ID: a light purple background with bold black text that reads "Do not respond to my Doylist Criticism with a Watsonian Explantion or your personal headcanon / popular fanon." End ID]
here's a simple image if anyone wants to put it on your Doylist posts to ward off the ~ popular fandom headcanons ~
Also, here's a bonus one:
[ID: a simple image with a light purple background and bold black text on it that reads "Do not repond to my Media Critique with 'this work has an unreliable narrator, therefore no critique is valid, but all praise is correct.' That's not how an Unreliable Narrator works and has absolutely no relevancy to my critique." End ID]
Pro Tip: if someone is critiquing a writing choice or an author's choices, you coming barging in proclaiming your headcanon is x, y, or z does not have any actual meaning or impact on the text itself and how others are interpreting it.
and last but not least:
[ID: a light purple background with bold black text that reads "I do not care what the Author Said On Twitter. If it does not exist in The Text Itself, it does not matter to a critique of The Text Itself", with the last four words in italics for emphasis. Below that, it says in paraphansies, "This is what 'Death of the Author' actually means: Critiquing a text based soley what is contained in the Text Itself, regardless of the Author's Intentions or any meta commentary they may make on Social Media." End ID]
Making it its own post for easy reference. Please feel free to use these images (as long as you include the attached image descriptions as indented or plain text below them) on your media critiques to ward off the hordes of fans who think any critique, (even the most surface-level, plain facts-based summary) is some kind of dire personal attack against themselves.