Teresa's Reviews > Heroines
Heroines
by
by
For me this is a continuation of a revelatory work I read years before Goodreads: The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. (Elaine Showalter’s A Jury of Her Peers: American Women Writers from Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx is another in this mode.) While the Zambreno is also informed by years of knowledge and research, it’s less of academic writing, and much more personal and impassioned in tone. It grew from Zambreno’s personal blog, itself a form of writing that’s disparaged—never mind her topics, which were also criticized. As well as sharing themes, Heroines’s fragmented nature reminded me of Tillie Olsen’s Silences. All of these works provoked the same feelings and reactions in me: deep interest; and appropriate anger over the suppression of women’s voices.
Zambreno’s particular concentration is on her beloved “mad wives,” the (supposedly) mentally ill women whose partners stopped them from writing. Many times these more famous individuals (all men except for a mention or two of Gertrude Stein) used their partners’ stories for their own writing: F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald being the prime example. A collusion of men (husband and doctor) kept Zelda from writing, even when she was at her calmest and the alcoholic F. Scott was at his most emotional. (The excerpt from their transcribed conversation is heartbreaking, as to Zelda.) This type of controlling behavior seems never-endingly relevant, as is the double standard concerning the determination of a mental illness.
(I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention my discomfort over the use of a gendered word I detest, one used here to describe Flaubert’s lover. I understand the word might be the “best” word—I registered one instance where it probably was— but, in general, I fail to understand why the word I just used (“lover”) isn’t used in lieu of a word that has no male equivalent.)
Zambreno’s particular concentration is on her beloved “mad wives,” the (supposedly) mentally ill women whose partners stopped them from writing. Many times these more famous individuals (all men except for a mention or two of Gertrude Stein) used their partners’ stories for their own writing: F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald being the prime example. A collusion of men (husband and doctor) kept Zelda from writing, even when she was at her calmest and the alcoholic F. Scott was at his most emotional. (The excerpt from their transcribed conversation is heartbreaking, as to Zelda.) This type of controlling behavior seems never-endingly relevant, as is the double standard concerning the determination of a mental illness.
(I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention my discomfort over the use of a gendered word I detest, one used here to describe Flaubert’s lover. I understand the word might be the “best” word—I registered one instance where it probably was— but, in general, I fail to understand why the word I just used (“lover”) isn’t used in lieu of a word that has no male equivalent.)
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Heroines.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
March 6, 2025
–
Finished Reading
March 12, 2025
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
Debi wrote: "Except I merely have to read a Wikipedia article to identify a preponderance of words of imbedded misogyny and find myself so irritated that it ruins several hours.."Yeah, none of this will be new to you in that regard, Debi. I guess I find pleasure in my righteous indignation when I read of these historical details.
Gila wrote: "But lazy of me to ask this, apologies, but is there any mention in the book of Dickens' wife?"Not that I remember, and probably not, as Zambreno's focus isn't on her time period. But Catherine Dickens is another great example.
Yes Sandra Gilbert and I believe Susan Gubart - essential reading on my feminist lit courses. Kind of depressing though to read of so much patriarchal suppression. It makes me wonder if Elizabeth Jolley read some of these "academic" texts and thought 'right I'm going to show them the coin flipped' - did you read The Sugar Mother - I posted a new review - you can skip that - just go straight to the book if you want some joyous vindication on the behalf of women - everywhere.



Except I merely have to read a Wikipedia article to identify a preponderance of words of imbedded misogyny and find myself so irritated that it ruins several hours.
Seems like all it takes is a label, say "hysterical," to discount a woman. But have you ever heard that word used to describe a man? Even if he has, in what must be the height of hysteria, screamed at a neighbor's kid for kicking a ball onto his lawn, or used an AK47 to mow down happy humans at a church or concert?
The negating impact of words on women like "domineering," "bossy," "shrill," "calculating," and more must be inestimable.