Avatar

on an atomic level!

@fagotello

Pinned

Avatar
Reblogged

Hey Yall I made a go fund me for my bills in relation to my psychiatric help (I don't really want ot talk much more about the specifics-) but if you support me by comming me, donating to my Cashapp or the Gofund me I made, I would greatly appreciate it. No one is forced though, and not everyone can afford, but every cent counts. Thank you. Or even reblogging would be appreciated.

trans unicorn guy raised as a pure divine being but he said "hmm actually fuck that" so now goes partying and plays around <333

and the nominees for best picture are: "sinners"... "one battle after another"... "marty supreme"... "ragebaiting my fat dog pt 20"

Avatar
Reblogged

#147.5 - Dratini are born underwater in reclusive caves and ponds, and often mature in isolation from human contact. The species is so rare that for a long time they were actually considered a mythical Pokemon, and it is only within recent history that they have been added to the National Dex. Dratini repeatedly shed their skin as they age, and as the life energy inside them becomes too powerful to contain, small stone-like beads begin to form and collect that energy.

#148.5 - As Dragonair get older, they gradually develop stubby limbs that grow larger and stronger over a long period of time. They undergo very frequent shedding as their body adjusts through several growth periods; their small, developing wings are all but useless until fully grown. Dragonair become more capable of containing their own powerful energy with age, and no longer rely on their crystal orbs to contain it. Mysteriously, they have been observed to eat their orbs when they fall off.

Named:  Dratini - Dragile  - Dragonair - Drayvern - Dragonite

#149 Mega - When paired with a Dragoninite and a Trainer it deeply trusts, Dragonite can Mega Evolve into the majestic Mega Dragonite. This transformation reawakens dormant genes from its time as Dragonair, causing its antennae to bloom into wing-like feelers and its tail to lengthen into a more serpentine form. Mega Evolution also greatly enhances its flight capabilities, allowing Mega Dragonite to fly faster and travel far greater distances than ever before. Excess energy from the transformation condenses into a chromatic pearl near the base of its tail, serving as a powerful energy reserve that can be unleashed in prolonged battles. Mega Evolution further magnifies Dragonite’s naturally kindhearted nature; it delivers overwhelming attacks with a gentle smile, believing that ending a fight swiftly is an act of mercy. Even in the heat of battle, a Mega Dragonite will abandon combat without hesitation if it senses someone in danger, rushing to their aid at once.

- - - - - - - - - -

Follow for more In-Progress Pokemon evolutions!

Pov: you’re a tall ass helicopter rescue bot who’s afraid of heights but have a very strong short BF who is also a menace

queer people on this site really make me feel like a confused straight guy at pride. the discourse here could kill a man

"why polyamorous people aren't valid" "mspec lesbians AREN'T okay actually" "aroallos are freaks" "he/him dni. cis men dni" "this post is for non-men only" yessss and the one with long hair goes in the girl box, then the one with short hair goes in the boy box!!

maybe I'm just a boring he/him white guy but inventing about 7 trillion terms to define "man" and "woman" so you can reinforce gender essentialism isn't very "love is love" of you. maybe i just don't have a sexuality but picking and choosing what sexualities are normal and which ones are "weird and predatory" sounds like we're all a bunch of republicans on fox news. if you attend your local pride parade and look REAAALLLYYY closely, you'll notice you can't actually tell if someone's gay or not from their appearance, and there's no way to know if they're "invading queer spaces". maybe it's just me, but when i attended my local gaybar last night for the drag show, they didn't ask for my gay-card with a peer reviewed diagnosis of faggot stamped on it. they just let me in the building. i live a life of bliss and luxury in not caring about any queer discourse ever, and just going "WHATEVER MAKES YOU HAPPY :-)" while booting up the latest cod game. and it seems much more fun than whatever the fuck you people are on about

muting my notifs for this post but i need to acknowledge this first. My favorite tags fr 🙏

Avatar
kendallroy-deactivated20210425

people on this website be like “it’s actually school’s fault that i don’t know how to read because i wanted to write my essay on the divergent trilogy and that BITCH mrs. clarkson made us study 1984 instead. anyway here’s a 10 tweet thread of easily disproven misinformation about a 3 year old news story and btw, who is toni morrison?”

Avatar
kendallroy

i KNOW most of y’all are lying about being in the gifted program as children because none of you could pass the basic reading comprehension assessment they give third graders today

this post is mean and I never read divergent or whatever the fuck but 1984 sucks and is rape apologism so if somebody wanted to write about divergent or whatever good for them

this reply is like literally exactly what op is talking about lol. like firstly ops point isn’t “1984 is good”, ops point is that analysing complex stories teaches you how to form opinions and think for yourself. and like secondly in 1984 you’re supposed to think damn it’s fucked up that he’s thinking that way about her, i wonder if this ties in with the central theme of “a society like this will fuck you in the head”? (this is the thinking for yourself part). like do you think orwell just put that in for fun? do you think that just because winston is the protagonist you’re supposed to agree with everything he does?

You know I feel like this post just gave me an epiphany for what is wrong with how Tumblr Fandom/Internet Fandom responds to media-or not *wrong* but makes it very hard to respond to anything but a morally correct, and heroic protagonist. 

When an English teacher, or reader, taught or picked up 1984, it wasn’t with the intention they were going to love the protagonist. They picked it up with the intention of reading a whole story and trying to grasp the theme or catharsis from the story. If the protagonist was a *shitty* person it played into the the themes or the story, because it wasn’t about morally judging the book or *liking* or feeling attachment to the protagonist. Sometimes and often times, books were just about gaining another perspective. 

No one read Lolita expecting to endear, or like, or be inspired by Humbert. You are supposed to be upset by his behavior, you don’t read Lolita with the intention of being inspired. You read it to learn more about what the fuck is going on inside someone’s head when they behave like that. How children get sucked into abusive situations. Or read “The Great Gatsby” not because they want to fall in love with Gatsby or Nick, but to better understand and analyze the experience of the 1920s or destitution of the American Dream. 

A lot of internet and fandom culture has changed that though. When we say something like “I love the Great Gatsby” it comes with the idea or association that means you must *love* or relate to one of the characters. And maybe you do, but the first assumption is not longer about the quality of the work or themes, or cathartic impact-it’s about character admiration. And with that character admiration, in tumblr stan culture, or kin culture, or exalting characters with fanart/romance/so on you don’t just ‘admire’ or find that character ‘compelling’ it now translates to ‘you LOVE that character’ or you ‘DIRECTLY relate to that character.’ 

You can’t say “I love how Humbert is written, it’s so fascinating and dark”, without it directly translating you somehow relate to a child abuser or condone his actions. Taking in media has become an act of worship and connection. We no longer watch meant to just see the story as a whole, we watch expecting to connect to a character and if we offer them our “worship” as it’s become, as opposed to just attention or interest study as it traditionally was, it means we are condoning the character or saying we directly empathize with all their actions. 

I think that’s why there is often now so much fuss over *toxic* characters or not. Or whether that classical novel is showing good or bad things anymore. We’re treating the characters as people we should love or want to draw or write about. Sometimes a story is just about getting the the theme or catharsis or learning another perspective. We don’t NEED to like the character. Or we don’t HAVE to like a character to be impressed by how they’re written or intrigued by their behavior. 

I think if internet culture could learn to view stories as small insights into other lives or single takes of one perspective instead of purposeful moral inspirations we’d be a lot less worried about how toxic or not toxic they are. 

>see bird creeping up and down a tree trunk >look it up >common treecreeper

can't make this shit up

this your man?

Remove the hitbox render from my son at once he will not be participating in your fighting game, you bastards

Ma’am your son just hit me with a meaty divekick crossup

Avatar
Reblogged

Biblically accurate Rise turtles, with Raf who is basically Gamera and I died a little inside drawing Donnie...

Alright imma like

Continue tmnt posting now

Au coming soon

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.