Title: Mastering the Challenge of Writing a Literature Review in Quantitative Studies

Crafting a literature review for quantitative studies is an indispensable part of academic research, yet
it remains a daunting task for many scholars. This critical component requires meticulous attention to
detail, a comprehensive understanding of existing literature, and the ability to synthesize complex
information effectively. As researchers strive to navigate through vast amounts of scholarly work,
they often find themselves grappling with the intricacies of literature review composition. However,
with the right approach and guidance, mastering this challenge becomes achievable.

Writing a literature review demands more than just summarizing existing research; it entails a
systematic analysis of relevant literature to provide a solid foundation for one's own study.
Researchers must critically evaluate various sources, identify key themes, trends, and gaps in the
existing literature, and demonstrate how their study contributes to the broader academic discourse.
This process requires both analytical skills and a deep understanding of the subject matter, making it
a time-consuming and intellectually demanding endeavor.

One of the primary difficulties encountered by researchers is the sheer volume of literature available.
Navigating through numerous articles, journals, and books to find relevant sources can be
overwhelming, especially for those new to the field. Additionally, ensuring the credibility and
reliability of sources adds another layer of complexity to the process. Researchers must sift through a
plethora of information to discern which sources are most pertinent to their study while also
critically evaluating the validity of each source.

Furthermore, organizing and synthesizing the gathered information into a coherent narrative presents
its own set of challenges. Researchers must seamlessly integrate findings from various studies,
presenting them in a logical and structured manner while avoiding redundancy. Crafting a literature
review that is both comprehensive and concise requires finesse and attention to detail, often requiring
multiple revisions and refinements.

In light of these challenges, seeking assistance from professional writing services can be immensely
beneficial for researchers striving to excel in their academic pursuits. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers
specialized support for crafting literature reviews in quantitative studies, providing expert guidance
and assistance every step of the way. With a team of experienced writers well-versed in academic
research and writing, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ ensures that your literature review is meticulously crafted
to meet the highest standards of excellence.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and
uncertainty associated with this daunting task, allowing you to focus your time and energy on other
aspects of your research. With our comprehensive support and personalized approach, you can
confidently navigate the complexities of literature review writing and embark on your academic
journey with confidence.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your research progress. Order from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first step towards mastering this critical aspect of academic
scholarship.
Purpose: It serves to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge within a
particular field. Thematic: If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue
working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that
address different aspects of the topic. The summary effect size is a value that reflects the average
magnitude of the intervention effect for a particular outcome of interest or, more generally, the
strength of a relationship between two variables across all studies included in the systematic review.
Searching the extant literature: The next step consists of searching the literature and making
decisions about the suitability of material to be considered in the review ( Cooper, 1988 ). The A to
Z list also includes open access resources and select internet sites. Systematic Review A review is an
overview of the research that's already been completed on a topic. Linfield Christian School More
Related Content What's hot Quantitative research design Quantitative research design Jimnaira
Abanto Introduction to qualitative research for shs teaching Introduction to qualitative research for
shs teaching Jeanette C. Analysis: Involves critically evaluating and summarizing key findings,
methodologies, and. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as
mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all
situations). Retrieved from Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for
students. View all journals Explore content About the journal Publish with us Sign up for alerts
CAREER FEATURE 04 December 2020 Correction 09 December 2020 How to write a superb
literature review Andy Tay is a freelance writer based in Singapore. You’ll need to discuss the studies
and assess their overall quality. Writing the literature review: A practical guide Available 3rd floor of
Perkins Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences
Available online. For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health
outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal
status, and economic access. Textbook Chapters. Creswell, Chapters 2 and 5 Salkind, Chapter 3A.
List and define conceptually unusual terms to avoid. Within each theme, students can critique key
studies and their strengths and limitations, in order to get a lay of the land and come to a point
where they can identify ways to contribute new insights to the existing academic conversation on
their topic. Shanghai, China Fudan University Postdoctoral Associate- Single- Cell and Data Science
Houston, Texas (US) Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Postdoctoral Associate Sign up for the
Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Rather some review
synthesises the theoretical aspects of articles. London: SAGE Publications; 1998. Higgins J. P. T.,
Green S., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book
series. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2005; 16:1. Kirkevold M.
Integrative nursing research — an important strategy to further the development of nursing science
and nursing practice. One strategy is to scan relevant journals or conference proceedings.
Presentation Outline: What “Literature Review” is and its importance. Tip 5: create your personalised
template for literature summaries Often templates are available for data extraction and development
of literature summary tables. Beijing, China Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(IOZ, CAS) Position Opening for Principal Investigator GIBH Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health(GIBH), Chinese Academy of Sciences Faculty
Positions in Multiscale Research Institute for Complex Systems, Fudan University The Multiscale
Research Institute for Complex Systems (MRICS) at Fudan University is located at the Zhangjiang
Campus of Fudan University. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the
literature review. In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the
literature and emphasise their significance. To this end, they conducted a comprehensive search on
multiple databases using highly sensitive search strategies without language or publication-type
restrictions to identify all rct s that are eligible for inclusion. Introduction to qualitative research by
Elmusharaf 1. A meta-analysis is a statistical analysis, not a type of review.
Meta-Analysis: A Quantitative Approach to Research Integration. Experts: Contact experts in the
field to ask if they have unpublished studies that should be included in your review. However, a
scoping review isn’t a type of systematic review. Findings revealed that there were over 77,000
medical informatics articles published during the covered period in numerous journals and that the
average annual growth rate was 12%. There is no preconceived plan to systematically review all of
the literature although this can be done. Literature Review Outline momentumclubs.org literature
review paper example sample write template research outline tips nice slideshare 50 Smart Literature
Review Templates (APA). If you’re a student, you should narrow the scope of your systematic
review and stick to a tight schedule. This is achieved by simplifying or omitting stages of the
systematic review process. Describe, if possible, the sample to- population ratio. Studies were
included if they examined consumers’ preference for food naturalness and contained empirical data.
You can emphasise the timeliness of the topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of
x”) or highlight a gap in the literature (“while there has been much research on x, few researchers
have taken y into consideration”). Search the database by subject, type, name, or do use the search
box for a general title search. The authors then extracted data from the selected articles and created
several tables, one for each outcome category. For instance, Levy and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic
framework for conducting such reviews. Textbook Chapters. Creswell, Chapters 2 and 5 Salkind,
Chapter 3A. To achieve this aim, they used a convenience sample of 150 participants and performed
exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the same sample. Was the research
funded by a source that could influence the findings. Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature
Review Rule 1: Define a Topic and Audience How to choose which topic to review. A good
literature review doesn't simply summarize the existing material, but provides thoughtful synthesis
and analysis. In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate
your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best
Practice Guide for Conducting and Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and
replicable methodology and presentation. A meta-analysis is a technique to synthesize results from
multiple studies. AU Library's database collection includes The Chronicle of Higher Education and
The Wall Street Journal. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped
the direction of the field. Literature reviews can be stand-alone research or part of a larger project.
Identifying Gaps: Aims to pinpoint areas where there is a lack of research or unresolved questions,
highlighting opportunities for further investigation. London: SAGE Publications; 1998. Higgins J. P.
T., Green S., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book
series. Analyzing and synthesizing data: As a final step, members of the review team must collate,
summarize, aggregate, organize, and compare the evidence extracted from the included studies. List
and define conceptually unusual terms to avoid. Whether the search is comprehensive or not,
whether it involves a methodical approach for data extraction and synthesis or not, it is important that
the review documents in an explicit and transparent manner the steps and approach that were used in
the process of its development.
AU Library's database collection includes The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Wall Street
Journal. Besides indicating and justifying the type of research. How to Do a Systematic Review: A
Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and
replicable methodology and presentation. With my undergraduate research students (who tend to
conduct small-scale qualitative studies ), I encourage them to conduct a narrative literature review
whereby they can identify key themes in the literature. A literature review is a survey of credible
sources on a topic, often used in dissertations, theses, and research papers. In this video, you’ll learn
what to include in each section, as well as 4 tips for the main body illustrated with an example. The
A to Z list also includes open access resources and select internet sites. How to Do a Systematic
Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and This guide describes how to plan, conduct,
organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative
review, meta-synthesis) information. There are so many issues in contemporary science that you
could spend a lifetime of attending conferences and reading the literature just pondering what to
review. Introduction to qualitative research by Elmusharaf 1. This is a group of about six people who
have experience in the topic you’re researching. It is also helpful to use as a guide is the searches are
not finding any useful results. When the selection process is complete, you can summarize what you
did using a PRISMA flow diagram. When Boyle and Tang disagreed about whether a study should
be excluded, they discussed it with Varigos until the three researchers came to an agreement. The
second or third time through your research may be the ideal time to focus on specific time periods or
material (scholarly vs newspaper). ? Truncating Search Terms Expanding your search term at the root.
This conceptual contribution of the article should be mentioned in the literature summary table.
Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the
field. The main purpose of the introduction is to provide the. Figure 2 offers an example of a
literature summary table. 4. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new
research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet
been answered. Why? Understanding the subject terminology used in databases can be challenging.
A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses)
related to a specific topic or research question. A meta-analysis is a statistical analysis, not a type of
review. Similar to a systematic review, a scoping review is a type of review that tries to minimize
bias by using transparent and repeatable methods. Step 6: Synthesize the data Synthesizing the data
means bringing together the information you collected into a single, cohesive story. Scandinavian
Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. This
is an important step because having a plan allows you to work more efficiently and reduces bias.
These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record ( phr ) systems including
design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. Lit reviews can also be
standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications.
For those research questions that were not convertible to. When starting a search, consider opting out
of limiters until the initial literature screening is complete. It presents information for connecting an
active Google account to EBSCO and steps needed to provide permission for EBSCO to manage a
folder in Drive. You should apply the selection criteria in two phases: Based on the titles and
abstracts: Decide whether each article potentially meets the selection criteria based on the
information provided in the abstracts. Delineating each reviewed article’s conceptual contribution is
particularly beneficial in qualitative reviews, mixed-methods reviews, and critical reviews that often
focus on developing models and describing or explaining various phenomena. Two members of the
research team selected the articles using a pre-established list of inclusion and exclusion criteria and
following a two-step procedure. They provide historical context for a field while offering opinions
on its future trajectory. It takes time to. Literature Review Dr. Eric Jensen, Professor of Sociology at
the University of Warwick, and Dr. Charles Laurie, Director of Research at Verisk Maplecroft,
explain how to write a literature review, and why researchers need to do so. The content will look
slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same
steps. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many
different ways. To this end, they provide a number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge
development towards improving the design and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring.
9.4. Summary Table 9.1 outlines the main types of literature reviews that were described in the
previous sub-sections and summarizes the main characteristics that distinguish one review type from
another. They involve gathering, analyzing, and evaluating existing knowledge about a topic in order
to find gaps in the literature where future studies will be needed. First, in quantitative (reviews
synthesising the results of quantitative studies) and mixed reviews (reviews synthesising the results
of both qualitative and quantitative studies to address a mixed review question), it allows the readers
to assess the congruence of the core findings and methods with the adapted framework and tested
assumptions. The most important difference is the goal: rather than answering a specific question, a
scoping review explores a topic. Meta-Analysis: A Quantitative Approach to Research Integration.
As explained above, systematic reviews seek to identify causation. Data analysis is a means of
determining and testing for the. Boyle and Tang read through the articles to decide if any more
studies needed to be excluded based on the selection criteria. A literature review is a document or
section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in
conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). A review is an overview of the research that’s
already been completed on a topic. Expand your journal search; a complete listing of available AU
Library and OhioLINK databases is available on the Databases A to Z list. Your Research Proposal.
I. Introduction A. Problem statement B. Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses;
make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. This is an important step
because having a plan allows you to work more efficiently and reduces bias. If an article isn’t
available online or through your library, you may need to contact the authors to ask for a copy. The
conceptual contribution of this research article could be that experiential learning is one way to teach
compassion to nursing students, as supported by case studies and reflective logs. Literature reviews
are set up similarly to other academic texts, with an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion.
References Meesters, P. D. (2013). Cognitive impairment in late schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder.
First, exhaustive coverage means an effort is made to be as comprehensive as possible in order to
ensure that all relevant studies, published and unpublished, are included in the review and, thus,
conclusions are based on this all-inclusive knowledge base. Realist reviews have no particular
preference for either quantitative or qualitative evidence.
Such an approach would indicate a flawed methodology because EFA and CFA should not be
conducted on the same sample. But few scientists are trained in how to write a review — or in what
constitutes an excellent one. The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just
literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). Literature Review This
chapter in SAGE's Encyclopedia of Research Design describes the types of literature reviews and
scientific standards for conducting literature reviews. The use of any parts of the work without
proper citation is forbidden. Importantly, narrative reviews can also be used as educational articles to
bring practitioners up to date with certain topics of issues ( Green et al., 2006 ). Recently, there have
been several efforts to introduce more rigour in narrative reviews that will elucidate common pitfalls
and bring changes into their publication standards. If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid
simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Use the key words in your question, as well as
synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. When the selection process is complete, you can
summarize what you did using a PRISMA flow diagram. Two members of the research team selected
the articles using a pre-established list of inclusion and exclusion criteria and following a two-step
procedure. Writing A Literature Review and Using a Synthesis Matrix An example synthesis matrix
created by NC State University Writing and Speaking Tutorial Service Tutors. In qualitative reviews
(reviews synthesising results of qualitative studies), this information is beneficial for readers to
recognise the underlying philosophical and paradigmatic stance of the authors of the included
articles. First, in quantitative (reviews synthesising the results of quantitative studies) and mixed
reviews (reviews synthesising the results of both qualitative and quantitative studies to address a
mixed review question), it allows the readers to assess the congruence of the core findings and
methods with the adapted framework and tested assumptions. Two people should do this step
independently, and the third person will resolve any disagreements. A practical guide to data analysis
in general literature reviews Quantitative studies tend to contain a lot of statistical data, and not all
of it is relevant in a general literature review, especially at the undergraduate level.. One of the
biggest challenges in writing a literature review is to actually draw a conclusion, rather than to
merely list the results of many different studies. In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current
state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic. Why?
Understanding the subject terminology used in databases can be challenging. APA7 Style resources
APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers 1. It is often written as part of a dissertation,
thesis, research paper, or proposal. Chesapeake, VA: Watertree Press. Telsi, M. et al. (2013). No
evidence for association between bipolar disorder risk gene variants and brain structural phenotypes.
Selecting studies, extracting data, and assessing risk of bias in a duplicate manner using two
independent reviewers to avoid random or systematic errors in the process. A literature review is an
integrated analysis -- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related
directly to your research question. It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to
avoid plagiarism. TemplateLab Example Of Significance Of The Study In Quantitative Research
Quantitative Analysis Literature Reviews Examples Research development based on quantitative.-
Mind Map How to write a literature review in research paper Quantitative critique sample. Second,
information about frameworks and methods enables review authors and readers to judge the quality
of the research, which allows for discerning the strengths and limitations of the article. This helps
you remember what you read and saves time later in the process. Step 6: Synthesize the data
Synthesizing the data means bringing together the information you collected into a single, cohesive
story. TemplateLab templatelab.com literature review template apa templates templatelab smart 50
Smart Literature Review Templates (APA). The authors identified six main ways which represent
“educated guesses” to be tested against the data in the evaluation studies.
What is the implication of the findings of the study. The commonly used information may include
authors, purpose, methods, key results and quality scores. The participants came from Norway and
some from the ongoing Thematically Organized Psychosis (TOP) Study. We outline core standards
and principles and describe commonly encountered problems. Although this guide targets
psychological scientists, its high level of abstraction makes it potentially relevant to any subject area
or discipline. International journal of clinical practice, 69 (11), 1257-1267. Systematic reviews with
discordant findings can cause great confusion and make it difficult for decision-makers to interpret
the review-level evidence ( Moher, 2013 ). When the selection process is complete, you can
summarize what you did using a PRISMA flow diagram. Literature reviews are the foundation of
research on a given topic. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key
concepts. Identifying Gaps: Aims to pinpoint areas where there is a lack of research or unresolved
questions, highlighting opportunities for further investigation. What do the findings of the study
suggest or what do. Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities
articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. As a publication, a lit
review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing,
synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. The most important skill for efficient review
of literature is the. A systematic review is secondary research because it uses existing research. There
are a variety of strategies that you can use to help you in this task. Sometimes scoping reviews are
an exploratory preparation step for a systematic review, and sometimes they are a standalone project.
Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic. Writing a useful literature review for a
quantitative research project The amount of detail should match the amount needed by the audience.
Why conduct a literature review, stages of a literature review, lit reviews: an overview (video),
check out these books. To this end, the authors resorted to using narrative analysis and synthesis to
describe the effectiveness of handheld computers on accessing information for clinical knowledge,
adherence to safety and clinical quality guidelines, and diagnostic decision-making. Selection
criteria: State how you’ll decide which studies to include or exclude from your review. The main
procedures of a systematic review involve: Formulating a review question and developing a search
strategy based on explicit inclusion criteria for the identification of eligible studies (usually described
in the context of a detailed review protocol). To begin organising your literature review’s argument
and structure, you need to understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve
read. In addition, researchers had carefully designed most aspects of the study such as selection of
the target group, literature of the previous studies and the data analysis processes. Download Word
doc Download Google doc Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined
topic. The methods are repeatable, and the approach is formal and systematic: Formulate a research
question Develop a protocol Search for all relevant studies Apply the selection criteria Extract the
data Synthesize the data Write and publish a report Although multiple sets of guidelines exist, the
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews is among the most widely used. Your literature review
should be guided by your central research question. Discusses published information in a particular
subject area. They originated from criticisms of positivist systematic reviews which centre on their
“simplistic” underlying assumptions ( Oates, 2011 ).