Nataliya's Reviews > 11/22/63
11/22/63
by
by
Nataliya's review
bookshelves: stephen-king, 2012-reads, favorites, i-also-saw-the-film, 2022-reads
Dec 03, 2011
bookshelves: stephen-king, 2012-reads, favorites, i-also-saw-the-film, 2022-reads
Read 2 times. Last read July 10, 2022 to July 28, 2022.
2012: Go ahead, book snobs. Proclaim haughtily that Stephen King is not Literature. I shall retort with a Pratchett quote,
"Susan hated Literature. She'd much prefer to read a good book."
And nobody argues with Sir Terry.
As you probably guessed from the not-too-spoiler-sensitive title, 11/22/63 is a book about time travel. My love for it is an exception rather than a rule - you see, I am not usually a fan of the Grandfather paradox. Speaking of which:
(By the way, this trip to the past gives plenty of deeeeee-licious 'Easter Eggs' to King's Constant Readers. We see little echoes from Pennywise the Clown era in Derry, meet our favorite 1958 Plymouth Fury (Hellllloooo there, Christine!), and even get a nod to A Wizard and Glass with Takuro Spirit.
And the reverse applies to the idyllic town of Jodie in which Jake is finally able to feel that he actually LIVES in the past. Deep down under the beauty and quaintness lies the ugly little reality. And the same remains true for the Land of Ago, the glorious past of absent airport security, no cholesterol warnings, and everyone happily puffing their way to lung cancers. The 1950s-60s are described with sweetness and nostalgia, but King never hesitates to bluntly remind the reader that the past has teeth and it's not afraid to bite.
King is an excellent writer and an amazing storyteller. His writing is effortless and natural, the characterization is apt and memorable, and the dialogue superb and real-sounding. I truly felt for Jake during each step of his journey. I loved how Oswald was described as not a villain or a nutcase but a flawed broken little man who stumbled into the middle of events that changed history. The other characters - Sadie, Deke, Ellie, Frank Dunning - were so well-written that I could feel them come to life (which actually can be a scary statement when the world of sai King is concerned). The story, despite its sizable length, was flowing along and never lost my attention. And his slow build-up of the sense of suspense and doom - think The Yellow Card Man (*) and jimla and the 'harmonizing past' - was just enough to keep me on the edge of my seat throughout the book.
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Pardon me for using this moth-eaten cliche, but Stephen King is like good wine - his writing gets better and better as he ages. Some may consider The Stand his masterpiece (to his dismay - who wants to think he's already reached the peak of his writing career three decades ago???), but I think this book along with “IT” may be it.
5 stars without hesitation for this excellent impossible-to-put-down book. Sai King, I will continue to be your Constant Reader for hopefully many more years to come, Capital-L Literature or not.
——————
——————
2022: Rereading my enthusiastic thoughts from a decade ago almost makes me feel like a time traveller myself. Many things have changed since then, but my sincere love for this book remains the same. It’s still wonderful, still so well-written and engaging, and I am thankful to King for being able to bring me that happiness that reading a good book can give you.
Still unwavering 5 stars.
![]()
(Since 'a picture is worth a thousand words', the above is a three-thousand-words summary of this book. Impressive, no? And also - “dancing is life”.)
As you probably guessed from the not-too-spoiler-sensitive title, 11/22/63 is a book about time travel. My love for it is an exception rather than a rule - you see, I am not usually a fan of the Grandfather paradox. Speaking of which:
“Yeah, but what if you went back and killed your own grandfather?"As the title proceeds to shamelessly tells us, the book deals with the assassination of John F. Kennedy (and if the title fails to convey the message, then hopefully you - like yours truly - have Google-pedia'd it. Hey, don't judge, I was born in Eastern Europe). Anyway, it's another of Stephen King's 'what if?' situations. What if you could go through a 'rabbit-hole' to the past? Would you try to change history for the better, would you try to right the wrongs? Well, who wouldn't??? And so Jake Epping, an English teacher, sets out to spend half a decade in the past to prevent the assassination of JFK (and to figure out whether Lee Harvey Oswald was indeed the lone gunman that day, despite all the conspiracy theories).
He stared at me, baffled. "Why the fuck would you do that?”
"As I flipped to the back, I kept seeing that double take. And the grin. A sense of humor; a sense of the absurd. The man in the sixth-floor window of the Book Depository had neither. Oswald had proved it time and again, and such a man had no business changing history."The question is - what would have happened had JFK survived the assassination that day in Dallas? Would we still have Vietnam War, race riots, and Martin Luther King's death? Could the lives of many innocent people be spared? Could JFK lead the country into a better future? Jake believes so. But what if the past resists the change? What is the price of changing the past?
“Even people capable of living in the past don't really know what the future holds.”
"The past is obdurate for the same reason a turtle’s shell is obdurate: because the living flesh inside is tender and defenseless."This book again dispels the long-believed but mistaken axiom that Stephen King is "just a horror writer" - of a spook and startle variety. No, in the traditional sense he is not. He knows that the true monsters are those that live inside every one of us (and, ahem, occasionally in Derry, Maine). He has created his own brand of psychological suspense - with the brilliant and scary insight into the minds of average everyday people (who all have some darkness inside them and a skeleton or two in the closet - sometimes quite literally) superimposed onto the masterful description of small towns themselves (eerily resembling sentient living creatures, determined to hold on to their dark secrets). (*) And we get plenty of these in this book, as Jake's quest to prevent that fateful shot in November in Dallas takes him along the way to the small towns of Derry, Maine and Jodie, Texas.
* I have an irrational fear of living in a small town, thanks to Stephen King. What if it turns out to be another Derry or Castle Rock?! *shudder*
![]()
(By the way, this trip to the past gives plenty of deeeeee-licious 'Easter Eggs' to King's Constant Readers. We see little echoes from Pennywise the Clown era in Derry, meet our favorite 1958 Plymouth Fury (Hellllloooo there, Christine!), and even get a nod to A Wizard and Glass with Takuro Spirit.
“On that gray street, with the smell of industrial smokes in the air and the afternoon bleeding away to evening, downtown Derry looked only marginally more charming than a dead hooker in a church pew.”Derry of 1958 (right after the terrifying events of IT) is particularly repulsive and sinister. It's a small wonder Jake is able to continue his quest after starting in such an ominous place. But even there King manages to include some unexpected beauty - just remember Richie and Bevvy dancing.
And the reverse applies to the idyllic town of Jodie in which Jake is finally able to feel that he actually LIVES in the past. Deep down under the beauty and quaintness lies the ugly little reality. And the same remains true for the Land of Ago, the glorious past of absent airport security, no cholesterol warnings, and everyone happily puffing their way to lung cancers. The 1950s-60s are described with sweetness and nostalgia, but King never hesitates to bluntly remind the reader that the past has teeth and it's not afraid to bite.
King is an excellent writer and an amazing storyteller. His writing is effortless and natural, the characterization is apt and memorable, and the dialogue superb and real-sounding. I truly felt for Jake during each step of his journey. I loved how Oswald was described as not a villain or a nutcase but a flawed broken little man who stumbled into the middle of events that changed history. The other characters - Sadie, Deke, Ellie, Frank Dunning - were so well-written that I could feel them come to life (which actually can be a scary statement when the world of sai King is concerned). The story, despite its sizable length, was flowing along and never lost my attention. And his slow build-up of the sense of suspense and doom - think The Yellow Card Man (*) and jimla and the 'harmonizing past' - was just enough to keep me on the edge of my seat throughout the book.
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Pardon me for using this moth-eaten cliche, but Stephen King is like good wine - his writing gets better and better as he ages. Some may consider The Stand his masterpiece (to his dismay - who wants to think he's already reached the peak of his writing career three decades ago???), but I think this book along with “IT” may be it.
"Is there any phrase more ominous than you need to see exactly what you’ve done? I couldn’t think of one offhand."-----------------------------
5 stars without hesitation for this excellent impossible-to-put-down book. Sai King, I will continue to be your Constant Reader for hopefully many more years to come, Capital-L Literature or not.
"If there is love, smallpox scars are as pretty as dimples."
——————
——————
2022: Rereading my enthusiastic thoughts from a decade ago almost makes me feel like a time traveller myself. Many things have changed since then, but my sincere love for this book remains the same. It’s still wonderful, still so well-written and engaging, and I am thankful to King for being able to bring me that happiness that reading a good book can give you.
Still unwavering 5 stars.
2192 likes · Like
∙
flag
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
11/22/63.
Sign In »
Quotes Nataliya Liked
Reading Progress
December 3, 2011
– Shelved
March 29, 2012
–
Started Reading
March 30, 2012
–
10.0%
"Stephen King can write. Beautifully. So far I'm loving every page of this book."
March 30, 2012
–
18.0%
"This book makes me want to re-read "IT". Derry in 1958 - not a pretty sight. Love King's writing!"
March 31, 2012
–
32.0%
"I'm afraid to go to sleep tonight - the town of Derry will be definitely haunting my dreams. Curse your imagination, Mr. King!"
April 1, 2012
–
47.0%
"Hairstyles change, and skirt lengths, and slang, but high school administrations? Never."
April 1, 2012
–
85.0%
"As I flipped to the back, I kept seeing that double take. And the grin. A sense of humor; a sense of the absurd. The man in the sixth-floor window of the Book Depository had neither. Oswald had proved it time and again, and such a man had no business changing history."
April 2, 2012
–
94.0%
"Is there any phrase more ominous than you need to see exactly what you’ve done? I couldn’t think of one offhand."
April 2, 2012
–
Finished Reading
July 10, 2022
–
Started Reading
July 10, 2022
–
7.0%
July 12, 2022
–
12.0%
July 16, 2022
–
27.0%
"“I stood there for maybe three seconds, half in the present and half in the past. Then I opened my eyes, saw Al’s haggard, anxious, too-thin face, and stepped back into 2011.”
—————
A decade later, and I’m still entranced. King can write magic."
—————
A decade later, and I’m still entranced. King can write magic."
July 16, 2022
–
27.0%
"“I stood there for maybe three seconds, half in the present and half in the past. Then I opened my eyes, saw Al’s haggard, anxious, too-thin face, and stepped back into 2011.”
—————
A decade later, and I’m still entranced. King can write magic."
—————
A decade later, and I’m still entranced. King can write magic."
July 21, 2022
–
38.0%
July 21, 2022
–
41.0%
July 22, 2022
–
43.0%
July 24, 2022
–
68.0%
July 28, 2022
–
91.0%
July 28, 2022
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 247 (247 new)
message 1:
by
Megs ♥
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 29, 2012 09:18PM
Ahh! This book is ah-maz-ing! I hope you love it too. :-)
reply
|
flag
It seems like the reviews of this book are overwhelmingly positive. I am a big fan of Mr. King, and given his prolific writing he has produced remarkably few "duds" (Insomnia, Tommyknockers, and Desperation are pretty much it). I think his writing is like good wine - getting better and better as he ages :)
I agree with you Nataliya, i've heard really positive stuff about the book and want to read it. I'm a big fan of King's work (specially duma Key and Pet sematary) and thought the concept of this book was cool. I'm looking forward to your Review.
Great review!!! I'm taking a break from SK but I'll be sure to check this out in the near future. :)
Nataliya, this is an awesome review, and my favorite that I've read so far!!!! You've hit on everything I loved about it, and I agree, I do think King is aging like a fine wine -- though I tend to see him more as a bottle of aged Scotch :)
I want to read this SO badly. I also adored your Pratchett quote. I'm so sick of book snobs turning up their noses at me because I actively seek out King books.
great review! I am dying to read this book I just hate that it is so expensive. I heard this is one of his best books.
Megan wrote: "great review! I am dying to read this book I just hate that it is so expensive. I heard this is one of his best books."Thanks, Megan. I thought it was one of his best. I got my copy from a library - I really can't afford buying all the books I like (small things like rent and food tend to get in the way).
Nataliya wrote: "Megan wrote: "great review! I am dying to read this book I just hate that it is so expensive. I heard this is one of his best books."Thanks, Megan. I thought it was one of his best. I got my copy..."
I know right? I wish books could provide nourishment cause I spend way to much money on food haha. I think that is probably what I will end up doing but my stack of books to read is already too large and libraries tempt me too much especially when I hit the Stephen King section.
King was my very first adult reading experience and I will defend him as a credible literary figure until the day I die. Consider me an ally!
I used to judge books by the number of quotes I copied from the pages. I had a lot from King's books. Is that not literature ~ food for thought, shaping opinions, forming ideas. King took common fears, turned them into long, horror stories, which seems to be great literature to me. But then I am only a bit of a snob.
Based on what you said, I would not call you a snob ;) King is definitely literature since his books have an impact on the readers. and if my old college professors did not agree with me - oh well, who cares if I still get to enjoy wonderful books?And yes, King is insanely quotable, isn't he?
I have lost interest in King's stories after IT; they did not frighten me, and many of them fell totally flat (apart from The Green Mile). So I must confess I have not read any of his later novels. But I am still a fan, because of mindblowing works like The Shining and Carrie.Stephen King is a serious writer: the fact that he writes ghost stories does not make him somehow "lesser". If ghosts spoilt "Literature", what would happen to Hamlet? ;)
Heh, that's an awesome Hamlet-related argument! I will definitely need to remember that one!As for the 'scary factor' - I don't read Stephen King because I want to be scared (I'm too much of a wuss for that; scared is just a side effect, I guess). I read him because I think he's a good writer. His works are becoming a little harder to digest since they are getting longer and longer and longer as he ages, and therefore tend to drag a bit. But 11/22/63 does stand out.
I consider horror, when seriously pursued, as a form of literature. I am not talking about Gorefest, but the creeping psychological horror that has you thinking about your own mortality. King considers this the highest form of horror, and I agree with him.I still remember reading Dracula (in translation) when I was in fourth grade: the shudders, and the sense of delicious nightmare in the small hours. Any writing that influence one like that has to be literature.
Nandakishore wrote: "I consider horror, when seriously pursued, as a form of literature. I am not talking about Gorefest, but the creeping psychological horror that has you thinking about your own mortality. King con..."I fully agree with you! The conventional gore does not ever make me scared, just mainly disgusted as well as occasionally startled. But not afraid. The psychological band of scary that King uses is of an entirely different kind. It's the anticipation, the fragility of human souls, and, just like you said, realization of your own mortality and vulnerability that 'gets' the reader in his books. He does not startle, instead he terrifies you by making you think about unsettling and creepy things.
That's why I think so many of the movies based on his books were terrible. His emphasis on the psychological instead of plain gore does not usually translate well to the screen.
Great review - you made me think I should actually read this - but if I did you'd have to read Libra....
Thanks, Paul. Question - what's Libra and why is it (I presume) awesome? Convince me and maybe I'll read it ;)
it's Don DeLillo's version of the JFK assassination - here's my review...http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
and by the way, there's a guy writing for the Guardian in England who is rereading ALL of Stephen king week by week...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/...
Okay, I added it to my ever-growing TBR pile and will check it out at some point. Your review convinced me to give it a shot (no pun intended).Thanks for the link to the Guardian reread!
Love this review. I downloaded this a while back but haven't started it. Need something unputdownable :-)
Missy wrote: "Love this review. I downloaded this a while back but haven't started it. Need something unputdownable :-)"I hope you'll read it and love it! Some people did say that it dragged a bit in the middle, but I loved all parts of this book, including the slower moving ones. I love when King takes a breather and develops the settings and characters without rushing into events at the breakneck speed.
Mosca wrote: "Really good review, Nataliya!This is the first Stephen King I have ever decided to read."
Thanks, Mosca! I think you will enjoy this one. It's an atypical example of a King work, honestly :)
I think J.D Salinger is a good book. So is anything from Dickens. So is anything by Thomas Hardy.I don't think a good book and good literature have to live in exclusive counties. They can be both IMO.
Not that my literary opinions mean diddly. I'm a Paramedic and only have 7 college credits in creative writing and literature.
I like books that get medical information correct. And they're more rare than anyone would know. The only books I've read in which the medical information excites me are books by Robin Cook. He teaches me things I didn't know. I wish more doctors knew how to write fiction.
Vicki wrote: "I like books that get medical information correct. And they're more rare than anyone would know. The only books I've read in which the medical information excites me are books by Robin Cook. He teaches me things I didn't know. I wish more doctors knew how to write fiction."In this case, you can try Cutting for Stone by Abraham Verghese or A Country Doctor's Notebook by Mikhail Bulgakov. They both get medical facts right since they both are/were doctors.
I'm currently reading it, and I totally love it! If King maintains this kind of awesomeness all the way through, I'll probably become a die-hard fan on this book alone.
Jocelyn wrote: "I'm currently reading it, and I totally love it! If King maintains this kind of awesomeness all the way through, I'll probably become a die-hard fan on this book alone."I think he does. Some people felt that things got a bit sluggish about 3/4ths through, but I still found it very enjoyable.
I really enjoyed your review and all of the references to other S. King's stories. I also share your fear of living in small towns -- I know they are all filled with scary people and entities just like in Derry. Hey, I should write a book about that!
Stacie wrote: "I really enjoyed your review and all of the references to other S. King's stories. I also share your fear of living in small towns -- I know they are all filled with scary people and entities just..."Thanks, Stacie!
Michael wrote: "Although I'm a big King fan I didn't want to read this until I read your review. Niche pics btw."Thanks! And I'm glad this review has served its purpose :)
Terry Pratchett is hardly the writer to quote when it comes to literature. This is a decent read, but far from the perfection these comments should lead you to believe. King is a very talented writer, and is the best at what he does, which is play it right down the middle. This novel would have benefitted from a few more risks taken on Mr King's part, but that would likely alienate his fan base.
Geoffrey wrote: "Terry Pratchett is hardly the writer to quote when it comes to literature. This is a decent read, but far from the perfection these comments should lead you to believe. King is a very talented wri..."Really? What is wrong with quoting Pratchett about literature? I think he is an excellent writer, with truly amazing sense of humor in addition to pure talent - but I guess I can safely assume that you don't share my admiration of his writing.
As for this book - I loved it, and so the level of enjoyment I got from it overshadowed all the flaws. I can only speculate how it would have turned out had he taken more risks as you suggest - but then we'll never know. I never really felt that he was playing it safe - but, then, the idea of what that means clearly varies from reader to reader. I think we can make this statement about pretty much any book out there, however.
I do not like horror, but I zipped through most of this avidly in one day (the second day was Much harder), skipping ubiquitous malevolent personalities lurking in buildings. Your choice of images is PERFECTION. I tried adding gifs, but words are challenge enough. Path to Negro "facilities" and swing dancing are terrifically relevant. Why does King harp on "Dancing is Life" motto? Seemed like the only positive life-affirming theme?
I got my copy at the library ..." Library IS a necessity of life, after rent - who needs breakfast? (Too many more books and authors out there to stockpile already read.)
AnEyeSpy wrote: "I do not like horror, but I zipped through most of this avidly in one day."That's probably because no matter how publishers choose to market King's books, this one is anything but horror.
Paul wrote: "except for a hundred pages in there the horror of slight to moderate boredom"Which ones are you talking about? I think I was so enthralled with this book that I didn't find any of it boring.
I took Paul's "horror of boredom" as tongue-in-cheek, meaning utter enthrallment? King does add supernatural - malevolent personalities look through building windows, and blow two houses away in an "angry wind".
AnEyeSpy wrote: "I took Paul's "horror of boredom" as tongue-in-cheek, meaning utter enthrallment? King does add supernatural - malevolent personalities look through building windows, and blow two houses away in a..."I like this interpretation ;)












