Every accusation must be proven
Okay !
[ID: Screenshot of Suggestrogen across two reblogs saying: “I do have one question about the people who say that the optics are bad and that we shouldn’t defend pedos because if we do we’ll look bad: how do you feel about dropping the T in LGBT? I mean. It’s essentially the same rhetoric.
/
Since I have to explain everything: Abandoning vulnerable community members because of a personal ick is not acceptable. And no I did not say that pedos are part of the LGBT community because it does not matter.” End ID]
Also, literally no one I see in this tag is harassing her. They’re posting *about her* to warn others about her.
She’s not being chased away from tumblr, she is the one who couldn’t stand her own followers asking follow-up questions trying to see if they’d somehow catastrophically misread her posts or see if she was catastrophicalyl misspeaking, and she’s the one who deleted her account when she started losing followers and popularity.
She is the one who went over to bluesky to keep posting, and evidently got bored of not being popular enough, which is why she’s now come back and re-made her blog twice, which has happened because she’s happily admitted to ban-evading, and agreed with posts that she should send her followers on harassment campaigns against the people who have posted HER OWN WORDS to warn people away from her.
If she doesn’t want to get people in her notes asking why she’s defending and supporting pedophiles, maybe she shouldn’t defend and support pedophiles.
Maybe there’s not nearly as many “child abuse defenders” and “secret pedos (said when you mean child abuser)” or “pedo defender (again, pedo meaning child abuser)”
No one has to be ultimately precise and nitpicking in the words we use to describe her actions when she’s the one using pedophile in this manner.
In the same way people against generative AI are not obligated to specify “LLMs” when we talk about the harm of AI data centers and the harm of AI being used to flood social media with misinformation at 100x the speed of pre-AI days, BECAUSE THAT IS THE TERM USED BY THE PEOPLE CREATING THESE INDUSTRIES , then no, when we, normal ass human beings who care about other people even when they’re not part of our extremely niche culty in-group of trans woman -inclusive radical feminists, call out ISFF (currently A/missforcefem, for anyone who’s unaware) for defending pedophiles and that her staunch supporters are defending pedophiles, because SHE is the one who has repeatedly posted about pedophiles and reblogged posts from proud pedophiles about literal “pedo liberation”.
The reality is that there should not be any single accusation, any single Terrible Thing that you can do or be, that you deserve to be stalked, depersoned, and socially murdered.
She has no been socially murdered. You are literally just misusing a word for the pure sensationalism of it; she is alive and well and posting from a multitude of social media accounts. Social Murder is LITERALLY when someone dies as a direct result of social inequality.
Social Murder is not when your social life gets tanked by the consequences of your own actions.
Facing direct social consequences for your actions is not social murder or ‘thoughtcrimes’.
“The reality is that there should not be any single accusation, any single Terrible Thing that you can do or be, that you deserve to be stalked, depersoned, and socially murdered.
There is not any single accusation that, when made, you should believe with no actual evidence of harm done and act like any harm you then do are justified because someone did something bad enough. No action, no accusation warrents that. None. Period.
Even rape. Even child abuse. Even murder. Even incest. Even child sexual assault.”
So you think proud rapists and child rapists and murderers, who are proud of their actions and support their actions and pretend that their actions make them part of the queer community, don’t deserve to be socially ostacized as a consequence of their actions?
You don’t think that other people have the right to have broundries or express disgust and not want to be around people who are proud of the harm they have caused?
You don’t think that people have the right to warn others away from people who are proud of causing harm to others, including children who cannot consent and are abused and raped by these proud pedophiles?
Because that’s literally what you are saying right there.
Social Murder is not when someone’s social life tanks because no one wants to be friends with them anymore because they’re a horrible person whose proud of that fact.
Social Murder is when people die because of a direct result of societal oppression including homelessness, unaffordable healthcare, lack of access to mental health services, etc.
“Social Murder” is not when proud “pedophiles, child abusers, rapists, and murderera”, (to use your own words) face social consequences for their actions, including losing friends and social media accounts because people are reporting their account when they admit to violating a websites terms of service.
Again, just so you can’t pretend there’s no proof the accusations:
[ID: Screenshot of Suggestrogen across two reblogs saying: “I do have one question about the people who say that the optics are bad and that we shouldn’t defend pedos because if we do we’ll look bad: how do you feel about dropping the T in LGBT? I mean. It’s essentially the same rhetoric.
/
Since I have to explain everything: Abandoning vulnerable community members because of a personal ick is not acceptable. And no I did not say that pedos are part of the LGBT community because it does not matter.” End ID]
