Furrawn's Reviews > The Great Alone
The Great Alone
by
by
Warning, I usually write quirky lyrical bits about a book. This is going to be more of a rant. There might be accidental spoilers so steer clear if that will bother you.
Again: SPOILERS though not clear spoilers.
Ok. I truly hated this formulaic flat stereotypes-everyone book. I LOVED The Nightingale. Made everyone I know read it. I thought The Nightingale hung the moon and stars. I was excited beyond words for the release of The Great Alone.
The Good:
The first few pages were great... Further into the book, the descriptions of the Alaskan landscape will move you and make you feel like you are standing there with the chill and snow kissing your face. The actual writing and turns of phrase are still beautiful in most places.
The Bad:
The book put a bad taste in my mouth almost immediately. Repeatedly, Hannah writes about Vietnam vets, alcoholism, PTSD, wife beating, etc as stereotypes. There’s no honest depth to the characters except Leni. Reading this book makes you think that ALL traumatized war vets become monsters. Ernst is a total worthless human being. Whatever he was before the Vietnam War, he comes back as a monster. There’s a brief nod to something a “shrink” once mentioned to him. Otherwise, there’s zero psychological or social support. Why was Ernst not seeing a therapist? Instead, he chose to be a raging alcoholic and to beat his wife and later his child. This is a choice. Plenty of war vets make other choices even though they’ve been through hell. NOT ALL THOUGH. The battered wife. I’ve known and worked with battered women. Most of them would have left an abusive husband over the rabbit heart. Most battered women will take abuse but will find the strength to leave the husband if he hurts their kids.
NOT ALL THOUGH.
That’s the thing. The book takes the worst case scenario for EVERY character. Every single character, even Leni, is the least of the best possibilities.
You know Job? Well, that’s Cora and Leni. It’s simply not believable. It’s like a formula for a bestseller. I feel like for the “bad thing happens that must be overcome” part of the fiction novel formula, there was a list about a mile long:
Vietnam War vet
PTSD
Mean
Extreme poverty
Pregnant at sixteen
Daughter will also be pregnant in high school.
Battered wife
Battered Daughter
Crazy preppers
Homesteading difficulties
Runaway
Fall off a cliff
Severe brain damage
Alcoholism
Murder
Cancer
Oh. Also, multiple times Hannah mentions Alaska and how people worship “weirdo Gods” there.I get that Alaska means you can be yourself. Hannah manages to make it sound like a lot of them are crazy. Idk. I doubt they are any crazier than the crazies in the lower forty-eight. She also writes about the flip side- the community spirit. Still, if I was from Alaska, I’d feel I was portrayed like a cartoon drawing.
Hannah piles on catastrophe after catastrophe.
How could she write The Nightingale and then this? I just am gobsmacked. It’s like two different writers... though the writing is always beautiful.
I read this overwrought mess of a book to the end. I’m sorry I did. I’d be happier dealing with my quiet guilt at an unfinished book than with my internal feelings of pervasive yuckiness over having read this book.
Just. No.
Again: SPOILERS though not clear spoilers.
Ok. I truly hated this formulaic flat stereotypes-everyone book. I LOVED The Nightingale. Made everyone I know read it. I thought The Nightingale hung the moon and stars. I was excited beyond words for the release of The Great Alone.
The Good:
The first few pages were great... Further into the book, the descriptions of the Alaskan landscape will move you and make you feel like you are standing there with the chill and snow kissing your face. The actual writing and turns of phrase are still beautiful in most places.
The Bad:
The book put a bad taste in my mouth almost immediately. Repeatedly, Hannah writes about Vietnam vets, alcoholism, PTSD, wife beating, etc as stereotypes. There’s no honest depth to the characters except Leni. Reading this book makes you think that ALL traumatized war vets become monsters. Ernst is a total worthless human being. Whatever he was before the Vietnam War, he comes back as a monster. There’s a brief nod to something a “shrink” once mentioned to him. Otherwise, there’s zero psychological or social support. Why was Ernst not seeing a therapist? Instead, he chose to be a raging alcoholic and to beat his wife and later his child. This is a choice. Plenty of war vets make other choices even though they’ve been through hell. NOT ALL THOUGH. The battered wife. I’ve known and worked with battered women. Most of them would have left an abusive husband over the rabbit heart. Most battered women will take abuse but will find the strength to leave the husband if he hurts their kids.
NOT ALL THOUGH.
That’s the thing. The book takes the worst case scenario for EVERY character. Every single character, even Leni, is the least of the best possibilities.
You know Job? Well, that’s Cora and Leni. It’s simply not believable. It’s like a formula for a bestseller. I feel like for the “bad thing happens that must be overcome” part of the fiction novel formula, there was a list about a mile long:
Vietnam War vet
PTSD
Mean
Extreme poverty
Pregnant at sixteen
Daughter will also be pregnant in high school.
Battered wife
Battered Daughter
Crazy preppers
Homesteading difficulties
Runaway
Fall off a cliff
Severe brain damage
Alcoholism
Murder
Cancer
Oh. Also, multiple times Hannah mentions Alaska and how people worship “weirdo Gods” there.I get that Alaska means you can be yourself. Hannah manages to make it sound like a lot of them are crazy. Idk. I doubt they are any crazier than the crazies in the lower forty-eight. She also writes about the flip side- the community spirit. Still, if I was from Alaska, I’d feel I was portrayed like a cartoon drawing.
Hannah piles on catastrophe after catastrophe.
How could she write The Nightingale and then this? I just am gobsmacked. It’s like two different writers... though the writing is always beautiful.
I read this overwrought mess of a book to the end. I’m sorry I did. I’d be happier dealing with my quiet guilt at an unfinished book than with my internal feelings of pervasive yuckiness over having read this book.
Just. No.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Great Alone.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 13, 2018
– Shelved
February 13, 2018
– Shelved as:
to-read
March 5, 2018
–
Started Reading
March 5, 2018
–
3.0%
"It’s very good. I was worried that it couldn’t possibly hold its own against something as singular and stellar as Nightingale, but it is holding its own!
Already, I don’t want to put it down."
Already, I don’t want to put it down."
March 5, 2018
–
6.0%
"“Alaska isn’t about who you were when you headed this way. It’s about who you become. You are out here in the wild, girls. That isn’t some fable or fairy tale. It’s real. Hard. Winter will be here soon, and believe me, it’s not like any winter you’ve ever experienced”
Sounds wonderful to me..."
Sounds wonderful to me..."
March 8, 2018
–
22.0%
"I have to say that I’m annoyed at the way “preppers” are portrayed as being crazy. Alaskans and Southerners have always been preppers. As for thinking about whether there’s another World War, the Doomsday Clock is run by SCIENTISTS. I’m just pointing out that a crazy person can be crazy about ANYTHING."
March 8, 2018
–
25.0%
"I am not a supporter of putting warnings on books. I feel like warnings on books can rob us of resiliency which is crucial to being a strong adaptable person. Having said that, there’s a hunting scene with a rabbit that’s hard to take. Also, most people with PTSD do not turn into monsters. Personality, resilience, love, and choices matter a lot."
March 8, 2018
–
28.0%
"I don’t know what to think about this book. Part of me completely hates this book. Maybe that’s the point. To feel trapped like the protagonist. Effective. I still am hating this book. I’m staying with it because Hannah is an amazing writer."
March 8, 2018
–
60.0%
"Multiple times in the book it says things like ““Alaska was full of fringe-ists. People who believed in weirdo things and prayed to exclusionary Gods.” Instead of freedom, she makes it sounds like they’re all fruitcakes. If I was from Alaska, I’d be pissed. I still despise this book."
March 8, 2018
–
Finished Reading
September 22, 2018
– Shelved as:
terrible-horrible-no-good-books
Comments Showing 1-50 of 191 (191 new)
message 1:
by
KAS
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Mar 08, 2018 06:32PM
Thanks for your total honesty, Furrawn! As the wife of a military veteran, the PTSD angle had me seething. I also have loved many of this author’s books and thought “The Nightingale” was phenomenal. I sure hope her next release is a another great read for both of us :)
reply
|
flag
Hi, KAS. Thank you. I was pretty shocked at some of the portrayals of things like PTSD in the book. They seemed so shallow, one-sided, and unreal...not at all like The Nightingale. Like you, I hope her next book is back to The Nightingale standards for us both:)
Agree 100% on all of your points. Just a truly absurd book and really surprising and disappointing because I too enjoyed The Nightingale.
I’m with you, Megan. If the writing wasn’t still gorgeous, I’d think a different writer wrote this book.
I love most of KH's books BUT you are right, as an Alaskan now relocated to Washington, I have some real problems with her portrayal of Alaskans and Homer area. Did she s lend any time there or do any research? First of all not all people there are nut jobs or quirky or preppers. The climate she describes is more like the interior or Arctic, not central Alaska. Winters are cold and snowy but not as severe as she makes it seem. There is much more but I won't go on. Just don't take this book as gospel about Alaska.
@Charlotte My dad adored Alaska and visited there many times. I think he secretly would have loved to live there. I haven’t been to Alaska yet , but it’s at the top of my list. I adored Eowyn Ivey’s book! I don’t know if she spent time in Alaska as research for her book. I have a feeling she didn’t. It’s far too full of stereotypes. It seems more as if the book is what she THINKS Alaska is rather than her experience of Alaska. It’s sad. How are you liking Washington? Missing the snow?
I couldn’t get over the errors! A Cowichan sweater is not warm enough to go out in during the winter, a VW van is not starting in the temperatures described without being plugged in, Leni becomes an expert shot in record time, etc. Don’t even get me started on the PTSD, battered wife, alcoholic stereotypes...
I agree, Erin. Each time I looked something up, I found errors. It made me crazy. I just don’t understand. Nightingale was incredible.
Absolutely, Fran! I know that a lot of people loved this book, but I’m just not one of them... There are so many wonderful books out there, including books by this very author... I’ve read multiple awesome books since The Great Alone and am in the middle of an amazingly written book about Churchill.
Furrawn wrote: "Absolutely, Fran! I know that a lot of people loved this book, but I’m just not one of them... There are so many wonderful books out there, including books by this very author... I’ve read multiple..."Enjoy! :D
Working at the circulation desk at a library, this book has past through my hands many times, the cover is lovely to behold, yet something keeps preventing me from checking it out myself. I am really glad you were so honest in your appraisal of this book - I won't be tempted any more.
Hi, Almira. I know a lot of people have loved it. Most, in fact. I just couldn’t. Usually I summon up my negative capability powers a la Keats, but I just couldn’t manage with this book. The writing is beautiful though. Have you read The Nightingale?
Furrawn wrote: "Hi, Almira. I know a lot of people have loved it. Most, in fact. I just couldn’t. Usually I summon up my negative capability powers a la Keats, but I just couldn’t manage with this book. The writin..."No, I haven't read the Nightingale. Worth IT?
It went on & on & on.. Going nowhere! Don't people edit any more! Like removing the middle 200 pages that repeat the same thing over & over???? Had to skim huge chunks, and I'm sure I missed nothing!
I agree with you. Having visited Alaska, I could appreciate the wonderful descriptions. I couldn't understand why the author felt she had to throw in all the adventures, love interests, social issues, crime, etc, This book never seemed to end. In "My Antonia", Willa Cather did a far superior job of combining descriptions of early life on the Nebraska plains with a much simpler, cleaner storyline.
I haven’t read My Antonia, but I just added it to my TBR list. I know it’s a classic. You make it sound too wonderful to miss.
I read My Antonia in high school ( MANY years ago!). I just read it for the second time and it made me remember why I loved it so much the first time.
Definitely can be read alone. In fact, I haven't read O! Pioneers which is the first book of the trilogy.
This book didn't grab me....in fact, at one point, I completely forgot it was Kristin Hannah writing it. It was that boring and just plain bad. I kept reading thinking maybe it was just me, I needed to read a little more, etc. But after 196 pages and still being incredibly bored, I decided to let Overdrive take the ebook back. I have too many other books to read to waste any more time. Truly disappointed. Nightingale was an amazing book. There was NOTHING even remotely as good about this book.
Thanks for reviewing it. I'm having different problems with it than you mention, but the sense that I'm forcing myself to continue out of respect for The Nightingale is shared. I came looking for a poor rating to find out if it's just me. I'm only on page 54, but I've struggled with close to a dozen passages already. I may have to devote the rest of my time with this book detailing the complaints I had in those first four chapters for the benefit of others, and likely resign myself to not finishing this book.
Thanks for your great review. I felt the same way. I loved The Nightingale. This book, well written, had characters that were despicable. And not the type that make a story interesting. It was just too mean, too thin, too awful for anyone to STAY in the situation. Again, thanks and I look forward to the next KH book. I'm not going to give up on her yet.
Thank you!! I was happy to see someone agree. It was cliche on top of repetitive cliche! I love a lot of her books, but this one was just not good.
Your last paragraph on your review made it worth sloshing through the end of the book to read the reviews. Hilarious!
I agree with your review word for word. So disappointing! Like watching a bad soap opera! I skimmed through the last 1/4 of the book & only finished it for a book club. I have The Nightingale on my bookshelf to read but having second thoughts now.
I agree! I have generally enjoyed the author’s other books. But this? No. I was disappointed in it, to say the least.
Seeing all of the four star ratings given to this melodramatic mess made me question myself. Reassuring to discover that others agree with me. I definitely found that attributing Ernst’s meanness to his war experiences was gratuitous and insulting to veterans.
I’m halfway through and have invested time in the book, so I want to finish it. However, I’m so angry at the major characters, and how Ernt is allowed to get away with his violence by everyone around him, like warnings are enough? This aspect of the story and how it’s impacting Leni is disturbing.
Jenf wrote: "This book was awful!I've never read Hannah before. Should I try the Nightingale?"
I didn't like this book at all and The Nightingale is one of my all time favorites!!!
I got to the middle of this book and quit. It didnt catch me and I tried very hard for it too. I agree when you say "How could she write The Nightingale and then this?" My thoughts 100%! The Nightingale was a phenomenal book that will stay with me forever. The characters were likable unlike this book.
I so agree with you!!Also find the evolution of the characters' life unrealistic .Too much drama for my taste.After reading and loving the "Nightingale" and seing so many 3 and 4 stars reviews i was more than excited to buy and read this book,but unfortunately it disappointed me.
Ok. This review makes me feel so much better about quitting. I can’t deal with such a slow moving train wreck of a situation.
Appreciate all your comments. Thoroughly agree. My first Hannah book & I’ve been really struggling with it, finding it vapid & uncompelling & unconvincing. I haven’t been able to connect with any of the characters - it’s just so cliched - it perhaps doesn’t help that concurrently I’ve been reading The God of Small Things. The brilliance & incisive depth & literary genius of this work perhaps by contrast, make it impossible for this insipid novel to stack up? I guess it seems really naive & unsophisticated - have been listening to it as an audio - perhaps the narration isn’t helping either - anyway your comments absolve me from any sense of having to endure it further. Thanks
This is the most accurate review I've found for this book. I was completely shocked that it had such high ratings. Like many, I was disgusted by her portrayal of PTSD. It felt like she googled the symptoms and used the first few that popped up.
The Nightingale is one of my all time favorite books & the first of hers that I read. Then I read Angel Falls-- could not believe it was the same author ! Wildly unrealistic & soap opera-ish. Just glad I read your review -- won't waste my time or money on this one !
I agree, couldnt wait for it to end! Tedious flat boring characters, soap opera plotline. Made worse by "reading" it as an audio book where the repetitive Momma Momma Babygirl Momma dirge made me want to scream.
I don’t think you were supposed to like Ernst... how boring would a book be if there were protagonists?








