Apatt's Reviews > Contact

Contact by Carl Sagan
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2457095
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: sci-fi

As far as I know Contact is Carl Sagan's only novel. This makes him almost the Harper Lee of sci-fi (though he did write boatloads of sci-fact books). Not being much of a nonfiction reader this is my first encounter with Carl Sagan's writing, I already feel like it is a shame that he only wrote the one novel; though I am sure the world is more than compensated by his other output.

Contact piqued my interest immediately with a vivid portrayal of Ellie Arrowway, a two years old genius, figuring out how a radio works and fixing a tube by straightening a bent prong. The girl’s thought processes throughout this scene are very clearly described. From there we follow Ellie’s growth into adulthood and becoming the director of “Project Argus”, a radio telescope institute for research into SETI (“search for extraterrestrial intelligence”). One day a message ostensibly from the Vega system, 25 light-years from Earth is received. Initially, it seems like just a looping series of prime numbers, remarkable in itself but of no practical value. Later a careful analysis of the modulations in the transmission reveals hidden messages, making the broadcast a kind of space palimpsest. One of the hidden messages turns out to be a blueprint for a mysterious machine containing five comfy chairs. Well, nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

I was fascinated by the hard sf aspect of Contact. Sagan’s popular science writing skills serve the readers well here, the science expositions in this book are generally understandable and often fascinating. I also had a feeling that Sagan is enjoying the relative freedom of writing fiction, even though he clearly seems to have a preference for writing nonfiction. In any case, this novel is partly autobiographical in that SETI was an important part of Sagan’s career. He has clearly thought out the worldwide implications of humanity receiving a communication from an undisputed extraterrestrial intelligence. The hitherto impossible level of cooperation between unfriendly countries to use their radio telescopes to help pick up and compile parts of “The Message” received as the Earth rotates. The panic and condemnations from some religious leaders are all too believable.

Contact is also a platform for Sagan to explore religion from his agnostic point of view. I really appreciate that he is not overbearing about his agnosticism, and it is just one aspect of this book of many facets. The diametrically different viewpoints between Ellie and a religious figure are articulately argued on both sides, but the agnostic view seems more convincingly presented (Ellie is basically a mouthpiece for the author at this point). It is interesting that Sagan seems to think that both atheists and Christians presume to know too much, taking their conjectures as fact. Agnosticism is presented as the happy medium.

Even though I had a sense that Sagan enjoyed writing Contact very much, it does not mean that the novel is a romp or a hoot. It is mostly narrated at a deliberate, thoughtful pace, and only ramps up a bit when the alien designed Machine is activated and weird sci-fi-ness ensues. I thoroughly enjoyed and admire Contact, it is thought provoking, fascinating and even educational. I wish he had written a sequel.

_______________

A word about the 1997 Movie Adaptation

I remember quite liking the movie, and Jodie Foster is always great. However, while I enjoyed the movie for what it was, I was disappointed in it as a sci-fi movie. For the longest time, it dissuaded me from picking up the source material. Having just read Sagan’s novel it seems as if the filmmaker has somehow de-sci-fied it, making the movie rather ambiguous about whether the aliens really did send a message or Ellie is simply off her rocker. In a single brief scene the movie clearly implies that the aliens are indeed real but by then I think the damage is already done. The movie feels more like a fairly decent human drama than an intelligent sci-fi film.
Carl Sagan was also not happy about the adaptation, though he passed away before it was finished.

The book is overtly, spectacularly, unapologetically sci-fi.
61 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Contact.
Sign In »

Quotes Apatt Liked

Carl Sagan
“The universe is a pretty big place. If it's just us, seems like an awful waste of space.”
Carl Sagan, Contact

Carl Sagan
“You're an interesting species. An interesting mix. You're capable of such beautiful dreams, and such horrible nightmares. You feel so lost, so cut off, so alone, only you're not. See, in all our searching, the only thing we've found that makes the emptiness bearable, is each other.”
Carl Sagan, Contact

Carl Sagan
“She had studied the universe all her life, but had overlooked its clearest message: For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
Carl Sagan, Contact
tags: love

Carl Sagan
“Your religion assumes that people are children and need a boogeyman so they'll behave. You want people to believe in God so they'll obey the law. That's the only means that occurs to you: a strict secular police force, and the threat of punishment by an all-seeing God for whatever the police overlook. You sell human beings short.”
Carl Sagan, Contact


Reading Progress

March 9, 2016 – Started Reading
March 9, 2016 – Shelved
March 14, 2016 – Shelved as: sci-fi
March 14, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Apatt Sabah wrote: "I watched the film as well, and actually drew the same conclusions as yourself. The ambiguity of whether she had really met them, their existence, had detracted completely from it being a sci-fi an..."

Ah, thank you so much Sabah. If I could give you a cake for being the first commenter I would, as it is I don't even have a cake in the house ಥ_ಥ.

I know, right? it's not sci-fi enough and you don't even like sci-fi! It just makes me mad!
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻┻


Apatt Sabah wrote: "Apatt wrote: "Sabah wrote: "I watched the film as well, and actually drew the same conclusions as yourself. The ambiguity of whether she had really met them, their existence, had detracted complete..."

BTW, I've been admiring your many profile pics, next one Trump in a wig?


message 3: by Kevin (new)

Kevin Ansbro NOT the comfy chairs!!
Apatt, I like the way that humour almost always manages to wander into your reviews, like a Hitchcock cameo!

And the review was of the same high standard that I have come to expect from you. Great job!


Apatt Kevin wrote: "NOT the comfy chairs!!
Apatt, I like the way that humour almost always manages to wander into your reviews, like a Hitchcock cameo!

And the review was of the same high standard that I have come t..."


Thanks so much Kevin, gotta get those Python references in! :D


Apatt Sabah wrote: "Actually it isn't even ready for one."

We shall overcomb!


message 6: by Anu (new) - added it

Anu Yes, having seen the movie myself, I couldn't really conclude that it was sci-fi per se; I think the whole religious aspect was overdone if you ask me, but it still wasn't bad. I look forward to reading the book though, after having read your review. Having read Sagan's Cosmos in its entirety, I must agree that he is a brilliant writer, though, much like you. Brilliant review, Apatt! :)


message 7: by Cecily (new) - added it

Cecily The nice red uniforms of the Spanish Inquisition are potentially dangerous in sci-fi, aren't they?
;)


Fun review - with serious bits as well. Perfect.


message 8: by Joe (new) - rated it 3 stars

Joe Wonderful review, Apatt. I have this novel on my reading docket for this year. I've seen the movie several times but never realized that Sagan considered himself an agnostic. Now I'm really looking forward to viewing the story through that lens.


Apatt Joe wrote: "Wonderful review, Apatt. I have this novel on my reading docket for this year. I've seen the movie several times but never realized that Sagan considered himself an agnostic. Now I'm really looking..."

Thanks so much Joe. Looking forward to your review.
Sagan was also displeased with the movie adaptation though he died before it was finished.


message 10: by Denis (last edited Mar 14, 2016 08:26PM) (new)

Denis Great review. I have had a hardcover copy of this novel on my shelf for several years now. I have not picked it up as the film, though I liked it enough, did not impress me enough to read the novel eagerly. Now I think I will pull it off and get to it knowing, as I respect very much your opinion on such things, that there is more to it than was shown in the film.


Apatt Denis wrote: "Great review. I have had a hardcover copyof this novel on my shelf for several years now. I have not picked it up as the film, though I liked it enough, did not impress me enough to read the novel ..."

Thanks so much Denis. The film goes into a very different direction. Still a good, and not stupid, film I think, but a crappy sci-fi film!


Apatt Anuradha wrote: "Yes, having seen the movie myself, I couldn't really conclude that it was sci-fi per se; I think the whole religious aspect was overdone if you ask me, but it still wasn't bad. I look forward to re..."

Thanks very much Anuradha! Perhaps I should check out Cosmos even though I don't normally read nonfic.


Alejandro Truly glad that you enjoyed that much this amazing novel :)


Apatt Alejandro wrote: "Truly glad that you enjoyed that much this amazing novel :)"

Thanks Alejandro. Your excellent review made me want to read it :)


Apatt Cecily wrote: "The nice red uniforms of the Spanish Inquisition are potentially dangerous in sci-fi, aren't they?
;)


Fun review - with serious bits as well. Perfect."


Aw, you are too kind. Flattery will get you everywhere (or is it flatulence? I always get the idioms mixed up)


message 16: by Anu (new) - added it

Anu Apatt wrote: "Aw, you are too kind. Flattery will get you everywhere (or is it flatulence? I always get the idioms mixed up)"

Oh, god. please stop. *can't control her laughter*


message 17: by Anu (new) - added it

Anu Apatt wrote: "Anuradha wrote: "Yes, having seen the movie myself, I couldn't really conclude that it was sci-fi per se; I think the whole religious aspect was overdone if you ask me, but it still wasn't bad. I l..."

I don't either, but this one's (Cosmos, I mean) written very well. And I have a weak spot for anything astronomy. :P


message 18: by Cecily (new) - added it

Cecily Apatt wrote: "Flattery will get you everywhere (or is it flatulence? I always get the idioms mixed up) "

I guess, with the right (wrong?) attachments, flatulence might get you somewhere as well!


Apatt Cecily wrote: "Apatt wrote: "Flattery will get you everywhere (or is it flatulence? I always get the idioms mixed up) "

I guess, with the right (wrong?) attachments, flatulence might get you somewhere as well!"


That's surely a fragrant disregard for something...


message 20: by Cecily (new) - added it

Cecily I thought you said somewhere that you were going to be pushing up daisies. They're slightly fragrant! However, I'm glad the evidence of presence is present.


Derek Personally, I loved the movie (probably my all time favorite). But then I've always been a sucker for Jodie Foster (I remember how my mother—who isn't one—used to say that my father had a fondness for redheads, and hear the identical tone when my wife mentions my fondness for Jodie Foster movies). But I don't remember a thing about the book...


Apatt Derek wrote: "Personally, I loved the movie (probably my all time favorite). But then I've always been a sucker for Jodie Foster (I remember how my mother—who isn't one—used to say that my father had a fondness ..."

Seems fair ;)


Wayne Barrett Great review. I read this back in the late 80's and loved it.


Apatt Wayne wrote: "Great review. I read this back in the late 80's and loved it."

Thanks very much Wayne. Is your first name Bruce? ;)
I love the 80s!


back to top