in the unfolding of this tour, there’s emerged this desire to read gerard (as parade leader) as a divine mother figure to the Gentleman, collapsing the ventriloquist dummy into baby doll, which — sure. but if we choose to do that, we need to pay careful attention to what role the concept of “motherhood” plays in the landscape of this narrative. because “motherhood” is not morally neutral within the aesthetic/storytelling language of the long live tour, just as it has never been morally neutral in gerard’s previous works, and just as it is not morally neutral in real life.
in draag, “mother” is the invisible, all-powerful hand of power. “mother” is that which has the capacity to discipline, the capacity to kill, the capacity to disappear from public memory. “mother” has its boot on the neck of the black parade and all the citizens of draag. mother doesn’t love you anymore. mother wants to see you disciplined. mother determines if you live or die. you love mother for how she provides as just as you fear mother for how she takes away. you will do what you can to please mother, which, in this case, means you must fall in line.
draag’s flag and crest, which both depict a juvenile deer being killed, is not incidental to this use of the “mother”/“motherhood” dynamic. the draag national anthem mentioning “breaking” babies’ fists to turn them into proper citizens to defend the nation (the motherland) through righteous force (through swords, through imprisonment, through execution, through missile strike) is not coincidental. in the long live tour, motherhood (and the figure of the mother) is inseparable from the crushing force of the authoritarian state.
which, then, forces us to ask, just as gerard and the band are telling this careful story about authoritarian force and power, how do we project our own desires onto that story?
and at the end of the day, what exactly is it that we desire for gerard (as parade leader) to embody, step into, or reclaim?
is reappropriation even possible within the landscape presented to us? why are we so attached to reclamation within such a narrative? and what does that attachment to repair or reclamation reveal about us?
in other words: under these conditions, if gerard becomes mother, what does gerard become?