Tim's Reviews > The Tombs of Atuan

The Tombs of Atuan by Ursula K. Le Guin
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
7202176
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: 1970s, fantasy, reviewed

2/19/21 - I'm editing my review. It may seem odd to edit a review for a book I read over two years ago without a reread, but I've noticed whenever I talk fantasy with my friends, I use this book as an example of perfect world building. It's one of those rare novels that the more I think about it the more perfect it becomes. I have no strong desire to revisit the first or third book, but this one may actually go on my favorites shelf.
_____

If you read my review of the previous novel, A Wizard of Earthsea, you will know I was not enamored with it. You will note that I did not say it was bad, far from it. I respected the hell out of that book for many of the things it did, but I did not personally care much for it. I went ahead and read the second book because I felt like, to a certain extent, I must be missing something. I think it is no exaggeration to say that Earthsea is one of the most loved Fantasy series, having clearly inspired many works and having endured strong since the late 60s. What was it that captured imaginations but did no more than gently tap mine? Was it the younger reader aspect? Was this a series that one needed to read at a young age and then let nostalgia keep fresh?

It is at times like this that I actually hate that our star rating is listed before the review, as anyone with a casual glance can say, “Yes Tim, enough with the dramatics, we can see the four (now FIVE) stars. Tell us why you liked this one better.” *Sigh* Star ratings just have no flare for the dramatic.

Yes, I liked this one better. A lot better. Where I respected the first book, I couldn’t say that I found it enjoyable. This one I can say both. This one is something of a masterpiece in my eyes. This one corrects literally every issue I had with the last. Here we get to know our characters more personally; we are let into their lives rather than kept at a distance. There is far more development than “I was an arrogant kid and then grew up” (yes, I know that’s a slight exaggeration… but not much of one). Here I actually really cared about what was going on.

The book is short, at only 212 pages in my edition. This works both in its favor and against it. On one hand, the story, if we really get down to it, could be summed up in a few sentences. Really, not much goes on from a plot assessment. In fact, if we only focus on plot, the book could have ended something like 20 pages earlier from a traditional narrative perspective. I will even confess that as I read the last two chapters, I had a metaphoric raised eyebrow wondering why the hell we were getting essentially an extended epilogue. Was this really needed?

Oh, my… yes, yes it was. The first book was a hero’s journey. A lesson learned, darkness vanquished, let’s go home triumphant. This one is almost entirely an internal struggle with a fantasy story happening around it. This is the story of someone who has literally lost everything, including her name, and seeing if she’s willing to lose what little security she has for, not the guarantee, but the mere possibility of something better. This is an emotional story, and one presented in a “young adult” friendly fashion, while letting those of us who are older see the darker side, the story told from the shadows and between the lines. The ending section, in my opinion, is what heightens the entire story aspect and raises it to that minor masterpiece status.

Now, ignoring this, I would still say I liked this book better, even if it didn’t have the emotional impact (though I assure you, I’m so very glad it did). Why? World building. The world of the previous novel was interesting, but with the second book Le Guin cemented herself as one of the best in terms of world building. She expands upon concepts mentioned in the previous book and plays with them in interesting ways. This one takes place on a different island, in a different country and as such we see a completely different perspective. We see the world through other eyes with a vastly altered view from the previous book. The world is built up in so many interesting, but small ways, such as the rituals in the temple performed, but never fully explained, as much of the reasons for them have been lost to time. I complained in my last review that the book seemed almost like a textbook, too distanced, now I almost feel like I would happily read a full history of the world presented here.

And that my friends, is the highest compliment I can give a fantasy novel in terms of world building.

5/5 stars and my highest possible recommendation.
122 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Tombs of Atuan.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 21, 2018 – Started Reading
November 21, 2018 – Shelved
November 24, 2018 –
page 138
73.8% "Already significantly more interesting than the first book in my opinion."
November 26, 2018 – Shelved as: 1970s
November 26, 2018 – Shelved as: fantasy
November 26, 2018 – Shelved as: reviewed
November 26, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Charles (new)

Charles Most folks having read this as a sprog I can see you need to back-fill your fantastical reading list? 🧐


message 2: by Jane (new) - added it

Jane Well, Tim, you make me a bit more hopeful about re-attempting this series. I know I read A Wizard of Earthsea because it was required reading for a university course I took. But I cannot remember actually reading it, and my only impression remaining is how much I disliked it. But everyone loves it, so I've been determined to retry, so much so that I even bought the audiobook.

Knowing that it leads somewhere awesome with (if I understand correctly?) a tough chick, makes me more optimistic about it all. (Though maybe not quite rainbow-puppy optimistic.)


message 3: by Tim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tim Jane wrote: "Knowing that it leads somewhere awesome with (if I understand correctly?) a tough chick, makes me more optimistic about it all. (Though maybe not quite rainbow-puppy optimistic.)
"


Tough may not be the right word for her, at least not in the physical sense, but a very interesting character with multiple layers and a fascinating psychological dilemma, absolutely.

I stand by not being a big fan of the first, but I like how this one almost re-examines the first from another point of view. Ged is not the hero here, and indeed would not be viewed as a hero at all from most of the points of view in this book. This is a wonderful exercise in world building and showing how others would view the world. If the series progresses in a similar pattern, it may make me re-evaluate the first, as it may very well have set up something quite special while seemingly giving a fairly standard hero's journey.

I would say if you do indeed re-attempt it, make sure you read at least the second before giving up again. :)


message 4: by Jane (new) - added it

Jane Tim wrote: "I would say if you do indeed re-attempt it, make sure you read at least the second before giving up again. :) "

Maybe I'll make 2019 the year of the retry! Inner tough counts just as much as outer strength in my book :)


message 5: by Tim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tim I genuinely would like to see your reactions to these (I put books 3 and 4 on order and plan on continuing soon as well). I remind you, that though I really liked this, I too was not a fan of the first. :)


message 6: by Jane (new) - added it

Jane Lol -- noted. :) I think I have about 5 other books lined up before I can get to it, so it likely won't be until mid-January or so. But between the old copy I've got kicking around from uni, and the brand spanking new audio version, I should be able to make it through the first book (blechy or not).


Aurora YES! So agree with this! I first read this book when I was eleven and I loved it. I read the others in the trilogy and didn't feel the same ping on my very soul (really, that's what this book was for me). I've re-read this one so many times, sometimes just for the world-building.


message 8: by Tim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tim Thank you for the comment Aurora, glad others see the series the same way. I honestly wish I would have read these when I was younger instead of in my 30s. I think I would have enjoyed the other two books more back then... that said, I think it is a testament to how good this one is that I think it's a book that is practically perfect no matter what age.


message 9: by Vicky (new)

Vicky "phenkos" Tim, I so love your reviews! You have this ability to put into words what I think but do not actually say (or do not say very well)! I loved the series when I read it but that was years ago now and I don't remember it very well. Out of curiosity, how do you think The Earthsea series compares to the Harry Potter phenomenon?


message 10: by Tim (last edited Feb 28, 2021 06:49AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tim Vicky wrote: "Tim, I so love your reviews! You have this ability to put into words what I think but do not actually say (or do not say very well)! I loved the series when I read it but that was years ago now and I don't remember it very well. Out of curiosity, how do you think The Earthsea series compares to the Harry Potter phenomenon?"

Thank you!

Now that is an interesting comparison! It's difficult for me personally because some of Rowling's recent comments outside of literature has... shall we say, soured the series a bit for me. That said, I think Le Guin was better in terms of creating an entire world and imparting significant messages (without feeling too preachy). She also was clever at subverting reader and publisher expectations (I love that a person of color is the lead in the first book, but because she knew if it was noticed by the publishers it likely would be altered, she never describes it and shows it through the strange attackers invading his land with their strange pale skin he'd never seen before). I think Le Guin is significantly a better author all around.

That said, I think Rowling created a more entertaining series. I say this in the same sense that something like Guardians of the Galaxy is a more entertaining than say Tarkovsky's Solaris. Guardians is far more fun, but Solaris is easily the better crafted and intelligent film (I actually love both movies, so that's not a knock against either). With that though, much like the Rowling/Le Guin comparison, Guardians/Marvel is a pop-culture phenomenon, whereas Solaris, while well loved, doesn't have quite the name recognition.


message 11: by Vicky (new)

Vicky "phenkos" Thanks for your thoughts! I like the Solaris/Guardians comparison, partly because Solaris is one of my favourite films and partly because I agree that Le Guin is the better author. Her Left Hand of Darkness was, in a my view, an entirely innovative book concerning gender, and the Earthsea series was rich and complex (although, as I said, I don't remember the plot terribly well). That said, I do appreciate your point about the entertaining value of Harry Potter, and yes, I can see the appeal.


message 12: by Tim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tim Ah, this leads to confession time, I've actually not read Left Hand of Darkness or any of Le Guin's Hainish Cycle. In fact, all I've read by her is the first three Earthsea books.


message 13: by Vicky (new)

Vicky "phenkos" Ok, confession time: to my shame, I haven't read 'Those Who Walk Away From Omelas' although I take it it's probably her most influential piece (and I have it on my computer hd somewhere...).😒 I haven't read the Hainish cycle either. But I've read her The Left Hand of Darkness twice and both times it blew my mind! Again, it's a book I haven't revisited recently, so it may be a bit dated given the recent eruption in gender studies, but in 1969 when it was written it was quite ahead of its time!


message 14: by Nick (new) - rated it 4 stars

Nick Totally agree with this review. Much more interesting than the first, if only in terms of character development. Masterful.


Holly Fantastic review, you've convinced me to continue on in the series!


message 16: by E2c (last edited Nov 13, 2022 01:29PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

E2c The entire series - by which I'm referring to Tehanu and the books after that - is worth reading, IMO. They all differ quite a lot, not least b/c Le Guin was a young woman when she wrote the 3 original Earthsea books, and then was in late middle age when Tehanu and her other Earthsea books were published. (Mild spoiler: Tenar plays a key role in them.)

I read the 3 original books when they 1st came out. This one has always been my least favorite of the 3, b/c the setting and atmosphere is, i think, deeply oppressive. That said, i do really like Tenar and her narrative voice.

Ged definitely appeals to me more, partly b/c he's a master mariner. And the books (in the original 3) that feature him tend to have a very expansive feel per setting, as they take place under the open sky, for the most part.

Le Guin was a master of spare, economical prose, yet the cadences in all of these books - the rhythm of many of the sentences - are like poetry (more along the lines of Shakespeare's use of blank verse, though, certainly not rhyming, unlike many types of poetry).

You might enjoy the early books in her Hainish cycle. The Left Hand of Darkness (also a Hainish novel) is pretty fascinating, too, and one of her best, i think.

FWIW, there really was nothing else like these books when they 1st came out. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis' Narnia books were the sum total of "fantasy" at that time. I think Le Guin took the genre in a whole new direction, not least in her creation of Tenar, and of this book. Also FWIW, i think Ged is the protagonist of the 1st book, not the hero per se, nor did Le Guin intend him to be heroic (IMO). Tenar, OTOH, really *is* heroic.


Joshua Marshall I give your review 5 stars. :)


back to top