Federico DN's Reviews > Catch That Rabbit
Catch That Rabbit
by
by
Rinse and repeat.
Powell and Donovan are two scientists on a planetary mining station, supervising the newly developed robots as they gather their daily quota of ore. At first glance everything seems to be working perfectly well, but under specific conditions the robots go completely haywire, with no reasonable explanation behind it. What on Earth is going wrong?
This was not bad, per se. A moderately short sci-fi story, with a moderately interesting ending.
Here's the thing: this is the third "Powell and Donovan" story I've read, in a row, and it just starts to get old. The two grumpy and usually obnoxious characters are hardly endearing, and their names just feel like name tags to me, you could call them "Smith and Vince" and I couldn't care less because they are barely defined and just don't stand on their own as MCs.
As far as I can see, Asimov's strength seems to be story rather than character development, frequently using the same characters, a different robot, and a new set of circumstances. Which isn't bad, per se; the 3 Laws are his babies and he excels at playing with them, but it can get old too. And after three similar "Powell and Donovan" stories in a row, it starts to feel like playing cards. You can shuffle all you want, and get a new hand each time, but you are always playing poker.
Btw I suck at poker I can't bluff.

-----------------------------------------------
PERSONAL NOTE :
[1942] [19p] [Sci-Fi] [1.5] [Not Recommendable]
-----------------------------------------------
★★★★★ Liar!
★★★☆☆ Robot # 0.1 - I, Robot <--
-----------------------------------------------
Enjuague y repita.
Powell y Donovan son dos científicos en una estación minera planetaria, supervisando los recientemente nuevos desarrollados robots mientras recolectan su cuota diaria de minerales. A primera vista todo parece funcionar perfectamente, pero en determinadas condiciones los robots se vuelven completamente erráticos, sin ninguna explicación razonable detrás. ¿Qué diablos les está pasando?
Esto no estuvo mal, en principio. Una historia de ciencia ficción medianamente corta, con un final medianamente interesante.
Esta es la cuestión: esta es la tercera historia consecutiva de "Powell y Donovan" que leo, y empieza a desgastarse. Los dos personajes gruñones y generalmente desagradables no son entrañables, y sus apelativos bien parecen etiquetas de nombre, podrían llamarse "Smith y Vince" y no podría importarme menos porque apenas si están definidos y simplemente no se sostienen por sí solos como personajes principales.
Hasta donde puedo ver, el punto fuerte de Asimov parece ser la historia más que el desarrollo de personajes, utilizando frecuentemente los mismos protagonistas, con un robot diferente y un nuevo conjunto de circunstancias. Lo cual no está mal, per se; las 3 Leyes son sus bebés y es sobresaliente jugando con ellas, pero también puede desgastarse. Y después de tres historias similares de "Powell y Donovan" seguidas una tras otra, empieza a parecer como jugar a las cartas. Podés barajar todo lo que quieras y obtener una nueva mano cada vez, pero siempre estás jugando al póquer.
Por cierto apesto en el póquer no sé mentir.

* No animals were harmed in the making of this story.
-----------------------------------------------
NOTA PERSONAL :
[1942] [19p] [Ciencia Ficción] [1.5] [No Recomendable]
-----------------------------------------------
Powell and Donovan are two scientists on a planetary mining station, supervising the newly developed robots as they gather their daily quota of ore. At first glance everything seems to be working perfectly well, but under specific conditions the robots go completely haywire, with no reasonable explanation behind it. What on Earth is going wrong?
This was not bad, per se. A moderately short sci-fi story, with a moderately interesting ending.
Here's the thing: this is the third "Powell and Donovan" story I've read, in a row, and it just starts to get old. The two grumpy and usually obnoxious characters are hardly endearing, and their names just feel like name tags to me, you could call them "Smith and Vince" and I couldn't care less because they are barely defined and just don't stand on their own as MCs.
As far as I can see, Asimov's strength seems to be story rather than character development, frequently using the same characters, a different robot, and a new set of circumstances. Which isn't bad, per se; the 3 Laws are his babies and he excels at playing with them, but it can get old too. And after three similar "Powell and Donovan" stories in a row, it starts to feel like playing cards. You can shuffle all you want, and get a new hand each time, but you are always playing poker.
Btw I suck at poker I can't bluff.

-----------------------------------------------
PERSONAL NOTE :
[1942] [19p] [Sci-Fi] [1.5] [Not Recommendable]
-----------------------------------------------
★★★★★ Liar!
★★★☆☆ Robot # 0.1 - I, Robot <--
-----------------------------------------------
Enjuague y repita.
Powell y Donovan son dos científicos en una estación minera planetaria, supervisando los recientemente nuevos desarrollados robots mientras recolectan su cuota diaria de minerales. A primera vista todo parece funcionar perfectamente, pero en determinadas condiciones los robots se vuelven completamente erráticos, sin ninguna explicación razonable detrás. ¿Qué diablos les está pasando?
Esto no estuvo mal, en principio. Una historia de ciencia ficción medianamente corta, con un final medianamente interesante.
Esta es la cuestión: esta es la tercera historia consecutiva de "Powell y Donovan" que leo, y empieza a desgastarse. Los dos personajes gruñones y generalmente desagradables no son entrañables, y sus apelativos bien parecen etiquetas de nombre, podrían llamarse "Smith y Vince" y no podría importarme menos porque apenas si están definidos y simplemente no se sostienen por sí solos como personajes principales.
Hasta donde puedo ver, el punto fuerte de Asimov parece ser la historia más que el desarrollo de personajes, utilizando frecuentemente los mismos protagonistas, con un robot diferente y un nuevo conjunto de circunstancias. Lo cual no está mal, per se; las 3 Leyes son sus bebés y es sobresaliente jugando con ellas, pero también puede desgastarse. Y después de tres historias similares de "Powell y Donovan" seguidas una tras otra, empieza a parecer como jugar a las cartas. Podés barajar todo lo que quieras y obtener una nueva mano cada vez, pero siempre estás jugando al póquer.
Por cierto apesto en el póquer no sé mentir.

* No animals were harmed in the making of this story.
-----------------------------------------------
NOTA PERSONAL :
[1942] [19p] [Ciencia Ficción] [1.5] [No Recomendable]
-----------------------------------------------
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Catch That Rabbit.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 15, 2025
– Shelved
June 16, 2025
–
Started Reading
June 16, 2025
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 50 (50 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Kat
(new)
Jun 21, 2025 06:27PM
I love the card playing analogy, Federico. I'm pretty confident I couldn't bluff anyone if I tried either! I'm sorry these stories don't feel very different from one another.
reply
|
flag
Kat *is catching up* wrote: "I love the card playing analogy, Federico. I'm pretty confident I couldn't bluff anyone if I tried either! I'm sorry these stories don't feel very different from one another."Thank you so much Kat <3. The stories are not so bad, I think Asimov just use the same formula too frequently and they just get blurry in the same collection :p
Sad that it's already getting repetitive, Feddie. Seems like he stuck to the same ingredients with just a slight difference in presentation.Your poker comparison is brilliant! Excellent review! ♡
At least the concept and the story are good. Shame it's already starting to feel repetitive though. Fair review, Federico.
Rosh ~catching up slowly~ wrote: "Sad that it's already getting repetitive, Feddie. Seems like he stuck to the same ingredients with just a slight difference in presentation. Your poker comparison is brilliant! Excellent review! ♡"Yup, and it doesn't get any better. This collection killed almost all my desire to read the rest of the books, but knowing me it's only a matter of time, eventually I'll have to finish this series xD. Thank you so much Rosh <3<3
Thibault wrote: "At least the concept and the story are good. Shame it's already starting to feel repetitive though. Fair review, Federico."Just hoping the repetitiveness doesn't carry to his other books as well! But I guess I'll have to see, someday. Thank you Thibault!
Your review makes it easy to see how it could start to feel repetitive. Hope your next book is better, Federico. :)
Nancy wrote: "Your review makes it easy to see how it could start to feel repetitive. Hope your next book is better, Federico. :)"Thank you so much Nancy! Luckily I'm already done with Asimov, for the moment :p
Cool to see you’re in an Asimov phase Fede! Totally get why this sounds a bit rehashed and tired. Love your analogies and review!
Esta wrote: "Cool to see you’re in an Asimov phase Fede! Totally get why this sounds a bit rehashed and tired. Love your analogies and review!"I'm still due a few reviews but gladly I'm already finished with Asimov, for the foreseeable future lol. Thank you so much Esta <3
¿Ya leíste los cuentos? Si no recuerdo mal había una editorial que los tenía en dos tomos, son adictivos. Los devoré en una semana.
Mientras leía la reseña sentía que ya la había visto; pero el problema no es la reseña, es el libro.
Johannes wrote: "¿Ya leíste los cuentos? Si no recuerdo mal había una editorial que los tenía en dos tomos, son adictivos. Los devoré en una semana."Sipsip, hay algunos cuentos muy buenos Johannes! Leí todos los nueves cuentos de "Yo, Robot", y este es uno de ellos, pero hasta ahí llegué. Por ahora no tengo intención de seguir con los demás libros de la serie, pero en un futuro... seguro :)
Pedro wrote: "Muy bueno! Y un alivio que no se hayan dañado animales. :D"Para los amantes de los animales siempre viene bien poner la aclaración jaja.
Pedro wrote: "Mientras leía la reseña sentía que ya la había visto; pero el problema no es la reseña, es el libro."Sí lo sé. Todos estos pequeños cuentos de Asimov parecen tener la misma portada pero con diferente nombre. También me confundía reseñandolos jaja xD
Liked the "no animals were hurt" part...I hear you on the poker part; not that I have played even but I couldn't bluff to save my life; I am more blunt than that and don't have the patience either...ha
Ah, recycling characters works when there's depth to them. I can see how it got old and boring after a while. Superb review, Federico! :)
Che, bo, no te meta con las tres leyes de la robótica que te vamo a buscar por CABA tritri.Asimov no se mancha papá.
Cindy wrote: "Liked the "no animals were hurt" part...I hear you on the poker part; not that I have played even but I couldn't bluff to save my life; I am more blunt than that and don't have the patience either...."Always crucial to let everyone know all doggies and rabbits survived lol. Thank you so much Cindy <3. I suppose Blackjack is more fun but I suck at it too xD
Srivalli wrote: "Ah, recycling characters works when there's depth to them. I can see how it got old and boring after a while. Superb review, Federico! :)"It's like every single character in Asimov's stories is angry for some reason. Ugh! Thank you Srivalli :D
Juan wrote: "Che, bo, no te meta con las tres leyes de la robótica que te vamo a buscar por CABA tritri. Asimov no se mancha papá."Posta este Asimov es a veces más repetitivo que código binario xD
Alexandra wrote: "Asimov is not that good at characters ;) Excellent review, Federico!"Yet you seem to have enjoyed many of his books plenty despite of it lol. Gives me hope for the future :). Thank you Alexandra <3
Well, there's always rummy, Federico, so no need to bluff your way out of that. 😊 Shame though it has become repetitive, though, even when sci-fi does offer a lot of open space for creativity. Still, a fair review, Federico, hope you have a better read next! ☺️
i care for characters refinement than the plot so this sounds like a miss! sorry u didnt enjoy this :/
Amina wrote: "Well, there's always rummy, Federico, so no need to bluff your way out of that. 😊 Shame though it has become repetitive, though, even when sci-fi does offer a lot of open space for creativity. Stil..."Oh rummy! That was a fun exciting game lol. Gladly I'm already done with Asimov so repetitiveness will have to wait... a few years maybe xD. Thank you so much Amina <3
aly wrote: "i care for characters refinement than the plot so this sounds like a miss! sorry u didnt enjoy this :/"Maybe another of his books are better characterized? We'll have to see, someday :p. Thank you Aly!
Fran wrote: "Feddie...No poker face for me either! Excellent review without any bluffing to complete!"I call your bluff. I mean you win lol. Thank you so much Fran <3
Jan wrote: "I'd rather play poker but not with Powell and Donovan. Maybe with Smith and Vince."There's also Dr. Susan Calvin, just not in this one. She gets her own "trilogy" too Jan xD
Fair review and sounds like it wasn’t a bad read— but I will absolutely admit that I’ve never been too enamored of sci-fi and have yet to read something by Asimov that makes me want to keep reading… despite the fact his name is synonymous with sci-fi.
Heidi wrote: "Fair review and sounds like it wasn’t a bad read— but I will absolutely admit that I’ve never been too enamored of sci-fi and have yet to read something by Asimov that makes me want to keep reading..."The stench of classicness maybe. I know Asimov is quite outdated compared to all the fancy exciting sci-fi stuff we have nowadays xD. Difficult to compete lol. Thank you Heidi <3
I can totally understand the story getting old if this was your third “Powell and Donovan” story in a row. Sorry this was a bit boring (I’m guessing) for you. I’m also wondering will there be a fourth book to read? Fantastic review as always, Federico!! 🤗
Rachel wrote: "I can totally understand the story getting old if this was your third “Powell and Donovan” story in a row. Sorry this was a bit boring (I’m guessing) for you. I’m also wondering will there be a fou..."Thank you Rachel <3. Oh there were nine stories in this collection I was reading, but not going to post them all. Just one more review to share and I'm done with Asimov for now xD
Great review, Federico! Oh no, an author that just writes the same story over and over again? I haven't read any of his books yet, so I'll read at least one lol.
Yun wrote: "Great review, Federico! Oh no, an author that just writes the same story over and over again? I haven't read any of his books yet, so I'll read at least one lol."Thank you Yun! Asimov's "Fundation" books are pretty famous too, though haven't read any of them, yet :p
I do not have a poker face either. Shame it was disappointing. I hope you love your current book. Great review, Federico!
Sandysbookaday wrote: "Sorry this was disappointing, Federico, but I enjoyed your review. 💖📚"Thank you Sandy! Duds happen, sometimes :p
Debbie wrote: "Yikes! Are you still planning on reading more by Asminov?"Yes, I'm afraid. My compulsive completionism will eventually break me from the inside and I'll have to read the rest of the 'Robots' books AND the 'Foundation' series. I have little to no control over it :p
Debra wrote: "I do not have a poker face either. Shame it was disappointing. I hope you love your current book. Great review, Federico!"It happens :p. Thank you Debra <3 !
Diana wrote: "You gave it a shot! Onto your next!"Might just give him another shot, in a few years lol. Thank you Diana!
Tina wrote: "Well at least there were a few good ones in the collection! Great review Fedo!"Yeah it wasn't all bad.. thankfully lol. Thank you Tina :) !
It's a shame that the characters weren't relatable or even well-crafted.I've never tried playing poker, but I bet I'd be terrible at it too. lol
Great review!
Persephone's Pomegranate wrote: "It's a shame that the characters weren't relatable or even well-crafted. I've never tried playing poker, but I bet I'd be terrible at it too. lolGreat review!"
They were just so irate and quarrelsome all the time.. they just wore me down. Some people actually found them funny! Maybe Asimov's humor just doesn't hit with me. Thank you Persephone :) !








