Avatar

Support for Multiples!

@pluralsupport-blog

Support blog for all people of plural/multiple systems!
Avatar
the-ohana-system

“Why do you need alters if you didn’t experience trauma?”

Ok um… a few things here… #1. Do not assume endogenic = no trauma. I assure you, my friends, I have had my fair share of traumatic incidents through childhood into adulthood. My headmates and I don’t always agree on what exactly they were… but that’s besides the point. #2. What in the actual flippy flapjack do you mean “need”? This phrasing bothers me so SO much.  To me that is the equivalent of “Why do you need friends?”. Excuse you, but um, I don’t have friends just because I need them. Granted, I do need them, but that’s not why I have them. If that was the only reason well that’d be pretty scummy wouldn’t it? No, I have friends because I love them, they love me, and we enrich eachother’s lives. This is not a one way street you know. The only possible way you could justify this question is if you’re going to tell me that headmates aren’t on the same level as friends, as people with independent thoughts and wills. Which, is how it feels to me personally when I see people bashing endogenic systems.  I am NOT going to claim that I know anything about how anyone else feels about their system or how they understand themselves to work, that’s not my business and it’s not what I’m here to say. What I am going to do though is tell how I personally feel about my headmates. I personally see my headmates as entirely separate people from me, the same way I see my outer world friends. So naturally they deserve to be treated just like I would treat any of those outer world friends. I don’t want any of my friends to stay with me if they feel like all I do is need things from them because that’s not how any relationship should work. The same with my headmates… of course, I’m not really sure if my headmates can ever really leave even if they wanted to, but even if they can’t I still don’t want them to exist solely for the purpose of needing them. I want to get to know them, make them as happy as possible because no matter what we are just like a family and I want to give them just as much as they give me. Now I realize not everyone feels this way, some systems feel that their headmates are a part of them of and in the end they’re all connected. That is 100% perfectly valid and fine too. I know most, if not all, still prefer to be treated like individuals though right? So they obviously still deserve the same respect as anyone else. So my main issue when someone asks a question like this is that I feel like they’re implying headmates aren’t good for anything other than what you need them for. It also feels like they’re saying headmates are just a terrible side effect and a pain to live with, which, I’m sure it’s not always super pleasant being in a trauma system, but I’m sure no one would say they hate their headmates right? (Well unless maybe you have the misfortune of having a not so nice one.) No one sees their headmates themselves as a disease right? Having headmates in itself is not a terrible tragic thing, only the horrible traumatic incident that brought them around is. Having a mental illness isn’t fun or something to love, headmates are, because they’re people too. #3. This isn’t to say I don’t need my headmates at all though, of course I need them! Like I said, we’re family, I love them, I need all my loved ones in my life. I also have some more exact reasons for needing them, and some of them do help me cope and function in parts of my life where I’d otherwise completely fall apart without their help. But buddy, pal, friend, I don’t owe you any of that information. I don’t need to prove or justify a darn tootalootin thing to you. - Sake (ok to reblog if you want to)

Dear singlets

  • Multiplicity is real.
  • Every multiple system is different.
  • Every multiple system is valid.
  • Every member of every multiple system is valid.
  • Every member of every multiple system is different.
  • Every system and even member of a multiple system copes with stuff in their own way.
  • Those ways are valid as long as they’re not hurting others.
  • No ~romanticising~ multiplicity (whatever the heck you even mean by that) is not hurting others.
  • Stop trying to figure out if anyone is a fake or hate on those you deem fake or attention seekers – THIS HURTS REAL MULTIPLES FAR MORE THAN ANY FAKES!
  • Stop policing us and our identities and the words and ways and concepts we use to express them.
  • Stop trying to speak over us.
  • Stop pathologizing and/or infantilising and/or romanticising us (There’s a difference between a singlet and a multiple doing that).

Thank you!

Please reblog this if you believe that alters are real people with valid emotions

Please, I need to prove a point. It would mean a lot to one of my very depressed and suicidal alters.

Plurality Glossary

Age Sliding

An age slider is a system member whose age may change over the course of minutes, days, hours, or months, and who may progress forward or backward depending on circumstance, the person themself. This may be a result of shifting identity or shifting physicality within the inner world. Age sliding is the act of moving ages, while an age slider is a system member who does so or has done so in the past.

Alter

An originally psychological term for a system member. It can be short for alternate personality, alternate, alter ego, or alternate identity, many DID systems use this term, and it was once thought of as implying that system members were somehow ‘cardboard cutout’ in comparison to the host or core. As of recently it has become markedly more popular in denoting the same use as 'system member’. Psychological alternates to this term are: personality, parts, aspects, fragments (easily confused with the type of system member by the same name). See also: headmate, skullbuddy, system member, other, collectivemate, systemmate.

@ other non-traumagenic systems

You aren’t harmful. You aren’t the reason why DID is viewed as such a ~controversial~ disorder. People who say that are just making up reasons to support their disagreements with non-traumagenic systems – that shit predates us, and the bulk of it was never about people who don’t claim to have been created through trauma, anyway??

You don’t have to hide away or lie about yourselves “for others’ sake” or anything. Because you aren’t harming anyone. If someone says “I don’t respect survivors because non-traumagenic systems exist,” then they probably didn’t need much of an excuse in the first place.

Your existences and attempts to describe yourselves accurately aren’t inherently ableist or problematic. It’s not ableist to question medical science or to want to distance yourselves from it. It’s not ableist to exist.

- Ace & Thomas

Avatar
the-ohana-system

-slams fist on table- INCLUDE 👏 ENDOGENIC 👏 SYSTEMS 👏 IN 👏 SYSTEM 👏 THINGS 👏 THAT 👏 HAVE 👏 NOTHING 👏 TO 👏 DO 👏 WITH 👏 TRAUMA 👏  ASPECTS

Avatar
kryiiks-archive

I’m here for systems.

I’m here for systems who do not remember what their trauma was.

I’m here for systems who wish they were singlets.

I’m here for systems who are fine with and open about their multiplicity.

I’m here for systems who have a hard time feeling valid.

I’m here for angry, destructive alters.

I’m here for littles who have to see their terminology appropriated and sexualized.

I’m here for alters of different genders than their host’s body.

I’m here for systems with only two members, and I’m here for systems with 30+ members.

I’m here for DID systems.

I’m here for OSDD systems.

I’m here for every system discovering their multiplicity and struggling to come to terms with it.

I’m here for fictive alters.

I’m here for systems who experience dissociative amnesia, and those who don’t.

I’m here for systems who fear switching.

I’m here for non-human alters who struggle with body dysmorphia.

I’m here for each and every system.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.