knig's Reviews > The Immoralist

The Immoralist by André Gide
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
F 50x66
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: favourites

Absolutely stunning portrayal of a French Catholic repressive confronting his (homo) sexuality at the turn of last century. I deliberately write ‘confronting’ rather than ‘journey of discovery’, ‘development’ or any other word which might imply a process of evolvement leading to clarity or even acceptance, for this is singularly missing. What unravels instead, is a sublime subconscious, torturous confrontation, an unwanted, unspoken clash of instinct and reason. And this is what makes the fibre so compelling: the very fact that this turbulent vortex of personal cataclysm simmers hidden in the subconscious strata, with the subtlest of surface manifestations: a bit like watching soporific bubbles crenulate the surface of a hot spring: we know its a harbinger of molten ferment which will erupt in volcanic spew, science classes posit that at this exact moment tectonic grinding is churning beneath, but for a few moments, before a supernova of lava excretes from the mouth of the epicentre, we have only these little ruptures to go by. This is the feel of this novel: a suggestion of immense reconfiguration as elicited by the the minutest, most fractional, ephemeral of manifestations.

I seriously do not believe anyone else could have written a more plausible, eloquent and lyrical account of sexual awakening. In this roman a clef, protagonist Michel commences asexual, evolved in his studies and if not exactly religious, than combobulated of religion.

I don’t think, apostate, secular and produced via the ‘religious studies ’modules of modern education as we are in Europe now, we can appreciate just how this religious combobulation might have worked in 1902. The only analogy I can think of even remotely to hint at the ‘tribal affiliation and upbringing’ of Michel is the old Irish joke about somebody in Northern Ireland who responded to a survey question about religious affiliation by declaring himself an atheist. ‘Would that be a Protestant atheist or a Catholic atheist?’ came the insistent reply. Can there be any atheist raised in a Christian country that does not understand this? The fact that renunciation of faith is almost a futile endeavour when the rest of the fabric: tradition, culture, norms and conditioning, remain. The combobulation, hence, at your service. You can run, but you can’t hide.


Michel marries a woman, and due to ill health does not consummate the marriage for a long time : (much like Gide, who married his cousin and stayed in an unconsummated marriage for 27 years). During a honeymoon convalescence in Biskra, his wife befriends some of the local children. And this is where the subtle suspirro of innuendo begins. Michel starts to notice the outlines, fleshy composition and grace of these teen boys. This slow, understated cognisance is so delicate and protracted that its hard to pinpoint the exact moment when casual inflection rearranges into a purposefully orchestrated pattern of involuntary but prescient mis en scenes of allusion. It is painfully, breathtakingly beautiful to observe this accretion of subsensual imagery, a layering of sense-data which eventually overwhelms not just Michel, but me as well. Talk about an excruciating build up. For those of us, mind you, who like our thrills in the realm of unrealised potentiality.
So why is this not a journey of self discovery? Which it is not. Even at the end, Michel, sleeping with a woman, (not his wife who dies) covets her little brother (yes, I’m a little concerned about paedophilia). We leave Michel as convoluted as ever. But why?

Clearly, no one knows why. I can only transpose my own interpretation on this cauldron of mess up. Fear of sexuality. Not religious fervered, morally attributed fear, but intellectual. For those for whom this is a resolved issue in its essence, regardless of sexual preference, Michel’s quandary will seem alien, and the whole book a mismanagement. But for some, where easy doesn’t come into it: ease of it, I mean, then this confrontation will ring true. This subconscious tension of a voracious instinctual yearning forever tempered and extinguished by a resolute, no irresolute, conscious inability to progress...this thing. Being sexuality, whatever it means to each and everyone of us.

14 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Immoralist.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 19, 2012 – Started Reading
April 19, 2012 – Shelved
April 21, 2012 – Finished Reading
July 8, 2017 – Shelved as: favourites

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by MJ (last edited Apr 21, 2012 01:45PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

MJ Nicholls subtle suspirro of innuendo begins

OK, you just made that word up. And I'm pretty sure combobulation doesn't exist without the dis-. But thanks for another illuminating trip on the circumbendibus, I'm sure I understood none of it. This book made me sad.


message 2: by knig (last edited Apr 22, 2012 02:34AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

knig Are you saying you actually read my reviews before voting? Damn,that means now I have to read yours as well. Instead of oxplopping through them. I didn't make suspiro up: I transbalanced it from my quadripolyglottilinguine to plug a lacuna in the English. Mainly its an aspiración profunda y prolongada seguida de una espiración para expresar tristeza,alivio o deseo. Can you tell i'm priming for exercises in style? My first Queneau.


message 3: by MJ (new) - rated it 4 stars

MJ Nicholls Of course, I read your reviews for such orgiastic wordsplurges as:

the very fact that this turbulent vortex of personal cataclysm simmers hidden in the subconscious strata, with the subtlest of surface manifestations: a bit like watching soporific bubbles crenulate the surface of a hot spring

Yum! (And yes, read the Queneau dammit)


message 4: by Traveller (last edited Apr 22, 2012 01:09PM) (new) - added it

Traveller Freaking hell. You mean I've been reading through all of these looong 'friend' reviews for nothing? That the authors of these reviews didn't intend for them to be read? AAAARRGGGHH!!

*smacks forehead*

Bubbles? Bubbles make me sleepppyy... zzzzz

Gawd, I didn't even know what 'suspirro' meant.
*Hides face in shame*
... but it sounds damn good the way you use it...


message 5: by Traveller (last edited Apr 22, 2012 01:10PM) (new) - added it

Traveller Oh, and just to prove I read it (before reading your comment that implied I shouldn't have), re this sentence: " and extinguished by a resolute, no irresolute, conscious inability to progress...this thing. "

...erm.. yeah.
Not sure what I wanted to say about it. (Except that it confused me.)


knig Oh no, I do read all of the reviews, except for MJ's (especially when hes writing from a bus)


message 7: by Traveller (new) - added it

Traveller Knig-o-lass wrote: "Oh no, I do read all of the reviews, except for MJ's (especially when hes writing from a bus)"

Heh. Especially if there are buttons involved?


message 8: by Tuck (new)

Tuck MJ wrote: "subtle suspirro of innuendo begins

OK, you just made that word up. And I'm pretty sure combobulation doesn't exist without the dis-. But thanks for another illuminating trip on the circumbendibus,..."

i read a novel that used combobulation quite a bit. does that make it legit? or, just like knig?
Which Brings Me to You


miroitante Great review, but just a minor correction. Michel was Protestant. Gide was also born into a Protestant family.


back to top