i swear to god if people don't start understanding that responding to doylist critique of a piece of media with watsonian exonerations is not an actual rebuttal
somebody saying "hey i don't like that the only gay man in this story is a weird pervert and it portrays gay sexual promiscuity as a moral failing and character flaw" cannot be rebuked by arguing about how the character's backstory or personality traits explain their behaviour. the choices made by a writer are all fundamentally mutable; somebody saying an author's choices should have been different is not going to be persuaded by an argument that takes those choices as immovable fact
when ur being mean to me this is who ur being mean to *picture of a grey alien that's small and sick and shriveled and fucked and clearly on the brink of death*
one of my favorite wayneradiotv clips
yeah man go for it
Die temu ad die
Hmm. Accidentally looks like latin.
It accidentally is latin
extremely fucked up that one of the symptoms of adhd is forgetfulness and difficulty sticking to habits and schedules and one of the best ways to alleviate those symptoms is by remembering to take a pill every morning at the same time
If 6 year olds were YouTubers they'd be making 35 minute video essays called like "The Problem with Tag" "How Toys get You to Play Longer" "The Brown Cow Chocolate Milk Theory" "We Need to Talk About Pretend"





