Non Parametric Tests
Non Parametric Tests
Testing
Learning Objectives
Understand . . .
• The differences between parametric and nonparametric tests and
when to use each.
• The factors that influence the selection of an appropriate test of
statistical significance.
• How to interpret the various test statistics
17-2
When Data Present a Clear Picture
17-3
Statistical Testing Procedures
State
Statenull
nullhypoth-
hypoth-
esis
esis
Interpret
Interpretthe
the Choose
Choosestatisti-
statisti-
test
test cal
caltest
test
Stages
Stages
Obtain
Obtaincritical Select
critical Selectlevel
levelofof
test
testvalue
value significance
significance
Compute
Computedif-
dif-
ference
ferencevalue
value
17-4
Tests of Significance
Parametric Nonparametric
17-5
Test Conducted
Non-parametric Tests?
- While most common statistical analyses (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA) are parametric, they
need to fulfil a number of criteria before we use them
- These criteria include satisfying the assumptions of outliers, linearity, normality, ho-
moscedasticity, to name a few
- If the data do not fulfil the criteria to conduct the parametric tests, we can opt for
non-parametric tests, which do not require those assumptions
- Do note that non-parametric tests make less assumptions, not no assumptions!
- The trade-off is that non-parametric tests are generally lower in power
Types of Non-parametric Tests
- In this set of slides, the focus is on 4 non-parametric tests
- Each of these 4 tests is a non-parametric version of t-tests and ANOVAs
One-way Between
Kruskal-Wallis One-way ANOVA
Subjects ANOVA
One-way Within
Friedman’s ANOVA
Subjects ANOVA
Wilcoxon signed-rank test
• The Wilcoxon signed-rank test is the nonparametric test
equivalent to the dependent t-test. It is used to
compare two sets of scores that come from the same
participants. This can occur when we wish to
investigate any change in scores from one time point to
another, or when individuals are subjected to more
than one condition
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test- The Wilcoxon signed-rank test is the
nonparametric test equivalent to the dependent t-test.
One-way Between
Kruskal-Wallis One-way ANOVA
Subjects ANOVA
One-way Within
Friedman’s ANOVA
Subjects ANOVA
Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA
To define groups:
5. In our dataset, Teenagers were
coded as ‘1’, Adults as ‘2’, and Seni-
ors as ‘3’
6. Hence, the range for our grouping
variable is 1-3; with a minimum of 1
and maximum of 3
7. Click Continue, and OK
Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA
Kruskal-Wallis H score =
Similar to Mann-Whitney 7.50, p = .024
U tests, SPSS ranks the
data. Given an alpha value
The value here displays of .05, there is a signific-
the average of the rank- ant difference between
ings teenagers’, adults’, and
seniors’ self reported
physical wellbeing
However
• It could lie between teenagers and adults, adults and seniors, teenagers
and seniors, or even all of the above
Types of Non-parametric Tests
One-way Between
Kruskal-Wallis One-way ANOVA
Subjects ANOVA
One-way Within
Friedman’s ANOVA
Subjects ANOVA
Friedman’s ANOVA
• Just like the Kruskal-Wallis test, although we now know that there is a sig-
nificant difference between the three groups, we do not know exactly
where the difference(s) lie
• Simply by eyeballing the mean ranks, we can probably guess that the dif-
ference comes from the improvement from pre-test to post-test (2.9 vs
1.6), but not so much from the post-test to one month follow-up (1.6 vs
1.5)
Thank you