Not quite! I’ll rewind a bit for context.
So a lot of people realize they’re aromantic when they unravel “I want someone who will support me, care about me, and who I can be vulnerable with long term” from “I want to be in a romantic relationship,” aka what society frames as the only way to achieve this. Once we realize that romantic/sexual attraction and the need for emotional intimacy can be two separate things, and some people may have one but not the other, it’s like a light bulb goes on.
This post is a playful way to take that lens to characters and relationships we’re intrigued by. Sometimes there’s a character with a hard shell and so so many bottled up issues we just want to shake them up and make them crack so they have to confide in someone for once. Sometimes their trust issues are so profound that the idea of them being forced into vulnerability and finding care is tantalizing. Sometimes a couple characters clash but are so similar if they only knew..!
Yet with shipping being a celebrated focus of fandom, folks may find themselves embracing that social framework I mentioned earlier of “the only way to have intimacy and trust is a romantic relationship.” I’m inviting people to step outside this mold and see the infinite possibilities of this trope in a non-romantic context, and maybe even consider if some of their ships are just because they want the characters to have their barriers pulled away and talk.
(I was specifically inspired by thinking about a canonically aroace and romance-repulsed character, and seeing people who want this scenario trip over themselves to come up with reasons for why it’s a) not actually aroace and b) why it would be okay to ship it even if it was)
I hope my rambles added some clarity, but given I am typing this up at the airport while waiting for an international flight I am only mildly optimistic