Ken's Reviews > More Than Words: How to Think About Writing in the Age of AI
More Than Words: How to Think About Writing in the Age of AI
by
by
A great primer on what in hell "AI" is and, most importantly, isn't. With decades of experience as a college writing instructor, Warner's been there and back -- and now THIS. Any teacher of writing at any grade level can relate, as generative AI has become a major problem. Yet another mess, as if education wasn't dealing with enough brushfires.
First off, Warner sides with those who dislike the term "artificial intelligence" because, well, there's nothing intelligent about it. Warner and others prefer to call it for what it is: automation. That's all, really. It spits out based on data that's pumped in, and while Warner tries hard to find uses for it in education and even plays with the automation in many ways himself, he's hard pressed to give it much beyond minor tasks to make our lives easier.
Why? Because writing is thinking and AI doesn't think. Because writing is feeling emotion and AI doesn't feel emotions and cannot reflect. Because writing is quirky at times and provides a snapshot of who we are through voice, and if there's one thing a machine based on algorithms cannot do, it's provide much in the way of voice.
It stands to reason, then, if writers use AI to generate writing, they are denying themselves the process of writing, thinking, feeling. You know, all the stuff that makes us HUMAN. And if they sneak it by their instructors, they are winning battles in a war they are sure to lose because, sooner or late, what they never learned by doing will be exposed.
I like telling students using generative AI to write papers for you is like watching workout videos on YouTube to get in shape. Good luck with that!
Diving even deeper, Warner warns us that it's the Musk-type 1%-ers who stand to make billions on this. The Zuckerberg types who ditch fact checks and create algorithms that reward extreme voices on both sides of the political divide (and the country be damned!) on FaceBook or Meta or whatever it's now called. What's more, creating infrastructure to build and support bigger and bigger AI facilities in rural areas (they need space) is having a huge effect on the environment (if anyone cares), especially water supply (and good luck to farmers in the same county).
Bleak, but revealing. Warner ends with advice under the categories of "Resist," "Renew," and "Explore." If everyone takes this as fait accompli and sits on their hands, it will only grow into a problem that can no longer be tangled with. Sound familiar? The same problem seems to exist politically in the sharply divided States of America (in fairness, I removed the "United"). It's act, or bear the consequences of doing nothing while everything goes to hell in a generative handbasket.
First off, Warner sides with those who dislike the term "artificial intelligence" because, well, there's nothing intelligent about it. Warner and others prefer to call it for what it is: automation. That's all, really. It spits out based on data that's pumped in, and while Warner tries hard to find uses for it in education and even plays with the automation in many ways himself, he's hard pressed to give it much beyond minor tasks to make our lives easier.
Why? Because writing is thinking and AI doesn't think. Because writing is feeling emotion and AI doesn't feel emotions and cannot reflect. Because writing is quirky at times and provides a snapshot of who we are through voice, and if there's one thing a machine based on algorithms cannot do, it's provide much in the way of voice.
It stands to reason, then, if writers use AI to generate writing, they are denying themselves the process of writing, thinking, feeling. You know, all the stuff that makes us HUMAN. And if they sneak it by their instructors, they are winning battles in a war they are sure to lose because, sooner or late, what they never learned by doing will be exposed.
I like telling students using generative AI to write papers for you is like watching workout videos on YouTube to get in shape. Good luck with that!
Diving even deeper, Warner warns us that it's the Musk-type 1%-ers who stand to make billions on this. The Zuckerberg types who ditch fact checks and create algorithms that reward extreme voices on both sides of the political divide (and the country be damned!) on FaceBook or Meta or whatever it's now called. What's more, creating infrastructure to build and support bigger and bigger AI facilities in rural areas (they need space) is having a huge effect on the environment (if anyone cares), especially water supply (and good luck to farmers in the same county).
Bleak, but revealing. Warner ends with advice under the categories of "Resist," "Renew," and "Explore." If everyone takes this as fait accompli and sits on their hands, it will only grow into a problem that can no longer be tangled with. Sound familiar? The same problem seems to exist politically in the sharply divided States of America (in fairness, I removed the "United"). It's act, or bear the consequences of doing nothing while everything goes to hell in a generative handbasket.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
More Than Words.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 4, 2025
–
Started Reading
April 4, 2025
– Shelved
April 7, 2025
– Shelved as:
finished-in-2025
April 7, 2025
– Shelved as:
nonfiction
April 7, 2025
– Shelved as:
teaching
April 7, 2025
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Pedro
(new)
Apr 07, 2025 11:52AM
The divide is happening worldwide, I believe, and I actually blame it all on the lack of human intelligence, critical thinking, and empathetic skills. Another ten years of social media and we’ll be back to where we started: the caves. Ooga booga, ooga booga. Uh uh uh… Ahhhhh..ahhhh…
reply
|
flag
Pedro wrote: "The divide is happening worldwide, I believe, and I actually blame it all on the lack of human intelligence, critical thinking, and empathetic skills. Another ten years of social media and we’ll be..."I completely ooga with your booga sentiments, Pedro.
Nicely reasoned for the defence of human intelligence, Ken.I like you educational homily about work out videos. (though I'm feeling a bit chubby thinking about workout videos)
There's much talk about AI generating genre books. I've already seen (a few years back, too) travel books available online which looked like long glossy brochures. And based on the banal repetitive writing were AI generated.
I guess publishes could simply put a sign up that said Author Generated Books and it may help their credibility. That's a form of resistance.
Wonderful review and overview. I'm going to pick this up, thank you, I'm in a library committee that deals a lot with grappling with AI and this sounds perfect for that.
I agree 100% with calling it "automation." It is so easy to feel defeated these days, but this is an excellent warning. Thanks for the review.
Agreed! I especially like your analogy: "I like telling students using generative AI to write papers for you is like watching workout videos on YouTube to get in shape."Writing, even the act of typing or writing with pen/pencil has a purpose to it. As you say, writing IS thinking, including all the pauses and missteps. So, even people who embrace generative AI, on the argument that it replaces the drudgery of typing or writing, are overlooking the value of what writing does.
Now, this doesn't mean that we cannot utilize generative AI as a writing tool. Are there ways to use AI responsibly in a writing process and in a way that enhances the epistemic value of writing? Probably, but that's unlikely to be how people use it, if it primarily affords writing a paper that is good enough fast enough.
path wrote: "Now, this doesn't mean that we cannot utilize generative AI as a writing tool. Are there ways to use AI responsibly in a writing process and in a way that enhances the epistemic value of writing? .."There's the rub! What exactly IS that use? So far all I've come up with is AI for doing is APA and MLA citations. Mind-numbing stuff! ;-)
Another way might be to use AI after writing a draft, as an aid to revision. The prompt might be “how can I improve this draft?”
Superb review. I absolutely shudder at the thought of the lack of critical thinking and creativity that AI is encouraging. I'm glad your students have you, Ken.
path wrote: "Another way might be to use AI after writing a draft, as an aid to revision. The prompt might be “how can I improve this draft?”"I guess I'd have to see what AI would say to that prompt to answer. Could something voiceless critique work that requires voice to succeed? I'd be curious to see.
Robin wrote: "Superb review. I absolutely shudder at the thought of the lack of critical thinking and creativity that AI is encouraging. I'm glad your students have you, Ken."Thanks, Robin. Some students are always glad to have certain teachers. Others, not so much. ;-)
Nick wrote: "Nicely reasoned for the defence of human intelligence, Ken.I like you educational homily about work out videos. (though I'm feeling a bit chubby thinking about workout videos)
There's much talk a..."
Would people buy AI-generated books? In submission markets, there are warnings everywhere that journals and magazines don't want it and won't publish it. There's a definite divide between the optimists (usually invested in the industry) and the cynics (people who've read, and in some cases written, all their lives).
s.penkevich wrote: "Wonderful review and overview. I'm going to pick this up, thank you, I'm in a library committee that deals a lot with grappling with AI and this sounds perfect for that."Committees! God help you! Just kidding. I think a library committee is a perfect place to step in the ring against AI. More people need to discuss it.
Kathleen wrote: "I agree 100% with calling it "automation." It is so easy to feel defeated these days, but this is an excellent warning. Thanks for the review."Feeling defeated is being defeated. We have automatons (machine and "human") but we have numbers in each other!
David wrote: "Bleak? That just adds to my worries, Ken."It's bad luck to count flowers on a Christmas cactus and bad luck to count worries, even budding ones! Just know they're there and you can deal with them as best you can. ;-)
Ken wrote: "Nick wrote: "Nicely reasoned for the defence of human intelligence, Ken.I like you educational homily about work out videos. (though I'm feeling a bit chubby thinking about workout videos)
There'..."
I think in the genre domain many wouldn't care, that is readers are unlikely to tell the difference, so publishers will do it. In the literature domain, unlikely. But strangely, literary books have also been scanned and used in the AI training process prompting 100s of authors to talk about copyright infringement. That will be interesting.
Nick wrote: "Ken wrote: "Nick wrote: "Nicely reasoned for the defence of human intelligence, Ken.I like you educational homily about work out videos. (though I'm feeling a bit chubby thinking about workout vid..."
Yes, without their permission, showing impunity is the law of AI land.
This is a terrific review Ken. Yes, AI doesn't think or feel, and that's a massive component of writing. Thanks for this reminder, we need to shout it from the rooftops!!!! Great review!
Stellar review, Ken. You nailed the key points of lack of “thinking and feeling”. Mass application of AI grammar is wrecking comma havoc on all the TikTok writing that doesn’t include proper sentence structure. It gives my classic English grammar training an actual, physical pain📚
Ah, yes, the no-longer united states of America, Ken. I hadn’t even thought of AI facilities as vying for our decreasing space. But so many bright, ordinarily active people are feeling all they can do is sit on their hands. Does this book offer channels for action? It still sounds interesting and important, I’ll probably read it when in a nonfiction phase, and truly appreciate your review—but what can we do?
Jennifer wrote: "Ah, yes, the no-longer united states of America, Ken. I hadn’t even thought of AI facilities as vying for our decreasing space. But so many bright, ordinarily active people are feeling all they can..."I feel your frustration. Seems like everyone feels like they're being carried downstream in a flood of inevitability. What can we do? I can do things in my own class, of course, and will do so, but as an ordinary citizen, I have less of an effect. And then there's the priority question: Is AI at the top of our list with all that's going accent-on-down?
So many fires, so few buckets of water!Thank you for your review of this work on an important topic. I appreciate that someone is paying attention.
@Nick, I appreciate your idea: "I guess publishes could simply put a sign up that said Author Generated Books and it may help their credibility. That's a form of resistance.


