The Aesthetic of Resistance: Why Some Western Leftists Support a Regime Which is Everything They Claim to Hate
(Dedicated with appreciation and admiration to literally every single Iranian person I've ever met for educating me.)
A vocal current within the Western Left has become inept at recognizing abuse of power…when it speaks in the language of 'resistance.'
Objectively, Iran isn't a scrappy underdog challenging imperialism. It's a repressive regime that embodies everything the Left claims to despise.
A Theocracy Run by Religious Extremists
If you believe in the separation of Church and State, the regime isn't an ally.
Iran is ruled by unelected clerics who claim divine authority and answer to nobody.
The Supreme Leader, currently Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is not an elected politician. He's a religious messianic figure with ultimate say over everything from military policy to women's clothing.
The Guardian Council is all male, conservative religious fanatics who regularly disqualify moderates, reformists, or women from participation in any public matters.
This is textbook authoritarian theocracy, a system where dissent is heresy and religious doctrine is law. There is no religious freedom in the Regime's Iran.
They Stone Women. Yes, Still.
- Women must cover their hair and bodies in public.
- They cannot sing solo in public.
- Their testimony in court is worth half that of a man.
- They need male permission to travel, study, or even get a passport.
- And yes, they have been stoned to death for adultery — in the 21st century.
When 22-year-old Mahsa Amini was arrested in 2022 by Iran's morality police for allegedly wearing her hijab improperly, she was beaten to death in custody. Her murder sparked mass protests, which the regime crushed with bullets and mass arrests.
There is no question what the response would be if a US state like Alabama enforced such laws. The outrage would be deafening and justified. So why does that same righteous fire for justice seem to extinguish itself somewhere over the Atlantic? What principle justifies this selective vision?
If you chant "ACAB" as a denunciation of state violence and the enforcement of oppressive norms as a moral principle, consistency demands you cast that same critical gaze towards the Regime and it's morality police.
These enforcers serve as agents of the state's ideological control. They target women for unveiled hair, arrest dissidents for defying religious codes, and violently suppress basic civil liberties.
If your anti-authoritarianism stops at Tehran's border because it feels geopolitically inconvenient to criticize a state opposed to Western influence, you're not anti-authoritarian and are not promoting moral principles. You're just performing selective, aesthetic outrage.
Solidarity, if it means anything, must extend to all those resisting state oppression, not just those who fit your aesthetic of revolution.
They Kill Gay People. By Law.
Iran's government executes gay people.
Consensual same-sex acts between men are punishable by death. Between women? Up to 100 lashes. The regime often forces gay and trans Iranians into exile, prison, or coerced surgery.
Iran's LGBTQ+ rights record makes Putin look like RuPaul.
Yet somehow, the same activist movements that cover their feeds in rainbows during Pride Month can't seem to work up a single post about Iran's state-sanctioned homophobia.
If your pride doesn't cross al borders, it's not pride. It's an aesthetic, just branding and performance. You can't claim to support LGBTQ+ liberation while ignoring the regime's brutal state-led persecution...unless your solidarity is only for show.
Real allyship doesn't flinch when it's inconvenient or challenges your preferred villains. Pride isn't pride if it's selective and intersectionality is meaningless if you use it to excuse abuses in one nation...which you'd condemn in another.
They Crush Labor Movements and Workers' Rights
Teachers, steelworkers, truck drivers — anyone who organizes is beaten, arrested, or disappeared. In 2023 alone, dozens of labor activists were sentenced to multi-year prison terms for trying to negotiate wages or demand safety protections.
You can't champion the "worker’s struggle" while turning a blind eye to a regime that jails, tortures, and executes labor organizers.
If your solidarity skips over Iranian workers because it complicates your anti-imperialist narrative, that’s not internationalism, it's performative ideological convenience. You don't get to wave the red flag for workers' rights while ghosting the ones bleeding for it under a theocratic police state. Labor solidarity isn't real if it ends where the slogans get uncomfortable.
They Colonize and Militarize Their Neighbors
The Islamic Regime of Iran is not just a local bully. It's a regional empire.
It bankrolls and controls violent militias in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen not to support anyone's liberation, but to spread its own political and religious dominance.
- In Lebanon, Hezbollah functions as an Iranian outpost that undermines democratic politics, murders critics, and uses civilians as human shields.
- In Syria, Iran helped Assad murder hundreds of thousands of people, including with chemical weapons, just to keep Assad in power as an ally on Israel's border.
- In Iraq, Iranian-backed militias have assassinated reformists, hijacked politics, and turned protests into bloodbaths.
- In Yemen, Iran arms the Houthis, prolonging one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises so it can poke Saudi Arabia from afar.
If any other country did this, the Left would call it neo-imperialism. When Iran does it? It's "resistance."
You can't claim to stand against imperialism and ignore Tehran's regional warlords. If empire is wrong when it’s Western, it's still wrong when it wears clerical robes and claims to operate under the banner of "resistance."
They Practice Ethnic and Cultural Domination
- Kurds are surveilled, imprisoned, and gunned down in the streets.
- Baluchis live under occupation-like conditions, with entire towns attacked by the military.
- Ahwazi Arabs are denied clean water and education in their own language — in the very province that produces most of Iran’s oil.
- Azeris, Turkmen, and others are pressured to assimilate and punished for cultural expression.
- Baháʼís, Sunni Muslims, Christians, and Zoroastrians face discrimination, harassment, and systemic exclusion from public life.
- The regime bulldozes indigenous cemeteries. Bans non-Persian names. Executes poets and religious leaders.
And yet the Western Left doesn't call this apartheid or colonialism.
If your anti-colonialism skips over this because it clashes with your chosen narrative, then it's not principle. It's just performance.
- There is no freedom of press. No freedom of religion. No freedom of speech. None.
- Journalists are imprisoned for reporting the truth.
- Filmmakers are banned or exiled.
- Internet access is filtered, throttled, and monitored by the state.
- Peaceful protests are met with bullets and mass arrests.
- Torture is standard. Forced confessions are routine.
- When students protest, they get shot. When families demand answers, they get threats.
- Iranian prisons are filled with feminists, union leaders, teachers, students, environmentalists, atheists, reformists, and even children.
Where is the Western Leftist solidarity for them?
You rally for free speech and civil liberties at home, so why the silence when Iran shoots students and jails teachers for demanding the same?
A regime that censors art, criminalizes dissent, and tortures activists is authoritarian.
If your solidarity evaporates the moment it's inconvenient for your narrative, it was never about justice. It was about fashion.
You can't be both pro-liberation and mute about the Regime's prisons overflowing with feminists, filmmakers, and kids. Either stand with the oppressed everywhere or stop pretending you have any moral principles.
If the Regime Wasn't Anti-American, You’d Hate It
The reason some progressives give Iran a pass is because it opposes the US and Israel.
If it were a Christian theocracy executing gay people, torturing minorities, and colonizing its neighbors,they'd see it for what it is: a violent, fascist, patriarchal, ethno-nationalist police state.
But because it wears the right aesthetic, they (either through dishonesty or pure ignorance) mistake the Regime as seeking justice.
The Regime Is What the Left Says It's Fighting
It's everything they claim to stand against:
- Misogyny
- Homophobia
- Theocracy
- Anti-labor authoritarianism
- Militarized ethnonationalism
- Colonial violence
- Censorship, repression, torture, and propaganda
So the next time someone chants slogans lifted from Tehran, ask yourself: do they know what they’re endorsing? Or are they just cheering for the empire they want to believe is innocent...because that narrative appeals to them.
The regime isn't the voice of the oppressed.
It's just another boot on 90 Million Iranian necks...and millions more in the region.
Sources and Further Information: