BlackOxford's Reviews > Ragtime
Ragtime
by
by
No One Ever Drove This Fast Before
The most startling thing about Ragtime is the pace of the narrative. It never slackens, even to allow direct speech. It moves relentlessly from place to place, person to person, with non-stop description, assertion, connection, reversal. There are crowds and traffic and excitement wherever you look. If there is temporary equilibrium, it is fragile: a tour boat listing first to starboard then to port; a motor car belching steam at the crest of a hill, a chauffeur bribed to keep his mouth shut.
This is extrovert writing. Active voice. Strong verbs. Present tense. High-frequency transmission. Introspection and interior monologue are almost non-existent. It's like travelling in an empty railway carriage as the scenery of events passes by, with billboards flashing the names of contemporary celebrities: Admiral Peary, Teddy Roosevelt, Stanford White, Freud, Houdini. Not until Bret Easton Ellis's American Psycho will there be more trendy brand names and trademarks in a novel.
What matters in Ragtime is mood, style, spirit. Plot is really the history of the epoch, a new age in America. Character is the making of that history by immigrants and street people and freaks and the new suburbanites and the Robber Barons of Fifth Avenue and Murray Hill. The principle characters are roles not people: Father, Tateh (Yiddish for Daddy), Younger Brother, The Boy. To have a proper name in Ragtime means the character is disposable background used to connect the principle roles to historical events: Houdini comes to the suburban house and exchanges adventure-tales with Father; Evelyn Nesbit, notorious wife of a celebrity-murderer, has an affair with Younger Brother and falls in love with Tateh.
Getting on, moving up, splashing out is what everyone does. Each in their own way dependent on class: insanely opulent parties for the insanely wealthy, polar expeditions for the well-off bourgeoisie, and an outing on the street cars for the proles. Members of each class know almost nothing of those of another, but each celebrates its distinct freedoms to the most they are able. This is the American Way. If it seems heartless or pointless - racist lynchings, destitution, child labour, starvation wages - that's only because you're not part of it. This constitutes the real world: get over it, or go back where you came from, or die: it's called freedom of choice.
Socialism and anarchism come with the immigrants. Agitation is intellectual - plays, lectures, study groups - with an international awareness that would disappear by mid-century. The plays of Ibsen are used to incite the masses as well as provoke police retaliation. Sex is something you discover accidentally for yourself. Unanalysed, it just happens, and you get on with that too, usually badly, and with the still prevailing dire consequences. Assassination is still a common form of transfer of governmental power.
Men still love their non-Oedipal mothers without guilt or shame. Women radicals like Emma Goldman make no distinction between capitalist oppression and patriarchal abuse. Both oppression and abuse have to be eradicated and the corporate system, because neither it nor its universal media yet exist, don't co-opt them as armchair liberals. The automobile is a luxury but that doesn't matter because trams can get you from New York to Boston for a nickel. But probably not if you're Black.
This is a novel of America on the turn, racing to get somewhere else as rapidly as possible. The immigrants want out of New York, the aspiring rubes want in. The national horror of the Civil War has been fictionalised by both sides into an heroic misunderstanding. So much fuss it was and no one could remember what it was about. These labour unions are going to crush this country if we don't crush them first. None of 'em is even American, yet. The only thing more irritating than immigrants is black folk, specially when they start acting like they was white folk.
Europeans may be decadent and always feuding over something silly, but their armies are sufficiently distant not to be a worry. Everything we want is made, or grown, or taken out of the earth right here, or soon will be thanks to Morgan's money and Ford's genius. Anyway the Pacific is easier prey: Hawaii, Guam and the Philippines in the bag already.
Industrialisation has taken an unexpected direction: not the factory-model of England so effectively attacked by Marx, but in the construction of giant corporate cartels controlled by a few hundred financiers. But who’s worried: the American world runs on parallel rails of steel that have no obvious terminus.
Everything after this cultural turn we can recognise as modern America. What happened before is forgotten or mythologised. It might as well be the new creation talked about in the Bible. At least that idea would keep the momentum, the crowds, the traffic, the striving upward, the excitement of 20th century America going; even if the ultimate destination isn't a religious paradise but entirely un-thought and unknown.
Movement is the most important thing. Our legacy, honoured still.
The most startling thing about Ragtime is the pace of the narrative. It never slackens, even to allow direct speech. It moves relentlessly from place to place, person to person, with non-stop description, assertion, connection, reversal. There are crowds and traffic and excitement wherever you look. If there is temporary equilibrium, it is fragile: a tour boat listing first to starboard then to port; a motor car belching steam at the crest of a hill, a chauffeur bribed to keep his mouth shut.
This is extrovert writing. Active voice. Strong verbs. Present tense. High-frequency transmission. Introspection and interior monologue are almost non-existent. It's like travelling in an empty railway carriage as the scenery of events passes by, with billboards flashing the names of contemporary celebrities: Admiral Peary, Teddy Roosevelt, Stanford White, Freud, Houdini. Not until Bret Easton Ellis's American Psycho will there be more trendy brand names and trademarks in a novel.
What matters in Ragtime is mood, style, spirit. Plot is really the history of the epoch, a new age in America. Character is the making of that history by immigrants and street people and freaks and the new suburbanites and the Robber Barons of Fifth Avenue and Murray Hill. The principle characters are roles not people: Father, Tateh (Yiddish for Daddy), Younger Brother, The Boy. To have a proper name in Ragtime means the character is disposable background used to connect the principle roles to historical events: Houdini comes to the suburban house and exchanges adventure-tales with Father; Evelyn Nesbit, notorious wife of a celebrity-murderer, has an affair with Younger Brother and falls in love with Tateh.
Getting on, moving up, splashing out is what everyone does. Each in their own way dependent on class: insanely opulent parties for the insanely wealthy, polar expeditions for the well-off bourgeoisie, and an outing on the street cars for the proles. Members of each class know almost nothing of those of another, but each celebrates its distinct freedoms to the most they are able. This is the American Way. If it seems heartless or pointless - racist lynchings, destitution, child labour, starvation wages - that's only because you're not part of it. This constitutes the real world: get over it, or go back where you came from, or die: it's called freedom of choice.
Socialism and anarchism come with the immigrants. Agitation is intellectual - plays, lectures, study groups - with an international awareness that would disappear by mid-century. The plays of Ibsen are used to incite the masses as well as provoke police retaliation. Sex is something you discover accidentally for yourself. Unanalysed, it just happens, and you get on with that too, usually badly, and with the still prevailing dire consequences. Assassination is still a common form of transfer of governmental power.
Men still love their non-Oedipal mothers without guilt or shame. Women radicals like Emma Goldman make no distinction between capitalist oppression and patriarchal abuse. Both oppression and abuse have to be eradicated and the corporate system, because neither it nor its universal media yet exist, don't co-opt them as armchair liberals. The automobile is a luxury but that doesn't matter because trams can get you from New York to Boston for a nickel. But probably not if you're Black.
This is a novel of America on the turn, racing to get somewhere else as rapidly as possible. The immigrants want out of New York, the aspiring rubes want in. The national horror of the Civil War has been fictionalised by both sides into an heroic misunderstanding. So much fuss it was and no one could remember what it was about. These labour unions are going to crush this country if we don't crush them first. None of 'em is even American, yet. The only thing more irritating than immigrants is black folk, specially when they start acting like they was white folk.
Europeans may be decadent and always feuding over something silly, but their armies are sufficiently distant not to be a worry. Everything we want is made, or grown, or taken out of the earth right here, or soon will be thanks to Morgan's money and Ford's genius. Anyway the Pacific is easier prey: Hawaii, Guam and the Philippines in the bag already.
Industrialisation has taken an unexpected direction: not the factory-model of England so effectively attacked by Marx, but in the construction of giant corporate cartels controlled by a few hundred financiers. But who’s worried: the American world runs on parallel rails of steel that have no obvious terminus.
Everything after this cultural turn we can recognise as modern America. What happened before is forgotten or mythologised. It might as well be the new creation talked about in the Bible. At least that idea would keep the momentum, the crowds, the traffic, the striving upward, the excitement of 20th century America going; even if the ultimate destination isn't a religious paradise but entirely un-thought and unknown.
Movement is the most important thing. Our legacy, honoured still.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Ragtime.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 2, 2017
– Shelved
February 2, 2017
– Shelved as:
to-read
February 5, 2017
–
Started Reading
February 5, 2017
– Shelved as:
american
February 5, 2017
– Shelved as:
jewish
February 6, 2017
– Shelved as:
new-york-city
February 6, 2017
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-41 of 41 (41 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Fionnuala
(new)
Feb 06, 2017 06:05AM
The pace of this review! It never slackens.
reply
|
flag
Fionnuala wrote: "The pace of this review! It never slackens."Phew! I'm exhausted. Have to rest now.
Very impressive, I must say! First of all, it took you less time to read this book than it would have taken for me to type out, much less compose a review this substantial. My main point, though, pertains to your content. I can see why you were short of breath at the end of it. That was quite a torrent of insight and invention! Seems like you were right in phase with Doctorow's wavelength, with a real feel for the times.
Steve wrote: "Very impressive, I must say! First of all, it took you less time to read this book than it would have taken for me to type out, much less compose a review this substantial. My main point, though, p..."Thanks very much Steve. You caught me out. I'm an objective introvert when it comes to reading: I end up mimicking whatever style is in front of me. Add that to Oxford training which essentially means churning out essay-length views on anything under the sun, and there you have it. A somewhat narrow specialisation. Ask me to write a bread and butter letter though and you're out of luck.
You can be honest with me. Are you one of those scholars who writes essays for purchase on the internet? Lazy, incapable students over here pay a small fortune for those things. :-)
Steve wrote: "You can be honest with me. Are you one of those scholars who writes essays for purchase on the internet? Lazy, incapable students over here pay a small fortune for those things. :-)"I wish. Actually I spent most of my adult life in finance, most of which was just about as dishonest. Now that I'm retired, I can just chummy up to books without fear they'll bite back.
David wrote: "Wow that was fun to read. Thanks Michael"Thanks David. It was fun to read as well. Doctorow is a favourite but I never got around to Ragtime until a GR reader told me I was missing out. I had been too.
Wow! Loved this book and loved your exhilarating review! You captured both the spirit and essence of the book! Lately when I take my mother places in the car she had been saying, Those other drivers, they drive too fast. They didn't used to drive so fast - That is America, isn't it? Fabulous review!
Renata wrote: "Wow! Loved this book and loved your exhilarating review! You captured both the spirit and essence of the book! Lately when I take my mother places in the car she had been saying, Those other driver..."I have to steal that quip by your mother: nobody used to drive this fast. That could be the title of the review. Do you mind if I change it? And thanks.
What an era where the past and the future collide with such resounding changes for most people. You've certainly whetted my appetite to dive back into history. This book is just what the Doctor(ow) ordered.
Jeffrey wrote: "What an era where the past and the future collide with such resounding changes for most people. You've certainly whetted my appetite to dive back into history. This book is just what the Doctor(ow)..."Dynamite stuff. He certainly has me looking at turn of the century America differently.
Thanks for yet another wonderful review. I read this one back in the 70s -- my Bantam paperback was printed in 1976 -- and I remember essentially nothing of it, except that I enjoyed reading it at the time.It is apt, considering the title of the novel, that Doctorow quotes Scott Joplin for his epigraph, even though Joplin's words:
Do not play this piece fast,
It is never right to play Ragtime fast
go quite against the rush of Doctorow's prose.
Margaret wrote: "Thanks for yet another wonderful review. I read this one back in the 70s -- my Bantam paperback was printed in 1976 -- and I remember essentially nothing of it, except that I enjoyed reading it at ..."You're right. I too felt that perhaps I'd gotten the wrong end of the stick given the Joplin quote. But then I rationalised it by interpreting it as a warning to the society of the time that THEY were moving to fast. I'm sticking with that.
BlackOxford wrote: "Margaret wrote: "Thanks for yet another wonderful review. I read this one back in the 70s -- my Bantam paperback was printed in 1976 -- and I remember essentially nothing of it, except that I enjoy..."I wasn't thinking you were off, more that the epigraph might be a sly joke.
Stunning review, sorry I haven't seen it before. I'll re-read the novel after I re-read "The Book of Daniel". Also recommend Pynchon's "Against the Day", Chabon's "Kavalier and Clay" and Bellow's "Augie March". I haven't checked whether you've read them.
BO, I really appreciate your review. I feel as though we shared some of the same sense in reading this book. I loved it, while at the same time had no doubt that it did not deserve a full five stars.
Brad wrote: "BO, I really appreciate your review. I feel as though we shared some of the same sense in reading this book. I loved it, while at the same time had no doubt that it did not deserve a full five stars."Better do a review then ;)
Ian wrote: "Stunning review, sorry I haven't seen it before. I'll re-read the novel after I re-read "The Book of Daniel". Also recommend Pynchon's "Against the Day", Chabon's "Kavalier and Clay" and Bellow's "..."Thanks Ian. Yes, I’ve read them all. Great minds.... Eh?
Brad wrote: "BO, I really appreciate your review. I feel as though we shared some of the same sense in reading this book. I loved it, while at the same time had no doubt that it did not deserve a full five stars."Thanks Brad. No doubt about it, we do share an aesthetic. Interesting to discover that. Go GR!
Greg wrote: "BlackOxford, nice review! Brings back memories of having read this. yes, good, solid entertainment."Thanks once again, Greg.
Helen wrote: "Fabulous review! Makes me feel like I am still reading the book."Thank you Helen. I found myself infected by Ragtime. One of the few advantages of being an introvert. 🙄
I relish your reviews, especially when, as is usually the case, we disagree in our assessments -- and even more when we both like a book for reasons that we disagree on (if that makes sense).Thank God we don't all like the same books, how ghastly boring that would be!
Jim wrote: "I relish your reviews, especially when, as is usually the case, we disagree in our assessments -- and even more when we both like a book for reasons that we disagree on (if that makes sense).Thank..."
How true. A pleasure disagreeing with you. From what I can see we’re fairly consistent in our views.
Robert wrote: "I read this years ago. I remember really liking his mixing of real and fictional characters."Thanks for commenting, Robert. I think it may be his best.
Lorna wrote: "Beautiful and incisive review. This was a stunning book."Thank you, Lorna. My favourite of his I think.
Okay, I'm sold. I'll pull out my old, dogeared copy and reread Ragtime. Honestly, since I first read it in high school, a gazillion years ago, I'm pretty sure it'll read differently today. Well, I am the one who is different, so yeah. Anyway, I'm glad to have come across your review...it gave me a necessary nudge. Thanks!
Lori wrote: "Okay, I'm sold. I'll pull out my old, dogeared copy and reread Ragtime. Honestly, since I first read it in high school, a gazillion years ago, I'm pretty sure it'll read differently today. Well, I ..."Glad to help, Lori.
A wonderfully well written book, that still has me mesmerised days later - and a perfectly pacy review. Thank you.
Billy wrote: "A wonderfully well written book, that still has me mesmerised days later - and a perfectly pacy review. Thank you."I think it’s my favourite Doctorow.
Yes I agree heartily that the rapid pace is the dominant feature of the novel. It is also the saving grace of novel desperately needed to move quickly.
Czarny wrote: "Yes I agree heartily that the rapid pace is the dominant feature of the novel. It is also the saving grace of novel desperately needed to move quickly."It is ‘different’ for sure.








