Tadiana ✩Night Owl☽'s Reviews > The Turn of the Screw
The Turn of the Screw
by
by
Tadiana ✩Night Owl☽'s review
bookshelves: classics, things-go-bump-in-the-night, horror, slower-than-molasses, suspense, whatever
Oct 24, 2015
bookshelves: classics, things-go-bump-in-the-night, horror, slower-than-molasses, suspense, whatever
Me at 50%:

And 75%. And 90%.
I was actually really excited to read this classic Henry James novella, a gothic ghost story published in 1898. A young woman is hired to be the governess for two young orphans by their uncle, whose good looks and charm impress the governess. She wants to impress him in turn with her capability, especially when his main command to her is that she never, NEVER, bother him with any problems or concerns.
She's packed off to the uncle's country estate to meet young Flora and Miles, who are delightful, beautiful children. The housekeeper becomes her friend and confidante. There are just a few odd things: strange noises in the house - footsteps, a child's cry - and Miles has been expelled from his boarding school for mysterious, unnamed reasons. But really everything is just fine. Until she starts seeing a mysterious man and woman appear and disappear, and becomes convinced that they are the ghosts of the prior governess and another employee. And she's certain that the children see these ghosts but won't admit it. Also she's quite sure that these ghosts are out to get the children.
How is she so sure of all these things? Who knows? She just is. And the question is: is she really seeing supernatural manifestations, or is she slowly becoming more and more delusional? or both? And are the children innocent or evil? James includes hints but doesn't ever answer these questions.
It sounds like a fascinating psychological examination, with a narrator who is both unnamed and unreliable. So it surprised me a little when I literally could barely keep my eyes open while I was reading it.

The story is told in a roundabout, murky way, which helps create a sense of confusion. You also have to continually plow through sentences like this one:
I think Henry James must have had some sort of allergy to periods. How did he even stay awake while he was writing convoluted sentences like this?
I persevered to the end (not so hard to do when it's only 100 pages), but this story just never grew on me. The whole thing was an odd and murky reading experience, which perhaps Henry James would say was his intent. Too bad it was also so very boring and unsatisfying.
So if you ever have insomnia, I've got the book for you.

I keep thinking maybe I read this wrong because it's such a classic. So I’ll give it another shot. Who knows? Sometimes that works out for me.

And 75%. And 90%.
I was actually really excited to read this classic Henry James novella, a gothic ghost story published in 1898. A young woman is hired to be the governess for two young orphans by their uncle, whose good looks and charm impress the governess. She wants to impress him in turn with her capability, especially when his main command to her is that she never, NEVER, bother him with any problems or concerns.
She's packed off to the uncle's country estate to meet young Flora and Miles, who are delightful, beautiful children. The housekeeper becomes her friend and confidante. There are just a few odd things: strange noises in the house - footsteps, a child's cry - and Miles has been expelled from his boarding school for mysterious, unnamed reasons. But really everything is just fine. Until she starts seeing a mysterious man and woman appear and disappear, and becomes convinced that they are the ghosts of the prior governess and another employee. And she's certain that the children see these ghosts but won't admit it. Also she's quite sure that these ghosts are out to get the children.
How is she so sure of all these things? Who knows? She just is. And the question is: is she really seeing supernatural manifestations, or is she slowly becoming more and more delusional? or both? And are the children innocent or evil? James includes hints but doesn't ever answer these questions.
It sounds like a fascinating psychological examination, with a narrator who is both unnamed and unreliable. So it surprised me a little when I literally could barely keep my eyes open while I was reading it.

The story is told in a roundabout, murky way, which helps create a sense of confusion. You also have to continually plow through sentences like this one:
They had never, I think, wanted to do so many things for their poor protectress; I mean--though they got their lessons better and better, which was naturally what would please her most--in the way of diverting, entertaining, surprising her; reading her passages, telling her stories, acting her charades, pouncing out at her, in disguises, as animals and historical characters, and above all astonishing her by the "pieces" they had secretly got by heart and could interminably recite.

I think Henry James must have had some sort of allergy to periods. How did he even stay awake while he was writing convoluted sentences like this?
I persevered to the end (not so hard to do when it's only 100 pages), but this story just never grew on me. The whole thing was an odd and murky reading experience, which perhaps Henry James would say was his intent. Too bad it was also so very boring and unsatisfying.
So if you ever have insomnia, I've got the book for you.

I keep thinking maybe I read this wrong because it's such a classic. So I’ll give it another shot. Who knows? Sometimes that works out for me.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Turn of the Screw.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
October 24, 2015
–
Started Reading
October 24, 2015
– Shelved
October 24, 2015
–
31.0%
"I was a screen-I was to stand before them. The more I saw, the less they would. I began to watch them in a stifled suspense, a disguised excitement that might well, had it continued too long, have turned to something like madness."
October 24, 2015
–
43.0%
"The single run-on sentence I was going to post here was too long to do as a status update. Henry James' fondness for these is enough to drive me to drink."
October 25, 2015
– Shelved as:
classics
October 25, 2015
– Shelved as:
things-go-bump-in-the-night
October 25, 2015
–
Finished Reading
October 29, 2015
– Shelved as:
horror
October 29, 2015
– Shelved as:
slower-than-molasses
October 29, 2015
– Shelved as:
suspense
October 29, 2015
– Shelved as:
whatever
Comments Showing 1-50 of 51 (51 new)
message 1:
by
Shan
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 25, 2015 08:19PM
Interesting. I liked it more than you did, I think - but I read it when I was 12 or 13, and then reread it as an adult after trying to wade through some of Henry James's longer novels, so that probably influenced my feeling about it. I had a subscription to the Library of America at the time and for several months it seemed like every book they sent me was yet more Henry James. I guess he was very prolific, and I really didn't like any of the longer novels I tried to read (I didn't finish any of them). Have you read and liked any of his others?
reply
|
flag
I haven't read any of his other works, Shan. I'm not in a hurry to do that now. :) I don't mind wordy, run-on sentences when I think the content is fascinating, but with this work I didn't care for either. And I was predisposed to like this one, so I'm disappointed.
I've read a few of his novels over the years, I find them for the most part very boring. Ye hath been warned! :P
I might have to skip this one. I've been in a reading slump for the past two months and have made no progress with my current book. I guess I don't need to add to the problem by reading this book.
I just started in this one. It looks discouraging :(
Licha, I'd say skip this one. It's a crunchy classic.Evgeny, I wouldn't have made it through this one if it had been longer. I kept hoping something would change and I'd like it in the end, but it never did. If you get, say 30% through and you're not having fun yet, I'd advise you to move on unless you're really determined to just plow through it (like me). :D
I'm going to take your advice, Tadiana. I've yet to finish our other buddy read and can't seem to read more than a few pages a day of The Shining. And I'm actually enjoying The Shining. This is worse than having the book blues. Reading slumps won't even let you read the books you're enjoying.
Tadiana ✩ Night Owl☽ wrote: "Licha, I'd say skip this one. It's a crunchy classic.
Evgeny, I wouldn't have made it through this one if it had been longer. I kept hoping something would change and I'd like it in the end, but i..."
I can count the number of times I DNFed a book by fingers on one hand, and considering this book's length I hope I will endure :)
Evgeny, I wouldn't have made it through this one if it had been longer. I kept hoping something would change and I'd like it in the end, but i..."
I can count the number of times I DNFed a book by fingers on one hand, and considering this book's length I hope I will endure :)
What!? You were frustrated with the drawn out paragraphs of sipping tea? How dare you!!! This is James, don't you know!Feigned shock aside, I love your "pre-" -view.
Tadiana, you have captured what I have felt while reading this novella, to a T. I quit finally (after falling asleep countless times) at about page 30.
This is my Halloween read this year, 3 chapters in and very indirect so far. I have to read paragraphs twice because I fall asleep the first time through. I best avoid looking at your GIFs or I'll be done for! Love your review.
Your review makes me want to read the book. The whole idea of this is so intriguing that it's a shame the book doesn't fulfill on that end. That's the bad thing with some of these classics. They're so wordy that it takes away from an enjoyable reading experience. I know that some of these authors got paid by the word, but really, how much can one sentence be extended just to get an extra penny? I sometimes wish some of these wordy books could be abridged when you know that it's being wordy for the sake of the extra cent.
Licha wrote: "Your review makes me want to read the book. The whole idea of this is so intriguing that it's a shame the book doesn't fulfill on that end. That's the bad thing with some of these classics. They're..."
Some of the modern writers are too wordy as well. Stephen King, George R.R. Martin, Peter F. Hamilton - just to name a few. These guys cannot (or in case of King - forgot) how to write short fiction.
Some of the modern writers are too wordy as well. Stephen King, George R.R. Martin, Peter F. Hamilton - just to name a few. These guys cannot (or in case of King - forgot) how to write short fiction.
Don't forget Stieg Larsson. But in the case of these guys, I'd venture to say that's their style rather than they're getting paid by the word. I actually don't mind King or Larsson (haven't read the others) but I can see why people have an issue with their writing. But like in the example Tadiana used, it just seems flowery. I'd be asleep before I got to the third comma.
Thanks, Anne. The gifs were very reflective of my feelings about this book. It was a snoozer for me. :)
I guess the upside of a soporific read is being able to fill a review with adorable sleepy gifs. :) Enjoyed reading your thoughts. I've been interested in gothic horror, but might skip this one.
Lily wrote: "I guess the upside of a soporific read is being able to fill a review with adorable sleepy gifs. :) Enjoyed reading your thoughts. I've been interested in gothic horror, but might skip this one."Well, I hate to suggest to anyone that they shouldn't read a book, especially if it's a classic. You might like it better than I did. It's short and free to download (on Gutenberg and probably elsewhere), so maybe give it a look sometime and see if it works for you better than it did for me. If nothing else, you've got a useful sleep aid. :D
I can't read this review yet, since I'm still torn as to whether I should read this.With all the low ratings once again, I'm leaning towards not. Ugh :(
C. wrote: "OMG Tadiana........you NAILED this one!"Lol, I keep thinking I had to have read it wrong because it's such a classic, but man, I just was not connecting to it at all! Maybe sometime I'll give it another shot.
"Murky" sums this up perfectly. I had the same reaction as you: I was so excited to read this at long last about 10 years ago, and then was left wondering why I bothered. Great review! You capture it all perfectly.
Eilonwy wrote: ""Murky" sums this up perfectly. I had the same reaction as you: I was so excited to read this at long last about 10 years ago, and then was left wondering why I bothered. Great review! You capture ..."Thanks Eilonwy! Someday I might give this another shot because it really seems like something I ought to like. But it probably won't happen anytime soon.
I felt exactly the same about this book..so excited about the synopsis, but so disappointed page after page...I probably didn't get the depth of it...but I didn't enjoy one bit of it!
HJ does the same in his 500+pager novels as well. :) I think in one of my reviews his style inspired me to say that it's like watching an aquarium with majestic fishes swimming in murky waters with a view-distorting lass. You get a headache if you watch too long. :)
Tadiana...you can't lik'em all...sorry this did not work out for you. Onward to your next five star read!
Great review as usual! I’ve never been able to finish one of his novels. My last unsuccessful attempt was “What Maisie Knew.” I always thought this one might be different, but I trust your review and I won’t even bother now! Someday I’ll just get around to watching themovie with Deborah Kerr.
"I think Henry James must have had some sort of allergy to periods." LOL. Yes. Thank you. Love your review's embedded videos.
Janinne wrote: ""I think Henry James must have had some sort of allergy to periods." LOL. Yes. Thank you. Love your review's embedded videos."Thanks, it was a fun review to put together. More fun than reading the book!
"I keep thinking maybe I read this wrong because it's such a classic."You didn't read it wrong. It sucks.


















