J.G. Keely's Reviews > To Your Scattered Bodies Go

To Your Scattered Bodies Go by Philip José Farmer
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
84023
's review

liked it
bookshelves: science-fiction, novel, reviewed, america

For me, the appeal of Speculative Fiction is the breadth and depth of its scope. An author is free to explore the most difficult questions and imagine worlds vastly different from anything we have ever experienced. Though all literature is concerned with what it means to be human, few outside of Sci Fi go to such lengths to ask what it means to be capable of thought and self-knowledge

However, there is a drawback. Often, authors succumb to the temptation to create a world so new, so different, so complex, and so vast that it becomes almost impossible to write it. Farmer has selected too vast a canvas, too great a scene, and so the small (if engaging) story he paints upon it seems a far cry from the overarching premise.

Farmer creates an artificial afterlife, one containing every human being ever born. By using the old Sci Fi trick of 'science did it', he avoids the knee-jerk response many people would have to a book making overt spiritual claims. Since everyone was just recreated by aliens, Farmer is not technically a blasphemer.

Everyone is there; even, as the book jacket likes to point out, 'you!'. Farmer has the grandest possible cast of characters, and does not waste it. His protagonists, their friends, and their enemies are plucked from the greatest and most notorious men in history (as well as Farmer himself). However, we are struck with an immediate difficulty: Farmer is trying to write some of the most remarkable people in history.

Unfortunately for Farmer, many of his characters' real-life counterparts were brilliant, eccentric men. Since they are more brilliant and eccentric than Farmer himself, we end up with fairly standard protagonists saddled with famous names.

For example, he chooses one of the most remarkable men of a remarkable period, Sir Richard Burton. In a time of colonial adventurers, he was one of the greatest and most notorious. He was one of the most adroit swordfighters of his day and braved and escaped death numerous times over his remarkably long career.

He was also a polyglot who knew some thirty languages, making him an extremely convenient hero for a book taking place on a world where every culture was rubbing elbows with every other. He also nearly discovered the source of the Nile, giving him a thematic connection to this 'Riverworld'.

In short he was a real-life hero, straight out of an adventure story. However, he was also a refined and educated man who made a full and unabridged translation of the 1,001 Arabian Nights. Though Farmer's version of Burton is as capable and impressive as we might expect, he does not have Burton's singular and remarkable personality.

Perhaps it was wise of Farmer to pick a man so clearly suited to play the role of the adventure hero. Many authors have tried to create adventure heroes out of small and inexperienced men. However, in this case, Farmer has thrown his net too far, and caught too large a fish for his dinner.

Farmer experiences a similar problem with all of the myriad cultures he writes. Since he is not a historical expert on any of these cultures, their portrayal tends to be rather unremarkable, such that as we travel along the river, we find Victorian Gentlemen, Dakota Indians, and Chinese Marauders are more or less interchangeable.

Beyond this, their interaction with one another becomes likewise simplified. It would be a remarkable feat for any author to be able to write such interactions as might occur between Sumerians and Olmecs, but this hardly excuses Farmer; after all, he was the one who chose to write this book.

Farmer took his inspiration from Edgar Rice Burroughs, who also had a mysterious and mystical river in his John Carter of Mars series. However, Farmer might have taken another lesson from Burroughs. When Burroughs wrote of strange Martian cultures, he could create as he liked without any need for research or knowledge. However, we can see by the wild inaccuracies of his 'Tarzan' that he probably should have stuck with aliens.

Likewise, if Farmer's book had been about his own made up cultures, there would be little to fault him. However, since he chose such a difficult path himself, I feel no compunction in stating that he was unequal to the challenge. The book is exciting, adventurous, and the writing is not without grace, but it is certainly not what it would promise to be.

The next book in the series is worse, with a hackneyed, unfunny Mark Twain taking center stage.
41 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read To Your Scattered Bodies Go.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
September 25, 2008 – Shelved
September 25, 2008 – Shelved as: science-fiction
September 25, 2008 – Shelved as: novel
September 25, 2008 – Finished Reading
June 9, 2009 – Shelved as: reviewed
September 4, 2010 – Shelved as: america

Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jim It has been over thiry years since I read this and Volume 2. Your review matches my recollection - the novel is good but not great.

Farmer posited the mother of all SF plot devices with this one, but one must wonder what Michener or Clavell could have done with this.

(without doubt, both would have researched the characters' backgrounds much more thoroughly)

I suppose one could not blame Farmer too much for that, however. Both Clavell and Michener had an early expectation to sell many more books than Farmer ever dreamed of.

The prospect of selling millions of copies could motivate one to work hard on research (and have the means to hire help with it).


J.G. Keely "The prospect of selling millions of copies could motivate one to work hard on research (and have the means to hire help with it)."

A curious notion--I guess most of the writers I know are mostly motivated by their own perfectionism instead of by a prospective audience. I know that when I write, I'm doing it fundamentally for myself. But yes, it would be interesting to see what a master of characterization might have done with the same theme.


message 3: by Jim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jim Hey Keely,

I don't know a lot of writers (you got me there) but the rumor is that the vast majority of them have day jobs. I infer that this is because not all artists wish to suffer poverty in the service of their art.

And like you, when I write, I do it to please myself.

My dad used to say "time is a man's most valuable asset" (this was poignant for him since when I heard him say this he was dying of cancer and dead within a few years).

I'm fairly sure it is inarguable that Clavell and Michener sold much more than any SF author. Given that Michener got started earlier that Clavell and was much more prolific he probably outsold Clavell - maybe even by an order of magnitude.

Clavell's first novel did not require a great deal of research. He was a WWII POW at a prison on Java and later at Changi Prison in Singapore. King Rat was based on his time there and its protagonist based on an American prisoner of war who (he said) saved him along with an entire battalion.

Likewise, Michener's Tales of the South Pacific was based on his Navy service during WWII.

Before King Rat, Clavell had written four screenplays that became films (and directed two of these).

Though Farmer is hardly "typical" he was more typical of writers in general having worked in a steel mill and as a technical writer in the defense industry before writing fiction full time at age 50.

Anyway, Clavell and especially Michener, who both primarily wrote historical novels, and who had a much larger audience to criticise their work, would require much more grounding in history than PJF, who mostly could spin his own future histories with impunity.

So I suppose for 9,999/10,000 writers the prospect of selling a million of any single title is "curious" (Shogun sales approach 20-million).

Niven and Pournelle were known for their collaborations. Imagine how much better Riverworld would have been if Michener had deigned to collaborate with Farmer.


J.G. Keely Well, I haven't read Michener, but you're right, this book could have been much better with more in-depth research.


message 5: by Jim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jim Right after I finished my engineering degree (in March 1982) I hung out in town (terre Haute, Indiana)- not wanting to drive home to Alaska in the winter. Sleeping in, drinking beer, and reading for pleasure were the order of the day.

I derived immense pleasure from two Michener novels. The first was a (relative) snack - The Drifters - about war veterans and Vietnam War era draft age youth (as "youthful" as I was when I read it).

The other was Michener's magnum opus - The Source.

I gather that your background would assure that you'd appreciate/understand the vast historical sweep of that novel better than I. I found that it wore very well on re-read.

As always,

Best Regards

Jim Susky


J.G. Keely Cool, thanks for the suggestion.


Virginia This is a very good review. I found myself underwhelmed and dissatisfied after finishing the book, but wasn't able to identify what exactly the problem was. Then I read your review and realized exactly why I was underwhelmed. Thanks.


back to top