Caroline 's Reviews > Ghost World

Ghost World by Daniel Clowes
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3236194
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: graphic-novel-or-sequential-art, he-wrote-it, ho-hum, memorable-characters, weird, waste-of-trees, zzz

Ghost World is the weirdest and worst graphic novel I’ve read to date. It has no plot and is instead a disjointed collection of scenes centered on two blasé teenagers, Enid and Becky, as they navigate their world. The operative word here is “disjointed.” This graphic novel doesn’t make sense. On the surface, the scenes are snapshots of a life full of superficial arbitrariness. However, I got the distinct impression that I was missing something, that I was too dumb to understand some greater intention. On the other hand, authors should never make their works so nebulous that readers can’t know for sure that they’ve missed something. I’m therefore reviewing Ghost World as is, without trying to puzzle out some deeper meaning, and as is, it’s boring and weird.

Ghost World is memorable for the character of Enid, a domineering, cynical protagonist—but unfortunately not the likable variety of cynical. Author Daniel Clowes’s failed effort to make her likable highlights the tricky nature of crafting such characters. For the reader to warm to them, cynical protagonists have to have some kind of charm or at least be relatable in some way. Enid is neither charming nor relatable (at least for this reader), so her constant unimpressed and snide observations just come off as rude and mean, and that soured me on the entire reading experience.

Clowes’s artistic style is somehow good and awful at the same time. Illustrated in black, white, and light blue, the images look garish. All the characters stand straight as boards and have exaggerated stiff mouths that stay closed despite the speech bubbles. For some reason most of the supporting characters are ugly, sometimes to the point of grotesque. On the positive side, Clowes’s style is precise and neat—and has such a strong signature look that it’s unlikely to ever be mistaken for someone else’s.

As a plotless work, Ghost World has an aimless feel, which I’m sure Clowes intended, but most readers enjoy cohesive stories that have an obvious point. I therefore doubt the average reader of graphic novels will enjoy Ghost World. Those who appreciate experimental work might. For me, unfortunately this was a waste of valuable reading time.
44 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Ghost World.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 6, 2017 – Shelved as: to-read
May 6, 2017 – Shelved
May 6, 2017 – Shelved as: graphic-novel-or-sequential-art
March 30, 2022 – Started Reading
March 30, 2022 –
page 12
15.0%
April 11, 2022 –
page 65
81.25%
April 12, 2022 – Shelved as: he-wrote-it
April 12, 2022 – Shelved as: ho-hum
April 12, 2022 – Shelved as: memorable-characters
April 12, 2022 – Shelved as: weird
April 12, 2022 – Shelved as: waste-of-trees
April 12, 2022 – Shelved as: zzz
April 12, 2022 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Linda (new)

Linda Excellent review. It sounds awful.


Sarah “Waste of trees” — what a great shelf name!

Great review as well. We felt similarly about this one. :( I hope your next read is better!


Caroline Linda wrote: "Excellent review. It sounds awful."

Thanks, Linda. It is. :[


message 4: by Caroline (last edited Apr 13, 2022 08:36AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Caroline Sarah wrote: "“Waste of trees” — what a great shelf name!

Great review as well. We felt similarly about this one. :( I hope your next read is better!"


Haha! I forgot about that shelf, Sarah. I probably need to add more to it. O_O

Fingers crossed for better future reads.


message 5: by ✨ Anna ✨ (new)

✨ Anna ✨ |  ReadAllNight I wondered if this title had anything to do with the movie (which I remember despite never seeing it, memory works in mysterious ways, I guess). It was adapted in 2001, I think, and it looks better than the book sounds.

Also, I just love your reviews, Caroline!


Caroline ✨ Anna ✨ wrote: "I wondered if this title had anything to do with the movie (which I remember despite never seeing it, memory works in mysterious ways, I guess). It was adapted in 2001, I think, and it looks better..."

Thank you for the compliment, Anna! I'm so out of the loop; I didn't realize this had a screen adaptation until I was in the middle of reading (and despite the "Now a major motion picture" announcement on the front. Ugh.) O.O There's so much room for improvement that I'm sure it is better. :/


message 7: by ✨ Anna ✨ (new)

✨ Anna ✨ |  ReadAllNight Caroline wrote: "✨ Anna ✨ wrote: "I wondered if this title had anything to do with the movie (which I remember despite never seeing it, memory works in mysterious ways, I guess). It was adapted in 2001, I think, an..."

You're very welcome.


Jayme Great review :) I wonder how I would have felt about this one if I’d read it as an adult. As a teen, I loooooved this. Clowes was one of the first people making graphic novels and this is the first one I’d ever read. It spoke to my angsty, indie, teenage heart in a big way. I read the book and watched the movie (yes it’s the same with a very young scarlet johanson as becky and steve buscimi as the weird guy, cause obviously) so many times it’s burned into my brain!


Caroline Jayme wrote: "Great review :) I wonder how I would have felt about this one if I’d read it as an adult. As a teen, I loooooved this. Clowes was one of the first people making graphic novels and this is the first..."

Yeah, I think whether one likes it is going to come down to relatability, in part. It just left me cold--and I LOVE cynical characters. I wish there were more in literature.


back to top