Em's Reviews > Alchemised

Alchemised by SenLinYu
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
98067259
's review

did not like it

DNF: This has the most egregious grammatical errors I have ever seen in a Del Ray, Random House published book. The prose structure is shockingly poor.

I can't finish this book. It's just far too difficult to get over the terrible, terrible grammar. In the first three chapters, there's maybe one actual sentence every ten lines or so. The misplaced modifiers are grotesque. This author has throats thinking. She has feet talking. Misplaced modifiers ruin writing. I cannot understand why this book wasn't edited and cleaned up. Writing is a professional art form. It's honestly offensive to me when hack jobs like this are published and hyped up, yet clearly the agent, the editor, and the author have made zero attempt to actually revise very basic errors most sixth graders could correct.

As the novel progresses, the grammar begins to stabilize a bit more. Unfortunately, this is largely due to the use of short, choppy sentences which "tell" a great deal instead of "showing." And the short repetition of simple sentences put me straight to sleep.

This rating is nothing to do with the premise or the story itself as I really couldn't even glean that thread through the mixed up, coagulation of words jumbled together with a period at the end. This rating is for the worst attempt at grammar and prose structure I have ever seen from a true publisher. If this had been independently published, then I might refrain from chiming in with a rating. But a book by Del Ray has had every advantage with multiple readers. What on earth were they thinking?

Is grammar necessary? I'm very aware that some people reading this review will be thinking to themselves, "but some sentence fragments are stylistic." True. But, stylistic grammar errors are always obviously intentional. An example of a book which varies sentence structure to near perfection and employs organic prose structure to show emotion instead of telling it is They Bloom At Night by Trang Thanh Tran. Tran is an author who has clearly mastered grammar, and so they know when and how to deliberately break the rules of grammar for emphasis without sacrificing meaning.

I'm certain that SenLinYu has talent, and they obviously have a plethora of ideas. Alchemised is over a thousand pages long, and no one can write that much without having lots to say. I just think their agent, editor and publisher failed them.
516 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Alchemised.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 2, 2025 – Shelved
February 2, 2025 – Shelved as: to-read
September 24, 2025 – Started Reading
September 25, 2025 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-37 of 37 (37 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Yasmine (new) - added it

Yasmine Oh no


message 2: by Kiera ☠ (new)

Kiera ☠ Read to FILTH. Thanks for the heads up lol.


Carol, She's so Novel ꧁꧂ Oh dear! Maybe the publisher no longer employs proofreaders?


message 4: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em It's a mystery to me. But truly I hope they get a strong editor for the next novel because they obviously (1030 p.p. long) have stories to tell.


message 5: by Sarah (new)

Sarah O’Oh! I was planning on checking it out haha 🫢
Thanks for letting us know Em!


Carol, She's so Novel ꧁꧂ Em wrote: "It's a mystery to me. But truly I hope they get a strong editor for the next novel because they obviously (1030 p.p. long) have stories to tell."
Ha, I didn't look at the book length!

1k of a book that needs better proofing would be a bit much!


message 7: by Jill (new) - added it

Jill Yikes! I absolutely love the cover art of this book and was looking forward to reading. 🤷‍♀️


message 8: by Nancy (new)

Nancy Yager I read one book the other day where the spelling was so bad (grammar too), I had to look up the word cean. No definition in Kindle. So I googled it, google came up with ocean. At least that fit in the sentence. Why are these publishers allowing this? Maybe I am just getting old!


message 9: by Anna (new)

Anna Oh damn. :/ It's on my list, but I wonder if I'll be able to read it without getting annoyed.


message 10: by Mariah (new) - added it

Mariah Oh, man! This is on my list, but now I am rethinking it. 🤔


message 11: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em Noelia, thank you, I hear ya. I tried not to address content as much just because I didn't read the last 200 or so pages to see if there was any redemption. But I once read a study that looked at how often women were exposed to the suggestion of violence against women in the news and media as well as in the entertainment industry, and it was staggering. So I too try to minimize my exposure to novels that center on such conflicts.


Haly Hoards Books Thank you for making me lose my FOMO! It looked as if everyone was reading this novel and I was going to miss out! Nope!


message 13: by Emily (new)

Emily H I’m an editor, and the same issues plagued the original fic. I glossed over it because of course, it wasn’t traditionally published then. I mean no offense at all when I write this: I could tell you didn’t finish the book by your review. And sure enough, you didn’t. I completely understand not wanting to finish based on your preferences. However, the only reason I gave its predecessor more praise is because of the impact of the ending. Again, I’m not saying at all that your review isn’t justified, but I strongly recommend you finish it. I’m only 20% into Alchemised, so it’s possible the ending doesn’t pack the same punch as its predecessor, but regardless, I still recommend you finish it.


౨ৎ emily ౨ৎ I haven't heard anyone complain about the grammar so far, I honestly love manacled so much I don't think I'm going to care much. I just want my heart shredded again ♡ I miss sinlinyus writing soooo much


BadWolfShells I'm about 600 pages in, and OMG, it's amazing. I'm so sorry you couldn't get past the errors.


message 16: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em Emily, Yes, I definitely owned that I only read 3/4ths of it because, I agree, you have to take that into consideration when deciding if you want to read it. And prose structure/grammar issues don't bother everyone. It might be a fun, wonderful read for lots of readers. That's the beauty of variety. I studied literature through multiple degrees and that academic perspective impacts how and what I read for better or worse. Academia certainly has its drawbacks. It often ignores fantasy and horror altogether, unfortunately. But I will probably forever cringe (like nails on chalkboard/blood curdling cringe) when I read page after page of misplaced modifiers, and lots of people may not even notice those. I try to be very honest about that so people can decide for themselves.


message 17: by NILTON (new) - added it

NILTON TEIXEIRA Was your copy an ARC or the finished product? I do want to read this book, but if it needs to be revised I will wait for it.


message 18: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em Nilton, it was the real deal, which is why I take such issue with the editor, or lack there of


message 19: by Christina (new) - added it

Christina AGREED!!!! I finally gave up on it halfway through. I couldn’t even focus on the story because I couldn’t get past how awful the writing and grammar was. I will read a lot of bad writing and not care- but it was beyond that point. I will try the audiobook at some point and see if I enjoy the story more


message 20: by Punxsutawney (new)

Punxsutawney Your review is akin to what I would've written had I read what you described. Thank you for saving me from a similarly frustrating experience.

And shame on you Del Ray. BTW, if you think there are no readers who make purchase decisions based on the publisher... you are unequivocally wrong. If I'm on the fence about whether to buy a book or series and see it's published by a company who can't be trusted to properly proofread/edit the retail (I'm expected to pay for it) version then I will skip that purchase. I know I'm not the only one. Do better!


message 21: by Sara (new) - added it

Sara I noticed certain things were “spelled” wrong. For an example, on some of the first pages one of the characters who’s supposed to have a northern dialect says “littler” instead of “small” or “younger. It threw me off so bad until i researched it, and it’s a real thing in old English dialect. Same thing goes for all the other things I thought were grammar mistakes.


message 22: by Meishuu (new)

Meishuu It’s fanfiction writing. There’s a certain “style” these fanfic to published pipelined books follow, these authors don’t get an editor, but one would think they could afford one after all this fanfare.


Flirting with Fiction💕 Ooof. SO offensive to all the talented authors not publishing their hp fanfics.


౨ৎ emily ౨ৎ Idk, the words that are "misspelled" were spelled like that for a reason, it wasn't an accident btw...


biba ♡ this is EXACTLY my issue so far! if they cut down the jumbled mess that is the sentences, i think i would enjoy the book so much more. I don't even get the worldbuilding because I honestly just can't be bothered to read about it. i guess in Manacled it wasn't so apparent because the HP universe was already established


message 26: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em Hey Sara, tyfor your comment. Yes, I take no issue spelling.


message 27: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em Flirting with Fiction, ty. This is exactly it!


message 28: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em biba, yes! It's just too bad because it could've been improved with few more drafts. I wonder if there was some sort of publisher deadline for a monetary return on the investment or something like this which precipitated publication before the book was truly ready.


message 29: by alix (new)

alix flora 🌙 very good review on this


message 30: by Heather (new)

Heather Is anybody bothered that it’s the same PLOT as manacled? Have I just not read enough to see it’ll be different? People are talking about rape, which sounds like it’s actually the only idea she has for a plot. It’s just so bizarre because obviously the reason there was hype around this book is because everybody had read Manacled. That’s who was excited to read this. So why not come up with a new plot line while you’re also creating a whole new world? I can’t decide if I should waste my time reading the rest. 😭


message 31: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em Heather, I didn't read that book online, but as I have seen in articles, they just had to revise and change just enough for JK's people not to sue. So yes, I think that is right.


message 32: by AmdynReads (new)

AmdynReads Thats disappointing to hear. I trudged through Manacled and I thought with some editing and cutting down on the length, this new published version could be amazing. Sounds like they did the bare minimum to not get sued by JK Rowling instead of making necessary edits. I think my book club is about to choose this one to read next. I will likely sit out of it. Thanks for your review.


͙͘͡★ Ancuta✨🌙 So sorry this one didn’t work out.🥹 I was once pretty excited to read myself, but after seeing some reviews I know this one is not for me. I hope your next read is so much better ✨🍁🦦


Kayla one of my favorite parts was when the table radiated through her skull on page 7. YESSSSS BESTIE GIVE US NONSENSE


message 35: by Em (new) - rated it 1 star

Em 😂Kayla, yes--honestly some of the misplaced modifiers have great potential for hilarity. I thought about quoting them for online grammar exercises on what to avoid.


message 36: by MARIAN (new)

MARIAN DIRIENZO "she went violently still" I almost tossed it out the window


message 37: by Jabotikaba (new)

Jabotikaba I guessed that a book adapted from fan fiction could be terrible, but I had no idea how terrible it actually was.
Thank you for letting everyone (including me) know about this. Now, I definitely won't read it.


back to top