Emily May's Reviews > Maybe Someday
Maybe Someday (Maybe, #1)
by

I am conducting what I'm shelving as a "New Adult (NA) Experiment". I'm going to work my way through some of the popular New Adult books and see if I can weed out the crap and hopefully find some surprising gems. Here's hoping!
You know, I promised myself something before starting this book: either I would decide it wasn't for me and DNF it without a review, or I would be pleasantly surprised and continue to the end and write a glowing oh-my-I-can't-believe-it positive review. Neither actually happened. I finished this book and I enjoyed parts of it. I hated others. I only picked the arc up out of curiosity because, as much as I disliked both the author's other books, there was a HUGE improvement in the writing between Slammed and Hopeless. In fact, I even mentioned in my review of the latter that it was almost a good book. What stopped it from being a good book was the glorifying of control freaks and stalker-ish behaviour.
I felt a similar way about Maybe Someday. It was almost a good book and it was definitely better than the other two I've read. I'm starting to think that, if this pattern persists, Hoover might actually write a book I love in about five years time. There's a reason I managed to read every single page of this with ease and it's the same reason I made it through Hopeless - the author writes in an addictive, engaging style. Some people just manage to pull this off and make it seem effortless. It's so easy, so palatable, that you manage to finish it without realising where all the pages went. Hoover definitely deserves credit for that, if nothing else. I think I keep returning to this author because I know she writes so well.
The main things I liked:
Apart from what I mentioned above about the author's addictive easy-to-read style, I also liked the guy in this a lot more than in Hoover's previous works. Dean Holder from Hopeless managed to freak me out and piss me off simultaneously. He was a tall, gorgeous message to teen girls that stalkery, predatory behaviour is absolutely fine when the person doing it is hot. I mean, how much stupid is in this quote:
"My instinct is telling me to run and scream, but my body wants to wrap itself around his glistening, sweaty arms."
But Ridge isn't like that. He's sweet, he's a musician, he's completely free of Douchebag Syndrome. Oh, and he's also deaf. Personally, I thought this was an interesting and original touch that was explored well and sensitively. Very few hearing-impaired protagonists exist, never mind sexy love interests and I really liked this unique view of a relationship where one person is unable to hear the other. They communicate a lot via text and facebook, which was also different.
Where did it all go wrong?
The same place it always seems to go wrong in the New Adult genre: the way every woman but the MC is portrayed. I admit that I almost DNF'd this book after the prologue because Sydney (the MC) calls another girl a whore on page one, and then a few pages later has an encounter with a bitchy girl who - surprise! - is wearing a Hooters uniform:
I don't know why she's complaining about getting wet, when there isn't much clothing to get wet. She's wearing next to nothing. I glance at her shirt, which is missing its entire bottom half, and realize she's in a Hooters outfit. Could this day get any weirder? I'm sitting on almost everything I own in a torrential downpour, being bossed around by a bitchy Hooters waitress.

But, unfortunately, it doesn't stop there. I'm starting to wonder if this whole slut-shaming thing in NA is a group conspiracy. It seems to be a defining feature of the genre. Once again, every woman is Sydney's enemy and they are all "whores" or "sluts" who are unfavorably compared to our "good girl" MC. The book is saturated with language that either openly shames other women or snidely implies it. Like, for example, calling Tori "Barbie" - a word which is meant to emphasise the difference between the sexualized depiction of Tori and Sydney's good and pure behaviour. At one point, Sydney even doubts that Bridgette (Hooters girl) has it in her to love anyone. There is often a direct connection in these kind of books between being evil or "bitchy" and sleeping around. I feel like I'm being hit in the face with Sunday school.
You will probably like this book if:
- You liked the author's other books.
- You tend to like NA contemporary romance.
- You are not pissed off by 1950s-style portrayals of women.
by

I am conducting what I'm shelving as a "New Adult (NA) Experiment". I'm going to work my way through some of the popular New Adult books and see if I can weed out the crap and hopefully find some surprising gems. Here's hoping!
You know, I promised myself something before starting this book: either I would decide it wasn't for me and DNF it without a review, or I would be pleasantly surprised and continue to the end and write a glowing oh-my-I-can't-believe-it positive review. Neither actually happened. I finished this book and I enjoyed parts of it. I hated others. I only picked the arc up out of curiosity because, as much as I disliked both the author's other books, there was a HUGE improvement in the writing between Slammed and Hopeless. In fact, I even mentioned in my review of the latter that it was almost a good book. What stopped it from being a good book was the glorifying of control freaks and stalker-ish behaviour.
I felt a similar way about Maybe Someday. It was almost a good book and it was definitely better than the other two I've read. I'm starting to think that, if this pattern persists, Hoover might actually write a book I love in about five years time. There's a reason I managed to read every single page of this with ease and it's the same reason I made it through Hopeless - the author writes in an addictive, engaging style. Some people just manage to pull this off and make it seem effortless. It's so easy, so palatable, that you manage to finish it without realising where all the pages went. Hoover definitely deserves credit for that, if nothing else. I think I keep returning to this author because I know she writes so well.
The main things I liked:
Apart from what I mentioned above about the author's addictive easy-to-read style, I also liked the guy in this a lot more than in Hoover's previous works. Dean Holder from Hopeless managed to freak me out and piss me off simultaneously. He was a tall, gorgeous message to teen girls that stalkery, predatory behaviour is absolutely fine when the person doing it is hot. I mean, how much stupid is in this quote:
"My instinct is telling me to run and scream, but my body wants to wrap itself around his glistening, sweaty arms."
But Ridge isn't like that. He's sweet, he's a musician, he's completely free of Douchebag Syndrome. Oh, and he's also deaf. Personally, I thought this was an interesting and original touch that was explored well and sensitively. Very few hearing-impaired protagonists exist, never mind sexy love interests and I really liked this unique view of a relationship where one person is unable to hear the other. They communicate a lot via text and facebook, which was also different.
Where did it all go wrong?
The same place it always seems to go wrong in the New Adult genre: the way every woman but the MC is portrayed. I admit that I almost DNF'd this book after the prologue because Sydney (the MC) calls another girl a whore on page one, and then a few pages later has an encounter with a bitchy girl who - surprise! - is wearing a Hooters uniform:
I don't know why she's complaining about getting wet, when there isn't much clothing to get wet. She's wearing next to nothing. I glance at her shirt, which is missing its entire bottom half, and realize she's in a Hooters outfit. Could this day get any weirder? I'm sitting on almost everything I own in a torrential downpour, being bossed around by a bitchy Hooters waitress.

But, unfortunately, it doesn't stop there. I'm starting to wonder if this whole slut-shaming thing in NA is a group conspiracy. It seems to be a defining feature of the genre. Once again, every woman is Sydney's enemy and they are all "whores" or "sluts" who are unfavorably compared to our "good girl" MC. The book is saturated with language that either openly shames other women or snidely implies it. Like, for example, calling Tori "Barbie" - a word which is meant to emphasise the difference between the sexualized depiction of Tori and Sydney's good and pure behaviour. At one point, Sydney even doubts that Bridgette (Hooters girl) has it in her to love anyone. There is often a direct connection in these kind of books between being evil or "bitchy" and sleeping around. I feel like I'm being hit in the face with Sunday school.
You will probably like this book if:
- You liked the author's other books.
- You tend to like NA contemporary romance.
- You are not pissed off by 1950s-style portrayals of women.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Maybe Someday.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 18, 2013
– Shelved
February 16, 2014
–
Started Reading
February 18, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 75 (75 new)
message 1:
by
Dan
(new)
Feb 18, 2014 05:59AM
Has the New Adult Experiment yielded any gems yet?
reply
|
flag
I've also had very little success with the New Adult genre. There's waaaaay too much slut shaming. Hmmm... there probably is some conspiracy going on here lol. Anyway, a deaf love interest sounds refreshing and new, so I might give this one a chance though. Great review :)
Thanks Jennifer :) The deaf love interest was the main thing that kept me interested - definitely something refreshing and new. Hope you like it despite the negatives!
Emily May wrote: "Two. Out of the fifteen I've read. I admit that it's not going great."You're a tougher reader than I am. It might be time to start the "Which Books Will Help Me Recover From the NA Experiment" Experiment.
Great review, Emily! I am one of the few who DON'T care for Colleen Hoover's writing, but many adore it. :)
@Dan Books like that exist? :)@Chelsea Thank you! You must hate these books, lol, because that's pretty much the only redeeming factor ^_^
@Litchick Thanks :) I'm really curious about your "theory". PM me?
I did like Hopeless, but I've been seeing less than stellar reviews about this one. I a getting sick of NA books in general too. They're all more or less the same!
I have to agree with you on the slut-shaming. And the "perfect" MCs just make the smexy moments a whole lot of awkward, with them being so "pure and virginal and inexperienced and blah,blah"...total cringe/laugh attack.
Thanks for the lovely review, Emily! I've been really skeptical of this genre, and have been checking in on your reviews every once in a while to see if anything promising emerges. One thing that really irks me about the genre is the names of the men: Ambrose, Emerson, Garrick, Kayden, Remington, Ridge, Rule, Rush, and I'm sure there are others. NA authors sure do like
Courtney wrote: "Thanks for the lovely review, Emily! I've been really skeptical of this genre, and have been checking in on your reviews every once in a while to see if anything promising emerges. One thing that r..."I actually really like the name Emerson ._.
I was glad to read this review because I've found every single new adult book I've read to be cliche, obsessed with sex, and poorly written. Yikes!! I thought I might be the only one wondering what on earth these publishers/authors are thinking??
@Giselle It's true, they are very similar. But one that really stood out for me was Unteachable. I still can't believe how much I enjoyed that book.@Courtney Thank you, Courtney :) I almost commented on the guy's name again here but I'm sick of typing it in NA reviews, lol. I used to like unusual names before it became "usual" to have unusual names, haha.
@Khanh I don't mind most of the names on their own. I like "unusual" names, but it feels like a competition between NA authors over who can come up with the strangest. I really miss the name "John", lol.
@Scribs I agree, this new "genre" has yielded very few gems. But I guess sex sells as always, even poorly written sex :(
Love your review. This is the reason why I stay clear of other NA books. It's like reading the same thing over and over again. I got tired of it.
You will probably like this book if:- You liked the author's other books.
- You tend to like NA contemporary romance.
1. No
2. Almost never
So...no.
Litchick (is stuck in the 19th century) wrote: "I have a theory about the prevalence of slut-shamming in these books. But I'll keep it to myself since airing it would likely insult a lot of people and lead to someone calling me a feminazi.
Gre..."
I'd love to hear your theory, Litchick. And Emily, lovely review (as always.) Doesn't seem to look like something I'd like.
Gre..."
I'd love to hear your theory, Litchick. And Emily, lovely review (as always.) Doesn't seem to look like something I'd like.
so agree with every flaw you pointed out about this book. Sidnay's unjustified contempt for brigettes cause of her uniform and how she didn't correct her that shes not deaf (come on, it was pretty much normal assumption to make what the girl doesnt say a word) practically killed her character for me. I actually struggled to like her and root for her it the story. The rest in book was pretty much perfect to me.
**Spoilers**The slut shaming that really bothered me in this book was how Ridge treated Sidney after he fell in love with her...demanding that she move out, cutting off contact, etc....when he was the one who
1) was involved with someone else
2) moved her into his apartment without telling her he had a serious girlfriend
3) had her write song lyrics on his bed
4) had his head and hands on her to "feel" the music
5) not asking her to move out rationally after they kissed
6) ogling her in front of his girlfriend
7) not admitting the depth of his attachment to Sydney to his girlfriend
8) not deleting his text messages from his laptop
I could go on and on about all the mistakes he made...Meanwhile the author treats him like a prince...and it's all dismissed as no one's fault....and Sydney is left to deal with the fallout.
Mary wrote: "The slut shaming that really bothered me in this book was how Ridge treated Sidney after he fell in love with her...demanding that she move out, cutting off contact, etc....when he was the one who ..."Sounds like douche bag behavior. This is why I stay clear of this genre. It is always the same. And then they do one thing and it is suppose to redeem them. Yeah, please, move on.
I love reading your reviews:) not because I 100% agree with them all the time but I totally understand where your coming from. It makes me giggle how right some of your comments are haha x
@Sonia What spoiler?@Amberlea Thank you! I love meeting GR members who can disagree with me about a book but still be friendly :) I'm glad you enjoyed it more!
Well, although I respect your review, it seems to thought out. Weird comment I know, but I don't go into a book looking for negative comments against feminism. If my best friend screwed my boyfriend, you can be sure the word "slut" would make an appearance. As far as the Hooters girl comment, I think the author was just trying to give some character definition that she wasn't the type of girl that would dawn a Hooters outfit. The fact that Bridget was depicted as rude and hateful, played well with the crazy roommate/boyfriend. She showed softer sides, and that was good to see. It shows me a deeper side of Bridgette's personality. I did ask the question, why? ... Made you think.... that's not all bad.Here is what I do know. It was different from the minutia out there. I "felt" their journey, and the escapism was real for me. That is what a good book should do for someone.
Wonderful review, Emily! I had a lot of problems with this one, and it seems like you liked Hoover's other books even less. I tried reading Hopeless and Slammed and stopped both even before hitting the 5% mark. :/ NA books don't work out well with me too. But I think I should try Unteachable!
I do agree with most of this review and I am angered by any prevalence of slut-shaming, but I think for this novel it's not so much about slut-shaming as it is about betrayal and anger, and a general reaction to events that occur. The main character calls her best friend names out of anger over a betrayal of trust - when said best friend sleeps with the main characters boyfriend. I personally feel like calling her a you-know-what is simply out of anger and not out of any form of slut-shaming. Would you not call her names as a form of a release of anger? It's only natural, and, despite the connotations of the words she uses, really has little to do with slut-shaming as it has to do with Sydney feeling betrayed and angry by Tori's actions.The same goes for Bridgette. Instead of labelling her based on her hooters uniform, it is more to do with the way Bridgette treats Sydney, being rude and loud and seemingly ignorant.
I also feel like no matter what Sydney would've called her friend, Tori, out of anger, issues were bound to come up. Whether Tori was labelled a b**** or a w****, someone somewhere would've felt angry over whatever-shaming it may be.
I have to agree with Ever After and Jessica White here. I didn't see slut-shaming in this book nor did I see Sydney as perfect. She did nothing to stop the escalating situation either and this is shortly after she was cheated on. She could have left on her own. The only thing I think came close to slut-shaming was Warren's attack on Sydney the night Maggie went to the hospital. Though he had a reason, that level of vitriol was uncalled for. Also, what about Maggie? If there's a perfect character in this book, it's her.
I seriously think you should NOT read books which you KNOW are not your style - because, really? 2/15 books!? WOW. You're a super tough reader, but I do admire the fact that you at least know that Colleen Hoover's writing is addictive and easy-to-read.
I'm currently reading this and I'm loving it so far. Obviously besides the slut shaming, but everything else is something I can handle or love. I completely agree with the writing style. Addicting and easy to zip right through. I love Ridge and think he's a great love interest. I'm sorry you didn't like it, but I'm glad that I'm enjoying it
With a rating of 4.40-something on Goodreads i thought this book was going to be amazing. Should have read your review before buying it. It's exactly how i feel. Makes me feel less alone haha
Sorry you didn't like it either, Marie :( If you're wanting to try some more NA romance, you could check out Unteachable - I thought that was really good!
^^Wow, I'm sorry that your life experience has led you to conclude that most girls hate girls. That is not a universal truth however.
if I were to recommend you any Colleen Hoover book it would be Ugly Love. I love that book to the moon and back.
Courtney wrote: "if I were to recommend you any Colleen Hoover book it would be Ugly Love. I love that book to the moon and back."Oh no... I may have to check this out now! LOL, my TBR gets longer every day :) What did you like about it?
I really like the concept of your New Adult experiment. It's a genre I know very little about! I hope you don't mind if I follow you. :)
Ya know what you should read? The novella that goes along with this- IT IS SO BAD. I would love to read a ranty review from you. It would be fab- I love your bad reviews better than your good ones. :)







