Jonathan K (Max Outlier)'s Reviews > I Am Legend
I Am Legend
by
by
Rating: 3.90
Film adaptations vary, and those that star Oscar winning actors are creatively 'adjusted' for marketing purposes; such is the case with this one.
We must first look at the book's time period, 1976-1979 which may come as a shock to those who saw the movie. An unusual plague strikes the world resulting in unprecedented death tolls and fear of going out at night by the dwindling number of the uninfected. Among the Los Angeles survivors is Robert Neville, husband, educator and above all else, human. Holed up in his home where windows are boarded and doors bolted he dotes over his wife Virginia who's battling the plague. With no cure, vaccine or medical help, she passes soon after.
The nature of the virus is about as strange as they get. Once infected, it causes the individual to hunt for blood turning him or her into a 'vampire'. But this is NOT the creature of folklore and over time Neville comes to realize this. Over the course of the three year period, he studies anatomy and disease and begins testing infected subjects with cures. On a daily basis, Ben Cortman, an infected former friend and colleague comes to his door to bate him. Neville becomes frustrated due to the virus' evolution and turns to alcohol. On days when he's not drinking, he roams the area hunting for equipment and supplies to study the virus. In the process, he discovers a blood test that will detect it.
A couple of years later, when scouring the desolate area for food and supplies in the daylight, he stumbles across Mary Lou, a weakened woman and against his better judgement takes her home. As he cares for her, flash backs of his wife surface while dreams provide details of the past. Lonely and destitute he hesitates to test Mary Lou's blood and eventually her health slowly returns. Rather than spoil the plot, the author throws an unexpected curve ball as the story draws to a close.
Engaging from the beginning, the author's skill at character development, premise and pacing result in a compelling story. And while the film incorporates elements, it differs in numerous ways. Recommended for film buffs like myself who enjoy seeking out the actual story and comparing it.
Film adaptations vary, and those that star Oscar winning actors are creatively 'adjusted' for marketing purposes; such is the case with this one.
We must first look at the book's time period, 1976-1979 which may come as a shock to those who saw the movie. An unusual plague strikes the world resulting in unprecedented death tolls and fear of going out at night by the dwindling number of the uninfected. Among the Los Angeles survivors is Robert Neville, husband, educator and above all else, human. Holed up in his home where windows are boarded and doors bolted he dotes over his wife Virginia who's battling the plague. With no cure, vaccine or medical help, she passes soon after.
The nature of the virus is about as strange as they get. Once infected, it causes the individual to hunt for blood turning him or her into a 'vampire'. But this is NOT the creature of folklore and over time Neville comes to realize this. Over the course of the three year period, he studies anatomy and disease and begins testing infected subjects with cures. On a daily basis, Ben Cortman, an infected former friend and colleague comes to his door to bate him. Neville becomes frustrated due to the virus' evolution and turns to alcohol. On days when he's not drinking, he roams the area hunting for equipment and supplies to study the virus. In the process, he discovers a blood test that will detect it.
A couple of years later, when scouring the desolate area for food and supplies in the daylight, he stumbles across Mary Lou, a weakened woman and against his better judgement takes her home. As he cares for her, flash backs of his wife surface while dreams provide details of the past. Lonely and destitute he hesitates to test Mary Lou's blood and eventually her health slowly returns. Rather than spoil the plot, the author throws an unexpected curve ball as the story draws to a close.
Engaging from the beginning, the author's skill at character development, premise and pacing result in a compelling story. And while the film incorporates elements, it differs in numerous ways. Recommended for film buffs like myself who enjoy seeking out the actual story and comparing it.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
I Am Legend.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
January 13, 2023
–
Started Reading
January 13, 2023
– Shelved
January 13, 2023
–
26.88%
"As with many adaptations, the screen writer takes significant liberties which barely touch the story/characters in the book. Having seen the Will Smith film countless times, I was expecting a dystopian element. Instead we get a story from 1976 about a guy surrounded by vampires..interesting indeed"
page
43
January 15, 2023
–
58.75%
"This one of the better paced stories I've read and far more engaging than the film which does little to explain why the area is devoid of life nor the creatures that live in the shadows, vampires. Fascinating to see how screen writers take elements of a story and take creative liberties to engage the audience"
page
94
January 16, 2023
–
84.38%
"As with most screen adaptations, stories are manipulated for marketing purposes. Fortunately the main character is retained, but premise dramatically altered"
page
135
January 18, 2023
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Kimber
(new)
Jan 19, 2023 03:49AM
I enjoyed the movie. Thank you for bringing the book to light!
reply
|
flag
Kimber wrote: "I enjoyed the movie. Thank you for bringing the book to light!" Thanks and my pleasure..Since studios tend to take liberty with book narratives, I find it interesting to learn the truth, so to speak
Ty Jonathan.. I will try the book because your review is compelling but I was not a fan of the flick or the loss of the dog
Murray wrote: "Ty Jonathan.. I will try the book because your review is compelling but I was not a fan of the flick or the loss of the dog" Thanks my friend..its an interesting story but by no means Pulitzer material :)
I definitely think I need to read this, I love a book that has me engaged throughout! I haven't seen the film yet but I look forward to comparing them! Wonderful review Jonathan! 🙂
Ellie wrote: "I definitely think I need to read this, I love a book that has me engaged throughout! I haven't seen the film yet but I look forward to comparing them! Wonderful review Jonathan! 🙂" Thanks Ellie..the Will Smith film is quite good, but like most adaptations, writers take liberties with plot, characters and premise
I thought it was very interesting to compare the two. I didn't write very much in my review (I read the book/story in 2008 after seeing the movie in 2007) but I remember thinking that it was more of the movie being inspired by the book than it actually being based on the book. I liked both, but they are so different!
Melissa (LifeFullyBooked) wrote: "I thought it was very interesting to compare the two. I didn't write very much in my review (I read the book/story in 2008 after seeing the movie in 2007) but I remember thinking that it was more o..." Agreed Melissa..I enjoyed both of them. That said, its good to see elements of the plot were kept in tact, which is more than I can say for some others, LOL

