Leo Robertson's Reviews > Ringworld

Ringworld by Larry Niven
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
7619789
's review

it was ok

I find it hard to believe anyone got through this one, let alone its whole legion of sequels and spin-offs.

The Ringworld is such a cool concept but it's SO poorly described, I defy anyone to picture what the hell Niven is on about. It was black and on the horizon blue, a ribbon, several squares were hovering there like... WHAT?! Take some time to do this thing justice, mate! We're gonna be spending a deal of time there...

It takes too long to get to Ringworld, then when they do, nothing happens. Plus I couldn't work out how they'd landed? Wasn't there supposed to be glass on the inner surface or something? Did I read that? So confused.

It was kind of fun to see how male writers handled female characters in the 70s though ;) Ahaha, so badly. Worst sex scene ever ("impaled herself"? More like "flattered YOURself"!)—it just came outta nowhere and ended just as abruptly.

Can't recommend.
30 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Ringworld.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 16, 2015 – Shelved
May 16, 2015 – Shelved as: to-read
June 10, 2017 – Started Reading
June 10, 2017 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Manny Damn... past its sell-by, I see. But it was great when it was fresh.


message 2: by Leo (new) - rated it 2 stars

Leo Robertson Manny wrote: "Damn... past its sell-by, I see. But it was great when it was fresh."

Yeah! I've seen your other recommendations though—will go for them :)


message 3: by Jason (new)

Jason Is this based in the New Forest?

My bad, that would be Ringwood.


Paul  Perry Niven is just a terrible, terrible writer.


message 5: by Leo (new) - rated it 2 stars

Leo Robertson @Jason: ahaha
@Paul: glad you agree- I really struggled with this one... Some of the ideas were interesting, but it didn't seem worth wading through the prose to the end!


Paul  Perry Leo wrote: "Some of the ideas were interesting, but it didn't seem worth wading through the prose to the end!"


I stuck with this as it's quite short, I was reading it with a group, and it's supposed to be a classic. The only other book of his I tried was Rainbow Mars, and I gave up less than 100 pages in.


message 7: by Derek (last edited Jun 10, 2017 03:54AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Derek Manny wrote: "Damn... past its sell-by, I see. But it was great when it was fresh."

Totally. I loved it when I read it as a teenager. Forty years later I reread it, and... flat.

Jason wrote: "My bad, that would be Ringwood. "

Haha! Love it. [ETA: Actually, it's still growing on me. I think my next homebrew may be Ringwood Engineers]

Paul wrote: "Niven is just a terrible, terrible writer. "

I wouldn't go that far. One "terrible" is sufficient.


Paul  Perry Derek wrote: "

I wouldn't go that far. One "terrible" is sufficient. ."



Fair enough, I wouldn't want to be too too harsh


message 9: by Beef (new)

Beef Bomb Seriously I think 9/10 low-star reviews mention sexism / representation. THIS IS NOT A CRITERIA FOR JUDGING A GOOD READ (history has proven)


back to top