of so much discourse, because someone will point to a character and claim that for whatever reason they can't be bad because they cannot consent to any actions, and then they get mad because the only responses that make sense to me are either "no, they're perfectly capable of making better choices, they're choosing to do this, and I think they're an interesting character but not a very good person" or "well, then, for the purposes of telling a good story, can we kill them off to get them out of the way and bring in someone who actually can do something?"
