Nataliya's Reviews > Orbital

Orbital by Samantha Harvey
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3672777
's review

liked it
bookshelves: 2024-reads

It seems that to turn a narrative set on the International Space Station — in low Earth orbit, with six people in a few tiny modules surrounded by cables and Velcro and darkness and stars and immense yet tiny planet Earth below — into literary fiction it takes removing the plot and leaving just inner dreamlike monologues and musings unable to escape the pull of Earth and humanity. It’s about our human earthly troubles, loneliness, connections, very contemplative and reflective and ultimately hopeful.
“Hello, are you there? Hello?”

Stripped of plot, this is really a very long essay that could have just gone on and on, as the lack of narrative structure other than dividing the book into multiple orbits of Earth over a day does not call for any ending or closure or a stopping point. Usually I’d have my eyes glaze over when confronted with such slow and dreamlike rumination on humanity, but I suppose the periodic injections of space station routines (bagging up waste to burn up in space? muscle atrophy from microgravity? Velcro-ing chopsticks to the table?) made my attention perk up, helping to refocus. I’m just nerdy that way. (Maybe that’s what Kafka needed to get my attention - a spacesuit).
“Before long, for all of them, a desire takes hold. It’s the desire – no, the need (fuelled by fervour) – to protect this huge yet tiny earth. This thing of such miraculous and bizarre loveliness. This thing that is, given the poor choice of alternatives, so unmistakably home. An unbounded place, a suspended jewel so shockingly bright. Can humans not find peace with one another? With the earth? It’s not a fond wish but a fretful demand. Can we not stop tyrannising and destroying and ransacking and squandering this one thing on which our lives depend? Yet they hear the news and they’ve lived their lives and their hope does not make them naive. So what do they do? What action to take? And what use are words? They’re humans with a godly view and that’s the blessing and also the curse.”

(Of course I immediately subscribed to YouTube NASA channel. And viewed live feed of Earth from ISS. Seriously, that’s hypnotic).

Borders are (mostly) invisible from space, and we are all passengers on this tiny blue dot which we cannot leave fully, ever. It’s all a matter of perspective, and it’s humbling realizing your insignificance in the light of something immensely and overwhelmingly amazing. “They’re humans with a godly view,” indeed.
“Some alien civilisation might look on and ask: what are they doing here? Why do they go nowhere but round and round? The earth is the answer to every question. The earth is the face of an exulted lover; they watch it sleep and wake and become lost in its habits. The earth is a mother waiting for her children to return, full of stories and rapture and longing. Their bones a little less dense, their limbs a little thinner. Eyes filled with sights that are difficult to tell.”

And yet this book is a bit long for its short length, in its slow movement through 16 Earth orbits in a day, and like that “godly view” it’s both a blessing and a curse. As much fun as an extra-long contemplative meditation can be, at some point the need arises for something focused somewhere else, something outside the space inside the six crewpersons’ heads (and maybe do something, anything, to help me connect with any of them just a little bit), and something to make time pass in a way that seems more real and less obsessively nebulous, even if the writing is quite lovely.
“The surprising thought occurs to them sometimes: they are encapsulated, a submarine moving alone through the vacuum depths, and when they leave it they will feel less safe. They will reappear on the earth’s surface as strangers of a kind. Aliens learning a mad new world.”

3.5 stars. I’m glad space stuff is coming into the literary fiction world, even if it’s just a framework for now.

——————

Also posted on my blog.
203 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Orbital.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 19, 2024 – Shelved
September 29, 2024 – Started Reading
October 1, 2024 –
40.0%
October 3, 2024 –
54.0%
October 5, 2024 –
99.0%
October 5, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-35 of 35 (35 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala A book that sounds a perfect fit for you, Natalya, yet somehow the wrong size. Still, the quotes you've honed in on are very fine samples of writing.


message 2: by Amina (new)

Amina There is something powerful about that phrase - 'godly view' - rings so very true... As always, very much enjoyed reading your ruminations on what could have been drawn-out rumination of an orbital in space, Nataliya. Great review! 💛


message 3: by Paul (new)

Paul Ataua Thanks for the review! This is one I have been thinking about reading and your review has given me some doubt. Maybe I will wait a bit longer and see what others think


Taufiq Yves This is a fantastic review, Nataliya. Heartfelt.


message 5: by Alexandra (new)

Alexandra I really liked the quotes you included, Nataliya! I am thinking of reading this one, I'll see what I think. I don't mind plotless books, but it rather depends on the book :) Wonderful review!


༺lowthorn༻ “Maybe that’s what Kafka needed to get my attention - a spacesuit” you’re onto something here


message 7: by Mir (new)

Mir I'm reading an interesting (free) set of stories about alien perspectives.
https:// astral-af . org/issues/02


Nataliya Fionnuala wrote: "A book that sounds a perfect fit for you, Natalya, yet somehow the wrong size. Still, the quotes you've honed in on are very fine samples of writing."

The writing was quite beautiful, and I do think that a shorter version of this meditation essay would have worked better than the novel-length book, even a short novel. Still I don’t regret the time I spent with it, and maybe it will help give more space fiction a bit more of a foothold in the “mainstream”.


Nataliya Amina wrote: "There is something powerful about that phrase - 'godly view' - rings so very true... As always, very much enjoyed reading your ruminations on what could have been drawn-out rumination of an orbital..."

Thank you, Amina! I can only imagine how humbling it must be, looking at our planet from above like that.


Nataliya Paul wrote: "Thanks for the review! This is one I have been thinking about reading and your review has given me some doubt. Maybe I will wait a bit longer and see what others think"

Thanks, Paul! This is not a bad book although it appealed to me a bit less than to some other readers. If you are ok with lengthy musings on human condition and lack of plot, it should be at least an alright read. Break g it up into a few chunks over at least a few days helps a bit too with the overlong feeling.

Quite a few readers loved it exactly for its dreamlike rumination vibe, so it’s all about what style of fiction appeals to you.


Nataliya Taufiq wrote: "This is a fantastic review, Nataliya. Heartfelt."

Thanks, Taufiq!


Nataliya Alexandra wrote: "I really liked the quotes you included, Nataliya! I am thinking of reading this one, I'll see what I think. I don't mind plotless books, but it rather depends on the book :) Wonderful review!"

I think you’ll really enjoy the writing. It’s pretty good and turned my hike into almost a dreamlike adventure. It’s not a bad book by any means; it’s just not fully my cup of (space) tea — but I didn’t dislike it at all and may decide to read more by Harvey.


Nataliya ༺lowthorn༻ wrote: "“Maybe that’s what Kafka needed to get my attention - a spacesuit” you’re onto something here"

I’m glad you think so, too! 😆


Nataliya Mir wrote: "I'm reading an interesting (free) set of stories about alien perspectives.
https:// astral-af . org/issues/02"


Sounds like something fun to check out. Thanks!


message 15: by Barbara K (new)

Barbara K Thoughtful review, Nataliya. I’ve considered this book and decided not to read it despite the warm reviews its received by others. Your review captures what I sensed might be a problem for me - that sense of drifting without structure. I am actually fond of books with idiosyncratic structures, but I do like *some* kind of structure. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.


Nataliya Barbara K. wrote: "Thoughtful review, Nataliya. I’ve considered this book and decided not to read it despite the warm reviews its received by others. Your review captures what I sensed might be a problem for me - tha..."

You’re welcome, Barbara! This book tries to have some structure by breaking the astronauts day into the orbits around Earth, but if that division were gone it wouldn’t have changed the book at all.

I think maybe in a properly contemplative mood the book would have worked better for me, but in the absence of that it was just alright, nothing special.


Left Coast Justin Humans are so stupid with long-term goals, but at least some humans appreciate what we have, or had.


Nataliya Left Coast Justin wrote: "Humans are so stupid with long-term goals, but at least some humans appreciate what we have, or had."

Amen to it all, my friend.


message 19: by Phil (new)

Phil Did you know this won the Booker Prize? I just saw that and thought of your review. Cheers!


Nataliya Phil wrote: "Did you know this won the Booker Prize? I just saw that and thought of your review. Cheers!"

I just learned that. It gives me hope that we can see more science fiction - or at least SCIENCE - in mainstream awards.


Hirondelle (not getting notifications) Nataliya wrote: "I just learned that. It gives me hope that we can see more science fiction - or at least SCIENCE - in mainstream awards"

Even just more widely read would be very cool to me. Incidentally, because I thought it very interesting, the next Taylor Jenkins Reid book Atmosphere will be about astronauts. Not sure if it will be your thing, but that is surely going to be a bestseller, and astronauts seem a lot more interesting to me than rock stars!


Nataliya Hirondelle wrote: "Nataliya wrote: "I just learned that. It gives me hope that we can see more science fiction - or at least SCIENCE - in mainstream awards"

Even just more widely read would be very cool to me. Incid..."


Ooooh, I’ll che k it out. Curious to see what she does with astronauts since I actually liked her Daisy Jones. Of course, I’ll be looking for technical details while she likely will care about relationships and such….


Hirondelle (not getting notifications) I did not get a notification for this comment (of course. Of course!). I expect technical details will be all off, but it will be a fun excuse to send me on a wikipedia expedition or something and it will be fun to see astronauts on a bestseller! (It is going to be a bestseller, 100% guaranteed)


Nataliya Hirondelle wrote: "I did not get a notification for this comment (of course. Of course!). I expect technical details will be all off, but it will be a fun excuse to send me on a wikipedia expedition or something and ..."

Hehe, same. I expect it to have a lot of literary license and many hours of me reading the space nitty-gritty, and of course it will be a bestseller and will be voted a winner in that year GR awards based on the author name recognition only.


Hirondelle (not getting notifications) Considering what won the Goodreads award for sf this year I am sure Reid would be an improvement in every regard.

ministry of time is such bad bad self insert fanfic.


message 26: by Nataliya (last edited Dec 05, 2024 06:41PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Nataliya Hirondelle wrote: "Considering what won the Goodreads award for sf this year I am sure Reid would be an improvement in every regard.

ministry of time is such bad bad self insert fanfic."


Oh, let me see what won….

Ah, ok. Looked at all the winners, and other than Stephen King I don’t think I’m interested in any of those.

Also, shelving Orbital under science fiction in those awards (I swear, that’s where I saw it when the awards voting was announced first)is odd. Not everything with the spaceship automatically belongs to science fiction. Just confirms that whoever compiles the list does a very mediocre job.


Hirondelle (not getting notifications) I got weird theories about the current state of publishing (its boom is not about books, but about social media fuelled trends though hopefully it will be about books for many who find books through that) and I think the highest correlation for a book's final position or if it wins is, grand disclosure, how many people read it even if many thought it was crap. So in the end marketing...

And yeah, spaceships (or the ISS if it is that... It's not very glamorous for a space ship ...) are not inherently science fiction, But I am just reading Roadside Picnic and thinking of it and Ministry of Time and comparing is making me very sad about modernity...


message 28: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Knowing your love of all things spacey, and that this doesn't get into anything tech or dramatic plotwise, I was hoping to see you review it. You didn't disappoint (not that I thought you would). A very nuanced and helpful review (but which somehow still leaves me undecided about whether to get it).

Anyway, festive felicitations to you and yours.


Cathy All very well put, as usual. I had similar feelings listening to the audio. I just looked at that NASA stream, it is hypnotic.
Have you read Ascension? I think that was on last year‘s Booker Prize longlist. I liked it.


Nataliya Hirondelle (not getting notifications) wrote: "I got weird theories about the current state of publishing (its boom is not about books, but about social media fuelled trends though hopefully it will be about books for many who find books throug..."

Didn’t get a notification for this comment because GR 🤷‍♀️
You are likely right about the current publishing. Visibility and recognition outweigh quality.

Oh, and I’m glad I haven’t wasted my time on Ministry of Time. And yeah, spaceships are now literary fiction, no matter what GR awards may think.


Nataliya Cecily wrote: "Knowing your love of all things spacey, and that this doesn't get into anything tech or dramatic plotwise, I was hoping to see you review it. You didn't disappoint (not that I thought you would). A..."

Thanks, Cecily. You know, it seems that most of my GR friends ended up lukewarm about it — and it didn’t seem to matter if they are more of science fiction reading kind of literary fiction devotees.


Nataliya Cathy wrote: "All very well put, as usual. I had similar feelings listening to the audio. I just looked at that NASA stream, it is hypnotic.
Have you read Ascension? I think that was on last year‘s Booker Prize ..."


I haven’t read it. Is it In Ascension? I’m curious and may try it.

NASA stream is indeed hypnotic.


message 33: by Colleen (new)

Colleen So very well said. I'm quite bored and, sadly, not even a third of the way. Jumping ship...


message 34: by Michelle (new)

Michelle Yeahhh I'm gonna skip this. The prose sounds beautiful, but musings on why "human nature is so senselessly destructive" annoy me because our problem isn't human nature. The destruction of the earth is the byproduct of a handful of assholes who have systematically hoarded way too much power and resources (over generations) instead of getting fucking therapy. And now everyone else has trauma because of it and keeps traumatizing each other. Human nature will absolutely fix this mess if we can ever get people who are a danger to themselves and others out of positions of power, stop propaganda, and administer mass trauma healing.


jrendocrine at least reading is good Reading this for book club and am puzzled as to the Booker enthusiasm - though the year to year panels do frequently miss. Orbital's really an extended essay, isn't it? Even the space-y stuff barely holds my attention, since it's pretty prosaic/known. I was hoping that you might promise me something to look forward to, some leaping/binding thought but... it is what it is. On another front, I'm going to try some of your fav, Tshiakovsky, for sure I'll get a plot.


back to top