Lizzy's Reviews > Atonement
Atonement
by
by
Lizzy's review
bookshelves: historical-fiction, time-all-time-100, read-years-ago, favorites-of-all-times, stars-5
Apr 15, 2014
bookshelves: historical-fiction, time-all-time-100, read-years-ago, favorites-of-all-times, stars-5
The subject matter of Atonement is literature itself, but it is much more. First, the writer is one of its characters; second, because Ian McEwan’s novel creates a world where subjectivity and objectivity interfere mutually. The characters are full of life and the language, even if elaborate and subtle, does not go around or makes inroads into itself.
The narrator and protagonist, Briony Tallis, emerges in the beginner as a pre-adolescent that dreams to arrange the world in her texts, as in the play she is writing. Her love for order, for the careful design according to her spoiled desires, is translated into an impulse to write that hardly depend on the theme.
Her cousins, Lola, and the twins will be the actors, with which she plans to awe the assembled family, that include her parents, her older sister Cecily and the son of the housekeeper, Robbie. On that day of 1935, Briony sees Cecily and Robbie in a game that culminates in a fateful scene. Briony believes she sees something that profoundly perturbs her. The development of the story doesn’t let the reader stop. When, later, Lola is raped by a man that was not seen, Briony, without any grounds, makes a ‘deduction’ of who committed the crime.
Here we are, therefore, in the territory of Jane Austen, cited in the epigraph, or Henry James, George Eliot, and many other English authors: social tension versus sexual stress, pride and prejudice conflicts, mere misunderstandings that adopt dramatic dimensions. McEwan considers the simple distortions that physical acts, such as vision, can suffer when clouded by moral bias. Briony is attracted to Robbie and envies in Cecily her independence and, and in her anxiety to wipe out her shortcomings recreates the world in her own way, succumbing to prejudice and threatening her already reduced capacity to accept reality.
But, more than that, what McEwan shows is how a writer can worsen weaknesses such as vanity, cowardice and credulity, sentiments that derive from the solitary and fallible condition that is above all human. Briony, with an absent father, a sick mother, a distant brother and an adult sister, fills her solitude with words that want to arrange everything, as she organizes her room.
She is emotionally deprived as all of us, but a few degrees above the Richer scale: her need to be praised, her inability to deal with her environment, her surrendering to a fantasy of perfection – it is as if she were an immature child, seeking protection from life itself.
However, the novel goes beyond an intimate recounting. In the second half, McEwan throws the reader into the Second World War, with memorable descriptions of the United Kingdom’s empire ultimate whisper at the battle of Dunkirk. McEwan uses this as background to show us Robbie’s feelings. Among dead and wounded, he drifts with his head down and wrapped in his own sentiments to protect himself and to dream he will be exonerated for having survived in a battle where so many had died.
____
The narrator and protagonist, Briony Tallis, emerges in the beginner as a pre-adolescent that dreams to arrange the world in her texts, as in the play she is writing. Her love for order, for the careful design according to her spoiled desires, is translated into an impulse to write that hardly depend on the theme.
“There did not have to be a moral. She need only show separate minds, as alive as her own, struggling with the idea that other minds were equally alive. It wasn't only wickedness and scheming that made people unhappy, it was confusion and misunderstanding, above all, it was the failure to grasp the simple truth that other people are as real as you. And only in a story could you enter these different minds and show how they had an equal value. That was the only moral a story need have.”
Her cousins, Lola, and the twins will be the actors, with which she plans to awe the assembled family, that include her parents, her older sister Cecily and the son of the housekeeper, Robbie. On that day of 1935, Briony sees Cecily and Robbie in a game that culminates in a fateful scene. Briony believes she sees something that profoundly perturbs her. The development of the story doesn’t let the reader stop. When, later, Lola is raped by a man that was not seen, Briony, without any grounds, makes a ‘deduction’ of who committed the crime.
Here we are, therefore, in the territory of Jane Austen, cited in the epigraph, or Henry James, George Eliot, and many other English authors: social tension versus sexual stress, pride and prejudice conflicts, mere misunderstandings that adopt dramatic dimensions. McEwan considers the simple distortions that physical acts, such as vision, can suffer when clouded by moral bias. Briony is attracted to Robbie and envies in Cecily her independence and, and in her anxiety to wipe out her shortcomings recreates the world in her own way, succumbing to prejudice and threatening her already reduced capacity to accept reality.
But, more than that, what McEwan shows is how a writer can worsen weaknesses such as vanity, cowardice and credulity, sentiments that derive from the solitary and fallible condition that is above all human. Briony, with an absent father, a sick mother, a distant brother and an adult sister, fills her solitude with words that want to arrange everything, as she organizes her room.
“But hidden drawers, lockable diaries and cryptographic systems could not conceal from Briony the simple truth: she had no secrets. Her wish for a harmonious, organised world denied her the reckless possibilities of wrongdoing. Mayhem and destruction were too chaotic for her tastes, and she did not have it in her to be cruel. Her effective status as an only child, as well as the relative isolation of the Tallis house, kept her, at least during the long summer holidays, from girlish intrigues with friends. Nothing in her life was sufficiently interesting or shameful to merit hiding; no one knew about the squirrel's skull beneath her bed, but no one wanted to know.”
She is emotionally deprived as all of us, but a few degrees above the Richer scale: her need to be praised, her inability to deal with her environment, her surrendering to a fantasy of perfection – it is as if she were an immature child, seeking protection from life itself.
However, the novel goes beyond an intimate recounting. In the second half, McEwan throws the reader into the Second World War, with memorable descriptions of the United Kingdom’s empire ultimate whisper at the battle of Dunkirk. McEwan uses this as background to show us Robbie’s feelings. Among dead and wounded, he drifts with his head down and wrapped in his own sentiments to protect himself and to dream he will be exonerated for having survived in a battle where so many had died.
“Now he reduced his progress to the rhythm of his boots -- he walked across the land until he came to the sea. Everything that impeded him had to be outweighed, even if only by a fraction, by all that drove him on. ...He knew by heart certain passages from her letters, he had revisited their tussle with the vase by the fountain, he remembered the warmth from her arm at the dinner when the twins went missing. These memories sustained him, but not so easily.”But what rots and sustains him is his hate for Briony:
“In that shrinking moment he discovered that he had never hated anyone until now. It was a feeling as pure as love, but dispassionate and icily rational.”Above everything:
“Let his name be cleared and everyone else adjust their thinking. He had put in time, now they must do the work. His business was simple. Find Cecilia and love her, marry her and live without shame.”The ability of McEwan is very well known, but in Atonement he arrived were he had not reached before and where few living authors – maybe Coetzee, Philip Roth and a few others – were able to arrive. The force of his narrative comes from its plot and its magnitude as well as from its richness and structure. The story is strong, but who narrates is not subservient to its hierarchy and its rhythm: it’s a subject that lets it flow and, at the same time, chooses the moments and the way to reveal its parts. McEwan does not need to resort to fragmentation and mysticism to deal with the battle between affection and speech, tolerance and freedom, a clash so in evidence nowadays.
____
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Atonement.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 15, 2014
– Shelved
October 19, 2015
– Shelved as:
historical-fiction
October 19, 2015
– Shelved as:
time-all-time-100
May 28, 2016
– Shelved as:
read-years-ago
Started Reading
June 7, 2016
– Shelved as:
favorites-of-all-times
June 7, 2016
– Shelved as:
stars-5
June 7, 2016
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-38 of 38 (38 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Erika
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jun 07, 2016 02:11PM
Fantastic review!
reply
|
flag
What an emotionally-worded review, Lizzy! I can just imagine how this story must have affected you. Well said! :))
Linda wrote: "What an emotionally-worded review, Lizzy! I can just imagine how this story must have affected you. Well said! :))"I loved this book indeed, Linda. This review took some work and time – that I don't always have – but it was worth it! It's a pity that I can't spend more hours writing reviews, for I really enjoy doing them. I really appreciate your feedbacks. Thanks!
Wonderful review, Lizzy! I guess this has to be McEwan's best work since I am yet to come across someone deprecating it. To read soon!
Thanks, Seemita. I have to agree with you, I haven't read all of McEwan's books but Atonement is exceptional. Hope you like it as I did. Enjoy it!
I'm echoing the praise, above. I'm not sure it's my favourite McEwan, though (but I'm not sure what is).
I understand, sometimes it is hard to determine whether we like best one book or another. Thanks for the praise, it means a lot to me! : )
Really excellent analysis, Lizzy - and I say that even though this book, and McEwan's books in general, repel me in an odd way, though I recognize that his writing style is flawless :-(
Thanks so much, Fionuala. As I told Cecily, I think that some books have the knack to be cherised or be rejected. (I don't know if 'reject' is the right word to use here, forgive me if not, but sometimes the fact that English is my second language doesn't help!) Nevertheless, Atonement seems the kind to provoke such disparate feelings. And it is good to agree to disagree, is it not? :-)
I read this when it first came out, Lizzy, and before I had started the practice of writing reviews. Indeed, you might say that this (with Ann Patchett's Bel Canto) was the book that started me reading seriously again, for the first time since my degree.I am interested that you come right up with it out front, stating that Briony is the protagonist. Did you think that when you were actually first reading, I wonder? To me, looking of course for the grand romantic love story, it was Celia and Robbie that carried the book, and Briony was just a pesky kid-sister interloper. Until… well, you know.
So you really zeroed in on her from the start? R.
Interesting question, Roger. Never asked it myself. I think I did it automatically for I felt the story started with Briony and developed around her. But I see how you would feel Cecilia and Robbie, and their romantic drama, carried the book.The great thing about reading - different from watching a movie - is that the reader can partly write the script in his mind. Isn't that great? L.
Yes, that is indeed great. And it makes mystery novels possible, together with a lot of straight ones. Here, I'm quite sure, McEwan encourages the reader to write the script a certain way, only to do a bait-and-switch at the end! R.
You are right about McEwan's bait-and-switch stratagem, Roger. But that is part of his genius, if I may call it that... L.
Read this again, because last time it was on a gadget where I could not write comfortably.You make an excellent analysis of the psychology of the characters and loved the way you linked that to a literary tradition. Normally either one or the other is discussed, while you blended them both splendidly.
Thanks for your comments, Kalliope! It's very nice to receive feedbacks like yours, even criticism for that matter. :) L.
Stellar job -- very insightful. And well-written, too! We can all appreciate the context you put this in, and the points you drive home.
Steve wrote: "Stellar job -- very insightful. And well-written, too! We can all appreciate the context you put this in, and the points you drive home."Thanks for your nice words, Steve!
Kevin wrote: "Remarkable review, Lizzy.A considered and eloquent summary of a modern classic."
Thanks, Kevin!
"She need only show separate minds, as alive as her own, struggling with .... show how they had an equal value. That was the only moral a story need have."I have often wondered whether McEwan was talking about his own writing principle in that passage which forms your first quote.
"She is emotionally deprived as all of us, but a few degrees above the Richer scale: her need to be praised, her inability to deal with her environment, her surrendering to a fantasy of perfection – it is as if she were an immature child, seeking protection from life itself. "
I liked seeing you extended your sympathy to her. Even if she was attracted to Robbie, she was still a lonely child. I think Robbie and Cecily might have forgiven him once the hardships of war was over.
Amazing review, Lizzy. Count me among your fans.
Sidharth wrote: ""She need only show separate minds, as alive as her own, struggling with .... show how they had an equal value. That was the only moral a story need have."I have often wondered whether McEwan was..."
Excellent comment and a very pertinent questioning, Sidharth. When we consider McEwan and his author-character, I think they are blended and it's difficult to separate them. After all, he is always behind the scenes directing the action. Or, Briony's life and writing, if you like.
I felt from the beginning that Briony, as a child and lonely at that, deserved my compassion and understanding. Malicious as she may have been. Maybe it's the mother in me, nevertheless it was a natural sympathy. And you are right, if everything ended differently Robbie and Cecily might have forgiven Briony. Forgiven but not forgotten, probably.
Thank you for such a marvelous praise, dear Sidharth. Very rewarding. I don't know if I deserve so much. I can only say that it took me hours of grinding up my feelings on Atonement, because it had a powerful impact on me. I think we do it better when we are emotionally involved.
Excellent and elegant review, Lizzy. This may well be McEwan's masterpiece, and even though the equally well-known movie adaption may have strengthened the novel's recognition among readers, for me the book still transports stronger feelings and a more atmospheric depiction of the subject than the movie did. Glad you liked it so much!
Councillor wrote: "Excellent and elegant review, Lizzy. This may well be McEwan's masterpiece, and even though the equally well-known movie adaption may have strengthened the novel's recognition among readers, for me..."I am glad you enjoyed it, Fabian. I think this is the only McEwan I read, I have A Children's Act and Nutshell on my to-read list. I think I'm delaying reading them because I fear they won't be as good. I loved the movie, but the book is no doubt best. Thanks for your feedback and praise. L.
Amalia wrote: "Beautiful review, Lizzy. It makes me want to read ''Atonement'' once more."Thanks, Amalia. It certainly deserves a revisit. L.
Jean-Paul wrote: "Splendid review, Lizzy. Once again you charm the reader with the elegance of your language and the acuity of your analysis. jp"Thanks for your kind words, Jean-Paul. I'm glad you liked it. L.
Lizzy, what an outstanding review! Like you, I appreciate how thoughtfully McEwan explores the role of the writer and how a writer can worsen weakness. Your last paragraph is a fitting and wonderful tribute to McEwan's writing prowess.
Laysee wrote: "Lizzy, what an outstanding review! Like you, I appreciate how thoughtfully McEwan explores the role of the writer and how a writer can worsen weakness. Your last paragraph is a fitting and wonderfu..."I'm glad you liked it, Laysee! Thanks. L.






