Trevor's Reviews > The Autobiography of Malcolm X

The Autobiography of Malcolm X by Malcolm X
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
175635
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: biography, history, race, religion

I’m going to be fairly critical of this Malcolm X in this review – although that makes me feel a bit uncomfortable, because I really think you should read this book and reflect on his life. And I think you should read this because this book is a great read. I mean, it’s a fast-paced story told extremely well by someone I think is being often painfully honest about his own life. Now, obviously, the fact this is well-told would have been helped along by it being co-written by Alex Haley. But while that could hardly have hurt, it is also clear that Malcolm X was no Donald Trump in the writing of this book – this is a book, I am certain, that is much more an autobiography than many books that go by that name on the lives of other significant figures. This book is told with candour, sometimes painfully so, and with the kind of dispassion that I guess only someone who has experienced a number of epiphanies and significant reversals in how they understood their life can muster.

Oh, I’ve just learned (in double-checking I had the spelling right) that ‘candour’ is from the Latin for ‘whiteness’ – and since Malcolm spends quite a bit of time in this book discussing etymology, it really is impossible for me to not mention that now that I know. The reason candour has its current sense, meaning being open and honest, is much the same reason why candid (also from the same Latin root) means truthful and straightforward – because ‘white’ is associated in our society with purity and with being ‘unmarked’. This digression on the origins of a word helps to confirm many of the things that Malcolm X had to say. That every aspect of the white man’s society is constructed to valorise whiteness and to degrade blackness. That every aspect of white society is designed to make black people feel uncomfortable in their own skins and to loath themselves. The discussion of this self-loathing, and particularly how this eats away at the very soul of those constructed as not fitting the social ideal whiteness, is powerfully told in this book. So much so that it seems hard to imagine someone could read this book and not be moved by the horror our society imposes upon people due to the arbitrary quantity of melanin in the skin of some. The utter absurdity of such a distinction seems only matched by the absolute horror piled upon horrors that have been perpetrated against black people by white people throughout history. That Malcolm X should call us ‘white devils’ could hardly surprise anyone – that over fifty years since his death some of us are still surprised that he might have thought of the ‘white race’ in such terms, goes a long way to confirm that history is written for and by the victors.

I think what I found hardest to read in this book wasn’t so much the horrors of white treatment of blacks documented here – I don’t think he actually told me anything I didn’t already know – but rather his own surprise at learning for the first time what had been done to his people over centuries. Of how hard it had been to convince fellow black people of the savage barbarism that was slavery. I’ve read this before, in Du Bois and in bell hooks, but I doubt there will ever come a time when reading a black person talking about this will not affect me. The terror for me lies in how it becomes clear that black people have been conditioned to love their oppressor, to cheer-on the white couple in a film, even while the black character is sacrificed as a pawn towards the greater drama. The whole thing is sickening.

I never know how to respond to books by religious figures who tell me how bad they were in their ‘pre-conversion’ lives. There is a natural tendency for such figures to want to make their early life sound as depraved as possible so as to support the true miracle that God, or Elijah Muhammad, wrought on their lives. So, a grain of salt is often recommended when reading the exploits of the early lives of most converts. Again, I suspect this concern could be overstated in this case. There is a ring of truth about Malcolm’s early life that is hard to ignore. I’ve a horrible feeling that Malcolm X is pretty much exactly what he says he was – a man in search of the truth, and I think he may have proved that rarest of all things, a man prepared to change his mind when he found the truth did not match his system of beliefs. He does this at least three times in the book – and each time the consequences to him in these conversion experiences were not only life altering, but life threatening. It is hard to not feel awe reading this man’s life.

Now, I started this review by saying I was going to be critical of Malcolm X – and I’m going to be, it’s just taken me some time to get here. One of the things Haley says that helped to break down the barriers that stood between him and Malcolm, and that were killing the book as he was interviewing Malcolm, was getting him to speak about his attitude to women. And this attitude was anything but progressive. He says, ‘Suddenly, between sips of coffee and further scribbling and doodling, he vented his criticisms and skepticisms of women. “You never can fully trust any woman,” he said. “I've got the only one I ever met whom I would trust seventy-five per cent. I've told her that”.’

I found Malcolm X’s attitude to women quite confronting. Firstly, I would dearly love to believe that someone so keenly aware of the harm done by defining away entire populations upon an arbitrary feature of their physical construction, would get that this is always a problem. That he would see that defining women as less than fully human would be something he would be damn careful not to do himself purely because he could see the harm precisely this had cause the people he’s seeking to free. So, while reading his rants on how women need to be kept under a firm hand or need to be ruled over by men as the head and so on – I found it impossible not to wonder how a clearly intelligent man who had been surrounded and supported by any number of insanely capable and strong women could possibly hold such clearly foolish ideas. Particularly when those ideas simply condemn half of the world’s population to servitude.

I also found much of the history he quoted that supposedly proved the superiority of pre-European African societies to be all a bit daft. I also found his calls for segregation a dead alley – and I think he come to this conclusion too at the end of his life. At one point in this Haley says “Nazi Party Commander George Lincoln Rockwell, who frankly stated that he admired the courage of Malcolm X, and he felt that the two of them should speak together across the United States”. Malcolm rejects this suggestion out of hand, but it is clear Haley is making a valid comparison here. I want to start by stressing that I feel it is a significantly different thing for a black man to speak of segregation compared to a white man speaking of the same thing – even if the outcome of them getting their way would be the same. In a society that sees black men purely in terms of the threat they pose, a black man saying black people need to be segregated from white people for their own protection tells us a truth about our society that is usually shrouded when a white man says he needs to be protected from black people.

All the same, I do not feel segregation is the answer, for much the same reason as James Connolly said that Ireland wouldn’t be free if all that happened with the establishment of a republic was that people were turned out of their homes by police wearing uniforms with a harp, rather than a crown emblazoned upon it. Being exploited by a black man, rather than a white man, is ultimately of little comfort.

As someone who is not religious at all, I found this book incredibly interesting for the passion his religious convictions brought to his ability to focus his energies. But I also think his devotion, especially to Elijah Muhammad, was problematic on too many levels to be ignored. I know he comes to this same conclusion shortly before he is murdered, and it is possible this might otherwise have resulted in another major shift in his thinking – I was left feeling that whatever good had come out of his religious convictions was ultimately overcome by the negatives.

I’m giving this book five stars – it is a classic and will continue to be read as such long after I’m dead and I was only just born when Malcolm died. But I also want my reservations noted. I think it would be very hard to read this book and come away not liking Malcolm X – you might not come away agreeing with him on everything, but there is a naked honesty about him that it would be inhuman to not respect and to like. But his sexism troubled me more than I was expecting – and I get it, he was a religious person, I really have no excuse for being surprised at his sexism, but it did surprise, as much as it also sadden me.
188 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Autobiography of Malcolm X.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
January 15, 2019 – Shelved
January 15, 2019 – Shelved as: biography
January 15, 2019 – Shelved as: history
January 15, 2019 – Shelved as: race
January 15, 2019 – Shelved as: religion
January 15, 2019 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-35 of 35 (35 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Varun (new) - added it

Varun Illuminating review, Trevor. Thank you so much for this and your valuable contributions to the Goodreads community :)

Do you publish your reviews on a blog of some sort? Would love to save some of your reviews offline, which isn't possible (to my knowledge) on this Goodreads.

Hope you're well!


message 2: by Varun (new) - added it

Varun On Goodreads*


Celina It's been at least ten years since I read this book, but the way I recall it, in the chapter right at the end, written shortly before he was murdered, Malcolm X renounces a lot of the antagonism and separatist attitudes from earlier in the book. That's what I've seen in most reviews, too. The whole thing was still valuable to me as it has been for millions of readers, but the last part had me discounting a lot of what you call out here as (for lack of a better word) problematic: the statements on women, the separatism, the allegiance to Elijah Muhammad. How did the renunciation at the end affect your view of those issues, if at all?


carol. Absolutely beautiful review. You captured much of what is so interesting about the man when reviewing his life story--his honesty, his dispassion--and much of what is disheartening. I tried to remind myself of the time period in America he was existing in, while I was reading, because I have to agree, some of the African reclamation seemed quite daft. Actually, some of the theories he talked about reminded me a great deal of early feminist theory that tried to elevate the female above the male, in various constructs and theories (whether Divine or political or social or whatever). I think that must be a stage in the evolution of philosophy in repressed groups--really, almost like personal development--to try and recognize what is special and unique about the group, and which may actually be better.

I found myself regretting his death on so many levels--not only an individual one--no one should ever be murdered--but on his personal journey. As you say, he was capable of great transformations, and it would have been very interesting to see what he became and how he impacted society.


Trevor Celina: it is hard to know what to say about his renunciation, as I can't help feeling he was killed before he had really worked out what this meant for himself. The whole thing is horrible and tragic. Part of my problem is I think he is in part right about separatism - not that it is a solution, but that if white people are in the same organisation both white and black people will likely see the white people as the natural leaders - and that is as counter productive as it is crazy. I think in the end he was coming closer to James Baldwyn - a book I'm going to try to review tonight if I get a chance. I can't help feel that racism is mostly a white problem and so it will only be fixed when white people take responsibility for it. Much as sexism is a male problem and it is up to men to stop taking a back seat and rather do what they can to also drive change. I honestly do believe that no one gets to be free while others are in chains - but the problem is that the benefits that come from white privileged and male privilege come unbidden and so are all too easy to deny, but much, much harder to renounce. Still, what is particularly hard to see in Malcolm X's case is that he knew his likely fate and struggled to know the truth anyway. It is reminiscent of Socrates. I found it troubling that in the end some of his followers were also upset he was spending so much time away, on his spiritual journey, when they were asking, 'what are we doing? how are we helping change?' The whole thing was a nightmare - and one that is ongoing.

Carol: I had much the same response, too - the utter desolation at not knowing what might have come next. But societies certainly do love to punish by death those who hold a mirror up to and for them.


Trevor Varun: Sorry, I meant to reply, but got lost in the other responses. No, I think I've left it too late to shift all of the reviews into a blog - I never really thought of it when I started. Sometimes I feel bad about using this site - Amazon is fairly close to the personification of evil and representative of just about the worst excesses of capitalism, and so my providing them with free content makes me feel a little sick - but it is probably too late now.


message 7: by Quo (new)

Quo An excellent review of a very formidable book. In reading it, I had the impression that the life of Malcom X was evolutionary and it id impossible to tell where his thoughts might have gone had he not been assassinated. Often, he was quite critical of American blacks as well, though apparently this was somewhat muted by Alex Haley who was aware of certain marketing values in transcribing the thoughts of Malcom X. His early death represented a considerable loss because this book served to engender a very important dialogue in America.

One wonders if there are any similarities between the Australian treatment of Aboriginals, the New Zealanders' past relationship with the Maoris and the impasse between whites & blacks in the U.S. at the time when Malcolm lived? In any case, I enjoyed your review Trevor! Bill


Trevor I think it would be hard to overstate the impact the civil rights movement had internationally. Naturally, this was a two way street - and the post war national liberation movements also strongly influenced the US civil rights movement - something Malcolm X mentions throughout this book. But even from my personal history this is true. My parents were heavily involved in the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association before coming to Australia and set up a branch of it here once the Troubles started and at around this time too Australian Aboriginals won the right to vote and to be counted in the census, you know, as people rather than as part of the native flora and fauna. There was a referendum held to grant this - there needed to be a change to the constitution for Aboriginal Australians to be counted as human - and we generally pride ourselves on the fact it passed overwhelmingly. But a lot of this ignores, of course, the years of struggle Aboriginal peoples engaged in to even have this put on the agenda.

The Penguin History of New Zealand is a good book on Maori struggles for recognition - it was recommended to me by a few Maori while I was in New Zealand for the first time 7 years ago. It is an odd thing - I think Australians and New Zealanders think of each other as very similar to each other, we are always going on about being family and so on - but really, the countries are strikingly different in both history and geography.


message 9: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala and I get it, he was a religious person, I really have no excuse for being surprised at his sexism

I smiled at that!
Great reviews, Trevor, both this and the James Baldwin which I just read.


Trevor Isn't the Baldwin amazing - I really do need to read more of him - oh, for a bit more time...Thanks Fionnuala.


message 11: by Tony (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tony The latest by Marble is a lot better. I read both. Malcolm was a great man.


message 12: by Tony (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tony Marable is the author of the new Malcolm X book.


Trevor I will see if I can track it down


Nyima What a great review, so descriptive and in depth! The duality of it being such a good book, being amazed by how well he explains racism at bits, but also being taken aback by his casual yet recurring sexist attitude towards women was somewhat confusing for me. But this review couldn't have worded my sentiments better!


Trevor Thanks Nyima - all the best


Santos Malcom X has been a life long hero to me. Not only for his passionate commitment to fighting for the rights of black people in the US but for his ability to constantly evolve-even as you said- when this lead to life threatening consequences. He is a great thinker, but alas, a flawed man as all men (and women) are. His sexism has always deeply bothered me as well. And, as an atheist, I have always been troubled by the religious force that drive him. This is a great review of an awesome book.


Trevor I don't even pretend to understand religion, so I generally leave that out of any criticism of people, you know, something must be going on there that I have no access to at all - but the sexism is too strange. Not least since it seems to be completely at odds with his actual message. Well, and because of the types of people it links him to - hardly a parade of geniuses.


message 20: by Isaac (new) - added it

Isaac Samuel Miller Nice review


Trevor Thanks Isaac


message 22: by Prakhar (new)

Prakhar Prateek I'm certainly going to read this book after reading your review.


Trevor I can't begin to tell you how happy that makes me feel Prakhar.


Derrick Brilliant take, Trevor. I'm impressed how you have reviewed this book.


Trevor It's a lovely book, Derrick - I highly recommend it


message 26: by Alismcg (new) - added it

Alismcg Great review Trevor. I'm NOT one to trust an Autobiography as a source for truth... I'll go on your recommendation for this one.


Trevor Yes, agreed. But he was an interesting and complex man, his autobiography is not nearly as much a hagiography as these things tend to be.


message 28: by Susanna (new)

Susanna Sturgis I second (or third, or fourth?) the recommendation of Manning Marable's book. Marable died when the book was just hitting the shelves (a month short of his 61st birthday), so it didn't get the launch it deserved. It's been decades since I read the Autobiography, and I got a lot out of it when I did, but IIRC Alex Haley had a lot to do with how it turned out. I suspect the times -- it was first published in 1964, the year before Malcolm was assassinated -- did too.


Trevor I will try to get to Marable soon - I can make no promises at the moment as I'm a bit snowed under.


message 30: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Spence Thanks for the insightful and informative review. I now want to read this book.


message 31: by Kyle (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kyle Amazing review Trevor! I find myself resonating with a lot of what you write, I think a lot of what you had to be critical of Malcolm about is very logically sound. I, like you am in awe while reading the story of his life and am incredibly glad I did so in reading this autobiography!


Trevor Just seeing these comments now, thanks Paul and Kyle


Francisco Brilliant review. I resonate a lot with what you've written that and reading your review helped me structure my own thoughts about the book. Thank you so much.


Francisco I found myself nodding as I read your review. It helped me structure my own thoughts about the book and I mostly agree with your take. Thank you for sharing.


message 35: by Nittesh (new) - added it

Nittesh Selvaraj brilliant review


back to top