This is asking only about your DIRECT genetic ancestors: parents, grandparents, etc. Do not count aunts/uncles or anyone who is not related to you by blood.

We ask your questions anonymously so you don’t have to! Submissions are open on the 1st and 15th of the month.

☆ねじれた三つ編みは後で直しておきました

2022.2.22

if everyone in the world including all systems suddenly forgot your birthday and you had to pick a new one , which month would you place it in ?

I realize that most people put their shower toiletries really high to avoid looking down and getting shampoo in their eyes and that's honestly dumb why risk an injury reaching for things when you can just have a small towel out of the water's way dedicated to drying your eyes with. How am I in the wrong here. I am revolutionary

i've been hanging a towel by the shower to wipe my eyes with since i was like twelve. shampoo gets in my eyes way too often. is doing that not normal?

all of my friends think i'm insane for this so i just took their word. maybe I'm not. survey time it is

bueno eh eh nos vamos calmando con la juzgalina respondan si sí o si no Y LISTO. no les pedí opinión esto no es la opinionería. apreten el botón nomás

Queerbaiting is real but not like. Common to the extent it's portrayed. Sherlock is a pretty unambiguous example: the teases basically were the show, and once they moved to outright mocking the fandom and the idea the show got worse. But once you get to shows with prominent queer characters and relationships...it's kinda hard to wrap my head around how it's different from any other ship or any other romantic thread that doesn't play out, in most cases. It's like when "bury my gays" went from criticizing how shows will kill off one of their very few, or sole, queer characters for shock value to calling it homophobic when a work that's queer-character-heavy or outright queernorm kills off anyone. Like the intent just isn't there

A lot of terms get adopted by people who understand that a thing is commonly considered bad, but never learned *why* it's bad, so they conclude it must be bad in every possible context

Others aren't doing this, but rather coopting existing terms to add weight to their criticism of a work cause just disliking a plot point is nothing, but accusing it of being bigoted adds a moral dimension

Sprouting Traditional + Digital Collage

I'm fed up with "maybe later".

nightfall

burn it 🔥

(he/him) 🐇

art I did for a naughty sudoku game

profits go to charity:

like you’ve never thought about it

Original post by puppercat

what’re the plungers for

Original comic by nicecleanfight

I just wanted to hear this post in real life, and I chased that impulse.

original post(s) here

i got this new anime plot. basically theres this high school girl except shes got huge boobs. i mean some serious honkers. a real set of badonkers. packin some dobonhonkeros. massive dohoonkabhankoloos. big old tonhongerekoogers

what happens next?!

transfer student shows up one day with even bigger bonkhonagahoogs. humungous hungolomghnonoloughongous

said this as part of a larger point in a reblog but I'm gonna make it its own post:

humans have the right to do things that are mildly bad for us sometimes.

you have the right to eat way too many pierogi and make yourself a little sick. you have the right to go skydiving. you have the right to pull an all-nighter building the Imperial City of Tamriel in Minecraft. you have the right to get drunk in your living room watching football.

life is not about making the safest most logically correct choice at all times. you're a blob of salty meat piloting a flesh mech and you get to act like it.

This is called dignity of risk and it's a big topic in disability rights spaces. id elaborate but im fuckin wiped

it's always funny how people will advocate for bodily autonomy when it comes to certain things but then shy away from anything they personally wouldn't do to their own body. like yeah, that's why it's your body buddy. i can do what i want with mine.