Federico DN's Reviews > Catch That Rabbit

Catch That Rabbit by Isaac Asimov
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
29005117
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: shorts, sci-fi

Rinse and repeat.

Powell and Donovan are two scientists on a planetary mining station, supervising the newly developed robots as they gather their daily quota of ore. At first glance everything seems to be working perfectly well, but under specific conditions the robots go completely haywire, with no reasonable explanation behind it. What on Earth is going wrong?

This was not bad, per se. A moderately short sci-fi story, with a moderately interesting ending.

Here's the thing: this is the third "Powell and Donovan" story I've read, in a row, and it just starts to get old. The two grumpy and usually obnoxious characters are hardly endearing, and their names just feel like name tags to me, you could call them "Smith and Vince" and I couldn't care less because they are barely defined and just don't stand on their own as MCs.

As far as I can see, Asimov's strength seems to be story rather than character development, frequently using the same characters, a different robot, and a new set of circumstances. Which isn't bad, per se; the 3 Laws are his babies and he excels at playing with them, but it can get old too. And after three similar "Powell and Donovan" stories in a row, it starts to feel like playing cards. You can shuffle all you want, and get a new hand each time, but you are always playing poker.

Btw I suck at poker I can't bluff.



-----------------------------------------------
PERSONAL NOTE :
[1942] [19p] [Sci-Fi] [1.5] [Not Recommendable]
-----------------------------------------------

★★★★★ Liar!
★★★☆☆ Robot # 0.1 - I, Robot <--

-----------------------------------------------

Enjuague y repita.

Powell y Donovan son dos científicos en una estación minera planetaria, supervisando los recientemente nuevos desarrollados robots mientras recolectan su cuota diaria de minerales. A primera vista todo parece funcionar perfectamente, pero en determinadas condiciones los robots se vuelven completamente erráticos, sin ninguna explicación razonable detrás. ¿Qué diablos les está pasando?

Esto no estuvo mal, en principio. Una historia de ciencia ficción medianamente corta, con un final medianamente interesante.

Esta es la cuestión: esta es la tercera historia consecutiva de "Powell y Donovan" que leo, y empieza a desgastarse. Los dos personajes gruñones y generalmente desagradables no son entrañables, y sus apelativos bien parecen etiquetas de nombre, podrían llamarse "Smith y Vince" y no podría importarme menos porque apenas si están definidos y simplemente no se sostienen por sí solos como personajes principales.

Hasta donde puedo ver, el punto fuerte de Asimov parece ser la historia más que el desarrollo de personajes, utilizando frecuentemente los mismos protagonistas, con un robot diferente y un nuevo conjunto de circunstancias. Lo cual no está mal, per se; las 3 Leyes son sus bebés y es sobresaliente jugando con ellas, pero también puede desgastarse. Y después de tres historias similares de "Powell y Donovan" seguidas una tras otra, empieza a parecer como jugar a las cartas. Podés barajar todo lo que quieras y obtener una nueva mano cada vez, pero siempre estás jugando al póquer.

Por cierto apesto en el póquer no sé mentir.


* No animals were harmed in the making of this story.

-----------------------------------------------
NOTA PERSONAL :
[1942] [19p] [Ciencia Ficción] [1.5] [No Recomendable]
-----------------------------------------------
259 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Catch That Rabbit.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 15, 2025 – Shelved
June 16, 2025 – Started Reading
June 16, 2025 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 50 (50 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Kat (new)

Kat I love the card playing analogy, Federico. I'm pretty confident I couldn't bluff anyone if I tried either! I'm sorry these stories don't feel very different from one another.


message 2: by Federico (last edited Jun 21, 2025 11:18PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Kat *is catching up* wrote: "I love the card playing analogy, Federico. I'm pretty confident I couldn't bluff anyone if I tried either! I'm sorry these stories don't feel very different from one another."

Thank you so much Kat <3. The stories are not so bad, I think Asimov just use the same formula too frequently and they just get blurry in the same collection :p


message 3: by Rosh (new)

Rosh Sad that it's already getting repetitive, Feddie. Seems like he stuck to the same ingredients with just a slight difference in presentation.
Your poker comparison is brilliant! Excellent review! ♡


message 4: by Thibault (new)

Thibault Busschots At least the concept and the story are good. Shame it's already starting to feel repetitive though. Fair review, Federico.


message 5: by Federico (last edited Jun 28, 2025 02:15AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Rosh ~catching up slowly~ wrote: "Sad that it's already getting repetitive, Feddie. Seems like he stuck to the same ingredients with just a slight difference in presentation. Your poker comparison is brilliant! Excellent review! ♡"

Yup, and it doesn't get any better. This collection killed almost all my desire to read the rest of the books, but knowing me it's only a matter of time, eventually I'll have to finish this series xD. Thank you so much Rosh <3<3


message 6: by Federico (last edited Jun 28, 2025 02:17AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Thibault wrote: "At least the concept and the story are good. Shame it's already starting to feel repetitive though. Fair review, Federico."

Just hoping the repetitiveness doesn't carry to his other books as well! But I guess I'll have to see, someday. Thank you Thibault!


message 7: by Nancy (new)

Nancy Your review makes it easy to see how it could start to feel repetitive. Hope your next book is better, Federico. :)


message 8: by Federico (last edited Jun 28, 2025 02:51AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Nancy wrote: "Your review makes it easy to see how it could start to feel repetitive. Hope your next book is better, Federico. :)"

Thank you so much Nancy! Luckily I'm already done with Asimov, for the moment :p


message 9: by Esta (new)

Esta Cool to see you’re in an Asimov phase Fede! Totally get why this sounds a bit rehashed and tired. Love your analogies and review!


Federico DN Esta wrote: "Cool to see you’re in an Asimov phase Fede! Totally get why this sounds a bit rehashed and tired. Love your analogies and review!"

I'm still due a few reviews but gladly I'm already finished with Asimov, for the foreseeable future lol. Thank you so much Esta <3


message 11: by Johannes (new)

Johannes ¿Ya leíste los cuentos? Si no recuerdo mal había una editorial que los tenía en dos tomos, son adictivos. Los devoré en una semana.


message 12: by Pedro (new)

Pedro Muy bueno! Y un alivio que no se hayan dañado animales. :D


message 13: by Pedro (new)

Pedro Mientras leía la reseña sentía que ya la había visto; pero el problema no es la reseña, es el libro.


Federico DN Johannes wrote: "¿Ya leíste los cuentos? Si no recuerdo mal había una editorial que los tenía en dos tomos, son adictivos. Los devoré en una semana."

Sipsip, hay algunos cuentos muy buenos Johannes! Leí todos los nueves cuentos de "Yo, Robot", y este es uno de ellos, pero hasta ahí llegué. Por ahora no tengo intención de seguir con los demás libros de la serie, pero en un futuro... seguro :)


Federico DN Pedro wrote: "Muy bueno! Y un alivio que no se hayan dañado animales. :D"

Para los amantes de los animales siempre viene bien poner la aclaración jaja.


message 16: by Federico (last edited Jun 28, 2025 04:52AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Pedro wrote: "Mientras leía la reseña sentía que ya la había visto; pero el problema no es la reseña, es el libro."

Sí lo sé. Todos estos pequeños cuentos de Asimov parecen tener la misma portada pero con diferente nombre. También me confundía reseñandolos jaja xD


message 17: by Cindy (new)

Cindy aka "The Book Fairy" Liked the "no animals were hurt" part...I hear you on the poker part; not that I have played even but I couldn't bluff to save my life; I am more blunt than that and don't have the patience either...ha


message 18: by Srivalli (new)

Srivalli (Semi-Hiatus) Ah, recycling characters works when there's depth to them. I can see how it got old and boring after a while. Superb review, Federico! :)


message 19: by Juan (new)

Juan Nalerio Che, bo, no te meta con las tres leyes de la robótica que te vamo a buscar por CABA tritri.
Asimov no se mancha papá.


Federico DN Cindy wrote: "Liked the "no animals were hurt" part...I hear you on the poker part; not that I have played even but I couldn't bluff to save my life; I am more blunt than that and don't have the patience either...."

Always crucial to let everyone know all doggies and rabbits survived lol. Thank you so much Cindy <3. I suppose Blackjack is more fun but I suck at it too xD


Federico DN Srivalli wrote: "Ah, recycling characters works when there's depth to them. I can see how it got old and boring after a while. Superb review, Federico! :)"

It's like every single character in Asimov's stories is angry for some reason. Ugh! Thank you Srivalli :D


Federico DN Juan wrote: "Che, bo, no te meta con las tres leyes de la robótica que te vamo a buscar por CABA tritri. Asimov no se mancha papá."

Posta este Asimov es a veces más repetitivo que código binario xD


message 23: by Alexandra (new)

Alexandra Asimov is not that good at characters ;) Excellent review, Federico!


message 24: by Federico (last edited Jun 28, 2025 07:01AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Alexandra wrote: "Asimov is not that good at characters ;) Excellent review, Federico!"

Yet you seem to have enjoyed many of his books plenty despite of it lol. Gives me hope for the future :). Thank you Alexandra <3


message 25: by Amina (new)

Amina Well, there's always rummy, Federico, so no need to bluff your way out of that. 😊 Shame though it has become repetitive, though, even when sci-fi does offer a lot of open space for creativity. Still, a fair review, Federico, hope you have a better read next! ☺️


message 26: by aly (new)

aly ☆彡 i care for characters refinement than the plot so this sounds like a miss! sorry u didnt enjoy this :/


message 27: by Fran (new)

Fran Feddie...No poker face for me either! Excellent review without any bluffing to complete!


Federico DN Amina wrote: "Well, there's always rummy, Federico, so no need to bluff your way out of that. 😊 Shame though it has become repetitive, though, even when sci-fi does offer a lot of open space for creativity. Stil..."

Oh rummy! That was a fun exciting game lol. Gladly I'm already done with Asimov so repetitiveness will have to wait... a few years maybe xD. Thank you so much Amina <3


Federico DN aly wrote: "i care for characters refinement than the plot so this sounds like a miss! sorry u didnt enjoy this :/"

Maybe another of his books are better characterized? We'll have to see, someday :p. Thank you Aly!


Federico DN Fran wrote: "Feddie...No poker face for me either! Excellent review without any bluffing to complete!"

I call your bluff. I mean you win lol. Thank you so much Fran <3


message 31: by Jan (new)

Jan I'd rather play poker but not with Powell and Donovan. Maybe with Smith and Vince.


message 32: by Federico (last edited Jun 28, 2025 12:14PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Jan wrote: "I'd rather play poker but not with Powell and Donovan. Maybe with Smith and Vince."

There's also Dr. Susan Calvin, just not in this one. She gets her own "trilogy" too Jan xD


Heidi (can’t retire soon enough) Fair review and sounds like it wasn’t a bad read— but I will absolutely admit that I’ve never been too enamored of sci-fi and have yet to read something by Asimov that makes me want to keep reading… despite the fact his name is synonymous with sci-fi.


message 34: by Federico (last edited Jun 28, 2025 01:04PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Heidi wrote: "Fair review and sounds like it wasn’t a bad read— but I will absolutely admit that I’ve never been too enamored of sci-fi and have yet to read something by Asimov that makes me want to keep reading..."

The stench of classicness maybe. I know Asimov is quite outdated compared to all the fancy exciting sci-fi stuff we have nowadays xD. Difficult to compete lol. Thank you Heidi <3


message 35: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Hanes I can totally understand the story getting old if this was your third “Powell and Donovan” story in a row. Sorry this was a bit boring (I’m guessing) for you. I’m also wondering will there be a fourth book to read? Fantastic review as always, Federico!! 🤗


Federico DN Rachel wrote: "I can totally understand the story getting old if this was your third “Powell and Donovan” story in a row. Sorry this was a bit boring (I’m guessing) for you. I’m also wondering will there be a fou..."

Thank you Rachel <3. Oh there were nine stories in this collection I was reading, but not going to post them all. Just one more review to share and I'm done with Asimov for now xD


message 37: by Yun (new)

Yun Great review, Federico! Oh no, an author that just writes the same story over and over again? I haven't read any of his books yet, so I'll read at least one lol.


message 38: by Federico (last edited Jun 28, 2025 04:54PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Yun wrote: "Great review, Federico! Oh no, an author that just writes the same story over and over again? I haven't read any of his books yet, so I'll read at least one lol."

Thank you Yun! Asimov's "Fundation" books are pretty famous too, though haven't read any of them, yet :p


Sandysbookaday (taking a step back for a while) Sorry this was disappointing, Federico, but I enjoyed your review. 💖📚


message 40: by Debbie (new)

Debbie W. Yikes! Are you still planning on reading more by Asminov?


message 41: by Debra (new)

Debra I do not have a poker face either. Shame it was disappointing. I hope you love your current book. Great review, Federico!


message 42: by Federico (last edited Jun 29, 2025 09:36AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Sandysbookaday wrote: "Sorry this was disappointing, Federico, but I enjoyed your review. 💖📚"

Thank you Sandy! Duds happen, sometimes :p


message 43: by Federico (last edited Jun 29, 2025 09:39AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Debbie wrote: "Yikes! Are you still planning on reading more by Asminov?"

Yes, I'm afraid. My compulsive completionism will eventually break me from the inside and I'll have to read the rest of the 'Robots' books AND the 'Foundation' series. I have little to no control over it :p


message 44: by Federico (last edited Jun 29, 2025 09:41AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Federico DN Debra wrote: "I do not have a poker face either. Shame it was disappointing. I hope you love your current book. Great review, Federico!"

It happens :p. Thank you Debra <3 !


message 45: by Diana (new)

Diana You gave it a shot! Onto your next!


message 46: by Tina (new)

Tina Well at least there were a few good ones in the collection! Great review Fedo!


Federico DN Diana wrote: "You gave it a shot! Onto your next!"

Might just give him another shot, in a few years lol. Thank you Diana!


Federico DN Tina wrote: "Well at least there were a few good ones in the collection! Great review Fedo!"

Yeah it wasn't all bad.. thankfully lol. Thank you Tina :) !


message 49: by Persephone's Pomegranate (last edited Jul 02, 2025 03:03AM) (new)

Persephone's Pomegranate It's a shame that the characters weren't relatable or even well-crafted.
I've never tried playing poker, but I bet I'd be terrible at it too. lol
Great review!


Federico DN Persephone's Pomegranate wrote: "It's a shame that the characters weren't relatable or even well-crafted. I've never tried playing poker, but I bet I'd be terrible at it too. lol
Great review!"


They were just so irate and quarrelsome all the time.. they just wore me down. Some people actually found them funny! Maybe Asimov's humor just doesn't hit with me. Thank you Persephone :) !


back to top