Justin's Reviews > The Underground Railroad
The Underground Railroad
by
by
I'm a guy who enjoys "best of" lists. One of my favorite things about December, besides my birthday, Christmas, football, colder weather, and hot chocolate, is sitting down to peruse lists of the best stuff of the year. Books, movies, albums, video games, etc. I love it. I have trusted sources that I rely on to provide my with the best of the best, and when I start to see the same stuff appear on very list, I drop everything and consume it.
Like right now I'm watching The Americans because Season 4 was consistently ranked as one of the best shows on TV last year. I watched La La Land and Manchester by the Sea because they were the two two movies on almost every list out there for 2016. Beyoncé's Lemonade album is awesome, too. And The new stuff from Radiohead.
But my fascination with lists doesn't necessarily mean I'm always consuming the best media in the entire world because it's so universally critically acclaimed. Sometimes a movie is just awful no matter what the experts say. Sometimes an album just doesn't do it for me no matter how many times I try to listen to it. And sometimes a book just doesn't win me over like it does others. That's all really great though. It's awesome. It's what makes us human and different and all that. We get to have different opinions and stuff can resonate with us in ways that others will never comprehend. It's beautiful.
The Underground Railroad just didn't do it for me. It was a tough book to read for many reasons. I mean the subject matter is just awful anyway. The fact that people were ever treated that way is disgusting and hard for me to even comprehend. The depictions in the book of cruelty were difficult to read since they were fiction rooted in real events. The concept of a real Underground Railroad was interesting, too, and put a unique spin on historical events.
I just didn't think it was written very well. I didn't think the characters were developed at all so I found myself completely unattached from them. I didn't even realize one of them was out of the picture until they were brought up later in the book. I just didn't connect. I feel like the events that unfolded would have impacted me more if the characters weren't so underdeveloped. It just seemed like there were a lot of things happening, but I wasn't invested from the beginning and couldn't find my way in as I went along.
So I was let down by what many consider the best book of 2016. That's OK. There's a million other books to get wrapped up, and many other books that I think deal with this time in history in a more meaningful way. I'm glad I read it though. It did provide me with a harsh reminder of a dark time in our country's history that is often easy to just shy away from or ignore. It was helpful, and I wanted to rate it higher, but I'm good with two stars.
Like right now I'm watching The Americans because Season 4 was consistently ranked as one of the best shows on TV last year. I watched La La Land and Manchester by the Sea because they were the two two movies on almost every list out there for 2016. Beyoncé's Lemonade album is awesome, too. And The new stuff from Radiohead.
But my fascination with lists doesn't necessarily mean I'm always consuming the best media in the entire world because it's so universally critically acclaimed. Sometimes a movie is just awful no matter what the experts say. Sometimes an album just doesn't do it for me no matter how many times I try to listen to it. And sometimes a book just doesn't win me over like it does others. That's all really great though. It's awesome. It's what makes us human and different and all that. We get to have different opinions and stuff can resonate with us in ways that others will never comprehend. It's beautiful.
The Underground Railroad just didn't do it for me. It was a tough book to read for many reasons. I mean the subject matter is just awful anyway. The fact that people were ever treated that way is disgusting and hard for me to even comprehend. The depictions in the book of cruelty were difficult to read since they were fiction rooted in real events. The concept of a real Underground Railroad was interesting, too, and put a unique spin on historical events.
I just didn't think it was written very well. I didn't think the characters were developed at all so I found myself completely unattached from them. I didn't even realize one of them was out of the picture until they were brought up later in the book. I just didn't connect. I feel like the events that unfolded would have impacted me more if the characters weren't so underdeveloped. It just seemed like there were a lot of things happening, but I wasn't invested from the beginning and couldn't find my way in as I went along.
So I was let down by what many consider the best book of 2016. That's OK. There's a million other books to get wrapped up, and many other books that I think deal with this time in history in a more meaningful way. I'm glad I read it though. It did provide me with a harsh reminder of a dark time in our country's history that is often easy to just shy away from or ignore. It was helpful, and I wanted to rate it higher, but I'm good with two stars.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Underground Railroad.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-27 of 27 (27 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Karen
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Feb 21, 2017 01:42PM
I was beginning to think it was just me who didn't really care for this book!
reply
|
flag
Great review, Justin. I was torn about whether to read this one, but your review has confirmed my suspicions!
I gave it a slightly higher rating than you did, but honestly I have to agree that the writing was not great. Fortunately, I read it before it made every "best of" list known to man. So I wasn't as disappointed (probably pushing it into the three star realm for me). As an aside and totally off topic, I am LOVING The Nix . . .
Anita, I wanted to go with three stars, but it was a very tedious read that took me a lot longer than it should have. I even stopped and put it down for a while before jumping back into it. I think I may have had higher expectations since it was on every list in the world. But The Nix!! Yeahhh!!!
Justin wrote: "Anita, I wanted to go with three stars, but it was a very tedious read that took me a lot longer than it should have. I even stopped and put it down for a while before jumping back into it. I think..."I like how you aren't unduly influenced by the opinions of others. I struggle with that sometimes. When everyone rates something 5 stars, I tend to think I must be missing something. Only with books. I'm ruthless with movies, lol . . .at any rate, I appreciate your reviews!
Haha, Anita! I'm ruthless with everything. I'm a very overcritical critic. I'm probably harder on books than movies though because I invest so much more time into a book. Movies I can just say oh well whatever it was bad but it's just a couple hours of my life I'm never getting back again.
Great review! The characters were very difficult to connect with. Even though I liked it more than you did, I expected to have a more emotional reaction to it and was disappointed when I didn't.(I love The Americans! I just finished Season 4 last night.)
Thanks, Taryn! I'm halfway through Season 2 now , and I've heard the show only gets better so I'm looking forward to seeing where it goes. I don't think I'll be caught up in time for Season 5, but I'm trying!
My roommate and I have also been highly let down by these "best of" categories on Goodreads. We seem to be taking turns and letting each other know which books are a letdown. I agree with you on this one. Also, skip the Goldfinch! So much hype, so little happening, so much energy exerted.
Yeah I would say if you aren't into it now, you probably aren't going to like it. It was tough for me to connect with the characters.
I read the first 97 pages the first night. It reminded me of Toni Morrison's books, "Jazz" and "The Bluest Eye": both books were hard to get into, but once I got into the text, I felt submerged (in a good way) into a story. Enjoy is not the word I would use for this book; yet, Colson's imagination and Cora's meaness demonstrate courage.
Thank you for this review. If I'm the only one who can't get into a book, I start to wonder about myself.
Thanks for the friend request! I noticed you're friends with my sister, Julie, so you must have good taste! Yea, as far as Underground Railroad, I'm right there with you. I wanted it to be great, but I felt the same as you - "unattached" to the characters.
Hey! Yeah, actually ran across your review of A Prayer for Owen Meany because she commented on it - so you both have great taste in books! Thanks for the add!
well I probably agree with you mostly....painful and important never the less. Important because criticism when comparing these events to the massive literature and compassion for victumes of the Holocaust and not so much understanding of the lasting affects of slavery. I say this as a decendent of holocaust victums and yet I do thing they compair in the evilness. Slavery being a slo burn as compaired to WWII from 39-45. Not that has anybearing on this book but probably for historical reasons to read it.....Yes I hated the movie that won the academy award last year about that love affair with the fish....forget the title....I had doubts from the beginning
Good review Justin, this book worked for me though - loved it, but always good to read a different opinion :)









