The Conspiracy is Capitalism's Reviews > The Radical King
The Radical King (King Legacy)
by
by
What is a “radical”?
“When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint.
When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist.”
-Hélder Câmara. I cannot think of a better quote to distinguish the radical.
--A radical rejects convenient excuses for status quo power structures (unlike The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined) by uprooting the structural beneath surface distractions and proposing alternatives.
The Good:
--MLK is popularized for advocating active nonviolence (see debate in How to Blow Up a Pipeline) during the Civil Rights movement. Ignorance and spectatorship (i.e. Western “democracy” with its theatrical elections amidst capitalist authoritarianism at the workplace, built on capitalism's violent global division of labour) is not nonviolence; it is the acceptance of violence.
--MLK's progression towards radicalism culminated in connecting racism with poverty, militarism, and materialism; we can more directly use the terms:
i) “capitalism”: the endless accumulation of private money-power requires dispossession of other social relations, ex. enclosures privatizing the Commons to commodify (buy-sell; “materialism”) land, creating the land market, which the dispossessed have nothing left to sell but their labour (labour market). Historically, capitalism has been the culprit of mass social dislocation (The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time) and mass poverty (Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present; conveniently pushed to Global South slums). MLK was assassinated during the “Poor People's Campaign”.
ii) “imperialism”: capitalism's violence holding together the global division of labour/resources. MLK protested against the most visible manifestation, the US's genocidal war on Vietnam.
...The FBI correctly marked MLK as a radical threat:
--While MLK’s analysis of capitalism, Liberalism, Marxism, Socialism, and Communism evolves throughout his lifetime, a pillar of his methodology is radical love. With a basis in his religious background and subsequent inspiration in Gandhian nonviolence (another topic to critically unpack: The Doctor and the Saint: The Ambedkar - Gandhi Debate), the principles of radical love are surprisingly challenging. To attack evil but not attack the individual (let us add the recognition of many levels of contradictions in the messy real world), to win the understanding of the opposition and transform their moral disposition to build community, these can seem utopic when confronted with real world violence. The cycle of violence can seem so inevitable it leaves one to wonder how we ever find empathy, peace, truth, justice and reconciliation.
The Missing:
-- I'd like to see more synthesis between:
i) editor Cornel West's works: ex.Race Matters
ii) pioneering sociologist W.E.B. Du Bois. who also started as a liberal reformist and became radicalized as a communist/anti-imperialist internationalist)
iii) today's radical historian Gerald Horne, as well as case studies from progressive liberals (The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America) to more radical economics/histories (The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism, Empire of Cotton: A Global History). Also, RIP bell hooks: Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism.
--MLK's roots were organizing at home, but his protest of the US war on Vietnam reveals the direction and recognition of capitalism's global and imperialist nature, something recognized by Malcolm X (Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention) and especially the Black Panther Party (Black Against Empire: The History and Politics of the Black Panther Party). We must expand this synthesis to the struggles of decolonization, especially the hidden economic structures (unequal “free trade” imperialism, deindustrialization, colonial taxes, foreign currencies/debt traps, intellectual property monopolies, imperialist finance of free capital movement while labour is restricted by militarized borders, etc.):
-Vijay Prashad on imperialism's ideological censorship and exportation of violence: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS...
-overview: The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions
-Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism
-economic intro: The Agrarian Question in the Neoliberal Era: Primitive Accumulation and the Peasantry
-economic dive: Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present
-history intro: Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations
-history dives: The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World
-The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South
-Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World
“When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint.
When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist.”
-Hélder Câmara. I cannot think of a better quote to distinguish the radical.
--A radical rejects convenient excuses for status quo power structures (unlike The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined) by uprooting the structural beneath surface distractions and proposing alternatives.
The Good:
--MLK is popularized for advocating active nonviolence (see debate in How to Blow Up a Pipeline) during the Civil Rights movement. Ignorance and spectatorship (i.e. Western “democracy” with its theatrical elections amidst capitalist authoritarianism at the workplace, built on capitalism's violent global division of labour) is not nonviolence; it is the acceptance of violence.
--MLK's progression towards radicalism culminated in connecting racism with poverty, militarism, and materialism; we can more directly use the terms:
i) “capitalism”: the endless accumulation of private money-power requires dispossession of other social relations, ex. enclosures privatizing the Commons to commodify (buy-sell; “materialism”) land, creating the land market, which the dispossessed have nothing left to sell but their labour (labour market). Historically, capitalism has been the culprit of mass social dislocation (The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time) and mass poverty (Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present; conveniently pushed to Global South slums). MLK was assassinated during the “Poor People's Campaign”.
ii) “imperialism”: capitalism's violence holding together the global division of labour/resources. MLK protested against the most visible manifestation, the US's genocidal war on Vietnam.
...The FBI correctly marked MLK as a radical threat:
“I am trying to get at the roots of it to see just what ought to be done.” [...]
“Are we integrating into a burning house?” [...]
It is no accident that just prior to King’s death, 72 percent of whites and 55 percent of blacks disapproved of his opposition to the Vietnam War and his efforts to eradicate poverty in America. When much of the black leadership attacked or shunned him, King replied, “What you’re saying may get you a foundation grant but it won’t get you into the kingdom of truth.”
--While MLK’s analysis of capitalism, Liberalism, Marxism, Socialism, and Communism evolves throughout his lifetime, a pillar of his methodology is radical love. With a basis in his religious background and subsequent inspiration in Gandhian nonviolence (another topic to critically unpack: The Doctor and the Saint: The Ambedkar - Gandhi Debate), the principles of radical love are surprisingly challenging. To attack evil but not attack the individual (let us add the recognition of many levels of contradictions in the messy real world), to win the understanding of the opposition and transform their moral disposition to build community, these can seem utopic when confronted with real world violence. The cycle of violence can seem so inevitable it leaves one to wonder how we ever find empathy, peace, truth, justice and reconciliation.
The Missing:
-- I'd like to see more synthesis between:
i) editor Cornel West's works: ex.Race Matters
ii) pioneering sociologist W.E.B. Du Bois. who also started as a liberal reformist and became radicalized as a communist/anti-imperialist internationalist)
iii) today's radical historian Gerald Horne, as well as case studies from progressive liberals (The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America) to more radical economics/histories (The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism, Empire of Cotton: A Global History). Also, RIP bell hooks: Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism.
--MLK's roots were organizing at home, but his protest of the US war on Vietnam reveals the direction and recognition of capitalism's global and imperialist nature, something recognized by Malcolm X (Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention) and especially the Black Panther Party (Black Against Empire: The History and Politics of the Black Panther Party). We must expand this synthesis to the struggles of decolonization, especially the hidden economic structures (unequal “free trade” imperialism, deindustrialization, colonial taxes, foreign currencies/debt traps, intellectual property monopolies, imperialist finance of free capital movement while labour is restricted by militarized borders, etc.):
-Vijay Prashad on imperialism's ideological censorship and exportation of violence: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS...
-overview: The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions
-Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism
-economic intro: The Agrarian Question in the Neoliberal Era: Primitive Accumulation and the Peasantry
-economic dive: Capital and Imperialism: Theory, History, and the Present
-history intro: Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations
-history dives: The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World
-The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South
-Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Radical King.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 16, 2017
– Shelved
May 30, 2018
–
Started Reading
June 3, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
robin
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jan 07, 2022 02:39PM
Good review. I read this book and also rated it highly. I think it important to recognize the radical character of the later King, in any event, as well as the more sanitized version. The two may not be separable. People who emphasize the radical King, such as Cornel West, do so because they think that is the part of King's vision and legacy that should be followed. I am not at all sure. The point for me is to get a more complete understanding of where he was coming from, maybe with different emphases at different times, and not to forsake critical thought. King deserves that as much as any other thinker or figure.
reply
|
flag
message 2:
by
The Conspiracy is Capitalism
(last edited Jan 07, 2022 09:34PM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
robin wrote: "Good review. I read this book and also rated it highly. I think it important to recognize the radical character of the later King, in any event, as well as the more sanitized version. The two may n..."Cheers Robin, old review so had to re-write haha. For sure, I agree it's important to add in the reformist side (reminded of Roy's critical essays on Gandhi/Mandela/MLK). Side note:
On a personal level, I'm not interested in focusing too much on individuals, let alone idolizing them. Heck, I'm cautious of meeting people I look up to because I expect a let down; we individuals are full of contradictions.
On a societal level, I am more lenient. I have a similar stance with religion, where I was raised with "god" as nonexistent (atheist? agnostic?), but I can empathize with others raised differently and the role of spiritual/community/ancestral connections. That doesn't mean I'm uncritical of mass religion; it just means I leave a wider space for what others might find inspiring/meaningful (more thinking of Cornell West's "radical love" communication style).
I quite like the nonviolence perspective (surprise surprise) and even worked with it as a theoretical perspective in my BA thesis (interviewed two former neo-nazis to explore processes of exiting extremist environments). I think what makes the principle (in this case of 'radical love') challenging, at least for a western audience, is that it does not operate on a dualist and empiricist ontology. For example, Buddhism (what I follow, but the same ofc. hold true for other Indian/Nepali/Tibetan/etc. systems of thought) has 'non-self' as a core principle and can with that distinguish between the conditioned layer of a person (e.g. identity, ideology, etc.) that is in this case considered evil (King being a devout Christian embedded the principles o nonviolence within the themes of good & evil, while Gandhi preferred 'truth force', or Satya). However, a human is still considered pure and good at her core. It's a framework that tears down borders and dualism, which is highly conflictual to our current globalised world of nation-states and property rights (and ontology, as mentioned above). I also think what you are saying about the systemic decolonisation perspective is crucial. The civil rights movement is an illuminating example of how social movement demands can eventually be institutionalised and how it can be partly co-opted. The South Africa liberation movement is another good example of this (wherein much of the political-economical power relations remained intact). The same goes for the second-wave feminist movement, which sought to challenge the paradigmatical foundations of the workplace but whose efforts mostly resulted in introducing women to yet another sphere of (capitalist) exploitation (the workplace). The foundations of the system must also be changed and challenged, not just introduced to new elements (or skin colours or genders). (However, I’m oversimplifying to make my point).
Gustav wrote: "I quite like the nonviolence perspective (surprise surprise) and even worked with it as a theoretical perspective in my BA thesis (interviewed two former neo-nazis to explore processes of exiting e..."Oh neat, lots to unpack from your insights. The "non-self" core sparks numerous thoughts. Ex. treatment of addiction ("In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts") in terms of unconditional love/empathy in treatment separating the individual from their/one's own behaviors + recognizing the functions of addiction to self-medicate from trauma in this messy world and social dislocation. Not a surprise religion/spirituality is part of the 12 step program etc.
"Extremist environments" is definitely not a niche topic if we consider imperialism's military/security forces; I keep thinking there needs to be more engagement with anti-war veterans of the Smedley Butler crowd, as they seem to slide easily into Ron Paul Libertarianism (war = "Government"; it's tricky when one's government is an empire).
Decolonization brings up a messy topic regarding the "nonviolence" of MLK/Gandhi/Mandela, who had heated disputes with other revolutionaries regarding tactics within each of their contexts. I'm reminded of Parenti's "Let Us Now Praise Revolution" chapter in "Blackshirts and Reds", in particular "The Costs of Counterrevolution" and "Whose Violence?". I need to read Domenico Losurdo's "Non-Violence: A History Beyond the Myth", have you read it?
Kevin wrote: "Gustav wrote: "I quite like the nonviolence perspective (surprise surprise) and even worked with it as a theoretical perspective in my BA thesis (interviewed two former neo-nazis to explore process..."'Non-self' is definitely a useful concept for addiction. It's also interesting in terms of what notions of individual agency can arise from it. An individual is here assumed to have the capacity to transcend ways of indoctrinated thinking and structures, which renders her a product of, but irreducible to them. Still, this is not about surrendering to a higher power, rather about self-transcendence as mentioned, so I am not sure how comparable it is to the 12-step program (although my knowledge of it is limited) :)
Did not quite follow your comment on extremist environments. Would you mind clarifying?
I have read neither Parenti nor Losurdo, but they both sound interesting! I've been meaning to revive my interest in the nonviolence literature since I became more interested in social movement theory and theories of social change.
Unsolicited interjection regarding (revolutionary) violence: This is a great addition - https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
message 7:
by
The Conspiracy is Capitalism
(last edited Jan 10, 2022 01:32PM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Gustav wrote: "Kevin wrote: "Gustav wrote: "I quite like the nonviolence perspective (surprise surprise) and even worked with it as a theoretical perspective in my BA thesis (interviewed two former neo-nazis to e..."12 step: fair, I'm more following Gabor Mate's adaptation which synthesizes "surrendering to a higher power" with "self-transcendence". Step 3 (Decision to turn our will & lives to the care of god): "Higher power" could be higher spiritual values, which one surrenders to as one tries to transcend the past-conditioned ego which one has built so much of their identity around. Mate also refers to Buddhism (which I'm less familiar with; embarrassed to say I've probably read more of Sam Harris on this topic then anything else smh). And I can see the uses of "God" as a common story to build community/mutual aid.
Extremist environments: I just mean neo-nazi can seem niche, but if we consider imperialist security forces (military, police, contractors, private militias) then such analysis has broad application.
message 8:
by
The Conspiracy is Capitalism
(last edited Jan 10, 2022 01:42PM)
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Maggie wrote: "Unsolicited interjection regarding (revolutionary) violence: This is a great addition - https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2..."Never unsolicited and always apt :) I definitely need to learn more on this, including the stereotypical start with Fanon which I set aside, Churchill's "Pacifism as Pathology", and case studies like Hinton's "Fanshen: A Documentary of Revolution in a Chinese Village".
Gustav wrote: "Kevin wrote: "Gustav wrote: "I quite like the nonviolence perspective (surprise surprise) and even worked with it as a theoretical perspective in my BA thesis (interviewed two former neo-nazis to e..."RE: Buddhism and treatment of addiction: found a book with a foreword by the addiction specialist I follow (Gabor Maté): "Eight Step Recovery: Using the Buddha's Teachings to Overcome Addiction"
