Avatar

Transgender World

@crossdreamers / trans-express.lgbt

The US Supreme Court is hear two transgender cases

The U.S. Supreme Court is to look at whether states can bar transgender girls and women from participating on girls' and women's school sports teams.

On January 13, 2026, the justices are scheduled to hear two cases together - West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox - challenging statewide bans in West Virginia and Idaho. The outcomes could set a national rule for a debate that has moved rapidly from state legislatures to federal courts, as more than two dozen states have adopted similar restrictions.

One case centers on Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 15-year-old West Virginia student who has competed in track and field and says the law threatens to end her ability to play school sports altogether. The other involves Lindsay Hecox, a transgender woman challenging Idaho's law. The legal arguments differ: West Virginia's case squarely raises Title IX (sex discrimination in education), while Idaho's focuses more on constitutional equal protection.

Advocates for inclusion argue that forcing trans students onto boys' teams - or out of sports - undercuts the purpose of school athletics: belonging, health, and community.

The spotlight is also on Justice Neil Gorsuch, author of the Court's landmark Bostock opinion, because a narrow ruling could turn on whether he (and possibly Chief Justice Roberts) reads sex-discrimination law as covering anti-trans discrimination in this context too. A decision is expected by early summer 2026.

More here:

Photo: Getty

Another study documents significant reductions in suicidality among trans youth getting hormones

PinkNews reports on a study slated for the February issue of the Journal of Paediatrics that tracked mental-health outcomes in 432 trans and gender-diverse patients aged 12–20 after starting puberty blockers and/or hormone therapy.

Participants were assessed before treatment and again at least 364 days later. Using the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool, clinicians found suicidality decreased over time, alongside "meaningful reductions" in depression and anxiety.

The decreases held regardless of gender identity, treatment duration, or age at the start of care. The bans on gender-affirming care in many US states and the UK ban on puberty blockers for trans youth are based on prejudices and hate politics and not scientific facts.

SUMMARY OF PAPER

Objective To examine changes in suicidality following hormone therapy (HT) among transgender and gender-diverse adolescents and young adults.

Study design A retrospective chart review was conducted at a multidisciplinary gender health clinic with 432 patients (mean follow-up = 679 days) completing the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions before and after treatment initiation. A repeated-measures ANCOVA assessed within-person changes in suicidality over time, adjusting for age at treatment and treatment duration.

Results Suicidality significantly declined from pretreatment to post-treatment (F[1, 426] = 34.63, P < .001, partial η2 = 0.075). This effect was consistent across sex assigned at birth, age at start of therapy, and treatment duration.

Conclusions HT was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in suicidality over time, extending prior findings with a larger sample and longer follow-up. These study findings provide clinical evidence supporting the mental health benefits of timely access to HT in this population.

400,000 American trans people on the run

In an article over at Erin in the Morning Erin Reed describes a large "safety migration" of transgender Americans since the 2024 U.S. election, linking it to escalating anti-trans laws and policies in many Republican-led states.

She cites a new Movement Advancement Project (MAP) survey conducted with NORC that polled more than 1,000 LGBTQ+ households about experiences and actions since the election.

In the survey, 9% of transgender respondents said they had moved to a different state because of anti-trans laws.

Using Gallup's estimate that transgender people are about 1.3% of the U.S. population (roughly 4.5 million), Reed extrapolates that this implies around 401,000 trans people have relocated—one of the largest politically driven relocations in recent U.S. history.

Photo: Getty

American Philosophical Association: "Trans members of this profession have been rapidly losing their freedoms and protections, both as scholars and as human beings."

The American Philosophical Association's Board of Officers has published an open letter to affirm its support for trans philosophers and for scholarship on sex, gender, and LGBTQ+ issues.

The letter comes in response to policies stripping trans people of legal protections, restricting access to gender‑affirming healthcare, and introducing federal policies that deny the legitimacy of transgender identities.

The APA highlights numerous consequences: loss of research funding tied to trans‑related topics, pressure on universities to adopt exclusionary gender policies, and increased risks for those teaching LGBTQ+ subjects.

Many trans philosophers face threats to personal safety, institutional hostility, and diminished support for themselves and their students. APA points out that these policies endanger academic freedom more broadly by chilling research and teaching on sex and gender, sometimes resulting in intimidation or job loss.

An article over at Transvitae argues that today’s “bathroom panic” is less about transgender people specifically and more about long-running social policing of gender expression.

The author, Bricki, presents a a viral New Year’s Eve confrontation in a men’s restroom - where Zachary Willmore (a cisgender gay man) was harassed for looking “too feminine”.

She points out that the incident exposes how quickly strangers appoint themselves as “gender police” when someone doesn’t perform masculinity or femininity the “right” way.

Bricki connects this to memories from the 1970s and 1980s, when androgyny and gender-bending were widely visible in pop culture (music, fashion, TV) while adults and politicians still warned it would “confuse children” and signal moral decline. Gender nonconformity was tolerated only as entertainment.

David Bowie.

Those fears, she argues, never disappeared - they were repackaged and redirected, with transgender people becoming the primary targets as gender identity turned into a political obsession.

England: Virtually no documented issues as regards trans women using women's spaces.

Examining data from English local government facilities about trans women i single sex spaces, with millions of daily interactions, Freedom of Information finds virtually no documented issues.

Local authority data showed virtually no complaints about trans women using toilets or changing rooms, despite millions of annual visits.

NHS trusts similarly reported almost no objections from women sharing wards with trans women, with only one minor complaint recorded among 157 trusts.

Domestic abuse refuges reported that established risk‑assessment procedures already ensure safety without excluding trans women.

The Advocate explains that research shows a correlation between autism and being transgender or gender-diverse, but no evidence of causation. In other words: Autism does not cause someone to be trans.

Ryan Adamczeski notes that officials sometimes try to frame gender diversity as a symptom of autism, citing concern over a reported U.K. NHS proposal to screen all youth presenting with gender dysphoria for neurodevelopmental conditions (including autism and ADHD) to see whether their distress is “caused by autism” - a move criticized as pathologizing both groups.

Statistically speaking people on the spectrum are more likely to report that they are trans. There may be different reasons for this, one of them being that they are less likely to be socially embarrassed.

Some of The Most Positive Transgender News Stories of 2025

Yepp, 2025 has been a bad year transgender wise, no doubt about it. And the endless stream of bad news takes its toll. But all this noise makes it hard to find all the good news of the year.

Over at CDL we have continuously published links to positive transgender news stories during the last 12 months. Here we have selected a few that may give us hope for the new year.

India

We have posted a large number of positive trans news stories in India where both courts and local politicians have been protecting the trans community

The US

The transphobic psychosis of the Republican Party has caused a lot of damage, but those who defend trans people can celebrate a lot of victories. Many of the cruel laws and rulings have been stopped.

The UK

Britain's fall into the pit of transphobia has been hard to digest, but there is another side to the UK.

The Dolls

We can understand why some find calling transgender women "dolls" is problematic, but the term comes from Black American ballroom culture, and the use of the "Protect the Dolls" t-shirt is clearly a sign of support.

Parents

A lot of parents - famous and not so famous - have come out in support of their transgender kids.

Art and culture

A lot of transgender artists have increased the visibility of trans people this year, and in a good way.

Religion

Science

The science is clear: The identities of trans people are real. Gender variance is real. Gender dysphoria is real. Here are some headlines from the field of science.

Sports

History

There is this myth about trans identities being a new thing. The fact is that we have undeniable truth for trans people being around for thousands of years.

Other stories

Jack Molay, Transgender World

..........

“Now It’s My Turn”: 79‑Year‑Old Norwegian Ex‑Mayor Comes Out as Transgender

Aftenposten tells the story about Sandra, a former mayor of the Norwegian municipality Øygarden, who at nearly 80 years old has publicly come out as a transgender woman.

After marrying Berit, the couple lived a traditional life with three children, and Sandra kept her identity hidden until Berit accidentally discovered women’s clothing that wasn’t hers.

Berit responded with acceptance, and the two made an agreement: Sandra would present as male in public and with family, but could explore her real gender in private. This arrangement lasted for decades.

Meanwhile, Sandra built a prominent political career. She served nine years as mayor and spent 24 years on the municipal executive board, playing a major role in shaping Øygarden’s development.

After Berit’s death from cancer in July Sandra decided it was finally time to live openly.

At a local pensioners’ gathering on Rong, the well‑known former mayor stood up and announced that she had always identified as a woman and wished to be known as Sandra. The room fell silent until someone praised her courage, prompting applause. Today, Sandra lives alone in the city of Tønsberg, presenting fully as a woman in her daily life.

Her daughter Marianne expresses admiration and sees her as an example of honesty and bravery. Her nephew Ove Rune struggles more, saying he misses the uncle he knew, though Sandra reassures him that the person he loves is still the same.

Now Sandra is preparing for consultations at a regional gender clinic.

From the Aftenposten article Det var topphemmeleg. Berre han og kona visste (paywall). Original artcile by Kjersti Mjør. Photos byEirik Brekke.

Elun Musk's Cruel Tranphobia Reaches New Hights

Bored Panda covers a heated online clash between Elon Musk and California Governor Gavin Newsom, sparked when Newsom’s press office mocked Musk by referencing his estranged transgender daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson. In response, Musk referred to Vivian as his “son” and described her identity as the result of a “tragic mental illness” caused by what he calls the “woke mind virus.”

His extremely transphobic wording drew widespread backlash, with many criticizing him for misgendering his daughter and publicly framing her transition as pathology.

It says a lot about the mental state of this man when he can treat his own daughter like this. The only "mind virus" seen here is his own absorption of fascist ideas and transphobic bigotry.

The dispute reignited public attention on Musk and Wilson’s long‑strained relationship, including her legal name change, her efforts to distance herself from him, and her criticisms of his politics.

As US Hospitals Retreat, Trans Youth Emergency Project Fills the Care Gap

The Trans Youth Emergency Project is ramping up support for families as the Trump administration moves to drastically restrict gender-affirming care for minors across the United States., Erin in the Morning reports.

A new federal rule now in public comment would cut Medicaid funding to any hospital that provides transgender healthcare, a change that could effectively force most major hospital systems to halt care for trans youth.

Launched by the Campaign for Southern Equality, the Trans Youth Emergency Project (TYEP) was originally created to help families in Southern states hit by youth-care bans. Now, organizers say they are prepared to scale up nationally as hospitals and clinics contemplate shutting down services in anticipation of the new rule.

TYEP offers one-on-one patient navigation, connecting families with independent clinics and physicians who do not rely on Medicaid and are less exposed to federal threats. It also provides $500 travel grants, renewable up to four times per year, with one-time grants available for families in states without bans who lose local care due to clinic closures.

US: HHS Proposal Could Effectively End Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth Nationwide

The Trump administration has unveiled a sweeping set of proposed federal actions that critics say amount to a de facto nationwide ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, triggering immediate backlash from medical organizations, civil rights groups, and Democratic state officials.

At the center of the effort is a draft rule issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., that would sharply restrict hospitals receiving federal funds from providing such care to minors.

Under the proposal, hospitals that participate in Medicaid or other federal health programs would be required to stop offering puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and related treatments for transgender youth - even if those services are paid for privately.

Because the vast majority of U.S. hospitals rely on Medicaid funding, advocates warn the rule could effectively eliminate access to care nationwide, including in states where gender-affirming care remains legal.

The draft regulation introduces broad new definitions of prohibited “sex-rejecting procedures,” a framing critics say is medically inaccurate and ideologically driven.

Health experts interviewed by NPR and Reuters warned that the proposal overrides established clinical guidelines and inserts federal officials directly into medical decision-making traditionally governed by doctors, families, and states.

The proposal follows a series of escalating federal actions, including the House passage of a bill criminalizing gender-affirming care for minors and parallel efforts during the Trump transition to reshape federal healthcare funding priorities. While congressional measures face uncertain prospects in the Senate, the HHS rule could move forward through executive authority after a public comment period.

Legal challenges appear inevitable. New York Attorney General Letitia James condemned the proposal as an unlawful attack on medically necessary care, while Lambda Legal called it “legally vulnerable” and warned it would violate federal civil rights and disability protections. The Trevor Project cautioned that restricting access to care could worsen already alarming mental-health outcomes for transgender youth, including elevated risks of depression and suicide.

Civil rights advocates argue the rule’s true impact lies not only in its immediate effects, but in its broader precedent. By tying federal funding to ideological restrictions on care, they say, the administration is attempting to bypass courts and Congress to impose a national policy through administrative pressure. If finalized, the rule would almost certainly face injunctions - but in the meantime, critics warn, the uncertainty alone could lead providers to halt care, reshaping access to transgender healthcare across the United States.

Sources:

Photo: Getty

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s transphobic hate bill passes the US House of Representatives

In a highly contentious vote on December 17, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that would impose federal felony penalties on healthcare providers who offer gender-affirming medical care to transgender minors, marking the first time a national trans youth healthcare ban has cleared a chamber of Congress.

The so-called Protect Children’s Innocence Act, spearheaded by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, passed 216-211 after Greene secured a floor vote in exchange for supporting the National Defense Authorization Act.

Under the measure, providers— and potentially parents or others who consent to or facilitate treatment—could face up to ten years in prison for administering puberty blockers, hormone therapy, or other gender-affirming interventions to those under 18.

While the bill is expected to fail in the Senate due to Democratic opposition and filibuster rules, its passage in the House represents a significant symbolic escalation in Republican efforts to restrict transgender healthcare.

The vote saw bipartisan defections, with three Democrats joining Republicans to support the felony ban and four Republicans voting against it, highlighting deep divisions within both parties.

Advocates warn that even if the bill stalls in the Senate, it could normalize criminal penalties for standard medical care and shape future federal and administrative actions targeting transgender healthcare nationwide.

More here:

Leading American medical organizations condemn Trump's anti-trans bills

In a letter the major U.S. medical professional organizations, urges Members of Congress to oppose two federal bills - H.R. 3492 and H.R. 498 - because of their harmful impact on health care for transgender youth.

The organizations argue that both bills threaten patient welfare by interfering with medical decision-making between families and clinicians.

They describe H.R. 3492 as criminalizing medically necessary care for transgender young people, potentially exposing parents and physicians to imprisonment and creating ethical conflicts for clinicians.

H.R. 498 is criticized for inserting the federal government into clinical care decisions, banning the use of Medicaid funds for gender-affirming care, and forcing clinicians to provide different care based on insurance status, thereby limiting access nationwide.

The organizations argue that gender-affirming care is individualized, age-appropriate, and guided by evidence-based clinical standards endorsed by leading medical bodies.

  • The American Academy of Pediatrics
  • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
  • The American College of Physicians
  • The American Psychiatric Association.

The fact that the relevant American professional organizations opposes the bills, proves that the claim that Trump's transphobic policies are based on science is pure nonsense.

The science is clear: Gender incongruence and gender dysphoria are real phenomena. Trans identities are real. Trans people deserve supportive health care.

Jack Molay

Photo: Getty

Trump-administration wants to establish cash reward system for reporting transgender activists as terrorists

LGBTQ Nation reports on a leaked Justice Department memo from U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi directing the FBI to create a “cash reward system” for information leading to the arrest of domestic terror leaders.

The memo defines primary targets as “Antifa-aligned extremists” and people promoting “radical gender ideology,” effectively singling out anti-fascists, immigration advocates, and trans activists rather than far-right extremists.

Bondi’s memo follows Donald Trump’s earlier executive order designating “Antifa” a terrorist organization, despite it not being a formal group.

Putin did something similar in Russia, defining foreign Non-Government Organizations and LGBTQ activists as a danger to the Russian state and Russian culture. Hitler used his racist anti-Jewish conspiracy theory to dismantle democracy in Germany.

Faefyx Collington (they/them) argues that these measures are less about public safety and more about criminalizing political opposition and shifting attention away from the documented threat posed by the far right.

Citing major studies, they note that far-right extremists are responsible for the overwhelming majority of domestic terror attacks and ideologically motivated killings in recent decades, but those findings have been downplayed or removed from official channels.

Here's a relevant quote from the memo:

Particularly dangerous are those acts committed by violent extremist groups that threaten both citizens' safety and our country's ability to self-govern. These domestic terrorists use violence or the threat of violence to advance political and social agendas, including opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality; and an elevation of violence to achieve policy outcomes, such as political assassinations.

It is easy to see that the "crimes" listed as being anti-American all boil down to being opposed to MAGA fascism.

The policy is unconstitutional and will very likely be challenged in court.

British Transgender Academics are Being Threatened by Transphobic Rules

Emily Dixon of Times Higher Education writes that trans academics in the UK describe an intensifying climate of fear after two major developments: the Supreme Court’s April ruling that “sex” in the Equality Act refers to sex assigned at birth, and a record £585,000 fine levied in March by the Office for Students (OfS) against the University of Sussex over its trans and non-binary equality policy.

Historian and trans awareness trainer Kit Heyam and King’s College London lecturer Chris Parkes say these moves haven’t created transphobia but have sharply worsened conditions, leaving trans people “exhausted and terrified”.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, interim guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission suggested barring trans women from women’s spaces and trans men from men’s spaces, and even excluding some trans people from gendered facilities altogether.

Although this guidance was withdrawn and is being challenged, similar language is expected in forthcoming official guidance. Research already shows increased harassment of trans and gender non-conforming people in toilets and other gendered spaces, with some avoiding public facilities altogether.

The OfS punished Sussex for policy statements committing to avoid stereotypical portrayals of trans people, discipline transphobic abuse, and positively represent trans lives, claiming these created a “chilling effect” on lawful speech.

Trans academics argue instead that the ruling encourages universities to tolerate transphobic abuse and creates a hostile work environment, while making institutions fearful of robust trans-inclusive policies.

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.