Jim Fonseca's Reviews > The Years

The Years by Annie Ernaux
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
6743601
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: french-authors, france, autobiographical, memoirs, history

This book is essentially an autobiography structured around a chronology of French history, politics and societal change from WW II to the present. What follows is a summary rather than a review. While I avoid spoilers related to the author’s personal life, I really have to say SPOILERS FOLLOW.

description

The author (the 2022 Nobel Prize winner) picked a bad time to be born: 1940, right at the start of WW II. She grew up in a small town in Normandy, 90 miles from Paris, when people still didn’t travel much. “…when you never leave home, even the next town is the ends of the earth.” People who had seen the Eifel tower “took on an air of superiority.”

Sections of the story are introduced by photos, later movies, and videos of a girl and her family as is someone is flipping through an old album.

Some of the things we read about:

Black and white TV, radio and television jingles for products; the annual Tour de France bicycle race where she tracked riders' progress with dots on a map. They had radios but saw TV only in cafes and in store windows where people gathered to watch. All the religious stuff: boys and girls sat on separate sides in church, no meat on Fridays. The hardship of poverty – never throw anything away. Newspaper used as toilet paper. Her schooling at a parochial girls’ school and all the crazy misinformation girls spread about sex.

We mark time by great events like a railway strike in 1953 and the fall of Dien Bien Phu, 1954. The fighting in Algeria. There are big international events too: the building of the Berlin Wall, the Cuban missile crisis, JFK’s assassination, Mao, the Beatles.

As a young teen she feels backward. Her family doesn't have a Frigidaire on indoor plumbing and she still hasn’t been to Paris. But there is an onslaught of new things: plastic cooking utensils replace metal ones; a gas stove replaces coal; a Formica kitchen table replaces the old wooden one covered with an oilcloth. Record players, hula hoops, transistor radios.

(This is not from the book, but from a magazine article I read recently mentioning how important the cheap transistor radio was that every kid could have. Parents controlled the music on the TV and the expensive big radio and record player in the living room. But now kids could listen to their own music in their rooms. Bing Crosby and Patti Page, parental favorites, did not promote rebellion.)

The author tells us that the feeling of endless progress was so strong in the 1960s that people talked of having a pill for food in 2000, robots would do the housework and people would be living on the moon. Did that happen?

There was ‘a pill’ though. In France, only available to married women. Girls thought “We’d be so free in our bodies it was frightening. Free as a man.”

The author makes much of the student strikes and political turmoil that upended the French nation starting in May 1968. That was a watershed in French history. She tells us that even years afterward, you might meet someone and think ‘What side was he on in 1968?’ After those events, “Now, everything one considered normal had become the object of scrutiny.” She writes “1968 was the first year of the world.” After 1968, ‘everyone was supposed to be listened to’: women, gays, miners, prisoners, prostitutes.

description

Now the pictures in the album become those of a young married woman with kids, bringing in bags of groceries from a car. It was an era of materialism. “Spending was in the air.” And “The ideals of May 1968 were being transformed into objects of entertainment.” People dreamed of a country life (which most had gladly left behind by then), while they flocked to cities and suburbs.

But she tires of this life. Her new symbol is a shapeless dress that indicates “Fatigue and an absence of a desire to please.” She is seized “…for the first time by the terrible meaning of the phrase I have only one life.” [LOL When is GR going to let us use italics without special formatting?]

The socio-political environment changes again. It’s a time of concern about Arab immigration – the Banlieue ghettos. Catholicism has essentially vanished from their lives. Sony Walkmans and computer games amplify the process of walling oneself off from society that began with the transistor radio. At a later age the author tells us the computer was “…the first object to which we ever felt inferior.” “We never ceased to upgrade. The failure to do so meant saying yes to aging.”

I found it fascinating too that way back, starting in the 1960s, the anti-immigration platform of right-wing political leader Jean-Marie Le Pen (father of Marine Le Pen who has continued his prejudices) presaged the racism and antisemitism of today’s American political scene where Le Pen “…was the guy who said out loud what others were secretly thinking.”

Late middle age is a time of dispossession. The kids have left home; the husband is gone, furniture is being sold off, parents are gone or going.

Did you ever read a book where you WANTED footnotes? There are dozens of references to French events that most Americans will be clueless about. Just one example: she mentions ‘the Petit-Clamant attack.’ That’s it. You have to look it up if you want to know that’s the name of a town where a hit squad fired machine guns at President de Gaulle’s car in an assassination attempt in 1962. (There are 20 or so footnotes, I guess for references that even French people might find obscure, but believe me, an American needs many more footnotes. We know from context that many are references to grisly crimes, such as Bruay-en-Artois.

description

I loved the book because I enjoyed learning about recent French history and politics. The author is a bit older than me but the timeline for innovations is about the same as it was for me since the US was probably a few years ahead of France in our ability to buy consumer stuff.

This is the second book I've read by the 2022 Nobel Prize winner (b. 1940). Almost all of her work is autobiographical. Her books in order, catalog her parents’ lives, her teenage years, her marriage, her affair with an East European man (Simple Passion, the first book of hers I read), an abortion she had, the onset of Alzheimer's, her mother's death, her battle with breast cancer.

Top photo the author in the 1960s from annie-ernaux.org
Demonstrations in Paris in May 1968 from thenewyorker.com
The author from nytimes.com

[Revised 6/21/23]
222 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Years.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 29, 2022 – Started Reading
December 5, 2022 – Shelved
December 5, 2022 – Shelved as: french-authors
December 5, 2022 – Shelved as: france
December 5, 2022 – Shelved as: autobiographical
December 5, 2022 – Shelved as: memoirs
December 5, 2022 – Shelved as: history
December 5, 2022 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-32 of 32 (32 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Teresa (new)

Teresa Wonderful review Jim!!!


message 2: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Teresa wrote: "Wonderful review Jim!!!"

Thank you Teresa!


David Fabulous review Jim and yes I wanted footnotes too. You cover so much that makes me realize how good a book it was.

Some events I knew, others not a clue. I too wondered at times what political stripe she was or thought that all politicians were bad in her view. De Gaule went from hero to zero, it seems.

I too learned a lot about France especially 1968 events. It was a remarkable story, one that I could relate too and not at all (being a woman and all those changes). What a life!


message 4: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca David wrote: "Fabulous review Jim and yes I wanted footnotes too. You cover so much that makes me realize how good a book it was.

Some events I knew, others not a clue. I too wondered at times what political st..."

David, yes I thought it was great. I'm close enough in age to the author that I felt it was like a trip down memory lane especially in the sequence of innovations. I remember no TV, no phone, no hot water (although we had indoor plumbing), kerosene heat switched to gas, an ice box replaced by a Frigidaire, eventually a tiny B&W TV with 3 channels and nothing on after midnight, oilcloth on a wood kitchen table replace by Formica, etc. etc. LOL


message 5: by Teresa (new)

Teresa Me too Jim. We moved from England to Ireland when I was about six years old. What an eye opener!!! No electricity, no running water, Seven of us in three rooms. I don't know how my mother didn't go crazy. In England we had electricity and an outside toilet, lived in a street with shops all around. We lived in the back arse of no where when we moved here. Ireland was way, way behind the times in the 60's and 70's.


message 6: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Teresa wrote: "Me too Jim. We moved from England to Ireland when I was about six years old. What an eye opener!!! No electricity, no running water, Seven of us in three rooms. I don't know how my mother didn't go..."

Yes, a lot of it is about geography! (I was a geog prof.) You can be in different worlds depending on WHERE you are. And that was a theme in the book. She felt left out in a way, not living in or near Paris. Of course today, 90 miles is almost nothing, but it was a big deal when she was growing up.


message 7: by Barb H (new)

Barb H Excellent review, Jim and to use your word, fascinating!
I admit that I was born around the same time as this author, so I experienced the advances, changes and events you have mentioned. These things remind me of the book I often think of, Future Shock , which was published in the 70's and refer to how people react to rapid changes.


message 8: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Barbara H wrote: "Excellent review, Jim and to use your word, fascinating!
I admit that I was born around the same time as this author, so I experienced the advances, changes and events you have mentioned. These th..."


Thanks Barbara, it was a fun read for us old fogies as she recalled so many things we all remember -- hulahoops for example. How many young ppl know what oilcloth is? I had fun with my son once (an engineer) when I found something in an old drawer and asked him - tell me what this is for? He had no idea. It was one of those disks that you put in a 45 rpm record so that it would fit on the spindle of a 33 rpm record player. Remember those?


message 9: by Kath (new) - added it

Kath B Great review Jim.


message 10: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Kath wrote: "Great review Jim."
Thank you Kath!


message 11: by Barb H (new)

Barb H Jim, as you mentioned, so much has become dated! I referred to someone as a "foreflusher". My kids did not understand that word. They are well educated. So language is in that category, although it is fluid!


message 12: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Barbara H wrote: "Jim, as you mentioned, so much has become dated! I referred to someone as a "foreflusher". My kids did not understand that word. They are well educated. So language is in that category, although it..."

Barbara, my son was about 30 and he got a big kick out of my saying "We were packed in like sardines." He had never heard that. LOL


message 13: by Jennifer (new)

Jennifer nyc Thanks for the warning, Jim. I enjoyed your first paragraph. Will return after I’ve read…


message 14: by Carmen (new)

Carmen Great review.


message 15: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Jennifer wrote: "Thanks for the warning, Jim. I enjoyed your first paragraph. Will return after I’ve read…"

I hope you like it Jennifer


message 16: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Carmen wrote: "Great review."

Thank you Carmen


message 17: by Frank (new)

Frank Have you heard her latest comments on "toxic masculinity"? If a man said something equivalent about toxic femininity, there is no way he would be awarded the Nobel.


message 18: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Frank wrote: "Have you heard her latest comments on "toxic masculinity"? If a man said something equivalent about toxic femininity, there is no way he would be awarded the Nobel."

I've only read two of her book and haven't followed her comments.


Fergus, Weaver of Autistic Webs Thanks so very much, Jim. An excellent review!


message 20: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Fergus, Quondam Happy Face wrote: "Thanks so very much, Jim. An excellent review!"

Hi Fergus, thank you!


ReadRat Applause from Austria for your comment


message 22: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca ReadRat wrote: "Applause from Austria for your comment"

Thank you RR! I hope all is well in Austria


HoYee Great review. A good summary of the innovations and political events. Going through your list is like re reading and re experiencing the book QuickTime


message 24: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca HoYee wrote: "Great review. A good summary of the innovations and political events. Going through your list is like re reading and re experiencing the book QuickTime"

Thanks HoYee. Which QuickTime book is that? I searched but there are so many with that title!


message 25: by Electra (new)

Electra I haven't read her yet but I want to read this one first. I'm not curious about her life but what you said about French History and the fact that she grew up around the same time (though 10 y.older) than my Mom, makes me even more curious about it. As for the French History, I totally get it - I knew about the Petit-Clamart and of course French history after WW2 (we're taught that part in high school in France). But I get it when you say footnotes would be helpful especially for a book translated into English.


message 26: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Electra wrote: "I haven't read her yet but I want to read this one first. I'm not curious about her life but what you said about French History and the fact that she grew up around the same time (though 10 y.older..."

Yes, there are some footnotes, but I think those must be things that French ppl may not know. For Americans about three times more footnotes are needed.


message 27: by Electra (new)

Electra Yes, it was then the job of the translator and American editor to add them. I would definitely feel the same reading about a country's history I don't know in detail.


message 28: by Christie (new) - added it

Christie This was my mother's childhood and the '50s are mine. This is now on my List for those reasons and that I am a Francophile! Thank you for your review.


message 29: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Christie wrote: "This was my mother's childhood and the '50s are mine. This is now on my List for those reasons and that I am a Francophile! Thank you for your review."

Glad you like the review Christie. I was in elementary school in the 50s too!


Colleen Chi-Girl Wonderful review, Jim. Very helpful.


message 31: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Fonseca Colleen Chi-Girl wrote: "Wonderful review, Jim. Very helpful."
Thanks Colleen!


message 32: by Emmkay (new) - added it

Emmkay Great review, Jim! And I appreciate the photos - how I wished I could see the actual ones described as I read the book….


back to top