Nataliya's Reviews > The Silkworm
The Silkworm (Cormoran Strike #2)
by
In fact, it seems to have upset someone enough to brutally murder Quine in a way that combines intestines and hydrochloric acid and a feeling of nausea trying to imagine the resulting crime scene.
It, of course, falls to the private detective Cormoran Strike (who recently solved the murder of Lula Landry, earning himself some notoriety and a bit of cash) to untangle this mess and find the killer. Yet again he's aided by his secretary Robin Ellacott who, having worked with Strike for a while now, dreams of receiving some investigative training herself, seeing that she has a knack for the job - while struggling to explain her love for the job and admiration for her gruffy boss to her way more conventional fiancé Matthew.

Rowling continues the pattern she set in the first Strike book. The solution to the mystery unfolds slowly, through the grunt of investigative work, through long interviews with suspects, through long treks on the streets of London, with many false trails and red herrings, guided by Strike's unerring sense and skill. The mystery is slow-moving and lacks the easy 'gotcha!' moments, hinged instead on character studies, allowing the suspects to slowly reveal their inner selves full of shallow and sometimes quite dark unpleasantness, propelled by almost casually shrewd observations of social inequalities and prejudices.
Every character (short of almost idealized Strike and Robin - just for once can Cormoran Strike ever be wrong about anything?) gets the not-too-pleasant but very apt treatment of Rowling's sharp characterization which makes them come alive even when you'd rather them not. The plotting is intricate, the multiple plot strands so tightly woven together that it's a pleasure to look back at the end of the story and see how they all were coming together. And even the annoying turn in the last quarter of the book when Strike has solved the murder but the readers are kept waiting for the final reveal does not spoil the enjoyment of the story.
All in all, I enjoyed this book quite a bit. While not perfect, it captures Rowling's talent as a storyteller and a master plotter quite well. 4 stars.
I'll be quite happy to follow the adventures of Strike and Robin for quite some time.
by
"...Writers are a savage breed, Mr. Strike. If you want life-long friendship and selfless camaraderie, join the army and learn to kill. If you want a lifetime of temporary alliances with peers who will glory in your every failure, write novels."And just like that, J.K. Rowling under the pseudonym of Robert Galbraith takes on the familiar to her world of writing and publishing, bringing to light the petty conflicts, backstabbing attitudes, hurtful gossips and inflated egos. The bared claws and at-your-throat attitudes, the dislikes and grudges held between successful writers and less successful ones, the wannabe writers, the ones who can and cannot write well, the agents, the publishers - it all looks like an ugly mess, to say the least.
This unpleasant world serves as a backdrop for a rather gruesome murder (let's just say that a writer spilling his guts can have a very literal meaning, okay?) that matches precisely the final scene in the victim's book. The victim, Owen Quine, is a not-too-successful writer and, frankly, a very unpleasant person, whose latest book seems to focus on trash-talking everyone connected to him in the literary world and personal life and pisses off quite a number of people.![]()
"The whole world's writing novels, but nobody's reading them."
In fact, it seems to have upset someone enough to brutally murder Quine in a way that combines intestines and hydrochloric acid and a feeling of nausea trying to imagine the resulting crime scene.
It, of course, falls to the private detective Cormoran Strike (who recently solved the murder of Lula Landry, earning himself some notoriety and a bit of cash) to untangle this mess and find the killer. Yet again he's aided by his secretary Robin Ellacott who, having worked with Strike for a while now, dreams of receiving some investigative training herself, seeing that she has a knack for the job - while struggling to explain her love for the job and admiration for her gruffy boss to her way more conventional fiancé Matthew.

Rowling continues the pattern she set in the first Strike book. The solution to the mystery unfolds slowly, through the grunt of investigative work, through long interviews with suspects, through long treks on the streets of London, with many false trails and red herrings, guided by Strike's unerring sense and skill. The mystery is slow-moving and lacks the easy 'gotcha!' moments, hinged instead on character studies, allowing the suspects to slowly reveal their inner selves full of shallow and sometimes quite dark unpleasantness, propelled by almost casually shrewd observations of social inequalities and prejudices.
Every character (short of almost idealized Strike and Robin - just for once can Cormoran Strike ever be wrong about anything?) gets the not-too-pleasant but very apt treatment of Rowling's sharp characterization which makes them come alive even when you'd rather them not. The plotting is intricate, the multiple plot strands so tightly woven together that it's a pleasure to look back at the end of the story and see how they all were coming together. And even the annoying turn in the last quarter of the book when Strike has solved the murder but the readers are kept waiting for the final reveal does not spoil the enjoyment of the story.
All in all, I enjoyed this book quite a bit. While not perfect, it captures Rowling's talent as a storyteller and a master plotter quite well. 4 stars.
I'll be quite happy to follow the adventures of Strike and Robin for quite some time.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Silkworm.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 31, 2014
– Shelved
July 5, 2014
–
Started Reading
July 12, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-21 of 21 (21 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Cathleen
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jul 19, 2014 05:34PM
I enjoyed The Cuckoo's Calling, and reading your review has heightened my anticipation for reading the second in this series.
reply
|
flag
Cathleen wrote: "I enjoyed The Cuckoo's Calling, and reading your review has heightened my anticipation for reading the second in this series."Well, I hope you will enjoy this one as well.
Great review, Nataliya. I felt pretty much the same as you did but a bit more annoyed at Rowling's lionization of Strike. It's unfortunate that in a novel with so many wonderfully complex characters, the protagonist is just oh-so-perfect!But nevertheless, I'll probably be back for the third installment, purely because it's Rowling and I can't quit her clever plots and keen characterization.
Nice review, Nataliya. I'm curious: Can this be a coherent read without the reading of the first in the series?
This is the only mystery writer I've found who stands up to Tana French. In terms of characterization, plotting, writing. Your thoughts? (I am pleased it's JK. I feel vindicated in my adoration for the HP series, particularly the seventh book, in which I felt the pacing was a deliberate device set by the author to communicate the feelings of Harry etc to the reader)
Teresa wrote: "Nice review, Nataliya. I'm curious: Can this be a coherent read without the reading of the first in the series?"You definitely can read this one without reading its predecessor. The story lines are completely separate, and all you need from the first book is a little background info on the protagonists - the information that is just as easily picked up from this story alone.
Elizabeth wrote: "This is the only mystery writer I've found who stands up to Tana French. In terms of characterization, plotting, writing. Your thoughts? (I am pleased it's JK. I feel vindicated in my adoration..."Tana French vs. J.K. Rowling? I think Tana French gets a bit of an edge here. She is school a superb mystery writer who excels at characterization and humanistic approach to those she writes about, and her ability to create an unbelievably immersive atmosphere for her stories is astonishing. Rowling is a very good writer, but she does not quite stand up to the mastery of French. And yet I love the books of both of them deeply,
Speaking of Tana French - the (now thankfully short) wait for her next book is unbearable! I'm really excited for that one.
Lovely review, Nataliya. I'm a fan of intricate plotting and for a while now, I've been intrigued by Rowling's work as Galbraith. Thanks for spelling it out for me.
Nataliya wrote: "Elizabeth wrote: "This is the only mystery writer I've found who stands up to Tana French. In terms of characterization, plotting, writing. Your thoughts? (I am pleased it's JK. I feel vindicat..."Yes, agreed. I was just saying this is the only murder mystery I've found thus far that even comes close. :)
I knooooowwww! I thought I put a hold on the book months ago and came to find I didn't. #96! Gah!
Hi, Nataliya! Great review! I have read the previous Cormoran Strike novel and also have to say that I liked the plot and supporting characters far better than the detective and assistant themselves, as they seemed somehow less realistic than the suspects. I was reading your your discussion with Elisabeth on Tana French vs. JK Rowling, and I have to admit that I have not read any of French's novels. Would either of you care to recommend me one to start with (I guess they don't need to be read in a specific order). Many thanks!
Jill wrote “Great review, Nataliya. I felt pretty much the same as you did but a bit more annoyed at Rowling's lionization of Strike. It's unfortunate that in a novel with so many wonderfully complex characters, the protagonist is just oh-so-perfect!”Wow. I have to completely disagree with Strike being perfect. In fact from his "pube" hair to the dangerous neglect of his amputation stump I would hardly call him perfect. I think he is lovably flawed and his one strong (very strong) gift is for unraveling a well-planned murder.
I am a big fan of Tana French also and I’m glad I don’t have to choose one writer over the other. One big difference between the two (imo) is that Galbraith has a certain tongue-in-check, amused attitude whereas French’s tone is serious, almost grave.
I do agree that your review is up to your usual high standard :-).
Paul, the idealization of Strike is not physical; it's that he is pretty much never wrong about anything, particularly his judgments about others. I guess it does make him quite a competent detective, and maybe in the sequels we will see an occasion or two when he's not instantly right. On the other hand, maybe he's the new Sherlock Holmes this way...
Nataliya wrote: "Paul, the idealization of Strike is not physical; it's that he is pretty much never wrong about anything, particularly his judgments about others. I guess it does make him quite a competent detecti..."He's awfully prickly and stubborn. And he's wrong about (view spoiler), which is what he originally suspected. Could he be more flawed? Sure. But he's hardly Sherlock Holmes or Lord Peter Wimsey. Now those guys are preternaturally perfect. (But I love the stories anyway!)
As to Robin, she's completely under her fiancé's thumb, even now. I want to shake her, myself. She has zero self-esteem.
Carmen wrote: "Well, I think he's far from perfect. I hated and despised the way he treated Nina in this book."He totally used her, you're right about that.
Surprisingly I began this book with no preconceived notions or thoughts as to how the book would progress, even though I knew JK Rowling was the real author. I have to hand it to her. She can truly weave a complicated tale and take the reader along for an intriguing ride with as many ups and downs as The Harry Potter Ride at Universal Studios. There were so many characters, it almost became overwhelming but she managed to delve into their psyche just enough to keep the reader involved. I found myself reviewing each character wondering....."Is this the one?" They all had sinister or at least very dark qualities.
Cormoran turned out to be a crusty individual with issues of his own. On the surface he took advantage of any offer presented as in the case of Nina but he also had the state of mind to know he was a schmuck for going through with it.
Overall, I quite enjoyed the book. The corpse scene was a little graphic but, hey, I couldn't stop turning the pages
I think Rowling's sharp characterisations, while very skilled, are one of the things I don't like about her books, honestly. She's a bit mean. Especially about spinsters in this one!





