The Conspiracy is Capitalism's Reviews > The Climate Book: The Facts and the Solutions

The Climate Book by Greta Thunberg
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
35434974
A Guide to 21st Century Survival and Beyond

Preamble:
--In perhaps my best reading year, it’s quite something for this book to challenge for the top spot:
i) #1 topic that haunts me.
ii) Broad synthesis (bite-sized essays introducing each topic, 100 in total), balancing accessibility with nuance.
iii) Featuring some of my favourite authors.

--While reading this book, I made the startling connection (it’s so clear now, how did I miss it?) that my most-memorable childhood lesson and my adult political slogan are actually identical:
i) Whenever I procrastinated as a child and paid for it, my dad would say: “plan for the worst, hope for the best”.
ii) As an adult, I draw inspiration from the political slogan popularized by Antonio Gramsci (imprisoned by Mussolini): “pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will”.

--Meanwhile, capitalism’s logic is “profit now, worry later”.
--Here’s the kicker: this is not a momentary lapse of “reason” that can be remedied with “enlightenment”; this is actually capitalism’s inherent logic. If a capitalist cannot profit, why bother? There’s no other reason for capitalists to exploit their workers (who keep the machines running) and the earth; it’s not a charity!
--An example to visualize this logic’s absurdity is the infamous passages from The Grapes of Wrath on global capitalism’s endless Great Depression. Watered-down socialist policies were not enough to hold things together this time; it took the greatest war in human history, i.e. WWII ("creative destruction" of stagnant capital; military-industrial complexes of Fascism, US, etc.) to temporarily “resolve” this crisis, only to unleash the Great Acceleration of climate/ecological crises (Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil Capitalism and the Crisis of the Earth System) [emphases added]:
This vineyard will belong to the bank [Finance capitalism]. Only the great owners can survive […]

Men who have created new fruits in the world cannot create a system whereby their fruits may be eaten [profit vs. social needs]. And the failure hangs over the State like a great sorrow.

The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price [profit or why bother?], and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. […] A million people hungry, needing the fruit—and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. [Such waste is still rampant in global capitalism; “efficiency” is for making profits.]

[…] There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificates—died of malnutrition—because the food must rot, must be forced to rot [millions die under global capitalism each year due to preventable hunger/thirst/diseases, the other side of all the waste].

The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quicklime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.

--So much work is needed for humans and ecosystems to survive (let alone thrive) in the 21st century, yet global capitalist profit-seeking refuses to reward such radical/progressive/enlightened/indigenous/spiritual/holy/conservationist ...(whichever-framing-inspires-you) work to save and reconnect with our shared home.
…Instead, capitalist work reproduces our daily hamster wheel, which in reality is our downward spiral destroying our shared home:
i) Rewards short-term gambling (financial speculation) and violence (military industrial complex) at the top. Parasites and merchants of death; we should note the other great existential threat: nuclear war:
-The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner
-Nuclear War and Environmental Catastrophe
ii) White-collar jobs include keeping us all addicted to short-term dopamine spikes with the colossal advertising/media/public relations/lobbying complex. More parasitic and bullshit jobs.
iii) Blue-collar extractive jobs: the initial extraction then flows through production/distribution/consumption/waste in a linear manner, with minimal circular restoration (let alone time/space for nature's restoration).
iv) Security/surveillance jobs (responding to increased inequality), from private security to police to soldiers.
v) Precarious jobs and no jobs (Global South’s mega slums, Global North’s structural unemployment Rust Belts/opioid crises “deaths of despair”).
vi) The jobs (social services) and non-jobs (care work) not mentioned are more clearly following a different logic (social needs), which profit-seeking suffocates (just look at the US’s healthcare/education/welfare/public infrastructure etc., despite all its wealth).
…How do we escape with our lives and repair our communities and our planet?

Highlights
--Of the 100 essays, 18 are by Greta Thunberg (as introductions). I’m just going to follow the collection’s useful structure and provide my highlights:

1) “How Climate Works”:
--I was relieved all the essays are so concise, because I remember slogging through books like The Goldilocks Planet: The 4 billion year story of Earth's climate. The book I found most useful to introduce such topics is Lenton’s Earth System Science: A Very Short Introduction.
--On the comparatively-shorter history of civilization/extinction, Elizabeth Kolbert (The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History) is featured.
--Next comes the history of the science (of climate change), by IPCC author Michael Oppenheimer, followed by the history of capitalist denial by Naomi Oreskes (Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming) following Big Tobacco’s playbook:
i) Cherry-picking/misrepresenting (see: Bad Science: Quacks, Hacks, and Big Pharma Flacks)
ii) Fund outlier scientists/deflection research/attack scientists/frame companies as pro science/capitalist think tanks (ex. Harperism: How Stephen Harper and his think tank colleagues have transformed Canada)/lobby policies
iii) Obscure capitalist production (the systemic driver, where so much emissions/waste are simply hidden from the public) by focusing on individual consumer responsibility (ex. "personal carbon footprint"; see later).
iv) Capitalist schemes like Green Capitalism, “natural gas” (fossil gas/methane gas) as a “bridge fuel”, etc.

2) “How Our Planet is Changing”:
--Each topic (essay) here is fascinating, but my top priority is to first get a sense of the big picture. It’s a curious paradox:
a) “Everything is connected” (synthesis), but how do we prevent this from becoming a tautology?
b) Break things down and prioritize; this is still a useful lens to start with, as long as we remember to follow up by shuffling things around with different lenses.
…Useful technical tools to start with:
i) Measurements and scale: the huge (global) numbers for emissions, energy units, etc. are simply not intuitive, especially when each essay uses them from their own specific contexts. We need to first take a step back and appreciate the overall picture. While I have many social disagreements with Bill Gates and his favourite author Vaclav Smil, Smil at least provides this: How the World Really Works: A Scientist's Guide to Our Past, Present and Future.
ii) Critical statistics: given the unintuitive numbers, we need to be exceedingly careful in how we communicate with statistics; how can we compare the stats between the essays when the methodologies behind them may be inconsistent?
-Bad Science: Quacks, Hacks, and Big Pharma Flacks
-I Think You'll Find It's a Bit More Complicated Than That
-How to Lie with Statistics
iii) Systems science: Thinking in Systems: A Primer; we can see the applications for this in the previously-recommended Earth System Science: A Very Short Introduction.
--So, how do we start with a big picture synthesis (i.e. scale, priorities) of all the essay topics covered here? Once again, “everything is connected”, but it is daunting keeping track of all these moving parts in your mind simultaneously; we need to start with some foundation. Since we do not dive into the social aspects here (ex. how does “agriculture” actually play out in the social world, i.e. global division of labour, colonization/cash crop exports/food sovereignty, etc.), I’ll revisit this later.
--Topics: heat, methane, air pollution, clouds, arctic warming/jet stream, dangerous weather, droughts/floods (water cycle), ice, oceans, acidification, microplastics, fresh water (curious to read more about centralized infrastructures like dams vs. smaller-scale distributed systems)…
…wildfires, Amazon rainforest (tipping point into degraded savannah?), boreal/temperate forests (since 2002, our “British Columbian” [what a colonial name] forests have shifted from carbon sinks to carbon sources due to wildfires; “sustainable forestry” focuses on wood as commodities, thus harvest young trees lacking biodiversity), biodiversity, insects (3/4 crops pollinated; inspired by Silent Spring), nature’s calendar (phenology), soil, permafrost (I was impressed by the impact of soil in carbon storage and how much is made up by permafrost), what happens at 1.5/2/4 degrees C of warming…
--Curious to read more about “attribution science” (extreme event attribution, measuring how climate change directly affects extreme weather events), esp. for wildfires (very local here in the Pacific Northwest)/droughts/floods.
--Of course, many people are experienced with certain topics, so the other important task here is to raise everyone’s general awareness in order to facilitate communication/cooperation.

…See the comments below for the rest of the review:
3) “How It Affects Us”
4) “What We’ve Done About It”
5) “What We Must Do Now”
110 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Climate Book.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 2, 2022 – Shelved
August 2, 2023 – Started Reading
October 1, 2023 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-25 of 25 (25 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by The Conspiracy is Capitalism (last edited Oct 08, 2023 11:11PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

The Conspiracy is Capitalism 3) “How It Affects Us”:

--Health: public health (a social “Commons”) has been a social struggle against capitalism’s privatization (“Enclosures”, creating artificial scarcity) ever since the struggle for public sanitation during the “dark, Satanic mills” of the Industrial Revolution (where capitalists resisted as it would trespass their private property; also see Engels' The Condition of the Working Class in England); these proto-socialist policies were crucial in reviving the life expectancy of the masses.
…The “Commons” of public health remains a key contradiction in global capitalism, which occasionally surfaces amongst liberals (ex. The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance). COVID-19 is a mere hiccup compared to climate/ecological crises; we should see it as another global warning of capitalism’s “profit now, worry later” (Dead Epidemiologists: On the Origins of COVID-19). Working in public health (under capitalism), it is eerie how compartmentalized we are away from the environment.

…Another public health example of capitalist absurdity is the widespread abuse of antibiotics (a pillar of Western medicine and post-war living standards, losing its efficacy from misuse) for livestock, partly because these animals are unnaturally sick (cooped up in industrial scale, genetically near-identical so lack diversity for disease resistance: Big Farms Make Big Flu: Dispatches on Influenza, Agribusiness, and the Nature of Science) but also because low-dosing of antibiotics stimulates faster growth (Big Chicken: The Incredible Story of How Antibiotics Created Modern Agriculture and Changed the Way the World Eats); capitalist “efficiency” here is churning out commodities in the form of meat, conveniently externalizing social costs.

--Air pollution: interesting note on how improvements can be quickly observed locally, thus easier for (capitalist) policy-making.
--I was excited to see the essays by communities struggling with decolonization in the Global South/Global North “peripheries”, as not just “victims” in “sacrifice zones”, but also as leaders in adaptations: esp. Bangladesh recognizing that money/technology are insufficient, so emphasizing social organization, ex. schoolchildren participation in community drills including helping the elderly, which also recognizes the transformative power of community help (direct action) rather than just protesting (seeking to sway the actions of those in power).


message 2: by The Conspiracy is Capitalism (last edited Jul 18, 2024 11:52AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

The Conspiracy is Capitalism 4) “What We’ve Done About It”:

--Greta’s key message here is how emissions stats have been manipulated. As emission stats are national, it’s convenient to exclude the production emissions of imports (huge in Global North consumption), as well as global transportation (shipping/aviation), military (enormous esp. US), etc.
...The latter (i.e. the relationship between the US military industrial complex and the "Great Acceleration" in Earth Systems overshoot, which I introduced in the context of capitalism's boom/bust) must be the biggest omission in this book. The closest essay, “Climate Conflicts” from the previous section, only covers additional conflicts due to the climate crisis (see Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence).
--Kevin Anderson, in the essay “The New Denialism”, focuses on how science denial has over the past 30 years shifted to “mitigation denial” (“empty promises of low-carbon technologies tomorrow”):
i) “carbon offsetting”/“net zero”: targeting current/future emissions, to continue “business as usual”, failing to address the overwhelming amount of historical cumulative emissions stuck in the atmosphere.
ii) “carbon capture and storage”: esp. “Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage” (BECCS), which requires non-existing scale of technologies, displacements, etc.
iii) trivial green investments compared to (still trivial) response to COVID, let alone the mountain of idle savings by the global rich.

--Capitalist agriculture: predictably, this requires several chapters to introduce:
i) land-use: cattle pastures/feed croplands take up soooo much [emphases added]:
Grazing land for cattle and the like is the largest agricultural land-use category, followed by forestland, with cropland coming third. The total land area used to nurture livestock is mind-blowing — it covers about 37 million square kilometres, roughly four times the size of Brazil; not only does it include all grazing land, but also a significant share of cropland, which is used to produce feed.
ii) decoupled nutrient (carbon/nitrogen) cycles: artificial fertilizers run-offs/human sewage (see Marxist “metabolic rift”), re-coupling with natural sinks, etc.
iii) consumer diets: see later
iv) waste: see later on end-user waste vs. industrial waste
v) alternatives: while I start with scale, it’s important to note local context is crucial as there’s no universal solution; local knowledge stewards need to be empowered rather than subverted by perverse incentives: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.
…As for priorities [emphases added]:
The highest priority for change is the 5 per cent of calories that account for 40 per cent of food’s environmental burden. These are predominantly high-input livestock and crops grown to supply urban markets. [A reminder that we need to be more careful contextualizing the statistics we offer]

--On geoengineering, I find agreeable the chapter warning that this top-down high-risk approach has no place in a decolonizing plan to reconnect with the planet and its inhabitants. For next steps, I do think it’s prudent to “plan for the worst” and have some preparation for all scenarios.
--More structural analysis on the emissions of the iceberg underneath the surface: global supply chain, heavy industry (i.e. production of steel/plastics/cement, a priority of the Smil book recommended above and less visible than power/transportation/agriculture). On transportation, comparing aviation (mostly leisure for global wealthy) vs. shipping (mostly global supply chain).
--Consumerism: I’m always concerned about the framing (individual vs. structural):
Yet individuals are the ultimate consumers of much of what gets pumped, built, slaughtered, mined, woven, cut, processed and shipped around the world, year in and year out. And it is their materialism and consumerism – our materialism and consumerism – that are leading to the destruction of the planet. More than 60 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions and up to four fifths of land, material and water use stem from household demand, with the most affluent bearing the greatest responsibility. [Once again, how messy we are with stats…]
…The problem is capitalism’s commodity fetishism (focus on the commodity and its price; relationships are often rendered impersonal, i.e. market exchange between strangers) is designed to hide the social/environmental relations/costs of commodity production, so consumers only directly see the tip of the iceberg.
...Municipal waste (from end-user consumption, including households) cannot compare with the scale of industrial waste (from the hidden production process): Gone Tomorrow: The Hidden Life of Garbage. One essay on waste points out that waste is often under local municipal management (in contrast to non-local industrial policies) and thus would be easier to change (local); this still seems to obscure municipal vs. industrial waste.
…I personally may have cut out driving and most animal products (I still live in the Global North), but we need structural changes to open space to scale up household changes, which would still pale in comparison with the waste of capitalist production until that is resolved. Yes, “everything is connected”, but “everything is everything” has limited use after a point.
...Thankfully, other essays (including Michael E. Mann, known for the “hockey stick graph” of global temperature rise) remind us that “personal responsibility” over “personal carbon footprint” was promoted by BP (oil giant) to shift the blame, just as capitalists promoted focus on consumer “littering” and “recycling” (a convenient myth esp. for the plastics i.e. petrochemicals industry) to distract from their industrial waste.

--Novelist Amitav Ghosh (The Nutmeg's Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis) considers the framing of:
a) Global North: technocratic, which contradicts with the reliance of global governance negotiations that assume a level of equality between nations.
b) Global South: geopolitical power struggle/justice


message 3: by The Conspiracy is Capitalism (last edited Jul 18, 2024 11:50AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

The Conspiracy is Capitalism 5) “What We Must Do Now”:

--While I recognize this is a “climate book” and not a “political economy” book, I would apply “everything is connected” as follows: many essays mention logically-obvious changes like slashing the advertising industry (sells us addiction to consumerism). Such changes for survival would bring about capitalist economic crises (impair capitalism's endless growth of profits/private accumulation, think back to The Grapes of Wrath), so we need to connect this to economic alternatives:
i) Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World: great to see an essay by Jason Hickel featured!
ii) Another Now: Dispatches from an Alternative Present: Varoufakis synthesizes micro with macro economic alternatives; instead, the book trots out Piketty for an essay on economic inequality. See the youtube video "Yanis Varoufakis Critiques Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century" for a critique of Piketty’s vague proposals like a “wealth tax”.
iii) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist: Kate Raworth also has a featured essay, which tackles consumerism and lifestyle change, which synthesizes well with Hickel on the “artificial scarcity” of capitalism/imperialism vs. the “radical abundance” of socialism/Commons.

--Greta considers the other side of herd behavior’s normalized inaction, which is the potential for social tipping points for change. Greta also warns about the falling down the rabbit hole of:
i) debating divisive details (moralizing over personal consumption behaviors)
ii) culture wars (“population growth, nuclear power or what about China?”)
…distracting from the big picture common ground for systemic climate change/justice.
--That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have critical stances on these topics:
-Ex. “overpopulation” targeting the poor: Too Many People?: Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis
-Ex. Greta seems to only refer to China as "dictatorship" (how is this not divisive in the new Cold War?); even if we don't get deep into geopolitics, you would think a climate/environment book would consider the many other sides of China.

--Margaret Atwood (The Handmaid's Tale) is featured in the essay “Practical Utopias”, where Atwood revisits her answer to why she used to focus on writing dystopias. This reminds me of:
i) Keeping up with the changing times, where Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? is actually giving way to “Crisis Realism”/“post-normal”. Where is our social imagination for this new context? Everything for Everyone: An Oral History of the New York Commune, 2052–2072
ii) Amitav Ghosh challenges fiction writers on the topic of climate crisis, elaborated in:
-The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable
-Our Shared Storm: A Novel of Five Climate Futures.

--Erica Chenoweth is featured, whose research on “nonviolent/civil resistance” is used as the core evidence of Extinction Rebellion’s manifesto (This Is Not A Drill: An Extinction Rebellion Handbook). We should consider the debates around this, including Andreas Malm (surprise he wasn’t featured) in How to Blow Up a Pipeline and Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency: War Communism in the Twenty-First Century.

--Several essays include learning from mass mobilizations for WWII/switch to peacetime and COVID-19 (David Wallace Wells). This is balanced by a more critical essay by Naomi Klein, who has steadily transitioned to the climate crisis in 2014 This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate and 2019 On Fire: The Burning Case for a Green New Deal (these can be synthesized with combatting fear of change with vision of opportunities):
i) “Energy democracy”: community-centered investments/control fits with the mobilization of local knowledge stewards; I still need to review Dawson’s People's Power: Reclaiming the Energy Commons
ii) “Frontline first”: beyond future control, justice/reparations need to be addressed for “sacrifice zones”. For more on the Global South: A People’s Green New Deal.
iii) “Care work is climate work”: we need to re-imagine work (beyond capitalism’s extractive, addictive and Bullshit Jobs: A Theory); care work (including restoring communities and ecologies) needs to be prioritized and rewarded (whereas capitalism externalizes it to cut costs): The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values
iv) “No worker left behind”: focus on a “just transition” with guarantees for workers/communities currently dependent on Fossil Fuel industries. Otherwise, we remain divided-and-ruled.
v) “Polluter pays”: capitalism forever warns us “who will pay for it?”, relying on (1) our ignorance of how much is spent to prop up capitalism’s destruction of our planet, and (2) our fear of systemic change. Sadly for capitalism, systemic change is now needed for survival.

--George Monbiot and several others have essays on restoration, on re-enchanting our life by reconnecting with the land/planet. It’s lovely to see Robin Wall Kimmerer conclude with the indigenous world-view of reciprocity and responsibility with the land: Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Another useful intro is The Red Deal: Indigenous Action to Save Our Earth.
--Greta’s essays reveal progress in synthesizing ideas/actions and amplifying them as a communicator. Meanwhile, I need to keep slogging through more challenging works:
-Marxism and Ecological Economics: Toward a Red and Green Political Economy
-Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital
-The Dialectical Biologist
-The Ecological Rift
--I realize I promised an introductory foundation for the laundry list of issues in the book, so I'll refer to the planetary boundaries of Earth Systems Science:
-see this handy chart!!! (which is pulled from Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist)
-Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil Capitalism and the Crisis of the Earth System
-Earth System Science: A Very Short Introduction


message 4: by Rick (new)

Rick Wilson It sounds like Thunberg did a great job with this. Nice summary/review. Can't wait to check it out.


message 5: by Cristian (new)

Cristian Cristea I started reading this last summer. I put it aside for a while as the format seemed unable to tackle the big issues the title suggested.

I’ll give it another try for the second half. So many things have been said and written in the last few years on this topic that I have the feeling that no one had the time to do anything about it.
I am currently down the rabbit hole on what the EU issue as regulations in sustainability.


The Conspiracy is Capitalism Rick wrote: "It sounds like Thunberg did a great job with this. Nice summary/review. Can't wait to check it out."

Cheers Rick! I’m curious what the decision-making process was like regarding which topics and guest-authors to include, as Thunberg’s essays were introductory/overviews (18 of the 100 essays; they did serve an important role in emphasizing the big picture takeaways).


The Conspiracy is Capitalism Cristian wrote: "I started reading this last summer. I put it aside for a while as the format seemed unable to tackle the big issues the title suggested.

I’ll give it another try for the second half. So many thin..."


Cheers Cristian! I actually went into this hoping for a refresher on the planetary boundaries (esp. from the physical sciences side), so I was “prepared for the worst” in terms of the litany of ecological issues in Parts 1/2 (which I found quite concise given the essay format).

Then again, for our focused dives into geopolitical economy, I’d say Parts 3/4/5 would not make an exceptional standalone book for our purpose. This book is introductory, whereas we are seeking the next-step dives to really connect the dots and map out the steps.

Ex. Something on my mind to connect:

i) Building power by targeting systemic vulnerabilities:
--In the Global North, production strikes (i.e. factories) may have been evaded due to outsourcing, but COVID reveals how vulnerable distribution strikes are (supply chain: dock workers/truck and rail transportation/ warehouse logistics: Choke Points: Logistics Workers Disrupting the Global Supply Chain) as well as “essential workers” (food/care/maintenance).
…Instead of doing a traditional shutdown strike (which in this case would be divisive for the public as these are essential services rather than factories churning out more commodities), how about alternatives like one where exchange of money (obviously the profit and rent-seeking aspects) is reduced to the bare minimum (bare bones accounting, as social relations cannot be re-invented instantly; perhaps using alternative local currencies, see point below), as a live demonstration of furthering the social Commons beyond capitalism’s artificial scarcity?
[Harald Beyer-Arensen] ends his essay by suggesting that certain strikes are actually better examples of direct action than others. His favorite example is a strike by transit workers in Melbourne during the 1980s in which, rather than walking off their jobs, bus drivers and train conductors stayed on, but stopped collecting fares—effectively making mass transportation free until the action was over. Imagine, he suggests, what would happen if, for just one day, workers in every branch of industry and service trade did the same. This alone could be a major step in showing how a capitalist economy could be transformed into an economy of freedom. [From Graeber’s Direct Action: An Ethnography; emphases added]
…we also have Varoufakis’ idea of targeting the systemic risk of financial instruments in Another Now: Dispatches from an Alternative Present.

ii) Debt jubilee and restructuring:
--i.e. public banking, turning money/credit into a public utility, and for different scales, how this will “degrow” our economic addiction since so much of economic activity is to pay off parasitic debt overhead (esp. housing, also education/healthcare/old age etc.; this is for workers of course; I’m also curious the debt relationships between industrial capitalists and their creditors)…
...Inspired of course by Graeber’s Debt: The First 5,000 Years (which was inspired by Hudson The Bubble and Beyond).

iii) Re-valuing (thus changing rewards/incentives) for work (esp. care work).

…I’d like to see some critical and rigorous analysis of this type, to connect these dots and investigate the potential scales (how much impact on capitalist emissions?) and steps... Something like Varoufakis’ Another Now but with more emphasis on the ecological lens.


message 8: by John (new)

John Who is the target audience here and what is the general strategy?


The Conspiracy is Capitalism John wrote: "Who is the target audience here and what is the general strategy?"

--I just think of all the people here in Vancouver who showed up for the climate march (I can’t remember being in a march that big for anything here), and then the next day going back to reproduce capitalism.
…So, these folks are past the “science denial” phase; the target should be the huge gap between vague concerns vs. social transformations needed.
--On social transformations, this book reminds me: emissions in isolation is frustratingly abstract, thus difficult to create visceral campaigns for diverse concerns to match the urgency/scale needed. However, thanks to capitalism’s contradictions, so many crises are directly tied to emissions.
…That’s why I started by listing capitalism’s variety of alienating “jobs”. For social transformation, there are indeed more visceral issues like building community relations and autonomy, re-valuing care, reconnecting with the land… these can be the direct issues for mobilization, and in parallel we strategically plan how these tie into the urgency of emissions.


message 10: by Mark (new)

Mark Brilliant review as always, Kevin. Thanks for highlighting this one.


message 11: by Steve (new) - added it

Steve Lawless Will give it for Xmas presents. Yet to read it. Of course the imperative is to take action. Just Stop Oil in the UK. Civil resistance may bloom into class struggle.


message 12: by Steve (new) - added it

Steve Lawless Owning The Future is my read of the year so far. Look forward to this one


The Conspiracy is Capitalism Steve wrote: "Owning The Future is my read of the year so far. Look forward to this one"

I'm behind on Adrienne Buller's works; great to see the younger generation (my generation) of scholars come out with books to popularize research/activism for such dire topics!


The Conspiracy is Capitalism Mark wrote: "Brilliant review as always, Kevin. Thanks for highlighting this one."

Cheers Mark! I enjoyed perusing your bookshelf; always relieved to meet someone who is both experienced with economics/finance while also being critical of its abstractions/horrors. I’ll make sure to pick your brains on the topic, and on JKG when I eventually get to his works :)


message 15: by John (new)

John How about McKibben's article?


message 16: by The Conspiracy is Capitalism (last edited Feb 08, 2024 12:16AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

The Conspiracy is Capitalism John wrote: "How about McKibben's article?"

--Hmmm, I thought I mentioned McKibben’s “The Persistence of Fossil Fuels” essay, but looks like I didn’t have any notes on it to review…
…In a collection like this, there will be enough introductory repetition (and Greta’s essays are already providing summaries), so I would have liked McKibben to focus on taking more advanced steps which he only raises near the end:
The fossil fuel industry continue to lobby, to greenwash, to delay. But now they are met by a large citizens’ movement that, for instance, has persuaded institutions to divest huge amounts of their stock, making it more difficult for them to raise capital. Other activists have blocked pipelines and coal terminals. So change is coming – the main question is, how fast?
…Elsewhere, he wrote an article available on New Yorker online published Sep 17, 2019 called “Money is the Oxygen on which the Fire of Global Warming Burns: what if the banking, asset-management, and insurance industries moved away from fossil fuels?”.
…He recently gave a guest lecture where he mentioned the need to mobilize private investment. And when asked about Global North helping the Global South, he said what the South really needs is “capital” for an immediate Green Transition and mentioned existing investment institutions like the IMF/World Bank.
--I’m obviously quite concerned with this supposedly “pragmatic” framing. The Global North’s investment institutions in their current state are dominated by Finance capitalism, not the post-WWII reconstruction-era Industrial capitalism.
…So, I think the following are going in opposing directions:
a) Radical divestment: targeting the fragility of Finance capitalism, a parasitic superstructure that serves no productive purpose so it can be cleanly severed from productive services/operational accounting.
b) Green capitalism: is it really “pragmatic” to spend our limited resources trying to lobby Finance capitalism into facilitating productive development? Sounds like trying to lobby the US military into nonviolence. The whole point of Finance capitalism is to seek economic rent from other productive sectors. What kind of wizardry would we need to financialize the environment in order to incentivize a reversal in its logic?
--As for Global South’s needs, what is “capital” from the Global North? Finance capital? That is debt.
…What the Global South actually needs is less debt from the Global North (i.e. abolishing their odious debts imposed by the Global North; they need economic sovereignty so they don’t keep piling on odious debts). They need abolition of Global North intellectual patent monopolies on renewable technologies; so much actual productive capacity is already outsourced (albeit unevenly) to the Global South, so it’s these IP rents/debts/trade to appease Global North consumption rather than self-sufficiency that drive up so much cost.
…They need South-South cooperation/regionalism rather than Global North rent-seeking, with China/BRICS as a more pragmatic source of productive investments, learning from China in terms of not just technology but science transfers (to build the future’s technologies).
...One non-climate example is India's incredible productive capacity for pharmaceuticals and South Africa's need for AIDs medications. The main barrier? Global North's Big Pharma IP patent monopolies. This was the origins of BRICS, going back to 2003 IBSA (India, Brazil, South Africa). See the article "The BRICS Have Changed the Balance of Forces, but They Will Not by Themselves Change the World: The Thirty-Third Newsletter (2023)" on the Tricontinental by Vijay Prashad (The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World).


message 17: by Iwan (new)

Iwan Monumental review of a book that I bought a few months ago and that collected dust in my bookcase. Thanks to your review I now feel the need to read some essays. I still doubt whether I'm gonna read this work from begin till end.


Freso :watermelon: And you giving it 5 stars and your review moves this from a maybe-to-read to to-read! Thank you! 🫡


message 19: by Jon (new)

Jon Newman Another fascinating review, Kevin. Interesting that you quote Steinbeck - a quote of his has always resonated with me: "The reason socialism hasn't caught on in the US is that Americans see themselves as temporarily inconvenienced millionaires."


The Conspiracy is Capitalism Iwan wrote: "Monumental review of a book that I bought a few months ago and that collected dust in my bookcase. Thanks to your review I now feel the need to read some essays. I still doubt whether I'm gonna rea..."

Cheers Iwan, the good thing with compilations is we can pick and choose in the table of contents which topics we prioritize and not feel guilty about disrupting the flow :)


The Conspiracy is Capitalism Freso :watermelon: wrote: "And you giving it 5 stars and your review moves this from a maybe-to-read to to-read! Thank you! 🫡"

Cheers Freso, while we would push harder on the radical politics side, it’s always helpful to practice how we synthesize this with the technical aspects and how we communicate this. I see you’re going through This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate, I’ll be curious to read your reflections.


The Conspiracy is Capitalism Jon wrote: "Another fascinating review, Kevin. Interesting that you quote Steinbeck - a quote of his has always resonated with me: "The reason socialism hasn't caught on in the US is that Americans see themsel..."

Cheers Jon, it’s interesting you bring up that legendary quote which I’ve also enjoyed referencing… I later read somewhere it was misquoted (which is no surprise really, as so many popular quotes are misattributed lol; ideas were never meant to be static…), and having a quick look now there’s a Reddit post suggesting author Ronald Wright misquoted (and more importantly mis-framed) Steinbeck’s “A Primer on the 30s” article, which read:
"Except for the field organizers of strikes, who were pretty tough monkeys and devoted, most of the so-called Communists I met were middle-class, middle-aged people playing a game of dreams. I remember a woman in easy circumstances saying to another even more affluent: 'After the revolution even we will have more, won't we, dear?' Then there was another lover of proletarians who used to raise hell with Sunday picknickers on her property. […]

I guess the trouble was that we didn't have any self-admitted proletarians. Everyone was a temporarily embarrassed capitalist. Maybe the Communists so closely questioned by the investigation committees were a danger to America, but the ones I knew — at least they claimed to be Communists — couldn't have disrupted a Sunday-school picnic. Besides they were too busy fighting among themselves."
…Of course, we always have to consider critiques in context. I definitely share a concern with leftist infighting and biases of middle-class intellectualism/idealism. However, in terms of big picture critiques, US Communists are the least of my concerns. Any vocal sectarians always distract us for the many more on the front-lines of struggles, and US Communists were well-represented in sacrificing on the front lines in not just strictly economic struggles (ex. Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists During the Great Depression).
…In the big picture, US socialism was crushed by the imperialist Red Scare purging anyone remotely Left, with the support of liberals/social democrats, esp. the AFL-CIO purging 12 unions, reducing its membership by 1.7 million, with the US labour movement never recovering since (Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism).
…Always tricky trying to decipher the real-world politics of popular fiction writers… at a glance, Steinbeck was part of the (Communist) League of American Writers in the 1930s, had some involvement with the CIA in the 1950s while trying to navigate through the "Red Scare" House Un-American Activities Committee, and later in the late 1960s did not speak out against the war on Vietnam.
...Reminds me of Orwell focusing on the threat of communism and being dismissive of socialists while being rather close to British imperialism.
…As for the misinterpreted quote, I’d frame it as the successes of the US’s cultural propaganda system, which is quite an expensive industry (money well-spent by capitalists); this framing emphasizes how manufactured the phenomenon is. We are all a mess of contradictions, and carefully re-framing can do wonders (ex. Occupy Wall Street, Bernie Sanders movement).


message 23: by Jon (last edited Feb 08, 2024 11:07PM) (new)

Jon Newman Kevin wrote: "Jon wrote: "Another fascinating review, Kevin. Interesting that you quote Steinbeck - a quote of his has always resonated with me: "The reason socialism hasn't caught on in the US is that Americans..."

My understanding of Orwell was that he was a committed socialist, who was appalled at the way the Soviet revolution deteriorated. But I suppose that would not necessarily preclude him from having some imperialist tendencies.


message 24: by John (new)

John Update on environmental economics?


The Conspiracy is Capitalism John wrote: "Update on environmental economics?"

I realized I’ve been stagnant on my priority readings for the past 5+ years, so I’m re-prioritizing the must-reads:

i) Mainstream textbooks:
-Daly’s Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications (2nd edition)
-Costanza/Daly etc. An Introduction to Ecological Economics (2nd edition)
-Hall’s Energy and the Wealth of Nations: Understanding the Biophysical Economy
-Georgescu-Roegen The Entropy Law and the Economic Process
-(micro) Ostrom’s Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
ii) Marxist synthesis with Daly: Burkett’s Marxism and Ecological Economics: Toward a Red and Green Political Economy
iii) Degrowth econ: Jackson’s Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet
iv) Political Ecology synthesis with Daly: Martínez-Alier’s The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation


back to top