Nataliya's Reviews > In an Absent Dream
In an Absent Dream (Wayward Children, #4)
by
Sometimes you can’t help but feel that you don’t belong in the world you were born into. Too much may be expected of you, or too little, or everything is just a bit of wrong and you don’t even realize it until you get a glimpse of the world where those subtle wrongs are replaced with undeniable sense of rightness. So what do you do? You’d like to think you’d abandon the wrong mundane and bravely step into the brave new world that is yours? Leave the old wrong world behind like a set of discarded clothes and never look back? But can you really be sure? Really really sure?
Or would you, a serious and thoughtful and logical person, stop and think really hard - about what it means to be sure, about the weight of your choice, about the painful need to extend your choices, have it both ways, find a loophole?
If you read the lovely Every Heart a Doorway by Seanan McGuire, you already know what happens to a serious and thoughtful girl Lundy who one day went through a strange door and ended up at the Goblin Market , where “everything was lovely, and everything was terrible.” It was a place or rules and consequences and penalties, and above it all, strict uncompromising fairness. You know how her story - and even her life - ends. You know that she tried to cheat, to have it all, to not - in the words of the Market itself - give a fair value. We know she suffered a cruel punishment and lost her world. We know there is no happy ending.
This is the story of what happened.
I liked the first and only book of ‘Wayward Children’ series that I read - McGuire’s Every Heart a Doorway. It was sweet and lovely, and I never felt the need to look deeper into this world, until this year I decided to read all the Hugo awards nominees - and lo and behold, this sequel/prequel In an Absent Dream was promptly featured. I figured I’ll fly through it, short as it is, and move on.
I did not expect to like it so much — better than the first one, certainly. I did not expect to actually care about the story whose conclusion I already knew and did not care that much about. And yet care I did.
This is a stronger book than its predecessor — and that’s not because I’m at all enamored with the series. It’s less syrupy and sweet — instead, banking on us already know the inevitable unhappy ending, it basks in bittersweetness and unexpected sharp edges and teeth (or maybe beaks and claws?) and provides a bit of a mean bite. A book asking its heroine to be *sure*, it does seem to have a much more sure footing than its predecessor does — perhaps a benefit of an author that over the years became much more sure herself?
We — or at least I do — like protagonists who are similar to what Katherine Lundy is — serious, thoughtful, deliberate, bookish and reasonable; the ones that stop to think of the consequences and weigh their decisions and make smart educated choices. Perhaps it’s because that’s what many of us, bookworms, lean towards and are. These are the children than can get overlooked in favor of those who conform easier and provide easier delight and seem to be the world’s darlings. I wanted Lundy to succeed so badly while knowing that it was not in the cards for her. And despite knowing the outcome in advance, it still broke my heart.
There are things that you can’t take back. There are decisions that will always have consequences and you can’t wish them away. There’s not always a magical door waiting for you in the end to take you back to where you actually belong. And that’s terrible and cruel — and apparently a really good book.
4.5 stars.
I’d be painfully lost in the Goblin Market, by the way.
———————
My Hugo and Nebula Awards Reading Project 2020: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
by
“You forgot that sometimes, fair value comes from change, and death, and sacrifice. You can’t have everything and give fair value.”
Sometimes you can’t help but feel that you don’t belong in the world you were born into. Too much may be expected of you, or too little, or everything is just a bit of wrong and you don’t even realize it until you get a glimpse of the world where those subtle wrongs are replaced with undeniable sense of rightness. So what do you do? You’d like to think you’d abandon the wrong mundane and bravely step into the brave new world that is yours? Leave the old wrong world behind like a set of discarded clothes and never look back? But can you really be sure? Really really sure?
Or would you, a serious and thoughtful and logical person, stop and think really hard - about what it means to be sure, about the weight of your choice, about the painful need to extend your choices, have it both ways, find a loophole?
“The Market does love me. It loves us all. It just ... loves the rules more. It doesn’t let any of us break them. It punishes us when it has to, because the rules have to be for everyone if they’re going to be for anyone.”![]()
If you read the lovely Every Heart a Doorway by Seanan McGuire, you already know what happens to a serious and thoughtful girl Lundy who one day went through a strange door and ended up at the Goblin Market , where “everything was lovely, and everything was terrible.” It was a place or rules and consequences and penalties, and above it all, strict uncompromising fairness. You know how her story - and even her life - ends. You know that she tried to cheat, to have it all, to not - in the words of the Market itself - give a fair value. We know she suffered a cruel punishment and lost her world. We know there is no happy ending.
This is the story of what happened.
“Home always shrinks in times of absence, always bleeds away some of its majesty, because what is home, after all, apart from the place one returns to when the adventure is over? Home is an end to glory, a stopping point when the tale is done.”
I liked the first and only book of ‘Wayward Children’ series that I read - McGuire’s Every Heart a Doorway. It was sweet and lovely, and I never felt the need to look deeper into this world, until this year I decided to read all the Hugo awards nominees - and lo and behold, this sequel/prequel In an Absent Dream was promptly featured. I figured I’ll fly through it, short as it is, and move on.
I did not expect to like it so much — better than the first one, certainly. I did not expect to actually care about the story whose conclusion I already knew and did not care that much about. And yet care I did.
“There is wanting and there is needing, and when you want, you can make good choices, but when you need, it’s important the people around you not be looking to take advantage. When there are no clear prices, only the nebulous idea of ‘fair value,’ people get hurt. People get cheated.”
This is a stronger book than its predecessor — and that’s not because I’m at all enamored with the series. It’s less syrupy and sweet — instead, banking on us already know the inevitable unhappy ending, it basks in bittersweetness and unexpected sharp edges and teeth (or maybe beaks and claws?) and provides a bit of a mean bite. A book asking its heroine to be *sure*, it does seem to have a much more sure footing than its predecessor does — perhaps a benefit of an author that over the years became much more sure herself?
“This, then, was Katherine Victoria Lundy: pretty and patient and practical. Not lonely, because she had never really considered any way of being other than alone. Not gregarious, nor sullen, but somewhere in the middle, happy to speak when spoken to, happy also to carry on in silence, keeping her thoughts tucked quietly away. She was ordinary. She was remarkable.”
We — or at least I do — like protagonists who are similar to what Katherine Lundy is — serious, thoughtful, deliberate, bookish and reasonable; the ones that stop to think of the consequences and weigh their decisions and make smart educated choices. Perhaps it’s because that’s what many of us, bookworms, lean towards and are. These are the children than can get overlooked in favor of those who conform easier and provide easier delight and seem to be the world’s darlings. I wanted Lundy to succeed so badly while knowing that it was not in the cards for her. And despite knowing the outcome in advance, it still broke my heart.
There are things that you can’t take back. There are decisions that will always have consequences and you can’t wish them away. There’s not always a magical door waiting for you in the end to take you back to where you actually belong. And that’s terrible and cruel — and apparently a really good book.
4.5 stars.
I’d be painfully lost in the Goblin Market, by the way.
“The Goblin Market had seemed like a beautiful adventure on her first visit, a place where the rules made sense and the penalties were fair. Then it had become something terrible, a place where friends could die and not come back. Maybe the truth was somewhere in the middle of those two things, but now she understood how much there was to lose, and she was afraid.”
———————
My Hugo and Nebula Awards Reading Project 2020: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
In an Absent Dream.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
January 14, 2019
– Shelved
June 19, 2020
–
Started Reading
July 19, 2020
–
10.0%
"“Children are capable of grasping complex ideas long before most people give them credit for, wrapping them in a soothing layer of nonsense and illogical logic. To be a child is to be a visitor from another world muddling your way through the strange rules of this one, where up is always up, even when it would make more sense for it to be down, or backward, or sideways.”"
July 20, 2020
–
29.0%
July 21, 2020
–
32.0%
"“I’m sorry,” she wailed. “I’m sorry, I’m so sorry. I won’t go back, I won’t.”
She was lying, of course. But she wouldn’t understand that for two more years.”"
She was lying, of course. But she wouldn’t understand that for two more years.”"
July 21, 2020
–
47.0%
"“There is wanting and there is needing, and when you want, you can make good choices, but when you need, it’s important the people around you not be looking to take advantage.”"
July 21, 2020
–
51.0%
"“The Market does love me. It loves us all. It just ... loves the rules more. It doesn’t let any of us break them. It punishes us when it has to, because the rules have to be for everyone if they’re going to be for anyone.”"
July 21, 2020
–
53.0%
"“Home always shrinks in times of absence, always bleeds away some of its majesty, because what is home, after all, apart from the place one returns to when the adventure is over? Home is an end to glory, a stopping point when the tale is done.”"
July 21, 2020
–
68.0%
"“Why do you have to take her away from me if I bring her back?”
“I don’t. I won’t. Not even the Market will. But she’ll take herself, and if you accept that fact now, it will be part of the payment, and she’ll owe you nothing when she goes.”"
“I don’t. I won’t. Not even the Market will. But she’ll take herself, and if you accept that fact now, it will be part of the payment, and she’ll owe you nothing when she goes.”"
July 21, 2020
–
89.0%
"“You forgot that sometimes, fair value comes from change, and death, and sacrifice. You can’t have everything and give fair value.”"
July 21, 2020
–
99.0%
July 21, 2020
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Melissa
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jul 22, 2020 10:32AM
And your review is equally as wonderful as mine, Nataliya -- if not, more so. I'm so glad you loved In An Absent Dream. It's my favorite of the series, so far. :)
reply
|
flag
Melissa wrote: "And your review is equally as wonderful as mine, Nataliya -- if not, more so. I'm so glad you loved In An Absent Dream. It's my favorite of the series, so far. :)"Thank you, Melissa! I really liked this one - against all of my expectations. I plan to tackle McGuire’s Middlegame next to complete my Hugos nominees reading list, and now I’m actually excited given how wonderful this one was.
Nataliya wrote: "Melissa wrote: "And your review is equally as wonderful as mine, Nataliya -- if not, more so. I'm so glad you loved In An Absent Dream. It's my favorite of the series, so far. :)"Thank you, Melis..."
Great minds think alike. I am also planning to read Middlegame soon, probably within my next five reads. It will be the first time I have read anything by McGuire that is non-Wayward Children. We will have to swap thoughts. :)
Great minds do think alike indeed ;)I haven’t read anything else by her (or by her other literary persona) either other than Wayward Children, so I’m curious to see if she has the same writing style in her other works as well.
I love her wayward children stories, the others less. The deep was some sort of horror, the others belong to different niches. Btw I've started reading a Russian father daughter duet fantasy writers if you can call ppl living in California Russian, the Dyachenko's : Sergev and Marina.
PyranopterinMo wrote: "I love her wayward children stories, the others less. The deep was some sort of horror, the others belong to different niches. Btw I've started reading a Russian father daughter duet fantasy writer..."Hmm, I’m more curious now. I like when authors can venture into different genres and keep it fresh (Mieville is always a good example for this).
I looked up Dyachenkos - it appears that they have been quite prolific. I’m surprised I haven’t heard of them before, but I don’t reach much Russian SF, I guess.
Tadiana ✩Night Owl☽ wrote: "This might be my favorite book of the whole series."It’s really good! I only read the first book in the series prior to this one, and that one was cute and sweet and I enjoyed it - but this one was so much stronger and much more sure of its footing.
Tadiana ✩Night Owl☽ wrote: "The second book is great - I'd definitely recommend that one."Is it the one about Jack and Jill? Because I did like Jack in the original story.
Yes, it's a prequel to the first book (like this one, in fact). I was actually surprised how much I liked it. Jack and Jill are also the main characters in the most recent one, Come Tumbling Down. It's worth reading though I didn't like it quite as well.
Tadiana ✩Night Owl☽ wrote: "Yes, it's a prequel to the first book (like this one, in fact). I was actually surprised how much I liked it. Jack and Jill are also the main characters in the most recent one, [book:Come Tumblin..."
Maybe I’ll try those two then, since I found Jack and Jill to be most interesting in the original story.
I find it interesting how polarized my friends' responses to this one are! It's the most somber of all the Wayward Children books, and the sense of inevitable loss - only Lundy of all the children seems genuinely attached to her home world - is palpable throughout. It spoke to me more than the other books in the series.
Jennifer wrote: "I find it interesting how polarized my friends' responses to this one are! It's the most somber of all the Wayward Children books, and the sense of inevitable loss - only Lundy of all the children ..."Hmm, looks like my GR friends overwhelmingly had positive responses to this one. You are right - it’s definitely somber and the foreboding is palpable — and that’s exactly where it’s strengths are.

